Rush University Medical Center, Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Chicago, Illinois
1 Correspondence: Rush University Medical Center, Department of Immunology/Microbiology, 1735 West Harrison Street, 614 Cohn, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: lalharth{at}rush.edu
Expression of CD4 or CD8 on T cells is pivotal in defining them as T helper or T cytotoxic cells, respectively. Aside from an intermediate stage during T cell maturation in the thymus, CD4 and CD8 molecules were thought to be mutually exclusive on mature T cells. However, accumulating evidence has proven that these two molecules can be coexpressed on mature T cells [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]. Populations of CD8+ T cells re-expressing CD4 have been designated CD4dimCD8bright or CD4lowCD8high T cells, and likewise, populations of CD4+ T cells re-expressing CD8 have been designated CD4brightCD8dim or CD4highCD8low T cells.
Much of what we know about CD4+CD8+ T cells is based on literature that has concentrated on the CD4dimCD8bright T cell population. These studies collectively established the importance of studying CD4+CD8+ T cell populations through demonstrating that the CD4 molecule expressed on CD8+ T cells is functional, as indicated by several lines of evidence, including the ability to coprecipitate CD4 with the Scr family protein tyrosine kinase p56lck [1 ] and the ability of CD4 on CD8+ T cells to mediate chemotaxis in response to interleukin-16, a CD4-specific ligand [3 ]. We have shown that CD4dimCD8bright T cells recognize viral [cytomegalovirus (CMV)] antigen more potently than CD8+ T cells, which do not re-express CD4 on their surface (CD4CD8+ T cells) [6 ]. Recent data suggest that CD4dimCD8bright T cells function as CD8 effector cells, as assessed in the severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) model of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and allogenic immunity [8 , 9 ] and in the chimpanzee model of hepatitis C virus immunity [7 ].
In analyzing the role of CD4 on CD8+ T cells and the biologic significance of this cell population, it is critical that these cells are defined appropriately and that no contaminating populations are included in the analysis. Based on a limited number of markers shown to be shared by both populations, some investigators have combined the analysis of CD4dimCD8bright and CD4brightCD8dim T cells as one population, defining all double-positive (CD4+CD8+) T cells [7 ]. Combining these populations to deduce functional potential is problematic. Our own analyses, when collecting a minimum of 100,000 events per sample for immunostaining and using CD4 antibodies conjugated to phycoerythrin (PE) or allophycocyanin (APC), demonstrate that multiple subpopulations of T cells, defined by the level of their expression of CD4 and CD8, exist within the CD4+CD8+double-positive T cell population. As seen in Figure 1 A , based on the intensity of CD4 and CD8 expression, six different populations are apparent: the single-positive populations include CD8+CD4 (denoted as P1) and CD4+CD8 (denoted as P6), and the double-positive populations include CD4dimCD8bright (denoted as P2), CD4medCD8bright (denoted as P3), CD4+CD8+ (denoted as P4), and CD4brightCD8dim (denoted as P5).
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Presence of natural killer T (NKT) cells within multiple subpopulations of CD4+CD8+ T cells. Peripheral blood was obtained from four healthy donors and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll-Paque density centrifugation. PBMCs were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-CD3, PE-CD16/56, peridinin chlorophyll protein (PerCP)-CD8, and APC-CD4 or FITC-CD3, PE-6B11, PerCP-CD8, and APC-CD4 antibodies, and expression of markers was evaluated using four-color flow cytometry. Flow representation of (A) gating on subpopulations of CD4+CD8+ T cells and (B) isotype staining. IgG, Immunoglobulin G. (C) Representative flow analysis and (D) cumulative data analysis of CD3+6B11+ invariant and CD3+CD16/56+ non-invariant NKT cells within the CD4+CD8+ T cell subpopulations.
|
Our studies here show that in characterizing the role of cells coexpressing CD4 and CD8, it is critical that multiple CD4+CD8+ T cell subpopulations (CD4dimCD8bright, CD4medCD8bright, CD4+CD8+, and CD4brightCD8dim) are not evaluated together as one double-positive population. Combining these populations, which may not share similar characteristics and may express differentiation and activation surface markers to varying degrees, and not depleting certain populations of contaminating cells (i.e., NKT cells) will mask the lineage and functional potential analysis of each individual subpopulation of CD4+CD8+ T cells.
Received August 16, 2005; revised September 9, 2005; accepted September 21, 2005.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Zloza, J. M. Schenkel, A. R. Tenorio, J. A. Martinson, P. M. Jeziorczak, and L. Al-Harthi Potent HIV-specific responses are enriched in a unique subset of CD8+ T cells that coexpresses CD4 on its surface Blood, October 29, 2009; 114(18): 3841 - 3853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||