|
|
||||||||
Published online before print September 25, 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Institute of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Charité-CBF, Berlin, Germany
2 Correspondence: Institute of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Charité-CBF, Arnimallee 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: reinhard.wanner@charite.de
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-secreting Th1 cells. Neither IL-12 nor IL-6 or TNF-
was involved. Microarray analysis pointed to a participation of Type I IFNs. In fact, D19-stimulated moDC secreted considerable amounts of IFN-
. This indicates that moDC themselves sense viral and bacterial DNA and do not need help from pDC.
Key Words: cell surface molecules cell activation vaccination
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mDC can induce B lymphocyte proliferation and antibody production, and they affect the activity of regulatory T lymphocytes [7 , 8 ]. In addition, mDC can induce tumor cell apoptosis directly and can activate NK cells [9 10 11 ].
As a result of the limited availability of human mDC, most studies about DC function relied on cells generated in vitro from DC precursors. The widest use in experimental and clinical studies was made of monocyte-derived DC (moDC) generated by culturing monocytes in the presence of IL-4 and GM-CSF [12 13 14 15 ].
DC can develop along a second pathway leading to precursors of plasmacytoid DC (pDC). These cells are also known as Type I IFN-producing cells, as they secrete 100–1000 times more of Type I IFNs after viral infection than other blood cells [16 , 17 ]. pDC are unrelated to monocytes and lack phagocytic activity [17 , 18 ]. Unlike mDC, the localization of pDC is normally restricted to lymphoid tissues and to peripheral blood [17 ]. Only during pathological conditions, as in psoriasis and systemic lupus erythematosus, pDC infiltrate the skin [19 ].
TLRs are transmembrane proteins mainly expressed in cells of the innate and adaptive immune system. They sense conserved molecular patterns of pathogenic microorganisms and initiate antimicrobial responses. Eleven TLR subtypes are described, which recognize different microbial components [20 , 21 ]. TLR9 evolved as the receptor for unmethylated CpGs, which are more prevalent in bacterial and viral than in vertebrate genomes [22 , 23 ]. Natural CpG sequences can be mimicked by CpG-containing oligonucleotides (ODNs). There are three main CpG ODN types, which are called CpG-A (formerly also called D-type), CpG-B (formerly also called K-type), and CpG-C, which are known to act differentially on TLR9-expressing cell types [24 25 26 27 ]. In humans, TLR9 was found to be expressed in B lymphocytes, NK cells, activated monocytes, and pDC [28 29 30 ]. TLR9 is located intracellularly in vesicles. Based on negative RT-PCR results and on failing of activation after treatment with CpG-B and untypical CpG-A ODNs, human mDC and moDC were believed to miss TLR9 expression [29 30 31 32 33 ].
Separate DC lineages with subset-specific TLR expression would argue for a specialized recognition of different microbial antigens. If, however, only pDC expressed TLR9, only CpG sequences of viruses could be sensed after pDC infection. Bacterial CpG sequences, which are accessible only after phagocytic uptake and fragmentation, would remain undetectable. This and the fact that murine mDC express TLR9 [34 ] led us to analyze TLR9 expression in human moDC using newly available antibodies. In conclusion, we show that human moDC express TLR9 and that their maturation can be triggered directly by CpG-A ODN D19.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, 10 ng/ml IL-1β (all from Immunotools), and 1 µg/ml PGE2 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) for 48 h. Human CD4+CD25–-T cells were isolated from the nonplastic-adhering PBMC fraction using the human CD4+-T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) followed by magnetic sorting with human CD25 microbeads using Midi-MACS LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec). Human pDC were enriched from PBMC by magnetic sorting with antihuman BDCA-4 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). The murine fibroblast cell line TNF-related activation protein (TRAP) expressing rhCD40L was a gift from R. A. Kroczek (Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany) and was cultured in RPMI 1640/10% FCS. 293-hTLR9 cells, stably transfected with human TLR9 and 293 null cells (Invivogen, San Diego, CA), were cultured in DMEM/10% FCS supplemented with blasticidine (Invivogen).
Stimulation of DC
ODNs were synthesized by Tib MolBiol (Berlin, Germany) and had <0.1 endotoxin units/mg x ml using the Limulus amoebocyte lysate test (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD). Sequences were 5'–3', D19: ggTGCATCGATGCAGggggg; control D: ggTGCATTGATGCAGggggg; K3: atcgactctcgagcgttctc; control K: tgcaggcttctc (bases in lowercase represent thioates). Cy5-D19 and Cy5-K3 were 5'-labeled. ODNs were applied to cell culture media at a final concentration of 3 µM. LPS from Escherichia coli serotype 0128:B12 (Sigma Chemical Co., Steinheim, Germany) was added at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml. rhCD40L trimer was from Bender (Vienna, Austria), IFN-
was from PharMingen (Heidelberg, Germany). These stimuli were used at concentrations of 1 µg/ml and 100 IU/ml, respectively. Stimulated cells were cultured in RPMI 1640/10% FCS at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
FACS analyses
At the indicated time-points, cells were harvested, and antibody staining of 105 cells was measured in a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Antibodies used were FITC-conjugated mAb against CD14, CD86, and HLA-DR (all BD Biosciences), PE-conjugated mAb against BDCA-2 and BDCA-4 (Miltenyi Biotec), and FITC-conjugated CD123 (Miltenyi Biotec), CD83 (BD Biosciences), HLA-DR (Immunotech, Marseille, France), and TLR9 (Clone eB72-1665, eBiosciences, San Diego, CA). Mouse antihuman FITC-CD11c was from Serotec (Düsseldorf, Germany). Isotype controls were FITC-conjugated mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences) and mouse IgG2a (Cymbus Biotechnology, Eastleigh, UK) and PE-conjugated mouse IgG1, mouse IgG2b, and rat IgG2a (all BD Biosciences). Intracellular staining of TLR9 required fixation and permeabilization with Cytofix/Cytoperm and washing with Perm/Wash (both BD Biosciences) before staining. Spectral overlap was corrected by appropriate compensation. Dead cells and debris were excluded by propidium iodide staining (200 ng/ml, Sigma Chemical Co., Deisenhofen, Germany) and scatter gates. Data of 10,000 events each were acquired using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by WinMDI (Scripps Institute, La Jolla, CA).
RT-PCR
RNA of PBMC, of cells of a fresh monocyte preparation (to adhere, cells have been cultured for 1 h), of moDC at Day 6 of generation, as well as of 293 null and 293-hTLR9 cells was prepared using an Rneasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturers instructions. DNA was digested using the On-column RNase-free DNase set (Qiagen). cDNA was prepared by adding 9 µl RNA to 8.25 µl of a solution of 12.12 µM pd(N)6 random hexamers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 1.5 mM deoxy-unspecified nucleoside 5'-triphosphates (dNTPs; Gibco, Grand Island, NY), first-strand buffer (in 1/2 dilution), and 24 mM DTT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After incubation at 90°C for 5 min, probes were cooled on ice, and 0.5 µl RNase inhibitor (Promega, Madison, WI) and 0.5 µl SuperScript RT (modified from Moloney murine leukemia virus, Gibco) were added. After 10 min at room temperature, probes were incubated at 42°C for 40 min, thereafter at 90°C for 10 min, and then stored at –20°C. RT-PCR was performed with Taq buffer with KCl (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany), 1.4 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM dNTPs (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 0.01 U Taq DNA-Polymerase LC (Fermentas), primers (Tib MolBiol), each at a concentration of 0.5 µM, and cDNA probes, which were titrated to equal β-actin contents. Primers for β-actin were 5'-CGGGAAATCGTGCGTGACAT-3' and 5'-TGGAAGGTGGACAGCGAGGC-3', and PCR was run for 24 cycles consisting of 1 min at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C. Primers for BDCA-2 were 5'-TGCGTCATGGAAGGAAAGG-3' and 5'-CACCTGAGTGCCAGAATGTGA-3', and PCR was run for 35 cycles consisting of 1 min at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 1 min at 72°C. Primers for TLR9A were 5'-AGCATGGGTTTCTGCCGCAGC-3' and 5'-CGGTTGGAGGACAAGGAAAGGC-3' (product length, 224 bp), and PCR was run for 35 cycles consisting of 1 min at 94°C, 30 s at 64°C, and 1 min at 72°C. Reactions (10 µl of 25 µl) were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. Documentation was done with a gel doc 2000 station (BioRad, München, Germany).
Western blotting
Cells were lysed in 50 mM MOPS, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1x protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Penzberg, Germany), and 400 U/ml DNase I (Roche). For complete lysis, the cell suspensions were frozen and thawed repeatedly. After addition of 400 U/ml DNase I and incubation overnight at 6°C, sample buffer was added to final concentrations of 62.5 mM Tris HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 5% β-ME, 10% glycerol, and 0.001% bromphenol blue. The samples were boiled for denaturation, separated by SDS-PAGE on 8% gels, and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 µm, Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany) by semidry blotting. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in TBS, incubated with goat antihuman TLR9 (sc-16247, 1:100) or rat antihuman TLR9 (eB72-1665, 1:100, eBioscience, Kranenburg, Germany) overnight, washed three times, and incubated with peroxidase-conjugated rabbit antigoat IgG (1:20 000) or with goat antirat IgG (1.5000) for 3 h. The antibodies (except eB72-1665) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (CA). After further washing, the blots were incubated with Super Signal West Femto chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and analyzed in a gel doc 2000 station (BioRad).
For Western blotting of deglycosylated proteins, lysed cell suspensions were adjusted to 0.25% SDS, heated to 95°C for 5 min, cooled on ice, and then incubated with 0.2 U/µl N-glycosidase F (Roche) in 50 mM MOPS, pH 7.4/0.67% CHAPS (Sigma Chemical Co.) for 2 h at 37°C before SDS-PAGE using SC-16247.
Microscopy
Microscopy was performed using a Leica DMRBE fluorescence microscope (Bensheim, Germany) equipped with a Hg-lamp, a Leica 40x water-immersion objective, filter sets from Omega Optical (Seefeld, Germany), and a Hamamatsu digital camera C4742-95 (Herrsching, Germany). Images were taken using Openlab software (Improvision, Heidelberg, Germany). Before microscopy, stimulating/staining solutions were removed, and cells were washed twice.
ELISA
For the detection of IL-4, IL-6, IL-12p70, TNF-
, and IFN-
, DuoSet ELISA kits from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany) were used. IFN-
was determined with the BioSource kit (Camarillo, CA), extended for pDC and high-sensitivity range for moDC.
MLR
CD4+CD25–-T cells were washed twice with PBS and adjusted to a density of 107 cells/ml in PBS. CFSE (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) was added at a final concentration of 50 nM. After 10 min at room temperature, 4 vol RPMI 1640/10% FCS was added, and cells were washed twice using this medium. T cells (105) and moDC at a ratio of 20:1 were cocultured for 6 days in 96-well U-bottom clusters (Corning, Wiesbaden, Germany). Oligos and LPS were not applied to the MLR media. The harvested cells were stained with a PE-Cy5-labeled anti-CD4 antibody (BD Biosciences). The CFSE fluorescence intensity of PE-Cy5-gated cells was determined by FACS analysis.
Microarray
RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). According to Affymetrixs target preparation and hybridization protocols, cDNA was synthesized using a HPLC-purified T7-dT24 primer (MWG, Ebersberg, Germany) and Superscript II RT (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Second-strand synthesis was performed with E. coli DNA ligase, DNA polymerase I, and RNase H (all from Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Cleanup of double-stranded cDNA was done by phenol/chloroform extraction. Biotinylated cRNA was prepared using the BioArray High Yield RNA transcription kit (Enzo Diagnosics, Farmingdale, NY). The amplified cRNA was purified with an affinity resin column (Qiagen), heat-fragmented, quantified by UV spectroscopy, and analyzed on a LabChip bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). HG-U 133 A 2.0 chips were hybridized and analyzed according to standard Affymetrix protocols. Data are deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information-Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI-GEO) depository under Accession Number GSE2859.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
MoDC express TLR9
For analysis of TLR9 expression, we purified the moDC further via CD1c sorting to a homogenous CD1c+CD11c+ cell population (Fig. 2a
, dot blot).
|
In FACS analysis, permeabilized monocytes and 293 null cells stained faintly positive for TLR9 as compared with the irrelevant antibody control (Fig. 2b) . 293-hTLR9 cells revealed high staining levels (Fig. 2b) . Intermediate TLR9 expression was detected in pDC and in CD1c+ moDC (Fig. 2b) .
Western blotting using antihuman TLR9 sc-16247 antibody revealed an apparent molecular weight of 200 kDa of the glycoprotein (Fig. 2c) . The TLR9 protein levels of moDC and pDC were comparable. However, bands became detectable only when applying the enormous protein amount of 7.5 x 106 cells/lane. After deglycosylation of proteins in moDC and pDC lysates using recombinant N-glycosidase F, TLR9 was not further detectable in Western blot analysis (not shown).
In moDC and pDC, Western blotting using antihuman TLR9 eB72-1665 did not result in TLR9 protein detection, and in 293-hTLR9 cells, neither the use of antibody sc-16247 nor eB72-1665 could provide evidence for TLR9 protein expression (not shown).
In addition, TLR9 expression in the human melanocyte cell line MeWo, in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, and in primary human mast cells was analyzed. Although MeWo and mast cells were comparable with 293 null cells, HaCaT cells stained faintly positive in FACS analysis (not shown).
MoDC are activated by the CpG-A ODN D19
Unlike monocytes, unstimulated moDC quickly incorporated Cy5-labeled D19- and K3-CpG oligonucleotides into vesicular structures (Fig. 3
). Prestimulation of moDC with unlabeled D19 or K3 for 24 h and 48 h did not alter the uptake of the labeled oligonucleotides (not shown). After treatment with IL-6, TNF-
, IL-1β, and PGE2 and coculture with murine fibroblasts expressing rCD40L (TRAP cells) for 2 days, the thereby matured moDC had lost the ability to capture labeled oligonucleotides (Fig. 3)
.
|
|
by moDC was determined after addition of 3 µM D19, 3 µM control D, or 1 µg/ml LPS and without treatment. In addition, the moDC cultures were provided with soluble CD40L trimer at a concentration of 1 µg/ml, with 1 µg/ml CD40L trimer plus 1000 IU/ml IFN-
, or moDC were seeded onto confluent layers of TRAP cells. If measured 24 h after addition, D19 treatment resulted in increased TNF-
secretion as compared with control D and untreated controls (Fig. 5
). Stimulation with LPS, however, induced a more pronounced TNF-
release (Fig. 5)
. Secretion of IL-12p70 and IL-6 was not influenced by D19. Concerning these cytokines, LPS was also the more potent inducer. Additional treatment with CD40L trimer had no effect, whereas the strong induction of cytokine secretion provoked by TRAP cells was independent from prestimulation with danger signals (Fig. 5)
.
|
was secreted at levels corresponding to the particular proliferation rates (Fig. 6)
.
|
in untreated and in control D- and D19-treated moDC cultures. In fact, D19 clearly up-regulated IFN-
secretion in moDC (Fig. 7
). As compared with D19-treated pDC, the levels of IFN-
produced by D19-treated moDC of different donors were 20- to 100-fold lower (Fig. 7)
.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Monocytes, mDC, moDC, and pDC differ in their expression of TLR9. Human monocytes were found to transcribe some TLR9 but did not react to stimulation with the CpG-B ODN 2006 and with the nonclassified CpG ODN AAC-30 [28 , 30 ]. Flow cytometrical analysis indicated that TLR9 protein is present on the cell surface of human monocytes. Moreover, infection with Yersinia pestis and stimulation with the CpG-B ODN 10103 induced increased cell-surface and cytoplasmic TLR9 expression [39 ]. Published RT-PCR data indicate that human mDC and moDC transcribe no or low amounts of TLR9, whereas pDC clearly show expression [28 29 30 , 40 ]. In the published RT-PCR studies, the primers shared sequences identical in all of the TLR9 isoforms [41 , 42 ]. The same primers were described to detect TLR9 in pDC [28 , 29 , 40 ]. To exclude amplification from any residual genomic DNA, RT-PCR primers should be placed over exon/intron borders or should span over an intron. There are two TLR9 transcript variants, A and B, and only Variant A contains an intron. We therefore constricted our analysis to TLR9A transcription. We found that human CD1c-sorted moDC transcribe the TLR9 Variant A. 293 null cells were found to transcribe TLR9A, if the PCR was performed at lowered annealing temperatures. These cells are known to express some TLR3. Our RT-PCR and FACS data (see below) might indicate that 293 null cells also express TLR9 at a low level.
To the best of our knowledge, data about TLR9 protein expression in human mDC and moDC were as-yet unpublished. The results presented here suggest that freshly isolated, nonactivated human monocytes do not contain TLR9 protein and show that differentiation to moDC induces intracellular TLR9 expression (Fig. 2a)
. Although the TLR9 antibodies used were said to be applicable in Western blotting, we have doubts about their quality for this purpose. Our results of Western blotting concerning TLR9 expression were not conclusive. Immunoblotting revealed a molecular weight of
200 kDa of the glycoprotein (Fig. 2b)
. As glycosylation patterns are cell type-specific, this result would argue for an increased carbohydrate fraction in DC as compared with human embryonic kidney cells [43
, 44
]. However, our attempts to stain deglycosylated TLR9 using the available antibodies were not successful. The need for high amounts of total cellular protein together with a sensitive detection method indicates that TLR9 is expressed at low numbers. It is surprising that moDC and pDC showed bands of comparable intensity (Fig. 2b)
. This result proposes that the cell type-specific and different effects of CpG ODN stimulation depend on further, as-yet unknown factors. These may also be responsible for the cell type-specific preference for CpG ODN sequences.
At Day 6 of in vitro generation, moDC captured fluorochrome-labeled D19 and K3 into vesicular structures (Fig. 3) . CpG ODN prestimulation did not down-regulate the endocytotic potential and thus, did not result in the mature phenotype observed in moDC treated with the cytokine cocktail plus CD40L.
During in vitro generation, moDC spontaneously access a maturation program [1
, 12
]. However, compared with untreated and control D-treated cells, D19 stimulation resulted in a further increased expression of the costimulatory molecule CD86, the maturation marker CD83, and of HLA-DR (Fig. 4a)
. The level of HLA-DR in D19-stimulated moDC was even higher than the expression reported for ODN 2216-stimulated, IFN-
secreting pDC [45
]. In previous studies about stimulation of moDC and mDC, K-type CpG ODN did not result in moDC stimulation [29
, 31
, 32
], nor did K3, used in this study (Fig. 4a)
. The as-yet used CpG-A ODNs did not activate moDC either. However, ODN 1585 and 1668 contain a murine CpG motif [46
, 47
], and ODN 2216 contains two CpG motifs [29
], whereas CpG-A ODNs typically contain only one CpG motif.
After LPS treatment, more cells showed surface expression for CD86, CD83, and HLA-DR as compared with D19 (Fig. 4a)
. Nonetheless, D19 and LPS applications resulted in elevated levels of CD4+-T cell proliferation together with Th1 differentiation (Fig. 6a
and 6b)
. Without further CD40L costimulation, D19 did not lead to secretion of typical moDC inflammatory cytokines, including the Th1-inducing IL-12 (Fig. 6)
. The microarray analysis using the Affymetrix platform pointed to an involvement of Type I IFN (Table 1)
, and in fact, D19 induced moDC to secrete IFN-
(Fig. 7)
. The absolute amounts of produced IFN-
showed a donor-dependent variability. The reason could not be analyzed further as a result of the donors anonymity. However, two of the four D19-stimulated moDC preparations produced IFN-
at 1/20 and 1/50 of the amounts of pDC and thus topped the IFN-
production of any other virus-infected blood cells (Fig. 7)
[17
]. Further support for the regulation of transcription of IFN-
is provided by detection of IRFs using microarray analysis. In addition to IRF1 (Table 1)
, dim up-regulation (1.7-fold) of IRF7 was observed in D19-stimulated moDC, suggesting a feedback mechanism for IFN-
as postulated recently [48
]. IFN-
participates in the induction of adaptive immune responses [48
49
50
]. Besides augmentation of costimulatory molecules, IFN-
is also supposed to polarize T cells into the Th1 subset [51
]. CpG ODN-stimulated pDC can activate mDC, possibly via IFN-
[17
, 33
]. MoDC stimulated directly by D19 produce IFN-
by themselves and thus need no help from pDC. Moreover, it could be speculated that in the periphery, DC different from pDC have the capacity to react immediately on pathogenic invaders by activating cytotoxic NK cells via IFN-
.
moDC are considered promising therapeutic vaccines in cancer [52 ]. The strength of their activation by D19 is less intense as compared with LPS, probably the most potent inflammatory, naturally occurring stimulus. However, TLR agonist combinations synergistically trigger a Th1-polarizing program in mDC and moDC [53 ]. Therefore, inclusion of D19 in combined moDC stimulation could be relevant for immunotherapy.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received January 6, 2006; revised July 21, 2006; accepted August 19, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(1)β(2), Fas ligand, and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand J. Immunol. 168,1831-1839
J. Exp. Med. 179,1109-1118
production J. Exp. Med. 202,135-143
-globin locus: implications for evolution of the
-globin pseudogene EMBO J. 6,999-1004[Medline]
induction in plasmacytoid dendritic cells Eur. J. Immunol. 33,1633-1641[CrossRef][Medline]
/β in plasmacytoid dendritic cells Eur. J. Immunol. 31,2154-2163[CrossRef][Medline]
as an immunotherapeutic protein J. Leukoc. Biol. 71,565-581This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Nierkens, M. H. den Brok, R. P.M. Sutmuller, O. M. Grauer, E. Bennink, M. E. Morgan, C. G. Figdor, T. J.M. Ruers, and G. J. Adema In vivo Colocalization of Antigen and Cytidyl Guanosyl within Dendritic Cells Is Associated with the Efficacy of Cancer Immunotherapy Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 5390 - 5396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, G. Roderiquez, T. Jones, P. McPhie, and M. A. Norcross Control of In Vitro Immune Responses by Regulatory Oligodeoxynucleotides through Inhibition of pIII Promoter Directed Expression of MHC Class II Transactivator in Human Primary Monocytes J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |