Journal of Leukocyte Biology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.0105053 on May 13, 2005

Published online before print May 13, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0105053v1
78/2/311    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiserlian, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hosmalin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaiserlian, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hosmalin, A.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2005;78:311-318.)
© 2005 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

The mucosal immune system: from control of inflammation to protection against infections

Dominique Kaiserlian*,1, Nadine Cerf-Bensussan{dagger} and Anne Hosmalin{ddagger}

* INSERM-U404, CERVI, IFR128 BioSciences Lyon-Gerland, Lyon, France;
{dagger} EMI-0212 INSERM, Faculté Necker-Enfants Malades, France; and
{ddagger} Institut Cochin, INSERM U-567, UMR CNRS 8104, IFR 116 Universite Paris V, France

1 Correspondence: INSERM-U404, CERVI-IFR128 BioSciences Lyon-Gerland, 21 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69365 Lyon CX 07, France. E-mail: kaiserlian{at}cervi-lyon.inserm;fr


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 
The IV meeting of the European Mucosal Immunology Group, held October 8–10, 2004, in Lyon, gathered fundamental and clinical research scientists to discuss the most recent updates on basic and clinical aspects of mucosal immunology. The meeting was focused on innate and acquired immune mechanisms underlying handling and immune recognition of commensals, allergens, and pathogens by the mucosal immune system and its outcome in health and disease as well as for vaccine development. The scientific program featured five topics of growing interest for fundamental research scientists and clinicians, including the role of commensal bacteria in mucosal immunity; function of dendritic cells in infection, inflammation, and tolerance; control of mucosal inflammation by regulatory T cells; novel routes and adjuvants for mucosal vaccines; and mucosal immunity against HIV infection and vaccination strategies.

Key Words: commensal bacteria dendritic cells • regulatory T cells • vaccines • HIV


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 
Mucosal tissues are the largest epithelial interface between environmental antigens and the immune system. The glycolalix [but also, mucus layer, proteolytic enzymes, and secretory immunoglublin A (IgA)] limits penetration of a wide variety of luminal antigens, including pathogenic micro-organisms and commensal bacteria, as well as of dietary and respiratory allergens. It is remarkable that two opposite features characterize the fine-tuning of mucosal immune responses. Immune recognition of inocuous antigens (i.e., dietary or respiratory antigens and commensal bacteria), to which mucosa are constantly exposed, leads to induction of a specific IgA response associated with lack of systemic IgG production and of local and systemic, antigen-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity and cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) responses. Immune responsiveness to mucosal pathogens (stimulating epithelial inflammation) generates effectors of humoral and cell-mediated immunity, which may lead to protection. In recent years, enormous progress has been made in the understanding of the innate mechanisms that take place locally at epithelial sites of antigen penetration and dictate the outcome of antigen recognition on induction of immunity or tolerance. Namely, signaling via receptors for cytokine, chemokines, Fc portion of Ig, and Toll-like receptors (TLR), as well as intracellular nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (Nod)1 and Nod2 receptors contributes to mucosal sensoring of antigens by epithelial cells and dendritic cells (DC) and induction of appropriate immune responses. Preclinical and clinical studies of the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory diseases as well as of food allergy and asthma have put emphasis on the crucial role of regulatory T (TR) cells in induction and maintenance of mucosal tolerance. Understanding the crucial role of the "Toll route" in the innate immune mechanisms that govern induction and regulation of mucosal immune responses has led to design of novel adjuvants for therapeutic and prophylactic vaccination. The progress made on mucosal adjuvants that induce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in the genital tract may open the way for development of HIV vaccines. Despite new insights into the mechanism of mucosal HIV infection and transmission, desperately seeking an efficient vaccine against AIDS has encouraged the development of alternative strategies based on topical microbicides to limit sexual transmission.


    COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL IMMUNITY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 
The intestine is an open ecosystem where mammalian and bacteria have coevolved into a high degree of interdependency. Many studies point to the beneficial effects of the commensal flora on host defense, likely via multiple mechanisms, including competition with pathogens, maturation and homeostasis of the epithelial barrier, and stimulation of innate and adaptive immunity [1 2 3 4 5 ]. There is, however, clear evidence that the intestinal microbiota serves as a trigger for intestinal inflammation in predisposed individuals (reviewed in ref. [6 ]). How the host and his commensal bacteria dialogue establish and maintain friendly relationships is a challenging issue addressed by the speakers of the first session.

Andrew McPherson (Zurich) studied the gut immune response in specific, pathogen-free mice challenged intragastrically with 109 commensal Enterobacter cloacae. Small numbers of live bacteria can penetrate via Peyer’s patches (PP) and are loaded onto DC, where they are retained for several days. Migration of DC loaded with commensals to mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) results in selective induction of secretory IgA by T-dependent and T-independent mechanisms, which in turn, limit translocation of commensals across the mucosa. Rapid and efficient killing of commensal bacteria by macrophages in MLN prevents their migration outside the mucosal immune system and preserves systemic ignorance. Accordingly, IgG response to commensals does not occur unless MLN are removed, or bacteria are deliberately injected intravenously (i.v.). This led to proposing that the MLN form an efficient filter limiting the commensal-specific IgA response to the mucosa and ensuring systemic ignorance to the flora [7 8 9 ].

Dana Philpott (Paris, France) gave an overview about innate TLR and NOD receptor families, which are involved in sensoring commensals and pathogenic bacteria [10 ], and discussed the mechanisms at the epithelial interface, which allow the host to discriminate between pathogens and harmless commensal bacteria. TLR recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns in the extracellular environment, and Nod1 [caspase recruitment domain 4 (CARD4)] and Nod2 (CARD15) are involved in cytosolic surveillance. Differential compartimentalization of these receptors seems to explain that bacteria remaining in the intestinal lumen cannot be recognized by NOD receptors, unless components thereof can translocate cell-wall components inside the cell. Thus, Nod1, constitutively expressed in intestinal epithelial cells and a receptor for a peptidoglycan derivative characteristic of Gram-negative bacteria, is implicated in the detection of invasive Gram-negative bacterial infection such as Shigella flexneri but can also induce an innate immune response to Helicobacter pylori. This bacterium remains extracellular but has a type IV secretion apparatus able to inject the peptidoglycan within the epithelial cells [11 , 12 ].

An alternative strategy developed by the host to avoid inappropriate triggering of intestinal inflammation in response to the microbiota might be to activate inhibitory pathways, exerting a strict retrocontrol. Pierre Desreumaux (Lille, France) showed that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-{gamma} is one good candidate for this function. In animal models of colitis, intestinal inflammation is triggered by commensal bacteria and dampened by synthetic PPAR-{gamma} agonists, an effect ascribed to inhibition of nuclear factor-{kappa}B and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in intestinal epithelial cell lines [13 14 15 ]. As strong expression of PPAR-{gamma} is induced via the TLR-4 pathway in normal, colonic epithelial cells upon bacterial colonization, activation of PPAR-{gamma} might be one important retrocontrol mechanism to prevent inappropriate, proinflammatory responses to the commensal flora [16 ]. Along these lines, patients with ulcerative colitis have an abnormally low expression of PPAR-{gamma} in their colonic epithelium, which may contribute to disease [16 ]. Furthermore, that 5-aminosalicic acid (5-ASA), commonly used as a therapy in ulcerative colitis, is a potent agonist of PPAR-{gamma} provides a rationale for the therapeutic use of 5-ASA and supports the value of PPAR-{gamma} as a therapeutic target in chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases.

Several presentations from posters provided complementary insights into the interactions between the host and its microflora. Markus Heimesaat (Oliver Liesenfeld, Berlin, Germany) described the deleterious impact of the flora on the severe ileitis induced by peroral infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Frank Ruemmele (Paris, France) observed that the Nod2 ligand, muramyl-dipeptide (a peptidoglycan derivative common to Gram-negative and -positive bacteria), can gain access into colonic epithelial cell lines and triggers a proinflammatory response without being injected intracellularly. They suggested that activation of Nod2 might induce the release of bactericidal peptides, able in turn to enhance the epithelial barrier and to avoid further proinflammatory contacts. Jean-Christophe Bambou (N. Cerf-Bensussan, Paris, France) showed that the TLR-5 pathway can be activated from the apical side of enterocytes ex vivo in normal murine ileum by intraluminal flagellin derived from a commensal Escherichia coli strain [17 ].

A large number of reports documented the anti-inflammatory and antiallergic properties of probiotics, in vitro and in vivo. Meng-Tsung Tien (Philippe Sansonetti, Paris, France) observed that pretreatment of intestinal epithelial cells with Lactobacillus casei prevented up-regulation of proinflammatory genes in response to bacterial or cytokine stimulation as a result of the blockade of proteasome and inhibitory {kappa}B degradation, as previously observed with nonvirulent salmonella strains. Sandrine Menard (Martine Heyman, Paris, France) showed that Bifidobacterium breve releases a low molecular compound able to cross the epithelial layer, which inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced secretion of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) by monocytes [18 ]. In vivo studies documented the ability of probiotics to modulate T cell-mediated allergic responses. Ludivine Chapat (Dominique Kaiserlian, Lyon, France) demonstrated the in vivo anti-inflammatory effect of L. casei oral regimen in a mouse model of T cell-mediated, allergic contact dermatitis. Daily oral administration of the probiotic reduced hapten-specific skin inflammation by decreasing the priming and/or expansion of specific interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma})-producing CD8+ effector cells [19 ]. This effect was dependent on the presence of CD4+ T cells and was associated with enhanced production of interleukin (IL)-10 by CD4+CD25+ TR cells, suggesting that L. casei may be acting by triggering the function of TR cells. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria may also induce immune deviation of allergic responses, as reported by Catherine Daniel (Annick Mercenier, Lille, France) in a mouse model of T helper cell type 2 (Th2) allergy to birch pollen, in which recombinant lactic acid bacteria expressing the major allergen Bet v 1 induce a specific Th1-biased, humoral response. Finally, Yan Zizka (Ludmilla Prokesova, Prague, Czeck Republic) reported that colonization of human newborns from allergic mothers with a probiotic strain of E. coli reduced the level of cytokines [IFN-{gamma}, IL-13, and transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß)] detected in the feces to the levels observed in infants born from nonallergic mothers. The mechanism of action of probiotics and their potential use in humans for maintaining health or treating chronic allergic and inflammatory disease by modulating the mucosal immune system are new, challenging areas of research.


    DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION, AND TOLERANCE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 
The interactions between DC and T cells determine the fate of an immune response to pathogenic microbes and to harmless allergens alike. The outcome of interactions between DC and T cells depends on the nature of the DC subset [i.e., myeloid DC, lymphoid DC, and plasmacytoid DC (pDC)], their maturation stage, and the tissue environment where they interact with naive or primed T cells. The remarkable plasticity of immature mouse DC has been highlighted in recent years by their ability to function as immunostimulatory or tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells (APC) in antiviral defense as well as in inflammatory and allergic conditions.

Paola Ricciardi-Castagnoli (Milan, Italy) provided an interpretation of DC plasticity at the genomic level by developing tightly controlled, functional genomic analysis of more than 600 DC genes to monitor the most relevant kinetic changes of their expression after interaction with bacteria, helminthes, or parasites [20 ]. These studies revealed that sensoring of most micro-organisms by DC resulted in the rapid production of IL-2 by DC, suggesting a primary role of DC in activation of innate natural killer (NK) cell responses but also of acquired CD8+ T cell immunity [21 , 22 ].

Mucosal DC play a key role for induction of adaptive mucosal immune responses but also contribute to local and systemic tolerance to dietary or respiratory antigens. Mucosal DC, localized in organized lymphoid organs, such as PP and MLN draining the intestine or mediastinal lymph nodes draining the lung, are responsible for induction of protective immune responses. However, the function of DC, diffusely distributed in mucosal tissues such as the lamina propria (LP) of the intestine or lung or forming a network of epithelial Langerhans-like cells in the trachea, bronchus, as well the buccal mucosa, vagina, and rectum, is less clear. Allan Mowat (Glasgow, UK) provided an overview of the different subsets of intestinal DC with particular emphasis on the phenotype and function of LP CD11c+ DC (LP-DC). Mouse LP-DC comprise primarily CD11b+CD8{alpha} DC and two minor subsets, including a CD11clo subset reminiscent of pDC and CD11bCD8{alpha} DC.

LP-DC were responsible for in vivo uptake of orally administered ovalbumin (OVA). LP-DC were able to present in vivo-loaded OVA to specific T cell receptor (TcR) transgenic T cells in vitro and in vivo and induced partial suppression of an OVA-specific DTH response. Although LP-DC constitutively produced IL-10 and type I IFN (but not IL-12), they did up-regulate accessory molecules in response to LPS, indicating that they can respond partially to proinflammatory signals and thus are not inherently tolerogenic.

Studies in recent years have documented that DC play an important role in the control allergic and inflammatory diseases. Pat Holt (Perth, Australia) demonstrated that DC could regulate the effector function of pathogenic T cells in the upper respiratory tract during the late-phase response in asthma. Studies in aerosol-challenged, sensitized rats revealed that DC are recruited rapidly into the tracheal epithelium and cluster in situ with memory T cells. This resulted in functional DC maturation and concomitant T cell activation, leading to enhanced airway hyper-reactivity, which terminated upon migration of airway mucosa DC to draining lymph nodes [23 ]. It is interesting that upon repeated allergen exposure, CD4+CD25+ T cells appeared after the late-phase response and blocked DC activation in the airway mucosa, suggesting that CD4+CD25+ TR cells require persistent exposure to the aeroallergen to dampen the late-phase response in asthma.

Although numerous studies have emphasized the tolerogenic potential of DC, there are, as yet, only limited studies about the DC subsets involved in mucosal tolerance. Anne Goubier (D. Kaiserlian, Lyon, France) documented the in vivo suppressive function of liver pDC in models of oral and i.v. tolerance. These studies revealed that the liver is highly enriched in CD11C+ DC, among which functional type I IFN-producing pDC constituted the major lymphoid DC subset. Liver pDC were the only subset of liver DC with intrinsic, suppressive properties in vivo, inasmuch as only transfer of pDC (but not of myeloid DC, CD8{alpha}+DC, or NK/DC) at the time of skin sensitization with antigen completely prevented in vivo priming of specific CD8+ T cell effectors mediating contact hypersensitivity (CHS). Moreover, in vivo antibody depletion of pDC abrogated hapten-specific CD8+ T cell tolerance induced by i.v. or intragastric administration of the antigen before skin sensitization. Thus, liver pDC are the main subset of liver DC endowed with intrinsic, tolerogenic properties and may contribute to orally induced tolerance by inhibiting priming of CD8+ effector T cell responses in lymphoid organs.

Selected oral presentation from posters highlighted the in vivo dynamics and function of mucosal tissue DC. To investigate the relative contribution of M cells and LP-DC in pathogen uptake, Alexander Eberhard (Steffan Jung, Weizmann Institute, Israel, and CNRS-BioMerieux, Lyon, France) performed in situ imaging of a ligated intestinal loop using CD11c-diphtheria toxin receptor and CXC 3 chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1)+/green fluorescent protein transgenic mice. Upon pathogen exposure, LP-DC formed transepithelial extensions, which were dependent on CX3CR1 expression. Lack of LP-DC or defect in CX3CR1 increased loading of pathogens via M cells of gut villi. Two presentations focused on the role of pathogens on DC. Fabienne Anjuere (Cecil Czerkinsky, Nice, France) described in vivo mobilization and maturation of intestinal DC subsets induced by oral administration of cholera toxin (CT), which induced in 2 h the appearance of CD8-DC in the LP close to the epithelium, followed at 24 h by a dramatic increase in CD8int and a moderate increase in CD8 DC subsets in MLN. Both DC subsets exhibited enhanced expression of costimulatory molecules and enhanced priming of Th1 and Th2 responses against a coadministered antigen [24 ]. The ability of CT to promote DC mobilization into the LP and their subsequent migration into MLN may explain the exceptional adjuvant properties of CT. Malin Sundquist (Marie-Jo Wick, Göteborg, Sweden) reported that DC maturation induced by oral Salmonella infection is not limited to the DC that get infected and that in vivo signaling through TNF receptor 1 is involved in DC maturation in MLN.


    TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 
TR cells encompass the naturally occuring CD4+CD25+ T cell subset, which represents 510% of CD4+ T cells in man and rodents, but also antigen-induced CD4+ TR cells, also known as Tr1 cells, which produce IL-10. First identified for their ability to suppress autoimmune diseases, CD4+CD25+ TR cells are now known to have a more general, suppressive role, inhibiting responses to self and environmental antigens. These cells are present within the antigen-experienced CD4+CD45RBlow population and perform their suppressive function following chronic antigen stimulation. Evidence from clinical and experimental studies suggests that aberrant inflammatory responses to resident bacteria may be involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and that quantitative or functional abnormalities of TR may contribute to untoward stimulation of T cells leading to oral tolerance breakdown in IBD.

Fiona Powrie (Oxford, UK) presented recent updates about the therapeutic potential of CD4+CD25+ TR in chronic intestinal inflammation, as assessed in models of T cell transfer into immunodeficient mice [25 ]. CD4+CD25+ TR can prevent or cure established colitis by homing to MLN and colon and inhibiting effector T cell proliferation at these sites [26 ]. The therapeutic potential of TR requires IL-10, mainly produced by CD4+CD25+ cells in the LP (but not the MLN), which inhibits activation of the innate immune system. In addition, TGF-ß plays a key role in the functioning of CD4+CD25+ TR by acting directly on effector T cells to inhibit their differentiation and effector function. It is important that CD4+CD25+ TR can also control T cell-independent colitis induced by Helicobacter hepaticus infection in immune-deficient mice [27 ]. CD4+CD25+ TR accumulated in MLN and colon of colitic mice and inhibit sustained rather than initial activation of the innate immune system, indicating that TR require the chronic inflammatory signals that they regulate to perform suppression.

Antigen-specific Tr1 clones have been described following repeated in vitro stimulation with APC and antigen in the presence of IL-10 and have also been reported to regulate colitis in the severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) transfer model. Hervé Groux (Nice, France) highlighted the relative contribution of constitutive CD4+CD25+ TR and Tr1 cells in control of colitis. He identified a tolerogenic CD11clowCD45RB+ DC subset, distinct from pDC, which can expand with IL-10, is absent in SCID mice, but can differentiate in vivo only after CD4+CD25+ TR transfer. This tolerogenic DC subset promotes in vivo differentiation of IL-10-secreting Tr1 cells expressing CD18+ and CD49b+, which are able to cure colitis in the SCID transfer model [28 , 29 ]. Thus, cure of colitis results from the capacity of transferred CD4+CD25+ TR to generate tolerogenic DC able to induce the differentiation of Tr1 cells. Along these lines, Edward Lavelle (Kevin Mills, Dublin) reported that bacterial toxins such as CT, heat-labile enterotoxins (LT), and adenylate cyclase from Bordetella pertussis, known as effective mucosal adjuvants, induce in vivo generation of Tr1 cells specific for bystander antigens by promoting maturation of IL-10-producing DC [30 ].

Oral tolerance is a physiological mechanism that controls untoward T cell-mediated hypersensitivity and autoimmune reactions to self or dietary antigens and was shown to involve anergy/deletion of effector T cells and TR cells, including TGF-ß-producing Th3 T cell clones. Although studies revealed that antigen feeding in OVA-specific TcR transgenic mice increases the number and suppressive function of CD4+CD25+ transgenic T cells, the role of naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ cells in tolerance induction in normal host remained to be clarified. Bertrand Dubois (D. Kaiserlian, Lyon, France) highlighted this issue in a well-characterized model of hapten-specific skin inflammation (i.e., CHS), mediated by CD8+ CTL effectors, independently of CD4 help. In this model, hapten gavage, prior to skin immunization, completely prevents CHS by inhibiting priming of specific CD8+ effectors in skin draining lymph nodes. That naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ TR are the main subset of regulatory cells responsible for induction of oral tolerance was demonstrated by in vivo antibody depletion and transfer experiments. Oral tolerance required environmental IL-10 in the host (and not IL-10 produced by CD4+CD25+ TR) and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules [31 ] and proceeds in two distinct, temporal phases. Gavage results in rapid uptake and presentation of the hapten to naive CD8+ T cells in gut-draining and nondraining secondary lymphoid organs, leading in a few days to functional inactivation of a hapten-specific CD8+ T cell pool in MLN and spleen, independently of CD4+CD25+ TR. It is interesting that gavage enhances the suppressive function of CD4+CD25+ TR, which completely suppresses priming/differentiation of residual CD8+ T cells into specific CD8+ CHS effectors during skin sensitization.

Formal proof of the pivotal role of CD4+CD25+TR in oral tolerance in human was provided by Per Brandtzaeg (Institute of Pathology, Oslo) in clinical studies of children with outgrown cow’s milk allergy (tolerant children), compared with those with clinically active allergy. Cow’s milk allergy in children is of short duration, and a proportion of children become tolerant with age. After a 2-month milk-free diet period, allergic children who became tolerant to cow’s milk challenge exhibited a diminished in vitro proliferative response to cow’s milk proteins as compared with children with active disease, as a result of a higher percentage of functional CD4+CD25+ TR [32 ]. It is interesting that milk reintroduction led to activation of CD4+CD25+ TR and to increased production of TGF-ß by peripheral blood cells, although it is still unclear whether CD4+CD25+ TR required TGF-ß for their functioning. This study demonstrates that acquisition of oral tolerance to dietary protein is associated with development of CD4+CD25+ TR, which requires exposure to the allergen to control specific T cells.

NK-T cells represent a distinct population of T cells that can act as regulatory cells in autoimmune and infectious processes. However, whether and how they could contribute to control inflammation in the gut have not been addressed. Dominique Buzzoni-Gatel (Pasteur Institute, Paris) showed that NK-T cells are attracted in the gut LP after oral infection with the parasite T. gondi and that CD1d-restricted NK-T cells contribute to the lethal ileitis as a result of overproduction of Th1 cytokines. However, when activated in vivo by {alpha}-galactosylceramide ({alpha}-GalCer), NK-T cells convert into Th2 cells and induce a dramatic influx of Foxp3+ CD4+CD25+ TR in the gut LP, which contributes to protection against infection. This indicates that NK-T cells can play a crucial role in initiation of inflammation and in its control via activation of CD4+CD25+ TR cells.


    NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS FOR MUCOSAL VACCINES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 
Mucosal vaccination can be used to protect the mucosal surfaces against colonization, invasion, or other pathogenic effects of microbial pathogens but also to treat selected autoimmune, allergic, or infectious immunopathologies by induction of antigen-specific, orally induced peripheral tolerance. Accordingly, development of mucosal vaccines for either purpose critically depends on efficient antigen delivery and adjuvant systems to present the vaccine or immunotherapeutic antigens to the mucosal immune system.

Jan Holmgren (Göteborg, Sweden) gave a thorough overview about the use of CT and the closely related E. coli LT, as well as their nontoxic B-subunit derivatives (CT-B and LT-B) as mucosal immunogens and adjuvants. The already licensed oral cholera vaccine Dukoral® (composed of inactivated whole-cell Vibrio cholerae bacteria and CT-B) has a safe and long-term, protective efficacy in children and adults of endemic and nonendemic countries. It also provides cross-protection against diarrhea caused by LT-producing enterotoxigenic E. coli, a pathogen for which no vaccine is currently available. Preclinical studies showed that vaccination with antigen-CT-pulsed DC drives tumor-specific CD8+ CTL, which eliminate established tumors, indicating that CT may be used as a combined carrier-delivery system and adjuvant for DC vaccination for therapeutic, anti-tumor vaccination [33 ]. Conversely to CT, which breaks oral tolerance, CT-B acts as an antigen carrier, promoting peripheral tolerance to appropriate antigen when administered via mucosal routes. The proof of principle about the use of CT-B for mucosal immunotherapy was provided in a phase I/II clinical trial in patients with Behcet’s disease, who develop autoimmune uveitis as a result of abnormal immune response against the 60-kd heat-shock protein (HSP60). Patients were treated by repeated oral administration of CT-B coupled to the immunodominant HSP60 peptide. Clinical remission was associated with immune unresponsiveness to HSP60, determined by an abrogation of HSP60-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation, down-regulation of Th1 cytokine and chemokine production, and decrease in CC chemokine receptor (CCR)7+ T cells, and these parameters were increased in patients with a relapse in uveitis [34 ]. Thus, oral tolerization by peptide CT-B is a novel, therapeutic vaccination strategy that may be applicable to other human autoimmune diseases, in which specific autoantigens are identified.

Ali Harandi (Göteborg, Sweden) described a novel adjuvant effect of CT-B, relying on activation of innate immunity. Initial in vivo mouse studies revealed that administration of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG-ODN) alone by vaginal, rectal, or gastrointestinal routes provided nonspecific protection against genital herpes, via stimulation of local production of macrophage-inflammatory protein-1{alpha} (MIP-1{alpha}), MIP-1ß, regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted, and IFN-inducible protein 10, as well as of IL-12 and IL-18 [35 , 36 ]. It is remarkable that mucosal administration of CpG coupled to CT-B (CTB-CpG) increased the local production of these factors, even across the species specificity of CpG oligonucleotides and could drive a Th1-biased, humoral response against coadministered tetanus toxoid. The molecular mechanism of such CT-B-linked CpG-ODN adjuvant effect is critically dependent on TLR-9 and myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88 (MyD88). Thus, CTB-CpG represents a powerful adjuvant delivery system suitable for systemic and mucosal immune vaccination.

Transcutaneous vaccination is a novel route of vaccination that has yielded promising results and safety with several vaccine antigens in healthy human volunteers. F. Anjuere (C. Czerkinsky, Nice, France) documented that transcutaneous immunization (TCI) using CT-B (but not CT) as adjuvant promotes a Th1-biased immune response to a coadministered protein antigen. It is notable that preclinical data showed that TCI with CT-B and coadministered OVA is able to suppress pre-established anti-OVA IgE responses, suggesting a medical potential of this immunotherapeutic approach in anti-infectious vaccination and type I allergy suppression/desensitization [37 ]. The divergent effect of CT and CT-B administered by different routes appears to be a result of their respective effect on local resident DC. Namely, although CT and CT-B induce recruitment of DC into skin after TCI, they differ in the ability to induce DC maturation when given by certain mucosal versus transcutaneous routes [24 ]. It is most likely that these differences result from the variable outcome of the local epithelial microenvironment that differs between tissues covered with monostratified and pluristratified epithelia.

A key issue for development of protective mucosal vaccine is to ensure homing of lymphocytes to mucosal organs, a process dictated by two major chemokines thymus-expressed chemokine (TECK) [CC chemokine ligand 25 (CCL25)] and mucosal-associated epithelial cells (MEC) (CCL28). Marianne Quiding-Järbrink (Göteborg, Sweden) verified this hypothesis in humans by testing in vitro chemotaxis to TECK and MEC of circulating B cells from volunteers immunized with an inactivated oral cholera vaccine combined with a subcutaneous (s.c.) recall vaccination against tetanus toxoid. Most cholera-specific, IgA-producing cells migrate in response to TECK (and to a lesser extent, to MEC), and tetanus toxoid-specific, IgG-producing cells failed to do so. This indicates that TECK could promote selective mucosal homing of antibody-producing cells but that this occurred only during a narrow time-slot in the immune response. Finally, Johanna Nyström (Göteborg, Sweden) reported promising preclinical data showing that protection against H. pylori could be induced by oral (but not systemic) therapeutic vaccination using H. pylori lysate mixed with CT, resulting in decreased stomach bacterial load and increased specific T and B cell-mediated mucosal responses.

Besides CT, LT, and their derivative gold standard mucosal adjuvant, two novel adjuvants promoting Th2-biased or Th1/Tc1-biased immune responses are on the pipeline. Jean-Claude Sirard (Lille, France) highlighted the exquisite Th2-promoting efficacy of bacterial flagellin, the TLR-5 ligand in mice, previously shown to up-regulate CCL20 gene expression by epithelial cell lines and to promote CCL20-specific chemotaxis of immature DC in vitro [38 ]. Flagellin, delivered via the nasal route, induces CCL20 production in the respiratory tract and promoted MyD88-dependent enhancement of mucosal and systemic antibody production responses to a coadministered, inert protein The mucosal instillation of flagellin is also associated with development of Th2 responses, as shown for s.c. administration [39 ]. Thus, epithelial signaling via specific TLR by stimulating DC recruitment into mucosal tissues may be a prerequisite for instruction of the mucosal immune system. Nathalie Etchart (D. Kaiserlian, Lyon, France) reported about the CD8+ T cell adjuvant property of a recombinant measles virus nucleoprotein (NP). This large molecular weight protein forms self-aggregates and has the unique property to induce cross-priming of IFN-{gamma}-producing CD8+ CTL against a soluble protein coadministered via pluristratified epithelia, i.e., the buccal mucosa and the skin. Similarly to flagellin, NP enhances local CCL20 production, resulting in rapid CCR6-mediated recruitment of DC at the site of immunization. Functional in vivo studies revealed that the adjuvant effect of NP is strictly dependent on DC recruitment via CCR6/CCL20. This unique adjuvant property of NP to trigger DC recruitment concomitantly in epithelia and functional CTL against an inocuous protein may be exploited for development of anti-infectious and anti-tumor vaccines.


    MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV AND VACCINATION STRATEGIES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 
The French Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS) sponsored this session to gather mucosal immunologists and AIDS specialists. HIV is indeed mostly transmitted via the genital tract and regardless of the mode of transmission, rapidly targets the mucosal immune system for infection and as a major reservoir for viral persistence [40 , 41 ]. Heterosexual transmission is the major mode of transmission and is increasingly affecting women, particularly in the developing world [42 ]. In the absence of an effective vaccine, there is an urgent need to develop alternative prevention strategies to block sexual spread of the virus.

Robin Shattock (London, UK) found that HIV transmitted by cells emigrating from human cervical explants was contained mostly in human leukocyte antigen-DR+ DC and to a lesser degree, in T cells. It is important that simultaneous blockade of mannose C-type lectin receptors, such as DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin) or the HIV envelope itself (with monoclonal antibody b12), and the CD4 receptor (CD4-IgG2 fusion protein) was able to inhibit localized infection and virus dissemination [43 ], thus identifying key targets for developing topical microbicides. Several compounds, including polyanions, which bind to positively charged gp120 residues, and more specific molecules preventing direct viral infection or even targeting reverse transcriptase are currently being evaluated as microbicides in clinical trials. Florian Hladik (Julie McElrath, Seattle, WA) found that conjugates of DC and CCR5+ T cells emigrating from the human vaginal mucosa support replication of R5 and X4-tropic HIV-1 strains. Further investigations were focused on the interactions of HIV-1 with Langerhans and T cells embedded in the outer epithelial layer of the mucosa. Using epithelial sheets separated from the vaginal stroma by ex vivo suction blistering, it was found that HIV-1 rapidly binds to and enters Langerhans and T cells, suggesting a parallel rather than a sequential infection of these two cell types. Complementary to these ex vivo models, in vitro reconstructed vaginal mucosa developed by Marielle Bousbacher (Jenny Valladeau and Colette Dezutter, Lyon, France) should provide an accurate model to dissect the cellular and molecular mechanism of mucosal HIV pathogenesis and to screen local microbicides.

Lessons regarding protective mechanisms against AIDS can be drawn from the immune response of HIV-exposed, yet seronegative subjects (ESN). Indeed, some ESN sex workers seroconverted and became infected after having reduced exposure or stopping risk behavior for several months, indicating that continuous exposure to the virus is necessary to maintain mucosal protection. Furthermore, lack of HIV immune memory indicates that innate immune mechanisms play a crucial role in the resistant status of these individuals. Kristina Broliden (Stockholm, Sweden) identified virus-neutralizing IgA in the serum and mucosal secretions from most ESN sex workers in Kenya. These antibodies neutralized primary HIV-1 isolates when peripheral blood mononuclear cells were used as target cells, could induce cross-clade neutralization, and inhibited virus transcytosis. Studies of discordant couples including ESN and of long-term, nonprogressor, seropositive individuals by Lucia Lopalco (Milan, Italy) [44 , 45 ] revealed the presence of CCR5-specific mucosal and systemic IgA antibodies, able to neutralize different HIV-1 clades by down-regulating CCR5 and blocking virus transcytosis specifically in epithelial cells. Morgane Bomsel (Paris, France) screened a phage-display Fab IgA library from mucosal B cells isolated from Cambodian ESN. The library was screened for Fabs specific for oligomeric HIV-1 gp41 and a derived peptide P1 (651–685), the epithelial receptor GalCer-binding site that also includes neutralizing epitopes ELDKWA and NWFDIT. Novel, recombinant Fab-blocking HIV-1 transcytosis and CD4+ T cell infection by primary isolates were selected. These IgA Fabs might thus be exploited as microbicides.

Kenneth Rosenthal (Hamilton, Canada) presented HIV vaccines with the dual capacity to trigger innate and acquired immunity in mice. He reported that mice, immunized intranasally with gp120-depleted, inactivated HIV-1 and CpG to stimulate TLR-9, develop HIV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in the genital tract and are protected against a cross-clade vaginal challenge. Intranasal immunization using a nonreplicating Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) gB protein with CpG induces similar protection against intravaginal infection with HSV-2. Local activation of TLRs by CpG or double-stranded RNA in the vaginal mucosa of female mice causes epithelial thickening and prevents HSV-2 replication in the genital mucosa, illustrating the potential of innate immune mechanisms in protection against sexually transmitted virus [46 47 48 ]. The possibility to induce specific systemic and genital CD8+ CTL by the vaginal route was illustrated by Carmelo Luci (F. Anjuère and C. Czerkinsky, Nice, France) using OVA conjugated to the CT-B subunit or coadministered with whole CT. Whereas the holotoxin promoted local and disseminated CTL responses, CT-B only evoked regional T cell responses in the draining genital lymph nodes.

As a multicentric human trial on mucosal HIV vaccine has been launched by the ANRS, Karine Petitprez, Laurent Belec, Dominique Salmon, and Gilles Pialoux (Paris, France) have developed standardized assays to monitor the level and functional activity of antibodies against HIV gp160 in the cervico-vaginal and other mucosal compartments of HIV-1-infected women. Progress has been made in the development of ex vivo human models of mucosal infection and transmission of HIV as well as of in vivo animal studies using HIV isolated from infected human tissues. Elucidating the protective innate and acquired immune mechanisms that are active in mucosal tissues will shed light on immune correlates of resistance to HIV infection. Thus, candidate vaccines able to trigger innate and adaptive immunity combined with microbicides appear as the rationale to prevent sexual HIV transmission.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We express our gratitude to the sponsors who have contributed to make this meeting possible and particularly to the major sponsor Danone-Vitapole as well as to ANRS, Becton-Dickinson, "Region Rhone-Alpes", "Fondation Merieux", and Society for Mucosal Immunology. We apologize to the many participants whose work has not been discussed because of space limitations. We are grateful to the speakers at the meeting for critical comments and helpful suggestions. We are also grateful to Bertrand Dubois, Nathalie Etchart, and Stephane Nancey (INSERM-U404, Lyon) and Pr. Alain Lachaux and Bernard Flourié (Hospices Civils de Lyon) as well as Elizabeth Fischer (ANRS), Morgane Bornsel (Cochin, Paris), and Cecil Czerkinsky (INSERM, Nice) for their precious help in organizing this meeting.

Received January 28, 2005; revised April 4, 2005; accepted April 5, 2005.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 COMMENSAL BACTERIA IN MUCOSAL...
 DC IN INFECTION, INFLAMMATION,...
 TR CELLS IN MUCOSAL...
 NOVEL ROUTES AND ADJUVANTS...
 MUCOSAL IMMUNITY AGAINST HIV...
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hooper, L. V., Xu, J., Falk, P. G., Midtvedt, T., Gordon, J. I. (1999) A molecular sensor that allows a gut commensal to control its nutrient foundation in a competitive ecosystem Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96,9833-9838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hooper, L. V., Wong, M. H., Thelin, A., Hansson, L., Falk, P. G., Gordon, J. I. (2001) Molecular analysis of commensal host-microbial relationships in the intestine Science 291,881-884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stappenbeck, T. S., Hooper, L. V., Gordon, J. I. (2002) Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,15451-15455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Backhed, F., Ding, H., Wang, T., Hooper, L. V., Koh, G. Y., Nagy, A., Semenkovich, C. F., Gordon, J. I. (2004) The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101,15718-15723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Paglino, J., Eslami-Varzaneh, F., Edberg, S., Medzhitov, R. (2004) Recognition of commensal microflora by Toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis Cell 118,229-241[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Bouma, G., Strober, W. (2003) The immunological and genetic basis of inflammatory bowel disease Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3,521-533[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Macpherson, A. J., Hunziker, L., McCoy, K., Lamarre, A. (2001) IgA responses in the intestinal mucosa against pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms Microbes Infect. 3,1021-1035[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Macpherson, A. J., Harris, N. L. (2004) Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4,478-485[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Macpherson, A. J., Uhr, T. (2004) Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria Science 303,1662-1665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Athman, R., Philpott, D. (2004) Innate immunity via Toll-like receptors and Nod proteins Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7,25-32[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Girardin, S. E., Tournebize, R., Mavris, M., Page, A. L., Li, X., Stark, G. R., Bertin, J., DiStefano, P. S., Yaniv, M., Sansonetti, P. J., Philpott, D. J. (2001) CARD4/Nod1 mediates NF-{kappa}B and JNK activation by invasive Shigella flexneri EMBO Rep. 2,736-742[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Viala, J., Chaput, C., Boneca, I. G., Cardona, A., Girardin, S. E., Moran, A. P., Athman, R., Memet, S., Huerre, M. R., Coyle, A. J., DeStefano, P. S., Sansonetti, P. J., Labigne, A., Bertin, J., Philpott, D. J., Ferrero, R. L. (2004) Nod1 responds to peptidoglycan delivered by the Helicobacter pylori cag pathogenicity island Nat. Immunol. 5,1166-1174[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Dubuquoy, L., Dharancy, S., Nutten, S., Pettersson, S., Auwerx, J., Desreumaux, P. (2002) Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} and retinoid X receptor heterodimer in hepatogastroenterological diseases Lancet 360,1410-1418[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Desreumaux, P., Dubuquoy, L., Nutten, S., Peuchmaur, M., Englaro, W., Schoonjans, K., Derijard, B., Desvergne, B., Wahli, W., Chambon, P., Leibowitz, M. D., Colombel, J. F., Auwerx, J. (2001) Attenuation of colon inflammation through activators of the retinoid X receptor (RXR)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) heterodimer. A basis for new therapeutic strategies J. Exp. Med. 193,827-838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kelly, D., Campbell, J. I., King, T. P., Grant, G., Jansson, E. A., Coutts, A. G., Pettersson, S., Conway, S. (2004) Commensal anaerobic gut bacteria attenuate inflammation by regulating nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of PPAR-{gamma} and RelA Nat. Immunol. 5,104-112[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Dubuquoy, L., Jansson, E. A., Deeb, S., Rakotobe, S., Karoui, M., Colombel, J. F., Auwerx, J., Pettersson, S., Desreumaux, P. (2003) Impaired expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} in ulcerative colitis Gastroenterology 124,1265-1276[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Bambou, J. C., Giraud, A., Menard, S., Begue, B., Rakotobe, S., Heyman, M., Taddei, F., Cerf-Bensussan, N., Gaboriau-Routhiau, V. (2004) In vitro and ex vivo activation of the TLR5 signaling pathway in intestinal epithelial cells by a commensal Escherichia coli strain J. Biol. Chem. 279,42984-42992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Menard, S., Candalh, C., Bambou, J. C., Terpend, K., Cerf-Bensussan, N., Heyman, M. (2004) Lactic acid bacteria secrete metabolites retaining anti-inflammatory properties after intestinal transport Gut 53,821-828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chapat, L., Chemin, K., Dubois, B., Bourdet-Sicard, R., Kaiserlian, D. (2004) Lactobacillus casei reduces CD8(+) T cell-mediated skin inflammation Eur. J. Immunol. 34,2520-2528[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Granucci, F. (2002) Opinion: interpretation of the complexity of innate immune responses by functional genomics Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2,881-889[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Granucci, F., Feau, S., Angeli, V., Trottein, F., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P. (2003) Early IL-2 production by mouse dendritic cells is the result of microbial-induced priming J. Immunol. 170,5075-5081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Granucci, F., Zanoni, I., Feau, S., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P. (2003) Dendritic cell regulation of immune responses: a new role for interleukin 2 at the intersection of innate and adaptive immunity EMBO J. 22,2546-2551[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Huh, J. C., Strickland, D. H., Jahnsen, F. L., Turner, D. J., Thomas, J. A., Napoli, S., Tobagus, I., Stumbles, P. A., Sly, P. D., Holt, P. G. (2003) Bidirectional interactions between antigen-bearing respiratory tract dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells precede the late phase reaction in experimental asthma: DC activation occurs in the airway mucosa but not in the lung parenchyma J. Exp. Med. 198,19-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Anjuere, F., Luci, C., Lebens, M., Rousseau, D., Hervouet, C., Milon, G., Holmgren, J., Ardavin, C., Czerkinsky, C. (2004) In vivo adjuvant-induced mobilization and maturation of gut dendritic cells after oral administration of cholera toxin J. Immunol. 173,5103-5111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Maloy, K. J., Powrie, F. (2001) Regulatory T cells in the control of immune pathology Nat. Immunol. 2,816-822[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Mottet, C., Uhlig, H. H., Powrie, F. (2003) Cutting edge: cure of colitis by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells J. Immunol. 170,3939-3943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Maloy, K. J., Salaun, L., Cahill, R., Dougan, G., Saunders, N. J., Powrie, F. (2003) CD4+CD25+ T(R) cells suppress innate immune pathology through cytokine-dependent mechanisms J. Exp. Med. 197,111-119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Groux, H., Fournier, N., Cottrez, F. (2004) Role of dendritic cells in the generation of regulatory T cells Semin. Immunol. 16,99-106[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Wakkach, A., Fournier, N., Brun, V., Breittmayer, J. P., Cottrez, F., Groux, H. (2003) Characterization of dendritic cells that induce tolerance and T regulatory 1 cell differentiation in vivo Immunity 18,605-617[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Lavelle, E. C., McNeela, E., Armstrong, M. E., Leavy, O., Higgins, S. C., Mills, K. H. (2003) Cholera toxin promotes the induction of regulatory T cells specific for bystander antigens by modulating dendritic cell activation J. Immunol. 171,2384-2392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Dubois, B., Chapat, L., Goubier, A., Papiernik, M., Nicolas, J. F., Kaiserlian, D. (2003) Innate CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are required for oral tolerance and inhibition of CD8+ T cells mediating skin inflammation Blood 102,3295-3301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Karlsson, M. R., Rugtveit, J., Brandtzaeg, P. (2004) Allergen-responsive CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in children who have outgrown cow’s milk allergy J. Exp. Med. 199,1679-1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sun, J. B., Eriksson, K., Li, B. L., Lindblad, M., Azem, J., Holmgren, J. (2004) Vaccination with dendritic cells pulsed in vitro with tumor antigen conjugated to cholera toxin efficiently induces specific tumoricidal CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes dependent on cyclic AMP activation of dendritic cells Clin. Immunol. 112,35-44[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Stanford, M., Whittall, T., Bergmeier, L. A., Lindblad, M., Lundin, S., Shinnick, T., Mizushima, Y., Holmgren, J., Lehner, T. (2004) Oral tolerization with peptide 336-351 linked to cholera toxin B subunit in preventing relapses of uveitis in Behcet’s disease Clin. Exp. Immunol. 137,201-208[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Harandi, A. M., Eriksson, K., Holmgren, J. (2003) A protective role of locally administered immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotide in a mouse model of genital herpes infection J. Virol. 77,953-962
  36. Harandi, A. M. (2004) The potential of immunostimulatory CpG DNA for inducing immunity against genital herpes: opportunities and challenges J. Clin. Virol. 30,207-210[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Anjuere, F., George-Chandy, A., Audant, F., Rousseau, D., Holmgren, J., Czerkinsky, C. (2003) Transcutaneous immunization with cholera toxin B subunit adjuvant suppresses IgE antibody responses via selective induction of Th1 immune responses J. Immunol. 170,1586-1592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sierro, F., Dubois, B., Coste, A., Kaiserlian, D., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., Sirard, J. C. (2001) Flagellin stimulation of intestinal epithelial cells triggers CCL20-mediated migration of dendritic cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98,13722-13727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Didierlaurent, A., Ferrero, I., Otten, L. A., Dubois, B., Reinhardt, M., Carlsen, H., Blomhoff, R., Akira, S., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., Sirard, J. C. (2004) Flagellin promotes myeloid differentiation factor 88-dependent development of Th2-type response J. Immunol. 172,6922-6930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Belyakov, I. M., Berzofsky, J. A. (2004) Immunobiology of mucosal HIV infection and the basis for development of a new generation of mucosal AIDS vaccines Immunity 20,247-253[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Veazey, R. S., Lackner, A. A. (2004) Getting to the guts of HIV pathogenesis J. Exp. Med. 200,697-700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Shattock, R. J., Moore, J. P. (2003) Inhibiting sexual transmission of HIV-1 infection Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1,25-34[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Hu, Q., Frank, I., Williams, V., Santos, J. J., Watts, P., Griffin, G. E., Moore, J. P., Pope, M., Shattock, R. J. (2004) Blockade of attachment and fusion receptors inhibits HIV-1 infection of human cervical tissue J. Exp. Med. 199,1065-1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Clerici, M., Barassi, C., Devito, C., Pastori, C., Piconi, S., Trabattoni, D., Longhi, R., Hinkula, J., Broliden, K., Lopalco, L. (2002) Serum IgA of HIV-exposed uninfected individuals inhibit HIV through recognition of a region within the {alpha}-helix of gp41 AIDS 16,1731-1741[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Barassi, C., Lazzarin, A., Lopalco, L. (2004) CCR5-specific mucosal IgA in saliva and genital fluids of HIV-exposed seronegative subjects Blood 104,2205-2206[Free Full Text]
  46. Ashkar, A. A., Bauer, S., Mitchell, W. J., Vieira, J., Rosenthal, K. L. (2003) Local delivery of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides induces rapid changes in the genital mucosa and inhibits replication, but not entry, of herpes simplex virus type 2 J. Virol. 77,8948-8956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Ashkar, A. A., Yao, X. D., Gill, N., Sajic, D., Patrick, A. J., Rosenthal, K. L. (2004) Toll-like receptor (TLR)-3, but not TLR4, agonist protects against genital herpes infection in the absence of inflammation seen with CpG DNA J. Infect. Dis. 190,1841-1849[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Jiang, J. Q., Patrick, A., Moss, R. B., Rosenthal, K. L. (2005) CD8+ T-cell-mediated cross-clade protection in the genital tract following intranasal immunization with inactivated human immunodeficiency virus antigen plus CpG oligodeoxynucleotides J. Virol. 79,393-400[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0105053v1
78/2/311    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiserlian, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hosmalin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaiserlian, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hosmalin, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS