Published online before print June 6, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China
1 Correspondence: Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701 Taiwan, ROC. E-mail: jen{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelium PMN calcium FAK paxillin
|
|
|---|
Although the endothelial responses to PMN transverse migration underneath are unknown, one may try to draw some analogy from cell adhesion and migration. The mechanistic information about the latter is well-appreciated [5 ]. Cell adhesion or migration usually involves the formation and dissolution of adhesion complexes. Out of the many cell-matrix adhesion complexes, focal contacts are dynamic structures, which organize around activated integrin clusters and serve as the attachment points of actin stress fibers to the cell membrane (for a review, see refs. [5 , 6 ]). Focal contacts contain numerous protein components, and some have phosphorylated tyrosine residues. As many focal contacts are connected to the cells interior via actin fibers, they play important roles in cell mobility and cell-matrix interactions. Using GFP-tagged paxillin as a marker, small focal contacts in cultured fibroblasts have been reported to translocate with a mean rate of 19 µm/h [7 ]. However, largely as a result of technical considerations, most of the available data about cell adhesion or migration was obtained from experiments using fibroblast-like cells cultured on rigid, two-dimensional matrices (for a review, see ref. [5 ]). Few of the derived model pathways have been validated thoroughly using tissues or other cell types cultured on soft substratum.
It is well known that mobile PMNs require intracellular calcium signaling to release their rear adhesion complexes (uropods) and to recycle integrins to their leading edges [8 ]. In addition, one of the most intriguing features of EC-PMN interactions is the PMN transmigration-associated endothelial calcium signaling [9 ], which is a requirement for PMN transmigration toward the chemoattractant underneath the EC monolayer. Although ECs pretreated with a permeable Ca2+-chelating agent still maintain their adhesive properties for PMNs, PMN transendothelial migration is abolished. We have shown that the calcium signaling is restricted to ECs immediately adjacent to a transmigrating PMN [10 ]. This endothelial calcium signaling happens during an early stage of PMN transmigration and is essential for the PMN cell body to pass through. In fact, PMN transmigration across the endothelial monolayer, but not rolling or adhesion, is accompanied by endothelial calcium signaling [10 ].
Whether or how ECs sense and respond to PMN transverse migration underneath them is an intriguing question. To address this issue, we used a tissue flow chamber to establish a gradient of fMLP, which attracted PMN transmigration across an EC monolayer. Parameters of interest included the turnover of endothelial focal contact components and the possible endothelial calcium signaling. We focused on focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and paxillin; both are capable of recruiting intracellular signaling molecules and thus, play pivotal roles in mediating cell spreading and motility [11 ]. Furthermore, as the vast amount of current knowledge about cell-matrix interactions is derived from studies using cultured cells [5 ], this study examined how endothelial focal contacts were arranged in vascular tissue specimens and how they responded to the transversely migrating PMNs.
|
|
|---|
Preparation of PMNs
PMNs were isolated from human peripheral blood by centrifugation on a discontinuous Ficoll-Hypaque gradient according to a method described previously [12
]. Briefly, two layers of Ficoll-Hypaque with densities of 1.077 and 1.119 were formed carefully in a centrifuge tube, and the blood specimen (anticoagulated with 1/10 vol 106 mM sodium citrate) was layered onto the upper gradient. After centrifugation at 800 g for 50 min, the PMNs were separated from other blood cells as a distinctive band sandwiched between two Ficoll-Hypaque densities. Purified PMNs were resuspended in Krebs-Ringer HEPES (KRH) buffer (125 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2, 25 mM HEPES, 6 mM glucose, 10% FBS, pH 7.4) and held on ice for no more than 3 h prior to use.
Studies about cultured ECs
Primary cultured ECs were isolated from human umbilical vein by collagenase (0.02%) digestion and were grown to confluence on a plastic dish in medium M199 containing 10% FBS, 10 U/ml heparin, and 25 µg/ml EC growth supplement. The endothelial monolayer was then trypsinized and resuspended in M199 and seeded on a 0.3% collagen gel-coated cover glass [10
]. The first-passage cells reached confluence within 2 days and were subsequently used in 3 or 4 days. Before the experiment, the specimens were incubated with KRH buffer overnight and immersed in 1 µM fMLP and 5 µM Fura-2 AM (for measuring endothelial calcium signaling in certain experiments) for 1 h. The specimens were then incubated in Fura-2-free buffer for an additional 20 min to remove extracellular Fura-2 AM. The cover glass containing the fMLP-treated, Fura-2 fluorescence-labeled specimen was mounted on a modified flow chamber, which accommodated the thickness of collagen gel [10
]. Then, the flow chamber was placed on a fluorescence microscope (Diaphot 300, Nikon, Japan, or Axioscope 2, Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA) or on a confocal microscope (TCS SP2, Leica, Heidelberg, Germany) and perfused continuously with fMLP-free buffer to establish a fMLP gradient across the endothelial monolayer. When a PMN suspension was perfused through the chamber, PMN transendothelial migration happened shortly after their contact with the ECs. The time of PMN transmigration across the EC monolayer along with the subsequent transverse migration steps were traced under phase-contrast optics.
Endothelial cytosolic calcium levels were derived from Fura-2 fluorescence intensity ratios between two excitation wavelengths [10 , 13 ]. Briefly, a video imaging system was set up on a microscope to automatically control the excitation filter wheel, which alternated between two filters of 340 nm and 380 nm. The fluorescence emission light at 510 nm was collected by a cooled charged-coupled device camera (CoolSnap fx, Roper Scientific, Duluth, GA, USA). The images were registered by the MetaFluor software (Universal Imaging, Detroit, MI, USA) at 10-s intervals with an exposure time of 0.25 s each to minimize photobleaching of the specimens. At the end of each experiment, the calcium concentration was calibrated by applying ionomycin (10 µM) in the presence of 5 mM EGTA, followed by 10 mM CaCl2. All signals were corrected by subtracting the autofluorescence, which was determined by exposing to 5 mM manganese to quench the cytosolic Fura-2 fluorescence. Finally, these fluorescent images were stored and processed off-line for ratio images of and converting to intracellular calcium ion concentration in individual ECs by a built-in formula. When necessary, we were able to monitor the kinetics of PMN transverse migration and endothelial calcium signaling by switching between phase-contrast and fluorescence optics. A correlation between each leukocyte-endothelial interaction step and the corresponding change of endothelial cytosolic calcium level, if any, could thus be established. All transmigration experiments were carried out at 37°C.
At the proper time-points during PMN transverse migration underneath the endothelial monolayer, the flow chamber assembly was removed rapidly from the microscope stage, immersed into ice water, and perfused with ice-cold fixative/permeabilizing agent (0.4% paraformaldehyde with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 3 min, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde overnight). As this process took less than 10 s, the morphology of fixed specimens was essentially the same as shown in the last phase-contrast image. Moreover, the possible postfixation protein degradation as a result of PMN protease activation [14 ] was avoided. Finally, fixed specimens were removed from the flow chamber and were processed further for immunostaining of various protein components in focal contacts. Briefly, the specimens were labeled with primary antibodies at 25°C for 30 min, washed away unbound primary antibodies, and labeled with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies for another 30 min. The blocking reagent, 20% human serum, was present in the whole labeling process. The nuclei were labeled at the end with Hoechst 33342 to identify the location of PMN and ECs.
To monitor the relative amounts of paxillin and FAK-pY397 in each endothelial focal contact, fixed specimens containing transversely migrating PMNs and ECs were double-labeled with antibodies against these two proteins, e.g., green fluorescence (Alex Fluor 488) for paxillin and red fluorescence (Alexa Fluor 546) for FAK-pY397. First, fluorescence images of two different colors were acquired for the same specimen, which was fixed immediately after taking the final phase-contrast image. Second, the PMN migration path along with its momentary cell contour were traced from phase images taken every 10 s and mapped on the fluorescence images. Third, the areas of interest were divided into five zones, i.e., naïve zone (areas never encountering any transversely migrating PMN), leading zone (areas at the front end of PMNs), central zone (areas covering the central part of PMNs), recovering zone (areas just behind the PMNs), and previously exposed zone (Areas 1–3 cell distance behind the PMNs). Fourth, the green and red fluorescence intensities were recorded for individual focal contacts by using the MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging). Finally, the green:red fluorescence ratio values for individual focal contacts in each zone were grouped together and normalized by those in the naïve zone (the averaged ratio value from 20 naïve focal contacts was set as unity). Although there could be several transversely migrating PMNs located in the same image taken under low magnification, the fluorescence intensities in different high-magnification images were not identical. Therefore, the normalization procedure was carried out for each set of green and red fluorescence images under high magnification.
The FITC-labeled collagen was used in certain experiments to verify whether transversely migrating PMNs were indeed sandwiched between ECs and the collagen gel. The FITC-labeled collagen gel was prepared by mixing 1% collagen monomer (150 µl in 25 mM acetic acid) with 500 mM FITC (50 µl in double-distilled water) and neutralized by adding 1 N NaOH (10 µl) and PBS (290 µl) to form a gel with a final collagen concentration of 0.3%. The gel was washed repeatedly with PBS to remove unbound FITC, and it was finally immersed in M199. ECs grew equally well on unlabeled collagen gel or on FITC-labeled collagen gel.
Studies about vascular tissue segments
Freshly isolated vascular tissues (human umbilical cords, rabbit carotid arteries, rat aortas) were flushed with KRH buffer and cut into 1- to 2-cm vascular segments. The vascular segments were trimmed carefully to remove excess adventitial tissue, longitudinally opened, and mounted temporarily on a silicon sheet. The handling process was performed without tissue dehydration or endothelial damage. Finally, after being immersed in the fMLP solution for 1 h, the specimens were mounted on a tissue flow chamber, similar to that used previously [4
, 13
]. Perfusion of the fMLP-free buffer through this tissue flow chamber also created a fMLP gradient, which allowed the transmigration of PMNs through the vascular endothelium [4
]. At the end of transmigration experiments, specimens were fixed and processed further for observation of transversely migrating PMNs buried in the vascular tissue. Immunostaining of focal contact proteins was carried out, and the resulting fluorescence images were analyzed to verify whether certain protein components were missing in the neighborhood of transversely migrating PMNs.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Fluorescent images showing endothelial focal contacts on collagen gel or in various vascular tissues. (A) Paxillin in HUVECs cultured on collagen gel; (B) FAK-pY397 in HUVECs cultured on collagen gel; (C) endothelial paxillin in rabbit aorta; (D) endothelial pY proteins in rabbit carotid artery; (E) endothelial pY proteins in rat aorta; (F) endothelial FAK-pY397 in human umbilical vein. Images were taken under wide-field optics. Note that regardless of which protein was used as an indicator for focal contacts, the focal contact patterns in vascular tissues (C–F) were different from those in cultured ECs (A and B).
|
![]() View larger version (171K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. Confocal images showing transversely migrating PMNs underneath an EC monolayer in culture. Optical sections were taken along the z direction from the apical surface of ECs (0 µm) toward the bottom of the collagen gel (A–H). Three PMNs with small and multilobed nuclei are marked; two are just underneath the endothelial monolayer (arrowheads), and one already penetrated into the collagen gel (arrow). Two vertical scans across a transversely migrating PMN are shown (I and J). (I) The vertical scan along the dotted line; (J) along the dashed line. F-actin is shown in red, collagen in green, and nuclei in blue. Although the PMN nucleus appeared to be located at the same level of the neighboring endothelial nucleus, the PMN was actually located underneath the endothelial actin network. The transversely migrating PMN was in direct contact with the basal side of the EC monolayer, as the collagen fibers were absent in regions between them.
|
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. Confocal images showing transversely migrating PMNs underneath the endothelium in a rabbit carotid artery. Optical sections were taken along the z direction from the apical surface of endothelium (0 µm) toward the smooth muscle layer of the vessel (A–H). pY proteins are shown in red and nuclei in blue. Three PMNs with small and multilobed nuclei are marked in the nuclear-stained image (I). The nuclei of two PMNs were underneath endothelial pY proteins (arrowheads), and one PMN nucleus was underneath the neighboring EC nucleus (arrow). Although the luminal surface of a vascular tissue was uneven at the microscopic level, smooth muscle cells with nuclei perpendicular to EC nuclei were absent in these images. As the optical sections only focused in the intimal layer, these PMNs were sandwiched between the endothelium and the basement membrane.
|
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
Figure 4. Rapid disappearance of paxillin from endothelial focal contacts during PMN transverse migration. Phase-contrast images in the upper panels show the direction and traces of a transversely migrating PMN underneath the cultured EC monolayer; (A) a wide-field, double-stained fluorescence image showing endothelial focal contact distribution at the last moment. The specimen was fixed within 10 s after taking the last phase-contrast image and subsequently processed for staining of focal contact components and nuclei. FAK-pY397 is shown in red, paxillin in green, and nuclei in blue. The boundaries of this transversely migrating PMN are marked (30 s in dashed line and 40 s in solid line). (B) The summarized results, indicating that the paxillin disappearance was associated with PMN transverse migration. The values of the paxillin:FAK-pY397 fluorescence ratio in focal contacts were obtained and classified according to their location: naïve zone (areas never encountering any transversely migrating PMN), leading zone (areas at the front end of PMNs), central zone (areas covering the central part of PMNs), recovering zone (areas just behind the PMNs), and previously exposed zone (Areas 1–3 cell distance behind the PMNs). The total numbers of focal contacts analyzed in each zone are marked in parentheses. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA indicated significant difference among groups (P<0.0001). Tukeys multiple comparison test indicated significant differences between two groups (P<0.001) except for naïve zone versus previously exposed zone (P>0.05) and recovering zone versus previously exposed zone (P>0.05). Note the fluorescence ratio values in PMN-affected zones were normalized against those in the corresponding naïve zone in each experiment. As the fluorescence color images were distorted partially by the nucleus stain, data from focal contacts, which overlapped with nuclei, were excluded.
|
![]() View larger version (81K): [in a new window] |
Figure 5. Fluorescence images showing delayed disappearance of FAK from endothelial focal contacts during PMN transverse migration. The PMN adhesion/transmigration experiment was performed regularly at 37°C but subsequently reduced to 25°C to retard the PMN transverse migration. The specimen was fixed after taking the last phase-contrast image and stained further for focal contact components and nuclei. Actin filaments were also labeled to examine whether stress fibers became disorganized. Phase-contrast images in the upper panels show the traces of a mobility-retarded PMN, and fluorescence images in A and B show the distribution of endothelial focal contacts and actin filaments. FAK-pY397 is shown in red, paxillin in green, and nuclei in blue (A). The boundaries of two PMNs located subendothelially are marked. Please note that yellow dots were present only in regions away from these two PMNs, indicating the absence of paxillin or FAK in the PMN-affected region. (B) The actin filaments are not grossly altered in the region without these two adhesion components. Actin filaments are in red and nuclei in blue.
|
![]() View larger version (162K): [in a new window] |
Figure 6. Fluorescence images showing disappearance of paxillin from endothelial focal contacts during PMN transverse migration in rabbit carotid artery. (A and B) Wide-field fluorescence images from the same location showing the distribution of pY proteins and nuclei, respectively. (C and D) The distribution of paxillin and nuclei, respectively. Please note that areas surrounding PMN nuclei (arrows) show normal pY protein stain (A and B) and interrupted paxillin stain (C and D).
|
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
Figure 7. The absence of endothelial calcium signaling during rapid PMN transverse migration. Four different ECs had encountered a transversely migrating PMN (upper panels). The PMN transverse migration path is marked in the right-most image (430 s). As in a neighboring, naïve EC, which never encountered the PMN, the intracellular calcium levels remained unchanged in four PMN-contacted ECs. Histamine exposure induced immediate calcium signaling in all ECs examined, indicating their capability of responding to a conventional stimulus. C, Control.
|
|
|
|---|
How would the relative movements of endothelial focal contact-associated paxillin and FAK affect PMN transverse migration? Paxillin and FAK are tyrosine-phosphorylated in early cell-matrix adhesions and located in close proximity as measured by microscopy-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer [16 ]. They are believed to play crucial roles in cell-matrix signaling pathways, as both contain a number of motifs, which serve as the docking sites for various signaling molecules, such as cytoskeleton proteins, tyrosine kinases, serine/threonine kinases, and GTPase-activating proteins. It is intriguing that although these two proteins are known to promote cell adhesion or migration in many cases, they inhibit cell migration under some conditions [17 ]. Contrasting the fact that FAK alone is capable of recruiting some proteins (such as p130cas) to activate the small GTP-binding protein Rac1, the FAK/paxillin complex may inactivate Rac1, directly or indirectly [18 ]. The conditions dictating positive or negative regulation and the mechanism of action in these two scenarios are unknown presently. Nevertheless, the dissociation of paxillin from FAK may lead to elevated Rac activity, which is needed for the interactions between cytoskeleton and membrane, such as the formation of local membrane ruffles. Thus, a transient paxillin disappearance from endothelial focal contacts could potentially alter local membrane properties in a way facilitating the rapid movements of a PMN underneath. Whether the prevention of paxillin relocation would hinder PMN transverse migration remains to be investigated.
It has been reported that substrata made of different proteins or rigidities can influence the growth of cells, possibly as a result of the various shapes and compositions of the focal contacts [19 , 20 ]. According to our observation, large focal contacts were located mostly at the periphery of ECs. Besides, our impression was that even relatively large focal contacts showed dynamic changes when encountering a transversely migrating PMN, indicating that they might be structurally alike. Whether these larger focal contacts were functionally different from small ones or not remains to be investigated. The current classes of adhesion complexes (mostly observed in cells cultured on solid substrata) include focal adhesions, fibrillar adhesion, focal complexes, and podosomes [5 ]. Focal adhesions are the large, oval-shaped structures composing numerous proteins, including paxillin, vinculin, integrin, and tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, whereas focal complexes are small adhesions near the leading edge of a protrusion, which are induced by Rac activation. Thus, focal contacts in conventionally cultured cells could be different, not only in their shape and size but also in their composition. It is interesting that it is the small adhesions at the cell front that drive migration, whereas the larger, more organized adhesions tend to inhibit migration [21 ]. Although we only monitored paxillin and FAK in this study, other adhesion components could undergo similar alterations by themselves or as a group. Little information is available at this stage about which components are most important or most labile under these conditions. Additional studies are needed to ascertain the physiological significance of this kind of adhesion alterations.
How would the opening and closing of existing endothelial focal contacts in this study be compared with the better-understood cell spreading and migration? The cell-surface contact and recognition steps during cell spreading occur on a subsecond time scale, and full cell spreading takes tens of minutes to hours [22 ]. Once integrins recognized the ECM components on the surface, numerous proteins are to be recruited and organized to form new focal contacts. Results from the current study showed clearly that the closing of existing focal contacts only caused minor disturbances, and it happened much faster than the spreading-associated focal contact formation process. As for cell migration, the uropod retraction step is essentially a focal contact dissolution process, which requires the activation of a calcium-dependent, phosphatase calcineurin [8 ]. In contrast, PMN transverse migration only induced minimal and transient alterations of endothelial focal contacts without stimulating EC calcium signaling. Taken together, the above-mentioned discrepancy could be regarded as two different modes of stimulation; i.e., although spreading and migration in general seemed to be "active", cellular processes, which involve complete reconstruction of focal contacts, PMN transverse migration only "passively" induced minor focal contact changes in locally affected ECs.
Intuitively, EC migration in response to shear stress may be regarded as another passive phenomenon, which happens under physiological conditions. Cultured ECs sense the shear stress applied on their apical surface and transmit the signal via cytoskeleton throughout the cell to the cell-matrix adhesions—promoting the formation of focal contacts in the flow direction and the disassembly of them at the rear [23 ]. Indeed, FAK and paxillin are involved in the shear-induced reorganization of focal contacts [23 , 24 ]. As the shear force is usually applied to the entire cell, it is not surprising that ECs in culture or endothelium in tissue respond to shear forces directly or indirectly with calcium signaling [25 , 26 ].
It would be interesting to compare the cell migration-associated forces and the adhesive forces between cell focal contacts and the substratum. Results from this study indicated that the adhesive force between endothelial focal contacts and matrix was apparently too small to retard any PMN transverse migration, thus providing a low-resistant pathway for a cell to migrate underneath cultured ECs. As our previous results showed that the speed of PMN transverse migration reached 11 µm/min in a piece of human umbilical vein tissue [4 ], a similar, low-resistance pathway was likely to be present in vascular tissues as well. A transversely migrating cell may take advantage of this property to find the proper spot for penetrating into the deeper tissue layers. Moreover, judging from the relatively short time scale needed in this event, the protease action does not seem to be involved in opening and reforming endothelial focal contacts. As most endothelial focal contacts, regardless of their sizes, showed similar, dynamic changes (Fig. 4 and Supplemental Fig. S2), a transversely migrating PMN might unlock adhesive sites such as opening a zipper tooth-by-tooth. It remains to be investigated whether transmigrating PMNs transiently form new adhesive sites with ECs above them to replace the original adhesive interactions between ECs and the matrix materials. Currently, relatively little is known about contact-induced cell-cell interactions in a three-dimensional tissue. How smooth muscle cells in the vascular medial layer respond to PMNs, which eventually broke through the basement membrane, deserves future research. As inflammation often takes hours or days to complete its course, numerous factors are expected to mediate the leukocyte-tissue interactions at later stages of it.
Finally, we believe that this is the first study reporting the organization of focal contacts in vascular tissues. The distribution patterns of endothelial focal contacts in situ were clearly distinct from those in cultured ECs. However, even with their well-organized arrangement, these focal contacts offered little resistance to the mobility of transversely migrating PMNs. This low-resistance subendothelial pathway appeared to be necessary for the rapid passage of PMN through the endothelial monolayer, which usually completes in less than 1 min [4 , 10 ]. Otherwise, if the transverse migration process is hindered by robust focal contacts, PMNs will be forced to penetrate into the medial layer of vascular tissue at the spot of transendothelial migration. As this basement membrane-piercing process probably takes longer time periods or may even involve the action of PMN-derived proteases, the interendothelial junctions will remain open during this period and lead to the breakdown of endothelial-barrier function.
In summary, our results supported the notion that a transversely migrating PMN was capable of interrupting endothelial-matrix interactions and inducing rapid alterations in endothelial focal contact composition.
Received February 1, 2007; revised April 19, 2007; accepted April 24, 2007.
|
|
|---|
6ß1 on transmigrated neutrophils in vivo and plays a functional role in the ability of
6 integrins to mediate leukocyte migration through the perivascular basement membrane J. Exp. Med. 196,1201-1211
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||