PeproTech Inc.
Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.1105693 on March 24, 2006

Published online before print March 24, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.1105693v1
79/6/1357    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Kehrl, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Kehrl, J. H.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2006;79:1357-1368.)
© 2006 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

RGS1 and RGS13 mRNA silencing in a human B lymphoma line enhances responsiveness to chemoattractants and impairs desensitization

Jang-Il Han, Ning-Na Huang, Dong-Uk Kim and John H. Kehrl1

Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

1Correspondence: Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Room 11B08, 10 Center Dr., MSC 1876, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: jkehrl{at}niaid.nih.gov


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Chemokines bind receptors that are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. Chemokine receptors transduce intracellular signals by activating heterotrimeric G-proteins. Acting to limit and modulate heterotrimeric G-protein signaling is a family of proteins, termed regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS). Two of these proteins, RGS1 and RGS13, are well-expressed in germinal center B cells and many Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines. Reducing RGS13 and to a lesser extent RGS1 expression in a Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line enhances responsiveness to two chemokines, CXC chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) and CXCL13, and reducing both mRNAs augments the responses more dramatically. The double knock-down (KD) cells respond better to restimulation with CXCL12 or CXCL13 after a primary stimulation with CXCL12 than do the control cells. The double-KD cells also exhibit a greater propensity to polarize and to develop multiple small lamellipodia. These results indicate that RGS1 and RGS13 act together to regulate chemokine receptor signaling in human germinal center B lymphocytes and provide evidence that they contribute significantly to the rapid desensitization of the signaling pathway.

Key Words: B lymphocyte • calcium • chemokine


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The recirculation of naïve and memory B cells; the egress of immature B cells from the bone marrow; the trafficking of B cells into B cell follicles and germinal centers within lymphoid tissues; and the appropriate localization of plasma cells depend on a regulated configuration of cell surface adhesion molecules and chemoattractant receptors and the appropriate localization of several different chemoattractants [1 2 3 4 ]. For the trafficking of immature B cells, naïve B cells, memory B cells, and plasma cells, prominent roles have been ascribed to the chemokine receptors CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), CXCR5, CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7), CCR9, and CCR10 [5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ].

Most chemoattracant and chemokine receptors couple to the Gi subfamily of heterotrimeric G-proteins [12 ]. The binding of ligand activates receptors triggering G{alpha}i subunits to exchange guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP) for guanosine 5'-diphosphate. This leads to the dissociation of the G{alpha}i subunit from its associated Gß{gamma} heterodimer, and both components can then activate downstream effectors [13 , 14 ]. The release of Gi-associated Gß{gamma} subunits is essential for triggering directional migration [15 16 17 ]. As G{alpha} subunits possess an intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity, GTP hydrolysis leads to the reassembly of heterotrimeric G-protein, causing signaling to cease. B lymphocytes strongly express two members of the Gi subfamily, G{alpha}i2 and G{alpha}i3 [12 ]. Mice deficient in Gnai3 are reportedly without a phenotype [18 ]; however, Gnai2–/– mice exhibit defective chemokine receptor signaling as evidenced by impaired lymph node development; poor B cell chemotaxis to CXC chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), CXCL13, and CC chemokine ligand 19 (CCL19); and defective homing of transferred B cells to lymph nodes [19 , 20 ].

A variety of regulatory mechanisms exists to control the magnitude and duration of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling. One of the most prominent is the existent of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which dramatically accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of G{alpha} subunits [21 22 23 24 25 26 ]. These proteins are termed regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS). By reducing the duration that a G{alpha} subunit remains GTP-bound and thereby, facilitating the reassembly of the inactive, heterotrimeric G-protein, RGS proteins can decrease G{alpha}-GTP effector activation and decrease free Gß{gamma} availability. Most of the RGS proteins have GAP activity for G{alpha}i and/or G{alpha}q subunits. As chemokine receptors use Gi and perhaps Gq to transduce intracellular signals, the presence of a RGS protein in target cells can substantially alter the response to chemokine stimulation. Germinal center B lymphocytes prominently express at least two RGS proteins, RGS1 and RGS13, as do many Burkitt’s lymphoma cells lines [27 , 28 ]. Burkitt’s lymphomas likely arise from germinal center B cells and retain many characteristics of these cells. Consistent with a role for RGS1 and RGS13 in regulating the B cell responses to chemokines, the expression of RGS1 or RGS13 in a variety of cell lines reduces CXCR4 and CXCR5 signaling, including impairing increases in intracellular calcium([Ca2+]i), chemotaxis, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation [27 , 28 ]. Conversely, Rgs1 disruption in mice enhances germinal center formation and chemoattractant responses of purified germinal center B cells [29 ]. To examine the role of endogenous RGS1 and RGS13 in human B cell lymphoma cell lines, we used a short hairpin (sh)RNA approach to reduce the expression of RGS1, RGS13, or both proteins and explored the effects on chemokine receptor signaling. Our results suggest that RGS1 and RGS13 act together to potently inhibit CXCR4 and to a lesser extent, CXCR5 signaling in these cells and function in the early desensitization of the signaling pathway.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Reagents
CXCL12 and CXCL13 were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Platelet-activating factor (PAF) and doxycycline were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) and Becton Dickinson (San Jose, CA), respectively. Doxycycline was used at concentrations of 1–2 µg/ml. Human RGS13, C-terminally tagged with green flouorescent protein (GFP), was prepared by inserting the RGS13 coding sequence into pcDNA3.1/carboxy terminus-GFP-topoisomerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and subsequently into the EcoRI site of plasmid adeno-associated virus-multiple cloning sites (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Human RGS1, C-terminally tagged with GFP, was prepared by inserting the RGS1 coding sequence into the EcoRI/BamHI sites in pEGFP-N1 (BD Biosciences Clontech, Mountain View, CA). CD19, CXCR4, CXCR5, and CCR7 monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Becton Dickinson. ERK and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) antibodies were obtained from Biosource International (Camarillo, CA). Anti-GFP polyclonal antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (CA). HeLa and HS-Sultan cells were obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (Manassas, VA).

Production of constructs for noninducible short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) and inducible shRNAs
A U6 promoter-based shRNA vector (pENTR/U6, Invitrogen) was used for the noninducible shRNA experiments. Twelve 60 base pair cDNA oligonucleotides were designed and synthesized to target RGS1 or RGS13 mRNA expression. The design of the shRNAs was assisted by the use of web-based software provided by Qiagen Inc. (Valenica, CA; http://www.qiagen.com/Products/GeneSilencing/customSiRna/SiRnaDesigner.aspx) and Invitrogen (http://rnaidesigner.invitrogen.com/rnaiexpress/). Blast searches were performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information expressed sequence tag database to ensure that the shRNA construct only targeted human RGS1 or RGS13 expression. After annealing, double-strand oligos were inserted to the pENTR/U6 Gateway vector system (Invitrogen). The resulting plasmids were sequenced and then transfected into HeLa cells along with a construct expressing RGS1 or RGS13 fused to GFP. Reduction of target protein levels was analyzed by immunoblotting for GFP expression using a GFP-specific antibody. Those shRNA constructs that showed a 95% reduction of target proteins were selected and transferred to a lentivirus-based system using Gateway protocols (Invitrogen). The final double-strand oligo DNAs for human RGS1 were as follows: top strand, adaptor-stem (sense), loop-stem (antisense) 5'-caccGGAAGTTTCCTAAAGTCTGAAttcaagagaTTCAGACTTTAGGAAACTTCC-3'; bottom strand, adaptor-stem (sense), loop-stem (antisense) 5'-aaaaGGAAGTTTCCTAAAGTCTGAAtctcttgaaTTCAGACTTTAGGAAACTTCC-3'. For human RGS13, they were: top strand, adaptor-stem (sense), loop-stem (antisense) 5'-caccgCTATGCAGTCCAACAACAGttcaagagaCTGTTGTTGGACTGCATAG-3'; bottom strand, adaptor-stem (sense), loop-stem (antisense) 5'-aaaaCTATGCAGTCCAACAACAGtctcttgaaCTGTTGTTGGACTGCATAGc-3'. (Capital letters are target sequences of RGS1 or RGS13.) For negative control, we used empty vectors or firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase sequence from pGL3 plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI). The final double-strand oligo DNAs for luciferase shRNA were: top strand, adaptor-stem (sense), loop, 5'-caccgAAGGCTCCTCAGAAACAGCTCttcaagaga; bottom strand, adaptor-loop-stem (antisense) 5'-aaaatctcttgaaGAGCTGTTTCTGAGGAGCCTTc-3'. [Capital letters are sequences from the firefly (P. pyralis) luciferase sequence.] An H1 promoter-based shRNA vector (pENTR/H1/TO, Invitrogen) was used for the inducible shRNA system. This inducible RNA vector contains two copies of regulatory elements from the Escherichia coli Tn10-encoded tetracycline (tet)-resistance operon in the H1 promoter region. In this system, expression of shRNA of interest is repressed by tet repressor protein (tetR) in the absence of tet (or doxycycline) and induced in its presence. The shRNA target sequences for RGS1 and RGS13 were the same as the noninducible system.

Gateway cloning
Gateway recombination cloning reactions were performed as suggested by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). pENTR-U6-shRNA or pENTR/H1/TO-shRNA plasmid was recombined with destination vectors pLenti-Hygro-DEST and pLenti-puro-DEST using the Gateway cloning system to generate the noninducible shRNA constructs (pLenti-Hygro-U6-shRNA and pLenti-puro-U6-shRNA) or inducible shRNA constructs (pLenti-Hygro-H1/TO-shRNA and pLenti-puro-H1/TO-shRNA). To generate the new Gateway DEST vector, the pLenti6/BLOCK-iT-DEST vector was modified. The antibiotic-resistance genes from commercial vectors were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers shown in Table 1 . Each resistance module had a 5' PmlI and 3' KpnI site, which were introduced during the PCR. The antibiotic-resistance module were then inserted into pLenti6/BLOCK-iT-DEST vector using PmlI and KpnI sites. Each antibiotic-resistance modules is under control of the simian virus 40 early promoter in the DEST vectors. The entry plasmids, destination plasmids, and final lentiviral shRNA plasmids are shown in Table 2 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primers Used for PCR of Resistance Modules


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. The Entry Plasmids, Destination Plasmids, and Final Lentiviral shRNA Plasmids

Producing lentivirus in 293T cells
All recombinant lentiviruses were produced by transient transfection of 293T cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen) with minor modifications. Briefly, subconfluent 293T cells (10 cm plate) were cotransfected with 10 µg lentiviral-shRNA plasmid, 10 µg pLP1, 10 µg pLP2, and 10 µg pLP/vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Lentivirus-containing supernatants of transfected cells were collected at 48 h; the solution was 0.2 µm-filtered and ultracentrifugated at 25,000 rpm for 90 min. The enriched virus pellet was resuspended in 500 µl phosphate-buffered saline and stored at –70°C.

Construction of stable cell lines
To generate inducible cell lines, we made tetR-expressing cell lines using pLent6-T-Rex (pLenti6/TR) virus infections (Invitrogen). The virally infected cells were treated with blastcidin (5–10 µg/ml) for 4 weeks. The blasticidin-resistant cells were selected, and tetR protein level was checked by immunoblotting. Next, we infected shRNA-expressing lentivius into the tetR-expressing cell lines. In this step, the lentiviruses have antibiotic selection markers (hygromycin resistance and/or puromycin resistance), and cells were selected using the appropriate drug. The noninducible cell lines were generated by shRNA expressing viral infection of normal cell lines. The antibiotic selection was conducted for 4 weeks, and stable cell lines were established.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR
For the quantitative RT-PCR, a Roche light cycler was used with a Light Cycler Fast Start DNA Master SYBR Green kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Melting curve analysis was performed to control the specificity of PCR product fluorescence. The value of the crossing point was determined for each gene and sample during real-time PCR. The value of the crossing point represents the number of cycles where fluorescence levels of each sample are the same. Plasmids with the appropriate PCR insert subcloned served as the control templates.

HS-Sultan cell migration
Chemotaxis assays were performed using a transwell chamber as described previously [29 ]. In some experiments, cells were preincubated with 100 ng/ml pertussis toxin (PTX) for 2 h at 37°C. The cells were washed twice, resuspended in complete RPMI-1640 medium, and added in a volume of 100 µl to the upper wells of a 24-well transwell plate with a 5-µm insert (Corning Glass, Corning, NY). Lower wells contained various doses of chemokines in 600 µl complete RPMI-1640 medium. The number of cells that migrated to the lower well following a 3-h incubation was counted using a flow cytometer. The chemotaxis index was calculated by dividing the number of cells that migrated in response to chemokine by the number of cells that migrated in the absence of chemokine.

Determination of changes in [Ca2+]i
Cells were seeded at a density of 20,000 cells in 100 µl loading medium [RPMI 1640, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)] into poly-D-lysine-coated 96-well blackwall, clear-bottom microtiter plates (Nalgene Nunc, Rochester, NY). An equal volume of assay loading buffer (FLIPR Calcium 3 assay kit, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) in Hanks’ balanced salt solution supplemented with 20 mM HEPES and 2 mM probenecid was added. Cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C before adding chemokine, and then the calcium flux peak was measured using a FlexStation (Molecular Devices). The data were analyzed with SOFT max Pro (Molecular Devices). Data are shown as fluorescent counts, and the y-axis was labeled as Lm1.

Immunoblotting
Cell lysates were prepared as described previously [28 ]. The detergent-insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 4°C. Equal amounts of proteins from each sample were fractionated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to pure nitrocellulose. Membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tween 20 plus Tris-buffered saline (TTBS) for 1 h and then incubated with an appropriate dilution of the primary antibody in 5% BSA in TTBS for 2 h. The blots were incubated with biotinylated antibody for 1 h and further incubated with streptavidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h. The signal was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Quantitative changes in the signal were determined following scanning the films using Photoshop (Abode Systems, San Jose, CA).

Imaging
All fluorescent images were collected on an inverted confocal microscope, a Perkin-Elmer Ultraview spinning wheel confocal system (Wellesley, MA) mounted on Zeiss Axiovert 200 and equipped with an argon/krypton laser, an Orca-ERII charged-coupled device camera (Hamamatsu, Japan), and filters suitable for the visualization of fluorescein isothiocyanate and red dyes. The cells were plated on fibronectin-coated glass-bottom culture dishes (MatTek Corp., Ashland, MA) in RPMI with 10% FBS. The cells were maintained in an environment with 5% CO2 at 37°C using an environmental controller system (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Images were recorded over time and collected using a 63x Plan-Aprochromax 1.4 oil immersion objective. To measure [Ca2+]i, individual cells were loaded with a long-wavelength Ca2+ indicator fluo-4/AM (5 µM, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), for 1 h at 37°C prior to plating on the culture dishes mentioned above. When excited at 488 nm, fluo-4 exhibits an increase in green fluorescence (525 nm) upon Ca2+ binding. The dye-loaded cells were scanned with the Ultraview confocal, and the fluorescent image was acquired every 15 s followed by a differential interference contrast image. Adobe Photoshop (v. 6.0) was used to prepare composite images and for annotations. Ultraview 5.5 (Perkin-Elmer) and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems) were used for the image processing. The numbers of polarized cells and cells with multiple lamellipodia were determined by visible inspection of 50–100 cells.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Reduction of RGS13 expression in the Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line HS-Sultan
HS-Sultan cells prominently express RGS13 and less so RGS1. Because of the high expression of RGS13 in these cells, we initially focused on developing shRNA constructs that target RGS13 mRNA expression. We chose six potential sites in the RGS13 mRNA sequence and subcloned the shRNA target sequences into the BLOCK-iTTM U6 entry vector. We screened each of the knock-down (KD) constructs by cotransfecting HeLa cells with a construct that expresses RGS13 fused to a GFP (RGS13-GFP) and then immunoblotting cell lysates for the level of the RGS13-GFP. Of the six shRNA-expressing constructs we tested, one of them reduced the expression of RGS13-GFP by more than 90% (Fig. 1A ). This construct was then transferred to the pLenti-Hygro-DEST vector (Tables 1 and 2) to make pLenti-Hygro-H1/TO-RGS1 shRNA. Using this plasmid, we produced lentivirus for stable expression in lymphocyte cell lines. A vector that expresses a control shRNA was prepared similarly. After virus production, we transduced HS-Sultan cells and a HS-Sultan subline, which had been selected by repeatedly taking cells that failed to migrate in a standard CXCL12 filter-based chemotaxis assay. The derived subline responded poorly to CXCL12 and CXCL13 and expressed higher amounts of RGS1 and RGS13 (Chantal Moratz, manuscript in preparation). Next, we tested RGS13 mRNA expression in the control shRNA and RGS13 shRNA-expressing cells by RT-PCR. HS-Sultan and the HS-Sultan subline KD cells had low residual expression (Fig. 1B) . To further document the RGS13 mRNA reduction, we performed quantitative RT-PCR. In HS-Sultan cells and in the subline, we found that we had reduced RGS13 expression by 95% and 99%, respectively (Table 3 ). We used HS-Sultan cells expressing the RGS13 shRNA or control shRNA in subsequent experiments. Assessment of CXCR4, CXCR5, CCR7, and CD19 expression by flow cytometry revealed nearly identical expression levels in the control and shRGS13-expressing cells (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. RGS13 mRNA silencing enhances G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. (A) Selection of a RGS13 shRNA. HeLa cells were transfected with six different shRNA RGS13 (lanes 2–7) constructs and with a construct that expresses RGS13-GFP (lanes 1–7). The level of RGS13-GFP expression was detected by immunoblotting with a GFP-specific antibody. (B) RGS13 mRNA expression in HS-Sultan (HS-S) and an HS-Sultan subline (HS-SR) expressing a RGS13 shRNA or a control shRNA. The level of RGS13 mRNA and actin mRNA was determined by RT-PCR. (C) Decreased RGS13 mRNA expression enhances CXCL12, CXCL13, and PAF-induced increases in [Ca2+]i. HS-Sultan control shRNA (Cont KD) and RGS13 KD cells were stimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml), CXCL13 (1 µg/ml), or PAF (1 µM), and changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 3 min. Either duplicate of triplicate determinations is shown. (D) Enhanced migration of RGS13 KD versus control shRNA-expressing cells. Filter-based chemotaxis assays with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml), CXCL13 (1 µg/ml), or PAF (1 µM). Chemotaxis index is shown. The results are from triplicate determinations in two separate experiments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Cell Lines

Reduction of RGS13 mRNA expression enhances chemoattractant signaling
We first tested whether reducing RGS13 expression affected chemokine-induced increases in [Ca2+]i by exposing the control shRNA or the RGS13 shRNA-expressing HS-Sultan cells that had been loaded with a calcium indicator dye to CXCL12, CXCL13, or PAF. We found that in the cells expressing the RGS13 shRNA as compared with the control cells, there was a substantially greater increase in [Ca2+]i following stimulation with each ligand (Fig. 1C) . Although the slope of the initial rise of [Ca2+]i following CXCL12 stimulation of the RGS13 shRNA-expressing cells exceeded that of the control cells, other experiments did not confirm that difference. As expected, the increases in [Ca2+]i in response to CXCL12 or CXCL13 were inhibited by pretreating the control or the RGS13 shRNA-expressing cells with PTX, which inhibits G{alpha}i activation (data not shown). As the PAF receptor (PAFR) couples to G{alpha}i and G{alpha}q, and both contribute to the mobilization of [Ca2+]i, the increases in [Ca2+]i in response to PAF were only partially inhibited by PTX (data not shown).

Next, we examined the migration of control shRNA and RGS13 shRNA-expressing cells to CXCL12, CXCL13, and PAF using filter-based migration assays. The RGS13 shRNA-expressing cells responded better to each of the chemoattractants than did the control shRNA cells (Fig. 1D) .

Inducible reduction of RGS13 expression also reveals enhanced chemoattractant signaling
The previous experiments compared a cell line expressing a control shRNA to one expressing a RGS13 shRNA. Inherent in the interpretation of these results is the assumption that despite the selection procedures and the long-term expression of two different shRNAs (control and RGS13), the cell lines differ only in their levels of RGS13 expression. An alternative approach, which bypasses the need for selecting separate cell lines expressing a control and the experimental shRNA and allows the comparison of cells shortly after the mRNA KD, is to use an inducible system to express the shRNA. Therefore, we prepared lentivirus, which expresses the shRNA-targeting RGS13 expression under the control of tet operator sequences. We transfected HS-Sultan cells with a pLenti6/TR lentivirus and selected a cell line that stably expressed tetR, referred to it as HS-SultanT. We transduced that cell line with a high-titer lentivirus prepared using pLentis-Hygro-H1/TO-RGS13 shRNA vector (Tables 1 and 2) and called these cells HS-SultanT13. Next, we induced expression of the RGS13 shRNA by treating the cells with doxycycline for various durations and examined RGS13 expression by RT-PCR. To maximally reduce RGS13 expression required approximately 1 week of treatment. A comparison between the noninduced cells (i.e., control) and cells treated with doxycycline for 1 week is shown (Fig. 2A ). To better quantify the decrease in RGS13 expression, we measured RGS13 mRNA using quantitative RT-PCR and found a 92% reduction in the doxycycline-treated HS-SultanT13 cells (Table 3) .


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Inducible silencing of RGS13 mRNA enhances GPCR signaling. (A) RGS13 mRNA in HS-SultanT13 cells induced or not to express the RGS13 shRNA. RT-PCR preformed to assess RGS13 and actin mRNA levels in noninduced (i.e., control) and cells induced to express the RGS13 shRNA (RGS13 KD). (B) Inducible decrease in RGS13 mRNA expression enhances CXCL12, CXCL13, and PAF-triggered increases in [Ca2+]i. HS-SultanT13 cells, induced to express the RGS13 shRNA or not, were stimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml), CXCL13 (1 µg/ml), or PAF (1 µM), and changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 3 min. Either duplicate of triplicate determinations is shown. (C) Inducible decrease in RGS13 mRNA expression enhances migration to CXCL12 and PAF. Filter-based chemotaxis assays with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml) or PAF (1 µM). Chemotaxis index is shown. The results are the mean of triplicate determinations for each chemoattractant, which varied less than 10% per individual measurement. (D) Inducible decrease in RGS13 mRNA expression enhances CXCL12-induced ERK activation. Noninduced and induced HS-SultanT13 cells were stimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml) for varying durations. Cell lysates were immunoblotted for pERK and total ERK. Similar results were obtained in two experiments. Fold induction of pERK is shown.

Overall, the results using the inducible system were similar to the results we had observed previously. The reduction of RGS13 mRNA expression resulted in increased levels of [Ca2+]i in response to stimulation with CXCL12, CXCL13, or PAF as compared with the nondoxycycline-treated cells (Fig. 2B) . In addition, the RGS13 shRNA-induced cells had a greater migratory response to CXCL12 and PAF compared with the noninduced cells and increased induction of pERK1/2 in response to CXCL12 stimulation (Fig. 2C and 2D) . However, the magnitudes of the differences between shRNA-induced cells and noninduced cells were not as striking as in the first set of experiments. Perhaps accounting for this difference, the residual RGS13 expression in the cells expressing the inducible RGS13 shRNA exceeded the levels present in cells constitutively expressing it.

Reduction of RGS1 expression in HS-Sultan cells minimally enhances chemoattractant signaling
Although HS-Sultan cells express relatively low amounts of RGS1 mRNA, it is readily detectable by RT-PCR. Previous studies had shown that overexpression of RGS1 in HS-Sultan cells blunted responses to CXCL12 and PAF [27 ]. To determine whether reducing the basal level of RGS1 expression in HS-Sultan cells augmented chemoattractant signaling, we used a similar approach as we had for the second set of experiments with RGS13. First, we screened a panel of candidate shRNAs targeted at RGS1 expression. We found that three of the six chosen shRNA sequences produced a significant reduction of RGS1-GFP expression and chose one that produced a 90% decrease (Fig. 3A ). We produced the corresponding lentivirus (Tables 1 and 2) to infect HS-Sultan T cells and selected a stable cell line, HS-SultanT1. A 1-week treatment of that cell line with doxycycline produced an 85% reduction of RGS1 expression (Table 3) . We compared these cells to noninduced cells (i.e., control) and examined their responsiveness to chemoattractants. We found a modest increase in [Ca2+]i, following chemoattractant exposure compared with the control cells (Fig. 3B) . We also noted a small increase in specific migration in the doxycycline-treated HS-SultanT1 compared with the noninduced cells (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Inducible silencing of RGS1 mRNA minimally enhances GPCR signaling. (A) Selection of a RGS1 shRNA. HeLa cells were transfected with five different RGS1 shRNA (lanes 1–5) constructs and with a construct that expresses RGS1-GFP (lanes 1–6). The level of RGS1-GFP expression was detected by immunoblotting with a GFP-specific antibody. RGS1 and actin mRNA expression in HS-SultanT1 noninduced cells (lane 7) or RGS1 shRNA-induced cells (lane 8) was determined by RT-PCR. (B) Decreased RGS1 mRNA expression minimally enhances CXCL12, CXCL13, and PAF-induced increases in [Ca2+]i. HS-SultanT1 cells, induced or not, were stimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml), CXCL13 (1 µg/ml), or PAF (1 µM), and changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 3 min. Either duplicate of triplicate determinations is shown.

Reduction of RGS1 and RGS13 expression in HS-Sultan cells further augments chemoattractant signaling
To examine the consequences of reducing the expression of RGS1 and RGS13, we used the RGS1 shRNA (puromycin resistance, pLenti-Puro-H1/TO-RGS1) and prepared RGS1 shRNA lentivirus. This virus was used to infect the HS-SultanT13 cells and produced a cell line we called HS-SultanT1/31 cells. We assayed these cells for RGS1 and RGS13 mRNA expression following treatment with doxycycline or not. Treatment reduced the expression of RGS1 and RGS13 significantly compared with the untreated cells. Analysis of the RNAs from the induced and noninduced (control) cells by quantitative RT-PCR revealed an 89% reduction in RGS1 and an 83% reduction in RGS13 (Fig. 4A and Table 3 ). Treatment with doxycycline did not alter the expression of CXCR4, CXCR5, CCR7, or CD19 as documented by flow cytometry (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Reduction of RGS1 and RGS13 expression potently enhances GPCR signaling. (A) Inducible expression of RGS1 and RGS13 shRNAs reduces RGS1 and RGS13 expression. RGS1, RGS13, and actin mRNA expression in HS-SultanT1/13-noninduced (lanes 2, 4, and 6) or doxycycline-induced cells (RGS1/13 KD; lanes 1, 3, 5) determined by RT-PCR. (B) Decreased RGS1 and RGS13 expression enhances PAF-induced increases in [Ca2+]i. HS-SultanT1/13 cells, induced to express the RGS1 and RGS13 shRNAs or not, were stimulated with varying concentrations of PAF, and changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 3 min. Each ligand concentration produced a greater increase in [Ca2+]i than the preceding lower concentration. (C) A more pronounced difference between control and double-KD cells at higher PAF concentration. The data from a previous experiment are plotted with percent of maximum [Ca2+]i response on the y-axis versus concentration of PAF on the x-axis. (D) Decreased RGS1 and RGS13 expression enhances a CXCL12-induced increases in [Ca2+]i. HS-SultanT1/13 cells induced to express the RGS1 and RGS13 shRNAs or not were stimulated with varying concentrations of CXCL12, and changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 3 min. Each ligand concentration produced a greater increase in [Ca2+]i than the preceding, lower concentration. (E) A more pronounced difference between control and double-KD cells at higher CXCL12 concentrations. The data from a previous experiment are plotted with percent of maximum [Ca2+]i response on the y-axis versus concentration of CXCL12 on the x-axis. (F) Enhanced migration of HS-SultanT1/13-induced cells versus noninduced cells. Filter-based chemotaxis assays with increasing concentrations of CXCL12. Chemotaxis index is shown. The results are from triplicate determinations from two experiments. (G) Enhanced ERK activation in RGS1/13 KD cells. Induced and noninduced HS-SultanT1/13 cells were stimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml) for varying durations. Cell lysates were immunoblotted for pERK and total ERK. Fold increase in pERK levels is shown. Similar results were obtained in three experiments.

The double-KD cells exhibited a much stronger increase in [Ca2+]i following stimulation with PAF as compared with the control cells (noninduced, Fig. 4B ). We also graphed the percent of the maximum amplitude of the response versus the concentration of PAF. The difference between the control cells and double-KD cells became more evident at the higher concentrations of ligand (Fig. 4C) . A similar analysis was performed using CXCL12 to elicit an increase in [Ca2+]i. Again the double-KD cells responded better than did the control cells, and the differences were most pronounced at the higher concentrations of CXCL12 (Fig. 4D and 4E) . Despite the relatively low expression of RGS1, the coreduction of RGS1 and RGS13 expression significantly augmented the responses compared with what we had observed previously with the individual RGS1 and RGS13 KD cell lines.

Next, we examined the responsiveness of the induced HS-SultanT1/13 cells to CXCL12-triggered cell migration. The specific migration of the induced cells (RGS1/13 KD) significantly exceeded that of the noninduced cells (Fig. 4F) . Finally, we examined ERK activation in response to stimulation with CXCL12. Treatment with CXCL12 triggered good ERK activation—substantially better than we observed with the noninduced cells (Fig. 4G) .

Decreased RGS1 and RGS13 mRNA expression impairs chemokine receptor desensitization
Next, we tested the ability of the nontreated and doxycycline-treated HS-SultanT1/13 cells to respond to a challenge with a second chemokine after a primary challenge. We exposed the cells to CXCL13 and rechallenged 15 min later with CXCL12 and measured the changes in [Ca2+]i. We found an unimpeded, secondary response to CXCL12 in the noninduced cells and the doxycycline-treated HS-SultanT1/13 cells (Fig. 5A ). However, when we reversed the order, we found that although the induced cells responded normally to the secondary challenge with CXCL13, the noninduced cells did not. This suggested that the primary exposure to CXCL12 had desensitized the noninduced cells to a secondary CXCL13 challenge but had not desensitized the doxycycline-treated HS-SultanT1/31 cells (Fig. 5B) . As the magnitudes of the responses elicited by the two chemokines differed, we expressed the magnitude of the secondary response as a percentage of that observed in the same cell type to the same chemokine in the absence of a primary challenge (Fig. 5C) .


Figure 5
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. RGS1 and RGS13 mRNA silencing impairs early desensitization of the signaling pathway. (A) CXCL13 does not desensitize CXCL12-induced increases in [Ca2+]i. HS-SultanT1/13 cells, induced to express the RGS1 and RGS13 shRNAs or not, were stimulated with CXCL13 (1 µg/ml) and 15 min later, stimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml). Changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 18 min. (B) CXCL12 desensitizes CXCL13-induced increases in [Ca2+]i more so in control than RGS1/13 KD cells. Noninduced and induced HS-SultanT1/13 cells were stimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml) and 15 min later, stimulated with CXCL13 (1 µg/ml). Changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 20 min. (C) Analysis of [Ca2+]i tracings in noninduced and induced HS-SultanT1/13 cells (RGS1/13 KD). Areas under each of the calcium tracing shown in A and B are graphed and expressed as a percentage of the expected response for each cell type if it had not been stimulated previously with chemokine. (D) Impaired CXCL12 desensitization in RGS1/13 KD cells compared with control cells. HS-SultanT1/13, induced or not, was stimulated with CXCL12 (25 ng/ml) and 3 (upper left), 5 (upper right), or 15 min (lower) later, restimulated with CXCL12 (100 ng/ml). Changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored over 6, 8, or 20 min as indicated. (E) Analysis of [Ca2+]i tracings in control and RGS1/13 KD cells. Areas under each of the calcium tracing shown in D are graphed. The results are expressed as a percentage of the primary response for the noninduced (Control) and induced cells (RGS1/13 KD).

To examine homologous desensitization, we rechallenged the two cell lines 3, 5, and 15 min after a primary exposure to CXCL12. As the magnitude of the primary response differed between the two cell lines, we plotted the secondary response as a percentage of the primary response. The noninduced (control cells) and induced cells (double-KD cells) desensitized, although on a percentage basis, the control cells desensitized more than did the double-KD cells (Fig. 5D and 5E) . Both cell lines demonstrated a greater level of desensitization when rechallenged at 15 min after the primary challenge than at 5 min and even less so at 3 min. Thus, the difference between the noninduced and induced cells was most evident when the rechallenge occurred early after the primary challenge and was less evident when the secondary challenge occurred later.

Reduction of RGS1 and RGS13 expression alters basal and chemokine-induced cell polarization and the distribution of [Ca2+]i
We also examined the morphology of the nontreated and doxycycline-treated HS-SultanT1/13 cells following exposure to CXCL12. We plated noninduced and induced cells on fibronectin-coated tissue-culture dishes incubated then for 1 h prior to moving the cells to the microscope stage, where they were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2. The cells were stimulated by adding 25 ng/ml CXCL12 and imaged every 15 s for 5 min and then restimulated 5 min later by adding an additional 100 ng/ml CXCL12 and imaged every 15 s for 5 min. We noted some minor morphological differences between the noninduced and the induced cells even prior to stimulation, as many more induced cells had visible filopodia (Fig. 6A and 6B , 0 Minute panels). Five minutes after stimulation, we noted that more of the shRNA-induced cells had a polarized morphology compared with the noninduced cells (Fig . 6A and 6B , 5 Minutes panels). By 15 min after the initial stimulation, the majority of the induced cells had polarized or had adopted an unusual morphology of multiple small lamellipodia; in contrast, the noninduced cells had a similar appearance as those 5 min after stimulation (Fig . 6A and 6B , note 15 and 20 Minutes panels’ insets). Five minutes after the second stimulation, the noninduced and induced HS-SultanT1/31 cells had not changed noticeably (Fig . 6A and 6B , 20 Minutes panels).


Figure 6
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. RGS1 and RGS13 mRNA silencing alters cellular morphology. (A and B) Effect of CXCL12 on control and RGS1/13 KD cell morphology. HS-SultanT1/13 cells induced to express the RGS1 and RGS13 shRNAs or not were plated on fibronectin-coated culture dishes, stimulated with CXCL12 (25 ng/ml), and imaged for 5 min at 15 s intervals. Ten minutes later, an additional 100 ng/ml CXCL12 was added, and the cells were imaged for an additional 5 min. Images collected before and 5, 15, and 20 min after the primary stimulation are shown. The 20-min image is 5 min after the secondary stimulus. A 45-µ bar is shown in some of the images. Electronic blow-ups of two RGS1/13 KD cells after stimulation are shown in the insets. (C and D) [Ca2+]i changes in control and RGS1/13 KD cells, respectively. HS-SultanT1/13 cells, induced or not, were loaded with Fluo-4 AM and plated on fibronectin-coated culture dishes prior to addition of CXCL12 (25 ng/ml) to the media. Cells were imaged every 15 s for 3 min. Individual images from the control and RGS1/13 KD cells are shown immediately prior to the addition of chemokine and ~130 and 210 s later. The direction of migration of a RGS1/13 KD cell, as assessed by examining its position on sequential images, is indicated by an arrow. (E) Morphological changes in control and RGS1/13 KD cells. The percentage of visibly polarized cells prior to chemokine stimulation, cells with multiple lamellipodia 15 min after exposure to CXCL12, and cells with polarized [Ca2+]i 15 min after exposure to CXCL12 (100 ng/ml). Results from control and induced HS-SultanT1/13 cells (RGS1/13 KD) are from the analysis of 50–100 cells for each condition.

We also examined the distribution of [Ca2+]i in individual cells following stimulation with CXCL12. Noninduced and induced cells were loaded with a calcium indicator dye, which fluoresces brightly when in the presence of calcium, and then plated the cells on fibronectin-coated glass-bottom dishes. Afterward, the cells were stimulated with CXCL12 by carefully adding it to the culture media so as not to disturb the cells and then imaged for every 15 s for 5 min (Fig. 6C and 6D) . Because of the experimental set-up, the time scales for these experiments are not directly comparable with the previously shown calcium assays. We noted that the doxycycline-treated HS-SultanT1/13 cells had a notable accumulation of fluorescence at one end of the cell even prior to stimulation with chemokine (Fig. 6D , left panel). Stimulation with chemokine exaggerated this effect, and although we also noted an occasional noninduced cell that had an asymmetrical pattern of [Ca2+]i, they were not nearly as numerous as among the induced cells (RGS1/13 KD). We also noted the elevated fluorescence accumulated in the rear of the cell in relation to its direction of movement as assessed by examination of multiple time-lapse frames (Fig. 6D , middle and right panels). This was not chemokine-directed cell movement, as the cells had not been exposed to a chemokine gradient. Finally, we counted the number of induced and noninduced, polarized cells (5 min after stimulation), cells with multiple lamellipodia (15 min after stimulation), and cells with an asymmetrical pattern of [Ca2+]i (5 min after stimulation, Fig. 6E ). We noted a marked difference in each of these parameters between the induced (RGS1/13 KD) cells and the noninduced control cells.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
This study provides several insights into the roles of RGS proteins in chemokine receptor signaling. First, the constitutive expression of RGS1 and RGS13 in human germinal center B cells likely attenuates their responsiveness to CXCL12 and CXCL13. Second, the reduction of RGS1 and RGS13 does not significantly shift the dose-response curves to CXCL12, CXCL13, or PAF but rather augments the magnitude of the responses, particularly at higher ligand concentrations. Third, RGS1 and RGS13 show little or no GPCR selectivity. Fourth, RGS1 and RGS13 contribute to the early desensitization of CXCR4 signaling in B cells, but other mechanisms are likely more important later. Fifth, RGS1 and RGS13 may be rapidly recruited to attenuate CXCR4 and CXCR5 signaling. Finally, the level of RGS proteins may control the propensity of the cells to polarize in response to GPCR-mediated signals.

Germinal center B cells express RGS1 and RGS13 [28 , 29 ]. Among the Burkitt’s lymphoma lines we have tested, all express high levels of RGS13 but variable levels of RGS1. The HS-Sultan cells used in this study constitutively express RGS1, although at relatively low levels compared with activated human B cells and RGS13. HS-Sultan cells and a subline of HS-Sultan cells, which respond poorly to chemokines, proved amendable to the RGS13 shRNA, showing greater than 20-fold reductions in RGS13 mRNA as compared with control shRNA-expressing cells. Furthermore, the placement of RGS13 shRNA under the control of a tet operator allowed the inducible expression of the RGS13 shRNA and the verification of the initial results, which had shown an enhancement in CXCR4, CXCR5, and PAFR-triggered signaling.

Several studies have shown that human germinal center B cells respond poorly to chemoattractants, a result consistent with their expression of RGS1 and RGS13 [29 30 31 32 33 ]. Also, germinal center B cells from Rgs1–/– mice migrate better to CXCL12 than do those from wild-type mice [29 ]. However, a recent study that used germinal center B cells from Bcl-2 transgenic mice observed that their germinal center B cells migrated well to CXCL12 and CXL13 [34 ]. The authors argued that the previously observed refractoriness of germinal center B cells to chemoattractants was caused by their poor in vitro viability, which Bcl-2 expression averted. An alternative explanation may be that the Bcl-2 transgene alters germinal center B cell selection. Two rescue signals, antigen and CD40 ligand, raise Rgs1 and Rgs13 expression levels, respectively [27 , 28 , 35 ]. As the forced Bcl-2 expression allows B cells to survive in the absence of normal rescue signals, the levels of Rgs1 and Rgs13 expression may be low in the Bcl-2 transgenic germinal center B cells.

This study provides little evidence for GPCR-RGS protein selectivity. Although there is some suggestion that RGS13 preferentially regulates CXCR4 signaling, the effect is relatively small, and CXCR5 and PAFR signaling are augmented in the RGS13 single-KD cells. In the double-KD cells, again PAFR, CXCR4, and CXCR5 signaling are all significantly augmented. Thus, the constitutive expression of RGS1 or RGS13 in lymphocytes is likely to impact signaling through multiple GPCRs. Also, the significant enhancement of signaling in the double-KD cells compared with the single-KD indicates that both proteins are contributing to the overall attenuation of the signaling pathway.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the RGS protein Sst2p is critical for desensitization of pheromone-mediated signaling [36 , 37 ]. However, yeast lacks GPCR kinases (GRKs). Mammalian cells likely use RGS proteins (refs. [29 , 38 39 40 41 42 ] and this study) and GRKs to desensitize GPCR-triggered signaling pathways. GRKs function at the level of the receptor by phosphorylating GPCRs. This leads to ß-arrestin recruitment, which uncouples the receptors from G-proteins [43 , 44 ]. A comparison of wild-type and GRK2+/– T cells stimulated with the chemokine CCL4 revealed that the GRK2+/– T cells had a 40% increase in chemotaxis, an enhanced calcium response, and an increase in ERK activation [45 ]. However, it is surprising that the Grk2+/– T cells became as refractory to CCL4 restimulation as the wild-type T cells, demonstrating no impairment in desensitization [45 ]. Unfortunately, the consequences of a complete GRK2 deficiency are unknown as a result of embryonic lethality. The relative importance of RGS proteins and GRKs in GPCR desensitization remains unresolved, in part, because of multiple family members. Our results with B cells suggest that the coreduction of RGS1 and RGS13 impairs the early desensitization of the CXCR4 signaling pathway, and other mechanisms are more important later.

A previous study of B cells from Rgs1–/– mice [20 , 29 ] and this study indicate that the absence of RGS1 or RGS13 does not alter the threshold at which a response occurs, i.e., does not shift the dose-response curve to the left, but rather affects the magnitude of the response. As the reduction of RGS1 and RGS13 expression more dramatically enhances chemokine receptor signaling at high-ligand concentrations, the strength of the initial signal may impact RGS1 and/or RGS13 function. We are currently testing whether RGS1 or RGS13 phosphorylation enhances their recruitment and/or activity. An obvious candidate to mediate the phosphorylation would be the GRK proteins, thereby tying together two different mechanisms that desensitize the signaling pathway: one aimed at receptor G-protein coupling and the other at the G{alpha} subunit. Several alternative mechanisms are also possible. One is a signaling-induced modification of an adaptor protein that recruits and/or activates RGS1 and/or RGS13, such as has been described for RGS9 [46 ]. Another possibility is a reciprocal regulation of RGS proteins by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate [PI(3,4,5)P3] and Ca2+/calmodulin, whereby PI(3,4,5)P3 binds to RGS proteins to inhibit their GAP activity, which can be reversed by the binding of Ca2+/calmodulin [47 , 48 ].

An interesting finding in our analysis of the RGS1/13 KD cells was their propensity to polarize, even in the absence of chemokine stimulation, and their enhanced polarization following stimulation with CXCL12. Their enhanced basal polarization may be accounted for by the presence of GPCR ligands in the serum, including sphingosine 1-phosphate and lysophosphatic acid. Supporting the enhanced propensity of the RGS1 and RGS13 double-KD cells to polarize was the distribution of [Ca2+]i in individual cells. [Ca2+]i in migrating leukocytes is known to be low at the leading edge and high in the rear [49 ], although to our knowledge, the distribution of [Ca2+]i in migrating B lymphocytes has not been reported previously. The finding that the RGS1 and RGS13 double-KD cells develop numerous small lamellipodia is also intriguing. Normally, lymphocytes and other motile cells emit a variable number of lamella, but only a single, dominant one contacts the substrate, expands, and directs cell migration. Although some of the chemokine-stimulated RGS1 and RGS13 double-KD cells had a clearly defined, leading edge and uropod, other cells exhibited multiple small lamella without an obvious dominant one. Thus, one of the functions of RGS proteins in lymphocyte migration may be to help stabilize the primary lamellipodia.

In conclusion, the analyses of a human B cell lymphoma cell line in which RGS1 and RGS13 expression has been silenced provide several useful insights and an impetus for examining whether the strength of the initial activation signal shapes subsequent RGS1 and RGS13 protein function by modifying their location or functional activity. Additional studies should help delineate the relative importance of GRKs and RGS proteins in regulating the signaling output from chemokine receptors and determine their relative importance in desensitizing the signaling pathway.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors thank the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Dr. Anthony Fauci for continued support and Mary Rust for her editorial assistance.

Received November 28, 2005; revised January 15, 2006; accepted February 14, 2006.


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Melchers, F., Rolink, A. G., Schaniel, C. (1999) The role of chemokines in regulating cell migration during humoral immune responses Cell 99,351-354[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. 2
  3. Campbell, J. J., Butcher, E. C. (2000) Chemokines in tissue-specific and microenvironment-specific lymphocyte homing Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12,336-341[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Ansel, K. M., Cyster, J. G. (2001) Chemokines in lymphopoiesis and lymphoid organ development Curr. Opin. Immunol. 13,172-179[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Luster, A. D. (2002) The role of chemokines in linking innate and adaptive immunity Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14,129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. 5
  9. Nagasawa, T., Hirota, S., Tachibana, K., Takakura, N., Nishikawa, S., Kitamura, S., Yoshida, N., Kikutani, A., Kishimoto, T. (1996) Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1 Nature 382,635-638[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Forster, R., Mattis, A. E., Kremmer, E., Wolf, E., Brem, G., Lipp, M. (1996) A putative chemokine receptor, BLR1, directs B cell migration to defined lymphoid organs and specific anatomic compartments of the spleen Cell 87,1037-1047[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Gunn, M. D., Ngo, V. N., Ansel, K. M., Ekland, E. H., Cyster, J. G., Williams, L. T. (1998) A B-cell-homing chemokine made in lymphoid follicles activates Burkitt’s lymphoma receptor-1 Nature 391,799-803[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. 8
  15. Legler, D. F., Loetscher, M., Roos, R. S., Clark-Lewis, I., Baggiolini, M., Moser, B. (1998) B cell-attracting chemokine 1, a human CXC chemokine expressed in lymphoid tissues, selectively attracts B lymphocytes via BLR1/CXCR5 J. Exp. Med. 187,655-660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Zou, Y. R., Kottmann, A. H., Kuroda, M., Taniuchi, I., Littman, D. R. (1998) Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development Nature 393,595-599[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Hargreaves, D. C., Hyman, P. L., Lu, T. T., Ngo, V. N., Bidgol, A., Suzuki, G., Zou, Y. R., Littman, D. R., Cyster, J. G. (2001) A coordinated change in chemokine responsiveness guides plasma cell movements J. Exp. Med. 194,45-56[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Kunkel, E. J., Butcher, E. C. (2002) Chemokines and the tissue-specific migration of lymphocytes Immunity 16,1-4[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. 12
  23. Kehrl, J. H. (1998) Heterotrimeric G protein signaling: roles in immune function and fine-tuning by RGS proteins Immunity 8,1-10[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. 13
  25. Hepler, J. R., Gilman, A. G. (1992) G proteins Trends Biochem. Sci. 17,383-387[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Neer, E. J. (1995) Heterotrimeric G proteins: organizers of transmembrane signals Cell 80,249-257[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. 15
  29. Neptune, E. R., Bourne, H. R. (1997) Receptors induce chemotaxis by releasing the ß{gamma} subunit of Gi, not by activating Gq or Gs Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94,14489-14494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Arai, H., Tsou, C. L., Charo, I. F. (1997) Chemotaxis in a lymphocyte cell line transfected with C-C chemokine receptor 2B: evidence that directed migration is mediated by ß{gamma} dimers released by activation of G{alpha}i-coupled receptors Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94,14495-14499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. 17
  33. Neptune, E. R., Iiri, T., Bourne, H. R. (1999) G{alpha}i is not required for chemotaxis mediated by Gi-coupled receptors J. Biol. Chem. 274,2824-2828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Wettschureck, N., Moers, A., Offermanns, S. (2004) Mouse models to study G-protein-mediated signaling Pharmacol. Ther. 101,75-89[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. 19
  37. Rudolph, U., Finegoldm, M. J., Rich, S. S., Harriman, G. R., Srinivasan, Y., Brabet, P., Boulay, G., Bradley, A., Birnbaumer, L. (1995) Ulcerative colitis and adenocarcinoma of the colon in G {alpha} i2-deficient mice Nat. Genet. 10,143-150[Medline]
  38. 20
  39. Han, S. B., Moratz, C., Huang, N. N., Kelsall, B., Cho, H., Shi, C. S., Schwartz, O., Kehrl, J. H. (2005) Rgs1 and Gnai2 regulate the entrance of B lymphocytes into lymph nodes and B cell motility within lymph node follicles Immunity 22,343-354[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. 21
  41. De Vries, L., Mousli, M., Wurmser, A., Farquhar, M. G. (1995) GAIP, a protein that specifically interacts with the trimeric G protein G {alpha} i3, is a member of a protein family with a highly conserved core domain Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92,11916-11920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. 22
  43. Koelle, M. R., Horvitz, H. R. (1996) EGL-10 regulates G protein signaling in the C. elegans nervous system and shares a conserved domain with many mammalian proteins Cell 84,115-125[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. 23
  45. Druey, K. M., Blumer, K. J., Kang, V. H., Kehrl, J. H. (1996) Inhibition of G-protein-mediated MAP kinase activation by a new mammalian gene family Nature 379,742-746[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. 24
  47. Berman, D. M., Wilkie, T. M., Gilman, A. G. (1996) GAIP and RGS4 are GTPase-activating proteins for the Gi subfamily of G protein {alpha} subunits Cell 86,445-452[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. 25
  49. Watson, N., Linder, M. E., Druey, K. M., Kehrl, J. H., Blumer, K. J. (1996) RGS family members: GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G-protein {alpha}-subunits Nature 383,172-175[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. 26
  51. Hunt, T. W., Fields, T. A., Casey, P. J., Peralta, E. G. (1996) RGS10 is a selective activator of G {alpha} i GTPase activity Nature 383,175-177[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. 27
  53. Moratz, C., Kang, V. H., Druey, K. M., Shi, C. S., Scheschonka, A., Murphy, P. M., Kozasa, T., Kehrl, J. H. (2000) Regulator of G protein signaling 1 (RGS1) markedly impairs Gi {alpha} signaling responses of B lymphocytes J. Immunol. 164,1829-1838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. 28
  55. Shi, G. X., Harrison, K., Wilson, G. L., Moratz, C., Kehrl, J. H. (2002) RGS13 regulates germinal center B lymphocytes responsiveness to CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)12 and CXCL13 J. Immunol. 169,2507-2515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. 29
  57. Moratz, C., Hayman, J. R., Gu, H., Kehrl, J. H. (2004) Abnormal B-cell responses to chemokines, disturbed plasma cell localization, and distorted immune tissue architecture in RGS1–/– mice Mol. Cell. Biol. 24,5767-5775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. 30
  59. Kupp, L. I., Kosco, M. H., Schenkein, H. A., Tew, J. G. (1991) Chemotaxis of germinal center B cells in response to C5a Eur. J. Immunol. 21,2697-2701[Medline]
  60. 31
  61. Bleul, C. C., Schultze, J. L., Springer, T. A. (1998) B lymphocyte chemotaxis regulated in association with microanatomic localization, differentiation state, and B cell receptor engagement J. Exp. Med. 187,753-762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. 32
  63. Bowman, E. P., Campbell, J. J., Soler, D., Dong, Z., Manlongat, N., Picarella, D., Hardy, R. R., Butcher, E. C. (2000) Developmental switches in chemokine response profiles during B cell differentiation and maturation J. Exp. Med. 191,1303-1318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. 33
  65. Corcione, A., Tortolina, G., Bonecchi, R., Battilana, N., Taborelli, G., Mahvasi, F., Sozzani, S., Ottonello, L., Dallegri, F., Pistoia, V. (2002) Chemotaxis of human tonsil B lymphocytes to CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 1, CCR2 and CCR4 ligands is restricted to non-germinal center cells Int. Immunol. 14,883-892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. 34
  67. Allen, C. D., Ansel, K. M., Low, C., Lesley, R., Tamamura, H., Fujii, N., Cyster, J. G. (2004) Germinal center dark and light zone organization is mediated by CXCR4 and CXCR5 Nat. Immunol. 5,943-952[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. 35
  69. Reif, K., Cyster, J. G. (2000) RGS molecule expression in murine B lymphocytes and ability to down-regulate chemotaxis to lymphoid chemokines J. Immunol. 164,4720-4729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. 36
  71. Dietzel, C., Kurjan, J. (1987) Pheromonal regulation and sequence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SST2 gene: a model for desensitization to pheromone Mol. Cell. Biol. 7,4169-4177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. 37
  73. Dohlman, H. G. (2002) G proteins and pheromone signaling Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64,129-152[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. 38
  75. Diverse-Pierluissi, M. A., Fischer, T., Jordan, J. D., Schiff, M., Ortiz, D. F., Farquhar, M. G., DeVries, L. (1999) Regulators of G protein signaling proteins as determinants of the rate of desensitization of presynaptic calcium channels J. Biol. Chem. 274,14490-14494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. 39
  77. Potenza, M. N., Gold, S. J., Roby-Shemkowitz, A., Lerner, M. R., Nestler, E. J. (1999) Effects of regulators of G protein-signaling proteins on the functional response of the µ-opioid receptor in a melanophore-based assay J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 291,482-491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. 40
  79. Garzon, J., Rodriguez-Diaz, M., Lopez-Fando, A., Sanchez-Blazquez, P. (2001) RGS9 proteins facilitate acute tolerance to µ-opioid effects Eur. J. Neurosci. 13,801-811[CrossRef][Medline]
  80. 41
  81. Witt-Enderby, P. A., Jarzynka, M. J., Krawitt, B. J., Melan, M. A. (2004) KD of RGS4 and ß tubulin in CHO cells expressing the human MT1 melatonin receptor prevents melatonin-induced receptor desensitization Life Sci. 75,2703-2715[Medline]
  82. 42
  83. Mutneja, M., Berton, F., Suen, K. F., Luscher, C., Slesinger, P. A. (2005) Endogenous RGS proteins enhance acute desensitization of GABA(B) receptor-activated GIRK currents in HEK-293T cells Pflugers Arch. 450,61-73[CrossRef][Medline]
  84. 43
  85. Shenoy, S. K., Lefkowitz, R. J. (2003) Multifaceted roles of ß-arrestins in the regulation of seven-membrane-spanning receptor trafficking and signaling Biochem. J. 375,503-515[CrossRef][Medline]
  86. 44
  87. Kohout, T. A., Lefkowitz, R. J. (2003) Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases and arrestins during receptor desensitization Mol. Pharmacol. 63,9-18[Free Full Text]
  88. 45
  89. Vroon, A., Heijnen, C. J., Lombardi, M. S., Cobelens, P. M., Mayor, F., Jr, Caron, M. G., Kavelaars, A. (2004) Reduced GRK2 level in T cells potentiates chemotaxis and signaling in response to CCL4 J. Leukoc. Biol. 75,901-909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. 46
  91. Ishii, M., Inanobe, A., Kurachi, Y. (2002) PIP3 inhibition of RGS protein and its reversal by Ca2+/calmodulin mediate voltage-dependent control of the G protein cycle in a cardiac K+ channel Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,4325-4330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. 47
  93. Ishii, M., Fujita, S., Yamada, M., Hosaka, Y., Kurachi, Y. (2005) Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and Ca2+/calmodulin competitively bind to the regulators of G-protein-signaling (RGS) domain of RGS4 and reciprocally regulate its action Biochem. J. 385,65-73[CrossRef][Medline]
  94. 48
  95. Hu, G., Wensel, T. G. (2002) R9AP, a membrane anchor for the photoreceptor GTPase accelerating protein, RGS9–1 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,9755-9760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. 49
  97. Sanchez-Madrid, F., Angel del Pozo, M. (1999) Leukocyte polarization in cell migration and immune interactions EMBO J. 18,501-511[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Bansal, J. A. DiVietro, H. S. Kuehn, S. Rao, K. H. Nocka, A. M. Gilfillan, and K. M. Druey
RGS13 Controls G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Evoked Responses of Human Mast Cells
J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 7882 - 7890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Piovan, V. Tosello, S. Indraccolo, M. Masiero, L. Persano, G. Esposito, R. Zamarchi, M. Ponzoni, L. Chieco-Bianchi, R. Dalla-Favera, et al.
Differential Regulation of Hypoxia-Induced CXCR4 Triggering during B-Cell Development and Lymphomagenesis
Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8605 - 8614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.1105693v1
79/6/1357    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Kehrl, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Kehrl, J. H.