Journal of Leukocyte Biology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.0306169 on September 12, 2006

Published online before print September 12, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0306169v1
81/1/75    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lotze, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ito, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lotze, M. T.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2007;81:75-83.)
© 2007 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Cytolytic cells induce HMGB1 release from melanoma cell lines

Norimasa Ito*, Richard A. DeMarco*, Robbie B. Mailliard*, Jie Han{dagger}, Hannah Rabinowich{dagger}, Pawel Kalinski*, Donna Beer Stolz{ddagger}, Herbert J. Zeh, III* and Michael T. Lotze*,1

Departments of
* Surgery,
{dagger} Pathology, and
{ddagger} Cell Biology and Physiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

1Correspondence: University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Surgery and Bioengineering, Hillman Cancer Center, 5117 Centre Avenue, Room G.21, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. E-mail: lotzemt{at}upmc.edu

ABSTRACT

High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is one of the recently defined damage-associated molecular pattern molecules, passively released from necrotic cells and secreted by activated macrophage/monocytes. Whether cytolytic cells induce HMGB1 release from tumor cells is not known. We developed a highly sensitive method for detecting intracellular HMGB1 in tumor cells, allowing analysis of the type of cell death and in particular, necrosis. We induced melanoma cell death with cytolytic lymphokine-activated killing (LAK) cells, tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes, TRAIL, or granzyme B delivery and assessed intracellular HMGB1 retention or release to investigate the mechanism of HMGB1 release by cytolytic cells. HMGB1 release from melanoma cells (451Lu, WM9) was detected within 4 h and 24 h following incubation with IL-2-activated PBMC (LAK activity). HLA-A2 and MART1 or gp100-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes induced HMGB1 release from HLA-A2-positive and MART1-positive melanoma cells (FEM X) or T2 cell-loaded, gp100-specific peptides. TRAIL treatment, however, induced HMGB1 release, and it is interesting that this extrinsic pathway-mediated cell death was blocked with the pancaspase inhibitor N-benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone. Conversely, granzyme B delivery did not induce HMGB1 release. HMGB1, along with other intracellular factors released from tumor cells induced by cytolysis, may be important components of the disordered tumor microenvironment. This has important implications for the immunotherapy of patients with cancer. Specifically, HMGB1 may promote healing or immune reactivity, depending on the nature of the local inflammatory response and the presence (or absence) of immune effectors.

Key Words: lymphocytes • necrosis • granzyme • death receptor

INTRODUCTION

Type III cell death or necrosis is a type of cell death defined as membrane discontinuity and leakage of intracellular molecules into the extracellular milieu [1 , 2 ]. Necrosis causes inflammation, activating the local endothelium, recruiting inflammatory cells, and thereby driving tissue matrix degradation, promoting functional changes in the remaining epithelia and stroma [3 4 5 ]. Other types of cell death, apoptosis (Type I) and autophagy (Type II), do not induce the same type of inflammation [2 , 6 7 8 ]. One of the key molecules released by necrotic cells is the nuclear protein and molecular superadaptor protein, high mobility group B 1 (HMGB1), which is released following necrosis but not with apoptosis or autophagic programmed cell death. HMGB1 matures dendritic cells (DC) and polarizes Th cells, predominantly to the Th1 pathway [9 ]. HMGB1 induces chronic inflammation, neoangiogenesis, and stromagenesis and protects cells from death, promoting the expression of antiapoptotic factors [4 ].

CTL and NK cells promote tumor cell apoptosis with delivery of perforin and granzymes directly into cells or through the extrinsic pathway, inducing apoptotic death by triggering death receptors by the TNF family of molecules, including TRAIL, TNF-{alpha}, Fas ligand (FasL), and lymphotoxin (LT), thereby inducing apoptosis in cells [10 ]. Such cytolytic cells could also induce extracellular delivery of intracellular molecules, including HMGB1, ATP, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The 51Cr and more recently, the calcein release assays are representative methods to measure the leakage of intracellular proteins by effector cells during necrotic death [11 ]. There have been no previous studies, to our knowledge, assessing whether HMGB1 is released from tumor cells following tumor cytolysis by immune cells. We examined HMGB1 release from tumor cells following coincubation with NK cells with enhanced lymphokine-activated killing (LAK) activity, induced by IL-2 exposure or mediated by melanoma-specific CTL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents
TRAIL (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), granzyme B (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), N-benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone (Z-VAD-FMK; R&D Systems), and Con A (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) were purchased from the commercial sources indicated. Recombinant IL-2 was the kind gift of Chiron (Emeryville, CA).

Antibodies
Affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-HMGB1 antibody that recognizes a specific HMGB1 peptide (166–172) was generated for our laboratory on contract (Sigma Antibody Service, St. Louis, MO). Mouse anti-HMGB1 mAb (R&D Systems), mouse anti-histone H1 mAb (Stressgen, San Diego, CA), and rabbit anti-histone H2A antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) and anti-ß-actin antibody (Sigma) were purchased and used at various concentrations in assays described below. Secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to Alexa 660 and goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa 546 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), were used for two-color flow cytometry (FC). In some studies, antibodies were labeled directly with Alexa 546, Alexa 647, or Alexa 750 with antibody labeling kits (Molecular Probes) as directed by the manufacturer.

Cell lines
The melanoma cell lines, 451Lu and WM9, were kind gifts from Dr. Meenhard Herlyn (Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA). MEL397, a HLA-A2-negative/Melan-A-positive melanoma cell line and CTL1520 were kind gifts of Steven Rosenberg (Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). FEM X is a HLA-A2-positive /MART1-positive melanoma cell line available from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA). T2 is a HLA-A2-positive cell line purchased from ATCC.

Subcellular fractionation of melanoma cells
Cells (1x106/100 ul) were suspended in fractionation buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride AEBSF (Sigma), 50 uM leupeptin (Sigma), 1 mM benzamidine (Sigma), and 500 nM aprotinin (Sigma). Cell membranes were mechanically disrupted with a 36G needle and serial passage with a syringe at 4ºC. Cells were spun down at 500 g for 5 min at 4ºC. Supernatants were collected and used as a bulk cytosol fraction. Pellets were washed with fractionation buffer and spun down at 500 g for 5 min. Pellets were resuspended at 1 x 107 cells/ml in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 0.25% deoxycholate, 1 mM AEBSF, 50 uM leupeptin, 1 mM benzamidine, and 500 nM aprotinin and used as a bulk nuclear fraction.

Cell culture
PBMC were collected from the buffy coat using Ficoll-PaqueTM Plus (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) and stored in 90% FBS with 10% DMSO (FisherBiotech, Fair Lawn, NJ) at –80°C. Cells were thawed and incubated at 106/ml, with or without 6000 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 in IMDM (Mediatech Inc., Herndon, VA), supplemented with 10% FBS for 3 or 4 days. IL-2-activated PBMC (LAK) were harvested and mixed with 1 x 105/ml tumor cells at various E:T ratios in IMDM, supplemented with 2% FBS for 4 h or 24 h. Then, cells and culture supernatant were collected and analyzed. Z-VAD-FMK is used with PBMC or TRAIL treatment to block caspase activation at the concentration of 50 uM.

CTL induction and coincubation
HLA-A2+/MART1+ tumor-specific CTL were induced from HLA-A2-positive CD8+ T cells from healthy donors as we reported previously [12 ]. Tumor cells were incubated with 1 µM Cell TraceTM Far Red DDAO-SE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 15 min at room temperature and washed with PBS twice. T2 cells were incubated with 1 µg/ml gp100-specific peptide for 1 h and washed with PBS once. Tumor cells were coincubated with CTL for 24 h in round-bottom, 96-well plates at a 10:1 E:T ratio in IMDM supplemented with 2% FBS. Cells and supernatant were then collected and analyzed.

TRAIL treatment
Tumor cells/ml (1x105) were incubated with TRAIL (50 ng/ml) for 24 h, with or without Z-VAD-FMK (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Granzyme B treatment
Tumor cells (1x106/ml) were incubated with nonreplicating adenovirus and granzyme B (10–20 µg/ml) for 5 h, as we have reported previously [13 ]. Following incubation, cells and supernatant were harvested and delivered for assessment of cell death and release of intracellular contents. The replication-incompetent adenovirus enters vesicles along with granzyme B and disrupts them intracellularly, allowing its release into the cytosol.

Western blotting analysis
Tumor cells were incubated with or without PBMC or LAK for 4 h at 5 x 106/ml with 100 µl/well. Culture supernatant was collected, and cell pellets were lysed in lysis buffer. Criterion XT sample buffer was added and boiled at 100ºC for 5 min. Samples were stored at –80ºC. Samples were analyzed by Western blotting. Briefly, rabbit anti-HMGB1 antibody and HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG were used for the first and secondary antibody. Rabbit anti-histone H2A antibody and HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG were used for the detection of histone H2A within the nuclei. Mouse anti-ß-actin antibody and HRP-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG were used for the detection of ß-actin. When performing reblotting of other proteins on the same membrane, antibodies were stripped by incubating in 100 mM 2-ME, 2% SDS, and 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.7) at 50ºC for 30 min.

Intracellular staining of HMGB1 and histone H1
Before mixing tumor cells with PBMC or tumor-specific CTL, DDAO-SE dye at a concentration of 1 µM was added and incubated for 15 min at room temperature and then washed twice with PBS. Target cells were treated with effector cells or compounds for 4 h or 24 h. Cultured cells were harvested and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed with FC buffer, which contains 1% FBS and 0.1% sodium azide in PBS once and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 with 300 mM sucrose in PBS for 5 min. Cells were washed, and anti-HMGB1 and anti-histone H1 antibodies were added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed, and secondary Alexa dye-conjugated secondary antibodies were added and incubated for an additional hour at room temperature. Cells were washed and resuspended with 200 uL FC buffer and analyzed by FC.

Immunocytochemistry
Cells (2x104) were placed in 96-well, flat-bottom plates and incubated for 2 h. Cells were treated with or without LAK cells for 24 h at an E:T ratio of 50:1. Cells were fixed with 2% PFA and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100-containing buffer. Cells were stained with rabbit anti-HMGB1 antibody, mouse anti-ß-actin antibody, and Hoechst 33342 and viewed on a confocal-scanning fluorescence microscope (Olympus Fluoview 1000, Malvern, NY).

Annexin V/Sytox Orange staining
Cells (1x105) were resuspended in 50 µl annexin-binding buffer containing 100 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, and 2.5 mM CaCl2. Cells were incubated with 2.5 ul Annexin V-Alexa 647 (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) and 50 nM Sytox Orange (Molecular Probes) for 15 min.

SR-VAD-FMK staining
Sulforhodamine B-labeled (SR)-VAD-FMK staining is performed following the manufacturer’s instruction. Cells (1x105/200 µl) were added 30x to fluorescence-labeled inhibitor of caspase (FLICA) solution and incubated for 1 h. Cells were washed with FC buffer twice and resuspended in FC buffer.

Flow cytometric analysis
Up to 1 x 104-gated cells were acquired on a FACSArray flow cytometer (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Data were analyzed using FACSDiva software (BD PharMingen). Tumor cells were gated and identified using prestained DDAO-SE, assessing side-scatter and forward-scatter. Gating between HMGB1-positive and -negative cells was determined using a lower oblique line of an untreated living tumor cell population in the HMGB1/histone H1 two-color display as shown.

51Cr release assay
Standard 51Cr release assay was performed at individual E:T ratios (20:1–2.5:1) for 4 h or 24 h. Gamma radiation is detected with a microplate scintillation counter (TopCount, Packard Instrument Co., Boston, MA).

LDH release assay
CytoTox assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI) was used for enzymatic assessment of LDH release following the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescence emission at 590 nm is measured with a Safire plate reader (Tecan, Switzerland).

Calcein release assay
Calcein AM (5 µM, Molecular Probes) is added to the tumor cells and incubated for 30 min. Tumor cells were washed with PBS twice and incubated with effector cells for 4 h and 24 h. Release of calcein in the supernatant is measured with a Safire plate reader (Tecan).

Statistical analysis
Percent Cr release, percent LDH release, and percent calcein release were calculated using the following formula: Percent release = 100 x (release of sample–spontaneous release)/(maximal release–spontaneous release). Differences between individual groups were calculated with a Student’s t-test. We considered P < 0.05 as statistically significant.

RESULTS

HMGB1 is located primarily within the nucleus
Immunostaining of melanoma cell lines demonstrates intracellular localization of HMGB1, which is found within the nucleus and only found in the cytosol of mitotic cells (white arrows; Fig. 1A ). We also evaluated subcellular localization of HMGB1 by separating bulk nuclei and cytosol fractions (Fig. 1B) . HMGB1 was detected in nuclei of FEM X and 451Lu, the nuclei and cytosolic fraction of MEL397 and WM9. Histone H2A is located in only nucleus, and ß-actin is located mainly in the cytosol. The amount of histone H2A content is different in those four different cell lines. The results of Western blotting should be considered with caution, as HMGB1 is readily released from the nucleus following cellular disruption.


Figure 1
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. HMGB1 is located primarily within the nucleus in melanoma cell lines. (A) Staining demonstrates intracellular localization of HMGB1. Blue, Hoechst 33342; green, HMGB1; red, ß-actin. HMGB1 is found within the nucleus and only found in the cytosol of mitotic cells (white arrows). (B) Subcellular localization of HMGB1 by separating bulk nuclei and cytosol fraction reveals HMGB1 primarily in the nuclei and cytosolic fractions. Histone H2A is located only in the nucleus, while ß-actin is located mainly in the cytosol. Western blot analysis results were obtained from a single membrane by stripping antibodies and reblotting.

 
Significant amounts of detectable HMGB1 are released into the culture supernatant of the mixture of tumor (451Lu, WM9) and PBMC
Mixtures of melanoma cells (451Lu and WM9) and LAK released HMGB1 during 4 h of coincubation (Fig. 2 ). Western blotting revealed that HMGB1 was released into the culture media of the mixture of tumor cells and LAK. These results suggest that LAK or melanoma cells could release HMGB1 into the extracellular space when lymphocytes interact with tumor cells. We cannot distinguish whether it is the tumor cells or the PBMC in such assays that are the primary source of HMGB1.


Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. HMGB1 is released into the supernatant of a mixture of tumor cells and cytolytic cells. PBMCs were pretreated with or without IL-2 for 3 days to increase cytolytics activity. Melanoma cells (451Lu, WM9, 5x105/100µl) were incubated with the PBMCs for 4 h at the E/T ratio of 10:1. Western blot analyses of HMGB1 in the culture supernatant and lysate of tumor co-incubated with or without PBMC were performed. Similar results were obtained in several other experiments.

 
HMGB1 is translocated from the nucleus to the cytosol
Immunostaining of HMGB1 revealed loss of HMGB1 from the nucleus in the melanoma cell lines (451Lu and WM9) surrounded by lymphocytes when cells were treated with LAK for24 h. Intracytoplasmic HMGB1 staining of LAK-treated tumor cells is higher than untreated cells (Fig. 3 ). To investigate individual tumor cell release of HMGB1, we analyzed intracellular HMGB1 by FC. HMGB1 and histone H1 positively stained melanoma cells (451Lu and WM9; Fig. 4 ). HMGB1 and histone H1 within tumor cells could be identified following PBMC or LAK treatment. HMGB1-negative cells appeared after treatment with LAK treatment. These results indicate that LAK induce nuclear HMGB1 release or degradation in tumor cells. This suggests that necrotic (Type III) cell death, as defined by HMGB1 release from target cells, is at least in part induced by LAK.


Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Tumor HMGB1 is translocated from the nucleus to the cytosol following immune cytolysis. Immunostaining of HMGB1 reveals translocation of HMGB1 from the nucleus to the cytosol in melanoma cell lines seen surrounded by lymphocytes when cells were treated with LAK for 24 hours. Intracytoplasmic HMGB1 staining levels are higher than untreated tumor cells. Blue, Hoechst; Green, HMGB1; Red, ß-actin.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Co-incubation with cells with LAK activity induces HMGB1 release from melanoma cells. Rapid induction of cytolytic activity following incubation with IL-2 in both NK and T cells has been defined as lymphokine activated killer [LAK] activity. Both HMGB1 and Histone H1 are positively stained within the tumor cells (451Lu and WM9). HMGB1 and histone H1 remain positive following PBMC treatment. HMGB1 negative cells emerged, appearing after treatment with LAK. The melanoma cells were incubated with PBMCs for 24 h. Tumor cells were gated with prestained DDAO-SE, side scatter and forward scatter. The E/T ratio used in these assays was 20:1–2.5:1. (FI, Fluorescence intensity.) Results are representatives of more than 3 experiments performed.

 
Flow cytometric HMGB1 detection in target cells is useful as a cytotoxicity assay
We compared the HMGB1-negative population with other measures of cytotoxicity including 51Cr, calcein, and LDH release assays. Determination of HMGB1-negative cells by FC (Fig. 5 ), 51Cr, LDH, and calcein release assays at an individual E:T ratio demonstrated greater release at the higher E:T ratios at 4 h and 24 h. Thus, HMGB1 release assays could also be used for sensitive assessment of necrotic (Type III) cell death.


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Flow cytometric detection of HMGB1 release parallels results obtained with other cytotoxic assays. We assessed melanoma cell (451Lu and WM9) death in various groups: (A) 51Cr release assay; (B) calcein release assay; (C) LDH release assay; and % HMGB1 negative cells by flow cytometry (4 or 24 h). Comparable release is demonstrated in each of these assays suggesting that HMGB1 release is a robust and faithful representation of necrotic cell death.

 
Tumor-specific lysis by CTL induces HMGB1 release
We also assessed whether HLA and tumor antigen-specific T cells induce HMGB1 release from tumor cells. HMGB1 release is induced by CTL specific for HLA-A2+/MART1+, gp100+ tumor cells (FEM X), or T2 cells loaded with gp100-specific peptide (Fig. 6 ). HLA-A2-negative/MART1-positive melanoma line MEL 397 or HLA-A2-positive tumor antigen-negative T2 cells did not release HMGB1. Thus, HLA-tumor antigen-dependent, specific T cells and nonspecific lysis induced by LAK cells promoted HMGB1 release, which induced by cytolytic effector cells, is not limited by recognition mechanisms but presumably by the means of cell death.


Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Tumor specific lysis by CTL induces HMGB1 release. HLA-A2+/MART1+ tumor specific cytolytic T-cells were used to assess melanoma cell HMGB1 release. Either FEMX (HLA-A2+), MEL397 (HLA-A2–), or T2 with or without gp100 peptide were co-incubated with or without specific CTL for 24 hours, fixed and stained with antibodies to histone H1 and HMGB1. HMGB1 was released from relevant but not irrelevant targets. Thus, cognate recognition of peptide/MHC allows T-cell delivery of lytic signals leading to the release of HMGB1.

 
Z-VAD-FMK partially blocked HMGB1 release of melanoma cell line 451Lu induced by LAK
When we add LAK, HMGB1 release from the melanoma cells was observed in 451Lu and WM9 after 24 h. Z-VAD-FMK blocked HMGB1 release partially from 451Lu, but release of HMGB1 from WM9 was not blocked by Z-VAD-FMK (Fig. 7 ), which blocked Annexin V staining of 451Lu and WM9 as well as membrane permeability by Sytox Orange staining in 451Lu, consistent with persistent viability of these cells. LDH release of 451Lu was blocked partially by Z-VAD-FMK. Induction of hypermembrane permeability could be correlated with HMGB1 release. We also used Con A to block perforin-mediated cell death. Blockade of HMGB1 release was not detected over the period we tested, even at levels that were themselves toxic (data not shown).


Figure 7
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Caspase inhibitors partially blocked HMGB1 release from the melanoma cell line 451Lu co-incubated with cytolytic (LAK) cells. When cells with LAK activity are added, HMGB1 release from the melanoma cell lines 451Lu and WM9 was observed after 24 h. zVAD-FMK blocked HMGB1 release from 451Lu partially, but not from WM9. zVAD-FMK blocked Annexin V staining of both 451Lu and WM9. ZVAD-FMK blocked induction of hyper-membrane permeability by Sytox orange staining in 451Lu partially, but not in WM9, consistent with the persisent viability of these cells. LDH release of 451Lu was partially blocked by zVAD-FMK, while LDH release of WM9 was not blocked. Induction of hyper-membrane permeability could be correlated with HMGB1 release.

 
HMGB1 release is induced by TRAIL but not by granzyme B treatment
To assess the mechanism of HMGB1 release induced by cytolytic cells, we investigated whether both pathways (intrinsic and extrinsic) of cytolysis induce HMGB1 release. HMGB1-negative cells appeared following TRAIL (50 ng/ml) treatment for 24 h (Fig. 8 ). TRAIL treatment induced apoptotic cell death and induced HMGB1 release. Cell death and HMGB1 release were blocked by administering Z-VAD-FMK (50 µM). HMGB1 release by TRAIL treatment occurs mainly following induction of the caspase-dependent, nominal apoptotic pathway. Adenovirus infection alone did not cause substantial cell death or HMGB1 release. Administration of adenovirus and granzyme B to 451Lu induced apoptotic cell death, as measured conventionally and by HMGB1 release. HMGB1-negative cells did not appear following adenovirus and granzyme B treatment for 5 h (Fig. 9 ) or 16 h (data not shown). WM9 did not die and release HMGB1 with adenovirus/granzyme B treatment.


Figure 8
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. HMGB1 release is induced by extrinsic pathway activation (TRAIL treatment) and blocked by caspase inhibitors. Apoptotic death was induced and assessed in two cell populations (451Lu and WM9). Either untreated (tumor), TRAIL 50 ng/ml, or TRAIL 50 ng/ml + zVAD FMK 50 µM was applied. HMGB1 negative cells appeared following TRAIL treatment. Emergence of HMGB1 negative cells, caspase activation, initiation of the apoptotic pathway, and LDH release are blocked with zVAD-FMK. Cells were incubated for 24 h. Numbers in the box are % HMGB1 negative cells. Thus, extrinsic pathways appear to mediate HMGB1 release. Results are representative of 3 or more experiments.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 9. HMGB1 is not released by granzyme B delivery-induced cell death. Assessment of granzyme B mediated cell death was assessed as previously described [13 ] using addition of the enzyme along with replication incompetent adenovirus infection, designed to disrupt intracellular vesicles following granzyme B uptake. Individual groups are shown: (A, D) Untreated; (B, E) adenovirus; (C, F) adenovirus + granzyme B 2 mg/ml. Melanoma cells (451Lu and WM9) were incubated for 5 h. Numbers in the box demonstrate % HMGB1 negative cells. Apoptosis (Annexin V single positive) was induced by granzyme B treatment in 451Lu, but not WM9. (F) Results are representative of 3 or more experiments.

 
DISCUSSION

How cells die is of considerable importance, not only for the careful husbanding of cellular resources following apoptotic or autophagic death but also for the consequences of necrotic cell death associated with inflammation and reactive angiogenesis and stromagenesis. Here, we show that the nuclear protein, HMGB1, is released following melanoma cell death induced by cytolytic lymphoid cells. It is interesting that HMGB1 was not released following intracellular delivery of granzyme B facilitated by adenovirus infection. Lieberman and colleagues [14 ] reported that HMGB1 was not cleaved with granzyme B treatment. Granzyme A destroys the nuclear envelope by targeting lamins and opens up DNA for degradation by targeting histones [15 ]. It is interesting that HMGB1 is not degraded by granzymes and is released from tumor cells following cytolysis by activated T/NK cells, which kill tumor cells, not only by delivery of perforin/granzyme but also by inducing cell death by triggering the so-called extrinsic, apoptotic pathway, delivering ligands/counter-receptors (FasL, TRAIL, TNF, LT) to tumor cell-expressed cognate death receptors [10 ]. TRAIL is demonstrated here to mediate HMGB1 release from melanoma cell lines. HMGB1 release as well as LDH release were induced by LAK cells. This HMGB1 release was blocked partially by Z-VAD-FMK with one melanoma cell line (451Lu) but not with WM9. The effect of Z-VAD-FMK was comparable with Sytox Orange staining and LDH release. Annexin V staining of 451Lu and WM9 was blocked by Z-VAD-FMK, which also blocked HMGB1 release by TRAIL. LAK-induced HMGB1 release is detected within 4 h, and TRAIL-induced HMGB1 release is observed only after 24 h (data not shown). These results suggest that HMGB1 release is caused by not only necrotic cell death but also as a result of caspase-dependent apoptosis and following hypermembrane permeability. Indeed, release of HMGB1 following apoptosis might be a slow process and only found late during aponecrosis when phagocytic cells are not available. Whether the acute and subacute release of HMGB1 has any difference on the host immune response is still unknown. Very recently, Qin and Tracey, et al. blocked apoptosis with Z-VAD-FMK and decreased serum HMGB1 levels in a mouse septic-shock model [16 ]. Blocking apoptotic pathways could thus be a possible way to limit HMGB1 release.

Known receptors of HMGB1-delivered ligands include TLR2 and TLR4 as well as the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) [3 ]. Suppression of TLR4 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) induces suppression of tumor growth in various mouse models [17 ]. The serum HMGB1 level is detected in many cancer patients (M. T. Lotze, R. A. DeMarco, H. J. Zeh III, unpublished data). Tumor tissues express a high level of HMGB1 and the receptor RAGE [18 , 19 ]. HMGB1 released from tumor cells, by modifying the activity of other immune cells such as plasmacytoid DC and tissue macrophages, may mediate local immune suppression (Petar Popovic et al., submitted).

Blocking HMGB1 release or signaling may be an important, new strategy for cancer therapy [20 ]. Possible methods to block HMGB1 signaling include: preventing HMGB1 release by promoting HMGB1 cleavage within the cell; protecting cell membrane or nuclear membrane from attack using Type II enzyme inducers such as ethyl pyruvate [21 ]; and sequestering HMGB1 within the nucleus by apoptosis inducers such as gamma or ultraviolet irradiation [3 , 22 ] or through creating GpG and GpA cross-links with platinum [23 ], serving as nucleating sites for HMGB1 sequestration. Alternatively, extracellular HMGB1 signals could be blocked by using anti-HMGB1 antibodies [24 ] or limiting access to nominal receptors, including provision of antibodies to TLR2, TLR4, or RAGE [25 ]. Interference with HMGB1 signaling could also use the HMGB1 antagonist: A box [26 ], siRNA preventing HMGB1 production, or possibly creation and delivery of soluble TLRs [18 ].

HMGB1 release from tumor cells was induced by CTL or NK cells or delivery of exogenous TRAIL but not transfection with granzyme B. Extrinsic, pathway-induced release may elicit local inflammatory responses and be important for the emergence of some tumors arising as the consequence of chronic inflammation and mediate, paradoxically, emergent systemic and local immune suppression.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by 1 PO1 CA 101944-01 (M. T. L.), Integrating NK and DC into Cancer Therapy, and 1 R21 CA115059-01 (M. T. L. and David L. Bartlett), Isolated Hepatic Perfusion with Oxaliplatin. We appreciated helpful discussions with Dr. Ramin Lotfi, Ms. Elisa Latorre, and Ms. Katie Horvath.

Received March 5, 2006; revised August 1, 2006; accepted August 2, 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Bustin, M. (2002) At the crossroads of necrosis and apoptosis: signaling to multiple cellular targets by HMGB1 Sci. STKE 2002,PE39
  2. Kim, R. (2005) Recent advances in understanding the cell death pathways activated by anticancer therapy Cancer 103,1551-1560[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Lotze, M. T., Tracey, K. J. (2005) High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1): nuclear weapon in the immune arsenal Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5,331-342[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Zeh, H. J., III, Lotze, M. T. (2005) Addicted to death: invasive cancer and the immune response to unscheduled cell death J. Immunother. 28,1-9[Medline]
  5. Rovere-Querini, P., Capobianco, A., Scaffidi, P., Valentinis, B., Catalanotti, F., Giazzon, M., Dumitriu, I. E., Muller, S., Iannacone, M., Traversari, C., Bianchi, M. E., Manfredi, A. A. (2004) HMGB1 is an endogenous immune adjuvant released by necrotic cells EMBO Rep. 5,825-830[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ameisen, J. C. (2002) On the origin, evolution, and nature of programmed cell death: a timeline of four billion years Cell Death Differ. 9,367-393[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lotze, M. T., DeMarco, R. A. (2004) Cancer: cell death without dignity Discovery Medicine 4,457-465
  8. Albert, M. L. (2004) Death-defying immunity: do apoptotic cells influence antigen processing and presentation? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4,223-231[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Dumitriu, I. E., Baruah, P., Valentinis, B., Voll, R. E., Herrmann, M., Nawroth, P. P., Arnold, B., Bianchi, M. E., Manfredi, A. A., Rovere-Querini, P. (2005) Release of high mobility group box 1 by dendritic cells controls T cell activation via the receptor for advanced glycation end products J. Immunol. 174,7506-7515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. LeBlanc, H., Lawrence, D., Varfolomeev, E., Totpal, K., Morlan, J., Schow, P., Fong, S., Schwall, R., Sinicropi, D., Ashkenazi, A. (2002) Tumor-cell resistance to death receptor-induced apoptosis through mutational inactivation of the proapoptotic Bcl-2 homolog Bax Nat. Med. 8,274-281[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Winikoff, S. E., Zeh, H. J., DeMarco, R. A., Lotze, M. T. (2005) Cytolytic assays Lotze, M. T. Thomson, A. W. eds. Measuring Immunity ,343-349 London, UK Lippincott.
  12. Mailliard, R. B., Wankowicz-Kalinska, A., Cai, Q., Wesa, A., Hilkens, C. M., Kapsenberg, M. L., Kirkwood, J. M., Storkus, W. J., Kalinski, P. (2004) {alpha}-Type-1 polarized dendritic cells: a novel immunization tool with optimized CTL-inducing activity Cancer Res. 64,5934-5937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Han, J., Goldstein, L. A., Gastman, B. R., Froelich, C. J., Yin, X. M., Rabinowich, H. (2004) Degradation of Mcl-1 by granzyme B: implications for Bim-mediated mitochondrial apoptotic events J. Biol. Chem. 279,22020-22029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fan, Z., Beresford, P. J., Zhang, D., Lieberman, J. (2002) HMG2 interacts with the nucleosome assembly protein SET and is a target of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protease granzyme A Mol. Cell. Biol. 22,2810-2820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lieberman, J., Fan, Z. (2003) Nuclear war: the granzyme A-bomb Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15,553-559[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Qin, S., Wang, H., Yuan, R., Li, H., Ochani, M., Ochani, K., Rosas-Ballina, M., Czura, C. J., Huston, J. M., Miller, E., Lin, X., Sherry, B., Kumar, A., Larosa, G., Newman, W., Tracey, K. J., Yang, H. (2006) Role of HMGB1 in apoptosis-mediated sepsis lethality J. Exp. Med. 203,1637-1642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Huang, B., Zhao, J., Li, H., He, K. L., Chen, Y., Chen, S. H., Mayer, L., Unkeless, J. C., Xiong, H. (2005) Toll-like receptors on tumor cells facilitate evasion of immune surveillance Cancer Res. 65,5009-5014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kuniyasu, H., Yano, S., Sasaki, T., Sasahira, T., Sone, S., Ohmori, H. (2005) Colon cancer cell-derived high mobility group 1/amphoterin induces growth inhibition and apoptosis in macrophages Am. J. Pathol. 166,751-760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ishiguro, H., Nakaigawa, N., Miyoshi, Y., Fujinami, K., Kubota, Y., Uemura, H. (2005) Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and its ligand, amphoterin are overexpressed and associated with prostate cancer development Prostate 64,92-100[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Lotze, M. T., DeMarco, R. A. (2003) Dealing with death: HMGB1 as a novel target for cancer therapy Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 4,1405-1409[Medline]
  21. Ulloa, L., Ochani, M., Yang, H., Tanovic, M., Halperin, D., Yang, R., Czura, C. J., Fink, M. P., Tracey, K. J. (2002) Ethyl pyruvate prevents lethality in mice with established lethal sepsis and systemic inflammation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,12351-12356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Pasheva, E. A., Pashev, I. G., Favre, A. (1998) Preferential binding of high mobility group 1 protein to UV-damaged DNA. Role of the COOH-terminal domain J. Biol. Chem. 273,24730-24736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Pil, P. M., Lippard, S. J. (1992) Specific binding of chromosomal protein HMG1 to DNA damaged by the anticancer drug cisplatin Science 256,234-237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang, H., Bloom, O., Zhang, M., Vishnubhakat, J. M., Ombrellino, M., Che, J., Frazier, A., Yang, H., Ivanova, S., Borovikova, L., Manogue, K. R., Faist, E., Abraham, E., Andersson, J., Andersson, U., Molina, P. E., Abumrad, N. N., Sama, A., Tracey, K. J. (1999) HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice Science 285,248-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Nattermann, J., Du, X., Wei, Y., Shevchenko, D., Beutler, B. (2000) Endotoxin-mimetic effect of antibodies against Toll-like receptor 4 J. Endotoxin Res. 6,257-264[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Yang, H., Ochani, M., Li, J., Qiang, X., Tanovic, M., Harris, H. E., Susarla, S. M., Ulloa, L., Wang, H., DiRaimo, R., Czura, C. J., Wang, H., Roth, J., Warren, H. S., Fink, M. P., Fenton, M. J., Andersson, U., Tracey, K. J. (2004) Reversing established sepsis with antagonists of endogenous high-mobility group box 1 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101,296-301[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Jiang, C. W. Bell, and D. S. Pisetsky
The Relationship between Apoptosis and High-Mobility Group Protein 1 Release from Murine Macrophages Stimulated with Lipopolysaccharide or Polyinosinic-Polycytidylic Acid
J. Immunol., May 15, 2007; 178(10): 6495 - 6503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. E. Bianchi
DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger
J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2007; 81(1): 1 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0306169v1
81/1/75    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lotze, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ito, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lotze, M. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS