Journal of Leukocyte Biology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.0804450 on November 5, 2004

Published online before print November 5, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0804450v1
77/2/190    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zola, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zola, H.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2005;77:190-198.)
© 2005 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

In silico evaluation of two mass spectrometry-based approaches for the identification of novel human leukocyte cell-surface proteins

I. C. Nicholson*,{dagger},1, M. Ayhan*,{ddagger}, N. J. Hoogenraad*,{ddagger} and H. Zola*,{dagger}

* Co-operative Research Centre for Diagnostics and
{dagger} Child Health Research Institute, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; and
{ddagger} Department of Biochemistry, Latrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

1 Correspondence: Child Health Research Institute, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide 5006, South Australia, Australia. E-mail: ian.nicholson{at}adelaide.edu.au


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The identification and quantitation of cell-surface proteins expressed by leukocytes currently use the wide availability of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in immunohistochemical and flow cytometric assays. Presently, ~400 such proteins have been characterized; however, analysis of the completed human genome sequence indicates that it may contain several thousand as-yet unidentified molecules, which may be expressed on the leukocyte cell surface. Recent advances in protein isolation and analysis using mass spectrometry illustrate that it is now feasible to identify the protein composition of a complex sample such as a plasma membrane extract. Such an approach may be useful for the identification of the cell-surface proteins that have not been identified using mAb techniques. Here, we detail the results of an in silico evaluation of the peptides isolated using two methods used to label plasma membrane proteins to determine whether these methods are suitable for the identification of known leukocyte cell-surface proteins by mass spectrometry. The labeling of cell-surface proteins before isolation and characterization is a valuable means of differentiating between plasma membrane and internal membrane proteins The results indicate that although the majority of cell-surface proteins can be identified using either of the approaches, others known to be important diagnostically and/or therapeutically would not be identified using either approach. The implication of this for the use of these techniques in the discovery of new leukocyte cell-surface proteins is discussed.

Key Words: proteomics • protein identification • MASCOT search • cell-surface biotinylation • glycoprotein identification


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasma membrane proteins expressed by leukocytes are involved in a range of critical functions, such as antigen-specific activation of cells, leukocyte-to-leukocyte and leukocyte-to-endothelium adhesion, the response to cytokines and chemokines, and the identification and removal of pathogens. Between 1982 and 2000, seven human leukocyte differentiation antigen (HLDA) workshops have collated information on 247 cell-surface "CD molecules," expressed by human leukocytes and malignant cells derived from them, using monoclonal antibodies (mAb) as a primary means of identification [1 ]. This represents a total of 320 individual molecules and 261 protein molecules. In various combinations, almost all of the CD molecules can be used to define stages of cellular development or activation of the cells of the immune system. This knowledge is used in the research, diagnosis, and therapy of conditions that have an immunological involvement, such as leukemia and lymphoma [2 ], human immunodeficiency virus [3 ], and hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation [4 ].

The CD molecules represent only a small fraction of the total of plasma membrane proteins expressed by leukocytes. The preparations for the eighth HLDA workshop identified ~200 "potential CD molecules" (see http://www.hlda8.org/PotentialCDs.htm), which have been characterized using mAb and/or gene analysis techniques [1 , 5 ]. Using recent experimental data, it is possible to derive an estimate of the number of cell-surface proteins expressed by leukocytes [5 ]. The human genome is predicted to encode 23,758 genes and can express 34,091 transcripts (Ensembl build v21.34d.1, May 10, 2004; http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/whatsnew/index.html).Expressed sequence tag data indicate that individual leukocyte populations express between 6000 and 17,000 genes, depending on their activation state [6 ]. Various studies predict that between 15% and 20% of the protein sequences in the human genome have one or more transmembrane helices [7 ]. These results imply that leukocytes may express several thousand membrane proteins, most of which remain to be identified and characterized. This estimate does not include some types of cell-surface proteins, such as glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins, which may not have transmembrane domains. The failure of current approaches to generate these reagents may be a result of a variety of reasons, such as low copy number and lack of immunogenicity as a result of high sequence identity with the equivalent protein in the species used to make antibodies. The identification of these molecules and the generation of suitable high-affinity binding reagents would facilitate the evaluation of these proteins as diagnostic or therapeutic targets.

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based sequencing of peptide fragments is increasingly being used to define the protein composition of a complex mixture and has been used to characterize protein expression by different populations of leukocytes. Several publications describing the partial analysis of leukocyte whole-cell protein extracts using 1-dimensional or 2-dimensional electrophoresis followed by MS analysis [8 9 10 ] suggest that this approach is relatively inefficient in identifying plasma membrane proteins, which have been identified using electrophoresis followed by MS in the analysis of detergent-resistant lipid raft domains of the membrane. However, these tend to be cytoskeletal proteins (e.g., flotillin, {alpha}-actinin, and moesin) and signaling molecules rather than integral membrane proteins [10 11 12 13 ]. Although the analysis of membrane lipid rafts does focus the analysis to the plasma membrane, only a fraction of the plasma membrane proteins is found in lipid rafts and the raft composition changes depending on the activation state of the cells, and relatively few of the known CD molecules have been identified in such preparations.

Two factors that contribute to the difficulty in analyzing membrane proteins by approaches based on electrophoresis followed by MS are the highly hydrophobic nature of many integral membrane proteins and the presence of post-translational modifications such as N-linked glycosylation. The partial fractionation of complex mixtures of proteins using specific labeling of proteins followed by affinity chromatography can be used in the MS-based identification of leukocyte plasma membrane proteins, which have not been identified using mAb-based approaches. The simplest labeling procedure is the biotinylation of cell-surface proteins using a water-soluble reagent such as sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin [14 ]. Although this approach proved useful to isolate CD molecules, over 40% of the proteins identified by MS-based sequencing were nonplasma membrane proteins. Cell-surface proteins can be labeled in preference to intracellular proteins by incubating intact cells using lipid-insoluble, maleimide-based, thio-reactive reagents [15 , 16 ] or through N-linked carbohydrates using hydrazide-based reagents [17 ]. Alternatively, cell-surface glycoproteins can be purified using lectin affinity chromatography and then tagged with the required isotope during deglycosylation [18 ]. An analysis of protein expression using (thiol-based) isotope-coded affinity tag reagents identified many CD molecules in a microsomal extract of HL-60 cells [16 ]. This analysis also identified a number of "hypothetical" proteins (proteins predicted from open reading frames of the human genome sequence), some of which may be cell-surface molecules.

Although these methods can lead to the discovery of previously unidentified plasma membrane proteins, it is not clear what proportion of proteins may be missed by any of these approaches. To gain some insight into the value of methods based on protein labeling through cysteines or glycosylation sites, we analyzed all 261 protein CD molecules to determine the likelihood that these known cell-surface proteins would be identified using these methods. This provides an indication of the proportion of typical membrane proteins that may be amenable to identification by MS following isolation using the approaches described. We find that a significant number of known CD molecules may not be identified by these methods, including several molecules that are currently important diagnostically and/or therapeutically. This suggests that a single approach will not be sufficient to generate a complete catalog of the proteins expressed on the surface of a cell and also indicates that additional alternatives to the isolation of plasma membrane proteins will need to be developed.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sequence identifiers for the CD proteins
The primary source of sequence identifiers for the CD proteins was the SwissProt identifier listed in the "CD nomenclature for surface proteins of human leukocytes" page of the Human Proteomics Initiative on the ExPASy website (http://www.expasy.org/cgi-bin/lists?cdlist.txt). The remaining identifiers were located by searching the ExPASy site with the gene names or protein accession numbers as listed in the Locus Link database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/). If this could not identify the protein, the protein sequence was identified from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, and this was used in a BLAST search of the SwissProt and TrEMBL databases (http://www.expasy.org/tools/blast/). Where SwissProt identifiers could not be determined, the TrEMBL accession number was identified using the same process. If no TrEMBL accession number could be identified, then the protein sequence from the NCBI database was used directly in the analysis.

In silico trypsin digestion
Peptide fragments generated by trypsin digestion were predicted using the "PeptideMass" program [19 ], accessed through the ExPASy proteomics server (http://www.expasy.org/tools/peptide-mass.html). The SwissProt protein identifier or the TrEMBL accession number was used to identify the protein or the amino acid sequence transferred from the NCBI record. Trypsin was selected as the enzyme, and the option to include "all known post-translational modifications" was selected. The other parameters were as follows: Cysteines were treated with "nothing"; peptide masses were isotopic and uncharged; zero missed cleavages were allowed; and peptides of a mass greater than 500 Da were displayed. These parameters will predict peptides that are readily characterizable using the currently available MS equipment.

N-linked glycosylation sites
For proteins with a SwissProt or TrEMBL identifier, the selection of all known post-translational modifications in the PeptideMass program was used to identify the peptide fragments that contained N-linked glycosylation sites. For the other proteins or where no glycosylation sites were indicated in the SwissProt annotation, potential N-linked glycosylation sites were identified using the "NetNGlyc Server" (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/), with the output selected to "Predict only on Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr sequons." O-linked glycosylation sites were not examined, as a consensus motif has not been identified [20 ], making the prediction of which peptides carry O-linked glycosylation too complicated for a rapid analysis.

MASCOT searching
For each protein, the peptides that contained a single cysteine residue were identified. To determine whether a peptide could identify the original protein, the peptide mass and part or all of the sequence were analyzed using the MASCOT sequence query form [21 ] on the Matrix Science site (http://www.matrix-science.com). For peptide fragments less than six residues, the entire sequence was submitted; for longer fragments, between five and seven residues were submitted. For example, the sequence tag "1436 seq(y[il][dn]atg)" (where "[il]" and "[dn]" indicate that either amino acid could be present at that position) was submitted as the N -> C sequence (the default "b-ion" setting) to search with the CD98-derived glycosylated peptide SLVTQL<N>ATGNR (amino acids 316–329 of CD98, where the <N> residue is predicted to be glycosylated). The following parameters were used in the form: NCBInr database; Homo sapiens taxonomy; trypsin as the enzyme; no missed cleavages allowed; no modifications selected; peptide tolerance of ±2 Da; MS/MS tolerance of ±0.8 Da; the peptide charge as "molecular weight" (no peptide charge); and the masses as monoisotopic. The score of the top match was recorded, and if the top match were not the source protein, then the position of the protein in the list was recorded. If the top match were not the correct protein, but the score for the correct protein was close to the score of the top match, then the sequences were compared by a pair-wise BLAST alignment to determine whether they were independent submissions to the database of a single sequence or whether the entries were distinct sequences. If they were, then the peptide was included as having identified the correct protein.

Data compilation
The following data were collected for each protein analyzed: the predicted polypeptide mass; the total number of peptides with a mass between 500 and 2000 Da; the number of peptides in this size range with a single cysteine; and the number of peptides in this size range with an N-linked glycosylation site.

Protein identification using cysteine-containing peptides
Protein identifications were rejected if the following set of criteria were not met for two or more peptides predicted from trypsin digestion: The peptides were of a mass between 500 and 2000 Da; a single cysteine residue was present in each peptide; there were no predicted N-glycosylation sites; and the peptides identified the original protein using the (MASCOT) search engine.

Protein identification using glycosylated peptides
Protein identifications were rejected if the following set of criteria were not met for two or more peptides predicted from trypsin digestion: The peptides were of a mass between 500 and 2000 Da; the peptide included a predicted N-linked glycosylation site; and the peptides identified the original protein using the (MASCOT) search engine.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The protein sequences of 261 CD molecules were analyzed. The 59 remaining CD molecule designations, which were not analyzed, include reserved designations (e.g., CD113, CD185), carbohydrate molecules (e.g., CD15, CD77), deleted or reassigned designations (e.g., CD67, CD78), or CD molecules that have not been cloned or for which no definitive sequence could be identified (e.g., CD139, CD165). SwissProt identifiers could be determined for 239 CD molecules, and TrEMBL identifiers were determined for the other 22 molecules.

There was a linear relationship between the predicted size of the protein and the number of peptides between 500 and 2000 Da, which would be generated by trypsin digestion (R2=0.87; Fig. 1A ). In contrast, the relationships between the total number of peptides in the size range and the number of peptides with a single cysteine residue (R2=0.63; Fig. 1B ) or the number of peptides with N-linked glycosylation (R2=0.55; Fig. 1C ) were not strong.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Correlations of peptides in a size range 500–2000 Da predicted to be generated by trypsin digestion of the sequences of 261 CD molecules with other characteristics of the proteins. (A) Plot of the mass of the protein sequence against the number of peptides generated. (B) Plot of the number of peptides generated against the number that has a single cysteine residue present. (C) Plot of the number of peptides generated against the number that has a single predicted N-linked glycosylation site. R2 values given in the main text were obtained by plotting a linear regression line to pass through the intersection of the axes (0,0).

 
The MASCOT search for the example CD98-derived sequence tag 1436 seq(y[il][dn]atg) returned four database entries with an identical score of 72 (for this search, scores above 63 were significant). The four database entries that were returned (gi_21361344, gi_178685, gi_177207, and gi_177216) all correspond to the target sequence (CD98), but the entries have been submitted by different individuals or represent a curated sequence (gi_21361344).

A protein identification approach using two peptides containing a single cysteine residue was not able to identify 88 of the CD molecules (33.7% of the sequences analyzed), as listed in Table 1 . An identification approach using glycosylated peptides was not able to identify 130 CD molecules (49.8% of the sequences analyzed), as listed in Table 2 . The reasons why particular CD molecules could not be identified using either method are summarized in Figure 2 . In most cases, the sequences did not generate two or more suitable cysteine-containing or glycosylated peptides.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. List of 88 CD Molecules That Could Not Be Identified by a Sequence Database Search Using Two or More Peptides Containing a Single Cysteine Residue

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. List of 130 CD Molecules That Could Not Be Identified by a Sequence Database Search Using Two or More Glycosylated Peptides

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Reasons for which CD molecules could not be identified using cysteine-containing peptides (A) or glycosylated peptides (B). The identities of the CD molecules in each category are listed in Tables 1 and 2 . "No Glycosylation" indicates the number of CD molecules that were not glycosylated. "No Peptides" indicates that no peptides in the size range contained a cysteine residue peptide or a glycosylation site. "Single peptide" indicates that only one in the size range contained a cysteine residue. "One suitable peptide" indicates that only one peptide with a cysteine residue peptide or a glycosylation site was present. "Search failed" indicates that the MASCOT search did not return the correct sequence.

 
In the analysis of glycosylated peptides, the database search failed for peptides derived from four sequences. Three of these were closely related sequences (CD158b1, CD158b2, CD158h), which produced identical peptide fragments. In the case of the fourth protein (CD47), one of the predicted glycosylated peptides was located immediately following the signal sequence. The fragment used in the MASCOT search did not include the signal sequence; however, the database entry for the protein included the signal sequence, leading to a larger fragment being expected (Fig. 3 ).



View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Sequences of peptide fragments resulting from trypsin digestion of the CD47 protein. The first 60 amino acids of the CD47 protein sequence are shown. The signal sequence as annotated in the SwissProt entry "CD47_HUMAN" is shown by underlining. The sequence is predicted to be glycosylated at amino acid 23, as indicated with an "N" above the sequence line. The peptide sequence 19..24 is the fragment predicted by trypsin digestion following cleavage of the signal peptide, as would occur when the protein is expressed. The peptide 1..24 is the trypsin digestion fragment predicted if the signal peptide is not removed. The peptide 19..24 (QLLFNK, mass 762 Da) does not return the CD47 sequence in a MASCOT search, as the NCBInr database used does not include a sequence entry without the signal peptide, and the same peptide fragment sequence (QLLFNK) with a mass of 2506 Da returns the CD47 sequence.

 
There were 103 CD molecules (39.4%), which could be identified by both protein identification approaches used (Table 3 ), and there were 60 CD molecules (23.0%), which could not be detected by either method (Table 4 ). The numbers in each category are summarized in Table 5 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. List of 103 CD Molecules That Could Be Identified Using Cysteine-Containing Peptides and Glycosylated Peptides

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. List of 60 CD Molecules That Could Not be Identified by Searching for Cysteine-Containing Peptides or Glycosylated Peptides

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Summary of the Numbers of CD Molecules That Could or Could Not be Identified Using Each Approach

 
To illustrate two difficulties presented by the analysis, details of the analysis for two CD molecules are presented in Figure 4 and Table 6 . The CD32 family of Fc receptors (FcRs) is distinct, functionally and by their expression patterns [22 ]. In silico prediction of the peptides generated by trypsin digestion indicates that the three members of the family, CD32a, CD32b and CD32c, would yield several common peptides, including the only peptide of between 500 and 2000 Da that contains a cysteine residue (Fig. 4) . A database search using these shared peptides cannot discriminate between the different family members.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of the CD32 family members, showing the sequences of the shared peptides that would be generated by trypsin digestion. Neighboring peptides are distinguished by a change from uppercase text to lowercase. The number below the peptide indicates the predicted mass of the fragment.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Matches Returned by MASCOT Search of Peptide Fragments from the CD169 Protein Sequence

 
A different situation, seen with peptides from the CD169 protein, can arise from the redundancy of the databases used for searching. The in silico trypsin digestion predicts the generation of 60 peptides of between 500 and 2000 Da, of which nine contain a single cysteine residue and another three have a predicted N-linked glycosylation site. The database search performed with several of these peptides returned matches to several proteins as well as the correct match (Table 6) . The source of the matched sequences are as follows: gi_28273128, gi_10440432, and gi_10440438 were isolated from human spleen cDNA libraries prepared in the same laboratory; gi_11493364 was identified by its homology with CD169 during the genome sequencing project; gi_13489095 is the NBCI reference sequence for CD169; and gi_12656130 is the original CD169 sequence deposited in the NCBI database, which was used to generate the reference sequence. BLAST analyses of the first four sequences listed return each of the others and the CD169 reference sequences, suggesting that these are fragments of the CD169 protein (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasma membrane proteins expressed by leukocytes are involved in a range of functions critical to the interaction of cells with their environment. Using mAb and more recently, gene analysis techniques, the seven HLDA workshops have characterized the expression of 320 cell-surface proteins expressed on the surface of leukocytes. It is clear from a number of sources that there are many more proteins expressed in leukocyte plasma membranes that have not been identified using these approaches. MS-based protein identification, using affinity chromatography to isolate proteins with exposed extracellular domains, provides a means to identify and characterize those cell-surface proteins that have not been identified through traditional means. We have examined two approaches used to affinity-isolate plasma membrane proteins to determine how effective they are likely to be in the identification of uncharacterized proteins.

Our results demonstrate that the isolation of peptides through N-linked glycosylation or thiol bonds can be used in conjunction with MS analysis to identify most (77%) of the known CD molecules (201 of 261 analyzed). Given that large size of the dataset and that it is representative of the diversity of plasma membrane proteins, this would suggest that these same approaches would be valuable for the detection and characterization of other cell-surface proteins that have not yet been identified. It is also evident that no single approach can be used to identify all the proteins in a particular sample and that other methods of isolating proteins and/or peptides will be needed to ensure that a complete coverage of the cell-surface proteins is obtained.

The analysis described here required that two peptides identify the target protein in the database source. The identification of proteins using peptide mass tags is a probability-based process [21 , 23 ], which can be affected by a variety of factors including the quality of the MS spectra, the mass accuracy of the peptide mass determinations, and the quality of the sequence database. Although it is possible to identify a protein using a single peptide sequence tag [23 ], mixtures of peptides can often result in poor quality MS–MS and the failure to identify a correct parent protein [18 , 24 ]. Thus, the need for two peptide sequence tags to contribute to the identification of the parent protein increases the confidence of the match [16 ]. In the approaches examined here, further confidence in the assignments can be gained by the requirement that the peptide sequence contains a cysteine residue or a motif for N-linked glycosylation. In the present study, an "in silico" analysis of database searches using peptide sequence tags means that factors such as MS spectra quality and mass accuracy could be ignored, and this allowed us to address whether a "perfect" peptide sequence tag is capable of identifying the parent protein when it is known to be in the database.

There are a number of factors that affected the identification of CD molecules using the approaches described and that would also impact on the use of these approaches for the identification of new cell-surface molecules. For example, the CD20 molecule, which is commonly used to identify B lymphocytes, has no N-linked glycosylation sites and generated only one peptide with a cysteine residue in the specified size range. A similar situation was observed with the CD8 {alpha}- and ß-chains. The detection of these proteins would require the use of alternative methods. In other cases, such as the low-affinity immunoglobulin G FcR-2 proteins (CD32a, CD32b, and CD32c), closely related but functionally distinct proteins could not be distinguished, as they generated a number of identical peptides.

The identification of certain proteins may be affected by the quality of the protein database used to match the peptide sequences. This may be a result of duplication of sequences or errors in the annotation of sequences. The database searches using peptides derived from the CD169 sequence returned a number of matches corresponding to clones from cDNA libraries as well as the prototype CD169 sequence. Further analysis of the other matches suggested that they represented fragments of the CD169 sequence rather than full-length sequences of closely related proteins. The presence of sequence fragments in a database may complicate the identification of novel proteins using these approaches. The completion of the human genome sequence and the determination of the final number of 23,758 protein-coding genes and 34,091 transcripts (Ensembl build v21.34d.1, May 10, 2004; http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/whatsnew/index.html) mean that a reference sequence database, which does not contain multiple copies of sequences or fragments of sequences, can now be assembled and curated.

In conclusion, the application of the protein isolation and identification strategies discussed in this paper will allow a significant proportion of the unknown cell-surface proteins to be identified and evaluated as markers of cell populations. It is apparent, however, that additional techniques will need to be applied to complete the analysis of the protein composition of the leukocyte cell surface.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was funded by the Cooperative Research Centre for Diagnostics. We thank Chris Mavrangelos and Debbrah Millard for assistance with compiling the data and Kim Fung for useful discussions.

Received August 2, 2004; revised October 4, 2004; accepted October 5, 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Mason, D., Andre, P., Bensussan, A., Buckley, C., Civin, C., Clark, E., de Haas, M., Goyert, S., Hadam, M., Hart, D., Horejsi, V., Meuer, S., Morrissey, J., Schwartz-Albiez, R., Shaw, S., Simmons, D., Uguccioni, M., van Der Schoot, E., Vivier, E., Zola, H. (2002) CD antigens 2002 Blood 99,3877-3880[Free Full Text]
  2. Jennings, C. D., Foon, K. A. (1997) Recent advances in flow cytometry: application to the diagnosis of hematologic malignancy Blood 90,2863-2892[Free Full Text]
  3. Helbert, M., Breuer, J. (2000) Monitoring patients with HIV disease J. Clin. Pathol. 53,266-272[Free Full Text]
  4. To, L. B., Haylock, D. N., Simmons, P. J., Juttner, C. A. (1997) The biology and clinical uses of blood stem cells Blood 89,2233-2258[Free Full Text]
  5. Zola, H., Swart, B. W. (2003) Human leucocyte differentiation antigens Trends Immunol. 24,353-354[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hashimoto, S., Nagai, S., Sese, J., Suzuki, T., Obata, A., Sato, T., Toyoda, N., Dong, H. Y., Kurachi, M., Nagahata, T., Shizuno, K., Morishita, S., Matsushima, K. (2003) Gene expression profile in human leukocytes Blood 101,3509-3513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Muller, A., MacCallum, R. M., Sternberg, M. J. (2002) Structural characterization of the human proteome Genome Res. 12,1625-1641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Thiede, B., Siejak, F., Dimmler, C., Jungblut, P. R., Rudel, T. (2000) A two dimensional electrophoresis database of a human Jurkat T-cell line Electrophoresis 21,2713-2720[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Nyman, T. A., Rosengren, A., Syyrakki, S., Pellinen, T. P., Rautajoki, K., Lahesmaa, R. (2001) A proteome database of human primary T helper cells Electrophoresis 22,4375-4382[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Nebl, T., Pestonjamasp, K. N., Leszyk, J. D., Crowley, J. L., Oh, S. W., Luna, E. J. (2002) Proteomic analysis of a detergent-resistant membrane skeleton from neutrophil plasma membranes J. Biol. Chem. 277,43399-43409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Foster, L. J., De Hoog, C. L., Mann, M. (2003) Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100,5813-5818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Li, N., Mak, A., Richards, D. P., Naber, C., Keller, B. O., Li, L., Shaw, A. R. (2003) Monocyte lipid rafts contain proteins implicated in vesicular trafficking and phagosome formation Proteomics 3,536-548[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. von Haller, P. D., Donohoe, S., Goodlett, D. R., Aebersold, R., Watts, J. D. (2001) Mass spectrometric characterization of proteins extracted from Jurkat T cell detergent-resistant membrane domains Proteomics 1,1010-1021[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Peirce, M. J., Wait, R., Begum, S., Saklatvala, J., Cope, A. P. (2004) Expression profiling of lymphocyte plasma membrane proteins Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3,56-65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Conti, L. R., Radeke, C. M., Shyng, S. L., Vandenberg, C. A. (2001) Transmembrane topology of the sulfonylurea receptor SUR1 J. Biol. Chem. 276,41270-41278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Han, D. K., Eng, J., Zhou, H., Aebersold, R. (2001) Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry Nat. Biotechnol. 19,946-951[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Zhang, H., Li, X. J., Martin, D. B., Aebersold, R. (2003) Identification and quantification of N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry Nat. Biotechnol. 21,660-666[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Kaji, H., Saito, H., Yamauchi, Y., Shinkawa, T., Taoka, M., Hirabayashi, J., Kasai, K., Takahashi, N., Isobe, T. (2003) Lectin affinity capture, isotope-coded tagging and mass spectrometry to identify N-linked glycoproteins Nat. Biotechnol. 21,667-672[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Wilkins, M. R., Lindskog, I., Gasteiger, E., Bairoch, A., Sanchez, J. C., Hochstrasser, D. F., Appel, R. D. (1997) Detailed peptide characterization using PEPTIDEMASS—a World-Wide-Web-accessible tool Electrophoresis 18,403-408[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Hansen, J. E., Lund, O., Tolstrup, N., Gooley, A. A., Williams, K. L., Brunak, S. (1998) NetOglyc: prediction of mucin type O-glycosylation sites based on sequence context and surface accessibility Glycoconj. J. 15,115-130[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S. (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data Electrophoresis 20,3551-3567[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Zola, H., Jessup, C., Nicholson, I. C., Macardle, P. J. (2000) CD32 (Fc {gamma}RII) J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 14,311-316[Medline]
  23. Mann, M., Wilm, M. (1994) Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags Anal. Chem. 66,4390-4399[Medline]
  24. Simpson, R. J., Connolly, L. M., Eddes, J. S., Pereira, J. J., Moritz, R. L., Reid, G. E. (2000) Proteomic analysis of the human colon carcinoma cell line (LIM 1215): development of a membrane protein database Electrophoresis 21,1707-1732[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
S. P. Mirza and M. Olivier
Methods and approaches for the comprehensive characterization and quantification of cellular proteomes using mass spectrometry
Physiol Genomics, March 10, 2008; 33(1): 3 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
R.P. Webster, D. Brockman, and L. Myatt
Nitration of p38 MAPK in the placenta: association of nitration with reduced catalytic activity of p38 MAPK in pre-eclampsia
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 12(11): 677 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0804450v1
77/2/190    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zola, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zola, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS