Published online before print October 4, 2005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
1 Correspondence: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, 1101 E. Marshall Street, Richmond, VA 23298-0678. E-mail: gacabral{at}hsc.vcu.edu
ABSTRACT
Microglia, resident macrophages of the brain, function as immune effector and accessory cells. Paradoxically, they not only play a role in host defense and tissue repair but also have been implicated in a variety of neuropathological processes. Microglia, in addition to exhibiting phenotypic markers for macrophages, express CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. Recent studies suggest the existence of a third, yet-to-be cloned, non-CB1, non-CB2 cannabinoid receptor. These receptors appear to be functionally relevant within defined windows of microglial activation state and have been implicated as linked to cannabinoid modulation of chemokine and cytokine expression. The recognition that microglia express cannabinoid receptors and that their activation results in modulation of select cellular activities suggests that they may be amenable to therapeutic manipulation for ablating untoward inflammatory responses in the central nervous system.
Key Words: brain immune modulation cytokines marijuana nitric oxide
Marijuana is a complex plant material, which can elicit a variety of pharmacological and immunological effects. Its major psychoactive component is
-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a compound that has been reported to account for the majority of effects on the immune system [1
, 2
]. Several modes of action have been proposed as accounting for the effects of THC on immune cells. At high concentrations, such as those exceeding micromolar levels, THC and other cannabinoids may have direct effects on membranes, as they are highly lipophilic [3
]. However, stereospecificity and structural requirements for biological activity indicate that cannabinoids also act through specific receptors. To date, two unique cannabinoid receptors have been identified. The CB1 is located primarily in the brain and is responsible for most, if not all, of the centrally mediated effects of cannabinoids [4
, 5
]. The CB2 is present primarily in cells of the immune system but has been detected in adult human uterine tissue and embryonic organs and adult rat retina [6
, 7
]. Both receptors are Gi/o protein-coupled, as evidenced by inhibition of adenylyl cyclase [8
], inhibition of N-type calcium channels [9
], and increased binding of nonhydrolyzable guanylyl-5'-O-(
-thio)-triphosphate in the presence of cannabinoids [10
]. The CB1 differs from the CB2, however, in that it also modulates Q-type calcium channels [11
]. Recent studies suggest the existence of a third receptor, a non-CB1/non-CB2 receptor [12
13
14
].
Major targets of marijuana and exogenous cannabinoids in the immune system are cells of macrophage lineage. Ultrastructural abnormalities have been observed in alveolar macrophages of humans who have been heavy users of marijuana [15
] and in peritoneal macrophages of mice exposed in vitro to various concentrations of pure THC [16
]. In addition, various functional defects of alveolar or peritoneal macrophages obtained from humans, rats, or mice following in vivo or in vitro exposure to marijuana or THC have been observed [17
]. Microglia constitute a resident population of macrophages in the brain, the spinal cord, and retina and are morphologically, phenotypically, and functionally related to cells of macrophage lineage [18
19
20
21
]. The function of quiescent microglia in normal brain is not well understood, but in pathological conditions, these cells play an active role as immunoeffector/accessory cells. Microglia migrate and proliferate during and after injury and inflammation [22
23
24
25
]. Once activated, they produce various cytokines including interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) and express major histocompatibility complex classes I and II antigens and the complement receptor, CR3. Microglia are also phagocytic and can process antigens and exert cytolytic functions. Paradoxically, these cells not only play a role in host defense and tissue repair in the central nervous system [26
, 27
] but also have been implicated in nervous system disorders such as multiple sclerosis [28
], Alzheimers disease [29
], Parkinsons disease [30
], and AIDS dementia [31
32
33
].
Microglia, as macrophage-like cells, undergo a process of maturation, differentiation, and activation, which is characterized by differential gene expression and correlative acquisition of specified functions [22 23 24 25 , 34 , 35 ]. This pattern of differential expression also applies to cannabinoid receptors (Fig. 1 ). Using an in vitro model of multistep activation, in which microglia are driven sequentially from a "resting" state to responsive, primed, and fully activated states, the CB1 was found at constitutive low levels at all states of cell activation. In contrast, the CB2 was found to be expressed inducibly and at maximal levels when microglia were in responsive and primed states. Collectively, the observations that expression of CB1 is constitutive, and that of the CB2 is inducible, that the two receptors are present at disparate levels, and that they exhibit distinctive compartmentalization [36 , 37 ] suggest that the two receptors have discriminative, functional relevance in microglia.
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Differential levels of CB2 mRNA are detected in neonatal rat brain cerebral cortex microglia in relation to cell activation state. (A) Southern blot of mutagenic reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (MRT-PCR) products from total nucleic acid of microglia maintained in medium ("responsive") or treated (6 h) with 100 U/ml rat interferon- (IFN- ; "primed"), 100 U/ml rat IFN- plus 100 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS; multisignal-activated), or 1 µg/ml LPS ("fully activated"). MRT-PCR was performed as described [36
]. RT primers were used, which introduced a single base mismatch into the cDNA of CB1 or CB2 to generate a unique MspI or HindIII restriction site, respectively. The upper band of the doublet is amplified genomic DNA (gDNA). The lower band of the doublet (arrow) represents an amplified cDNA product from mRNA. (Upper panel) CB1 mRNA was detected at low levels for all treatment groups. (Lower panel) High levels of CB2 mRNA were detected for microglia maintained in medium or IFN- (100 U/ml), and low levels were detected for cells treated with IFN- plus LPS or with LPS alone. (B) Graphic representation of relative levels of CB2 mRNA depicted by MRT-PCR. The graph represents a single experiment performed in triplicate. The ordinate designated as Relative OD Units represents densitometric analysis of cDNA-amplified product based on area X pixel density and is represented relative to the corresponding densitometry obtained for the gDNA-amplified product. A significant decrease in levels of CB2 mRNA was recorded for cells treated with LPS or with LPS plus IFN- as compared with those for untreated cells. Error bars are ± SD, n = 3, **, P< 0.01. OD, Optical density.
|
. A less-inhibitory effect was exerted by the lower affinity-binding, paired enantiomer CP56667 (Ki=62 nM). The differential effect exerted by CP55940 versus CP56667 is consistent with a role of a cannabinoid receptor in the inhibition of iNO production, as selective binding affinity of paired cannabinoid stereoisomers has been shown to correlate with bioactivity in vivo and in vitro [5
], and differential dose-related effects of one enantiomer versus its enantiomeric pair are implicative of a functional linkage to a receptor. The receptor, which was found as linked to the cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of iNO production, was CB1-based through the application of antagonist experiments. Treatment of microglia with the CB1-selective antagonist SR141716A prior to exposure to the agonist CP55940 blocked the CP55940-mediated inhibition of iNO production. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 1. Properties of Select Cannabinoid Receptor Ligands
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. CP55940-mediated inhibition of iNO release by microglia is blocked by the CB1 receptor-selective antagonist SR141716A. Microglia were pretreated (1 h) with 5 x 107 M SR141716A prior to exposure (8 h) to 5 x 106 M CP55940 or CP56667 and LPS plus IFN- activation (24 h). Culture supernatants were assayed for nitrite using the Griess reagent. The CP55940 inhibition was stereoselective, as the paired enantiomer CP56667 was less bioactive. Results (mean±SEM of triplicate wells) are expressed as percent inhibition versus vehicle control (*, P<0.01, vs. SR141716A). Nitrite accumulation in LPS plus IFN- -treated vehicle control cultures was 29.3 ± 3.5 (µM/106 cells). VEH, Vehicle (0.01% ethanol).
|
![]() View larger version (101K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. Augmentation of CB2 mRNA levels in response to A. culbertsoni. (A) Scanning electron micrograph of an A. culbertsoni trophozoite. (B) Graphic representation of relative levels of cannabinoid receptor mRNA. Microglia were incubated with A. culbertsoni at a microglia:ameba ratio of 10:1. Levels of mRNA for the CB1 receptor remained unaffected, but those for the CB2 receptor exhibited a time-dependent augmentation as determined by RNase protection assay (RPA; PharMingen, San Diego, CA). The ordinate designated as Relative OD Units represents densitometric analysis based on area X pixel density relative to that of constitutively expressed L32 ribosomal (L32) mRNA product for each sample. The graph represents a representative single experiment. (C) RPA detection of mRNA for CB1 and CB2 receptors from whole brain homogenates of mice infected intranasally with A. culbertsoni (1x105 50% lethal dose). As expected, an excess of mRNA for the CB1 was obtained from whole brain homogenates. An apparent increase in levels of CB1 mRNA was noted for homogenates of brain obtained at 14 and 21 days. mRNA levels for the CB2 receptor exhibited a time-related increase following infection with amebae. Infection was confirmed by isolation of amebae in culture from mouse brains. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained murine brain section demonstrating multiple foci of amebae surrounded by cells (arrows), which morphologically resemble microglia. (A, D) Original bars, 10 µm.
|
and TNF-
in a mode that is not blocked by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A or the CB2 antagonist SR144528 (Fig. 4
). Similarly, the partial agonist THC (Ki=42 nM) and the agonist CP55940 (Ki=0.9 nM) inhibited the induction of cytokine mRNAs for IL-1
, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-
in a mode that was not blocked by the CB1 or the CB2 antagonist (data not shown). Furthermore, enantiomeric selectivity for the CB1/CB2 high-affinity ligands, as compared with the paired, lower affinity counterparts, was not observed [51
]. The "less bioactive" enantiomers CP56667 and HU211 exhibited inhibitory activity comparable with that of the potent CB1/CB2 agonists CP55940 and HU210, respectively. A similar outcome was obtained when the stereoisomers levonantradol (Ki=1.06 nM) and dextranantradol (Ki=3100 nM) were used. Collectively, the observations that gene expression for proinflammatory cytokines is associated with microglia that are fully activated and express low levels of CB2, that stereoselective paired cannabinoids exert comparable inhibitory effects on the induction of proinflammatory cytokine mRNAs, and that the CB1 and CB2 selective antagonists SR141716A and SR144528 do not block the inhibition of cytokine gene expression by the agonists CP55940 and levonantradol indicate that cannabinoid-mediated modulation of proinflammatory cytokine gene expression is not linked to the CB1 or the CB2. Whether these results are indicative of the presence of a non-CB1, non-CB2 receptor in microglia, which is functionally relevant when these cells are in a state of full activation, awaits biochemical and molecular analysis.
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
Figure 4. The CB1 and CB2 receptor-specific antagonists do not block the inhibitory effects of levonantradol (Ki=1.06 nM) on cytokine mRNA expression. Microglia were treated (4 h) with levonantradol or pretreated (1 h) with 1 x 106 M SR141716A or SR144528 prior to exposure (3 h) to 1 x 106 M levonantradol. Cells then were treated (6 h) with LPS (100 ng/ml), and levels of cytokine mRNA were determined using the RiboQuant multiprobe RPA (PharMingen). The ordinate designates that the data are presented as the percent LPS-treated (100 ng/ml) vehicle control. Results are expressed as the mean percent cytokine mRNA expression of triplicate cultures versus that for the LPS-treated vehicle mean ± SEM (*, P<0.01; two-tailed Students t-test). SR1: CB1-selective antagonist SR141716A; SR2: CB2-selective antagonist SR144528; VEH: 0.01% ethanol.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse Awards R01 DA05832, R01 DA015608, and 2P50 DA05274.
Received April 24, 2005; revised August 19, 2005; accepted August 22, 2005.
REFERENCES
-1-tetrahydrocannabinol and its effect on membrane fluidity Harvey, D. J. eds. Marihuana 84: Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Cannabis IRL Oxford, UK.
9-tetrahydrocannabinol on cannabinoid-stimulated [35]GTP
S autoradiography in rat brain J. Neurosci. 16,8057-8066
8-tetrahydrocannabinol-dimethylheptyl to inhibit adenylate cyclase and bind to the cannabinoid receptor Neuropharmacology 29,161-165[CrossRef][Medline]
-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol modulates antigen processing by macrophages J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 273,1216-1223This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Wynne, C. J. Henry, and J. P. Godbout Immune and behavioral consequences of microglial reactivity in the aged brain Integr. Comp. Biol., April 23, 2009; (2009) icp009v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. T. Snider, J. A. Nast, L. A. Tesmer, and P. F. Hollenberg A Cytochrome P450-Derived Epoxygenated Metabolite of Anandamide Is a Potent Cannabinoid Receptor 2-Selective Agonist Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2009; 75(4): 965 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Tambuyzer, P. Ponsaerts, and E. J. Nouwen Microglia: gatekeepers of central nervous system immunology J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2009; 85(3): 352 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang and C. Chen Endocannabinoid 2-Arachidonoylglycerol Protects Neurons by Limiting COX-2 Elevation J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2008; 283(33): 22601 - 22611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Russo, J. LoVerme, G. La Rana, T. R. Compton, J. Parrott, A. Duranti, A. Tontini, M. Mor, G. Tarzia, A. Calignano, et al. The Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor URB597 (Cyclohexylcarbamic Acid 3'-Carbamoylbiphenyl-3-yl Ester) Reduces Neuropathic Pain after Oral Administration in Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 236 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Benamar, M. Yondorf, J. J. Meissler, E. B. Geller, R. J. Tallarida, T. K. Eisenstein, and M. W. Adler A Novel Role of Cannabinoids: Implication in the Fever Induced by Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2007; 320(3): 1127 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Borner, V. Hollt, W. Sebald, and J. Kraus Transcriptional regulation of the cannabinoid receptor type 1 gene in T cells by cannabinoids J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2007; 81(1): 336 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||