science pharmaceutical expo biotech jobs
Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.1203658 on August 3, 2004

Published online before print August 3, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.1203658v1
76/5/1082    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cheong, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cheong, J.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2004;76:1082-1088.)
© 2004 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

The orphan nuclear receptor SHP is involved in monocytic differentiation, and its expression is increased by c-Jun

Yoon Ha Choi*, Min Jung Park*, Kook Whan Kim*, Hyung Chul Lee*, Young Hyun Choi{dagger} and JaeHun Cheong*,1

* Department of Molecular Biology, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea; and
{dagger} Department of Biochemistry, College of Oriental Medicine, Dong-Eui University, Busan, Korea

1 Correspondence: Department of Molecular Biology, Pusan National University, Busan 607-935, Korea. E-mail: molecule85{at}pusan.ac.kr


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Small heterodimer partner (SHP) is an atypical member of nuclear receptor superfamily that lacks a DNA binding domain. Here, we show that SHP expression increases during monocytic differentiaton with exposure HL-60 leukemia cells to a 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) response element, whose treatment induced the SHP promoter activity dependent on c-Jun expression, which is well known to be involved in the commitment step in the TPA-induced differentiation of HL-60 leukemia cells. We also show that overexpression and activation signaling of c-Jun increase the SHP promoter activity, suggesting that the level of SHP expression is normally limiting for c-Jun-dependent monocytic differentiation. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using oligonucleotides derived from the SHP promoter reveal that c-Jun exhibit TPA-induced DNA binding, providing a mechanism for the transcriptional activation of SHP gene expression. It was also found that overexpression of SHP and c-Jun greatly facilitated monocytic differentiation by TPA and surprisingly, that expression of SHP or c-Jun alone was sufficient to make cells differentiate into functionally mature monocytes, but silencing of SHP and c-Jun by RNA interference diminished the TPA-induced monocytic differentiation. Taken together, these works suggest that c-Jun works to activate the expression of SHP genes associated with the cascade regulation of monocytic differentiation.

Key Words: monocyte • c-Jun • SHP


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The differentiation of committed progenitors is especially well characterized, and it is generally believed to be controlled in large part by lineage-specific transcription factors regulating the appearance of lineage-specific molecules [1 , 2 ]. Conversely, the molecular mechanisms underlying the developmental programs of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells are largely unknown. The successive activation of tissue-specific genes during cellular differentiation is orchestrated by the formation of different transcriptional complexes consisting of cell-specific and ubiquitous transcription factors [3 , 4 ]. This process is arguably best exemplified in the hematopoietic system, where different transcriptional complexes control the production of distinct cellular lineages from a common hematopoietic stem cell precursor.

Changes in gene expression during monocyte/macrophage differentiation have been investigated [5 6 7 ], and in monocyte-specific mRNAs, levels were reported to increase. During differentiation of HL-60 cells, which are usually used as a model to study monocyte/macrophage differentiation, Krichevsky et al. [8 ] described a cluster of mRNAs that are more associated to polysomes, which are more susceptible to translation into proteins.

Small heterodimer partner (SHP) is an orphan nuclear receptor, specifically expressed in liver and a limited number of other tissues, and its activities are in some ways opposite to those of retinoid X receptor (RXR) [9 ] and is also named with NROB2 according to the nuclear receptor nomenclature. Based on its ability to interact with a variety of nuclear receptors, distinct features distinguish SHP from RXR, the only known, common heterodimerization receptor [10 , 11 ]. First, SHP, unlike RXR, interacts with estrogen receptors (ERs), and agonistic ligands enhance, whereas antagonistic ligands inhibit, these interactions (for discussions, see refs. [10 , 12 ]). Second, the C terminus within SHP, including the putative dimerization helix, is dispensable for interactions, and a central ligand-binding domain region apparently forms the SHP-specific domain for interaction with receptors.

We investigated pathways leading to SHP production during HL-60 cell differentiation toward the monocyte lineage. Various studies have reported SHP to be a repressor of transcriptional activities of a number of nuclear receptors, including ligand responsive receptors, such as ER, thyroid hormone receptor, retinoic acid receptor, and RXR, and orphan receptors, such as constitutive androstane receptor, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4, and fetoprotein transcription factor [9 , 10 , 13 , 14 ]. Initial studies indicated that SHP is expressed predominantly in the liver, spleen, small intestine, and pancreas [11 ]. However, later studies with more sensitive approaches have demonstrated the presence of SHP mRNA in a wide variety of tissues, with highest expression in heart, brain, liver, lung, and adrenal gland [12 ]. Although very little is known about SHP gene regulation, some recent reports have suggested important roles for the bile acid receptor farnesoid X receptor and activated protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factors in regulating SHP gene expression and subsequent regulation of cholesterol homeostasis [15 , 16 ].

As the SHP gene promoter contains several 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) response elements (TRE), which are predicted to be c-Jun response elements, we investigated whether c-Jun subfamily members can regulate the SHP gene promoter. Mapping studies revealed that only one of the TRE on the SHP gene promoter is responsible for the c-Jun-mediated activation of the SHP promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) and mutational studies confirmed the binding of c-Jun to this element. In this study, we show that SHP plays a critical role in the monocytic differentiation, and c-Jun activation signaling induces its expression during differentiation. Cells expressing SHP stably led to transform the HL-60 leukemia cell differentiation into a monocyte-like character and to induce monocytic marker tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) protein expression.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
HL-60 cell culture and induction of differentiation
HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin 100 U/ml, and streptomycin 100 µg/ml (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY). To induce monocytic differentiation, the cells in logarithmic growth were seeded at 2 x 105/ml and were grown in the presence of 20 nM phorbol ester (TPA) for up to 3 days. At the end of the differentiation experiment, differentiated cells were confirmed with nonspecific esterase staining assay, harvested, and resuspended in an appropriate buffer for each experiment.

Plasmids
A full-length c-Jun cDNA was generated by reverse transcription followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and verified by sequencing. c-Jun was subcloned into pCMX1 as BamHI and BamHI/KpnI fragments, respectively. pCMX1 was a gift from Jon Shuman (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and was used in the transient transfection analysis. In vitro translation products were verified by [35S]Met incorporation and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis. The human p38 expression plasmid was provided by Jiahuai Han (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA) [17 ]. The SHP promoter, based on luciferase reporter plasmids, was provided by Heung Sik Choi (Chonnam University, Korea). The mammalian expression plasmids for mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MKK1), MKK4, and MKK6 were provided by Han Do Kim (Pusan National University, Busan, Korea).

Western blot analysis
Untreated or TPA-treated HL-60 cells were harvested in Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer, and 30–50 µg nuclear protein was fractionated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were electroblotted to Immobilon-P (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline, 0.02% Tween 20, containing 5% nonfat milk. Specific antibody for SHP was prepared. The SHP cDNA (EcoRI) was subcloned into the vector pGEX (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) for protein expression in bacteria. Glutatione S-transferase (GST)-SHP was affinity-purified, and the antigen was excised from a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Antisera were raised according to standard protocols, and appropriate reactivity was verified against recombinant proteins. The specificities of all antisera were verified against purified recombinant proteins. TNF-{alpha} and TATA binding protein (TBP) antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Secondary detection used goat anti-rabbit-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK) visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Gel mobility shift analysis
Nuclear extracts were prepared from HL-60 cells following stimulation with hormones or kinase inhibitors as indicated in the figure legends. Approximately 10 µg nuclear extract was immunoprecipitated with a SHP-specific antibody and incubated with a probe. A double-stranded oligonucleotide encoding the SHP TRE sequence (promoter positions –251 to –229) was used for gel shift analysis: 5'-TGTGCCCTGCAATGGCCACTTACA. Binding reactions were assembled without probe and held 5 min on ice followed by 5 min at room temperature. Probe was added with further room temperature incubation for 30 min. Samples were separated in 4% acrylamide, 0.5 x 0.045 M Tris, 0.045 M boric acid, 1.0 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), gels run at 200 V constant voltage.

Transient and stable transfection
HL-60 cells were transfected by the standard electroporation method. Cells were incubated with DNA precipitates for 16 h, washed, and maintained in complete medium 48 h prior to harvest. Relative luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were determined. Basal promoter activity is reported as the activity observed after transfection of the reporter plus an appropriate amount of empty expression vector. In all cases, transfection data represent the mean of three independent experiments. For establishment of a SHP-expressing, stable cell line, HL-60 cells were transfected with 3 µg SHP expression plasmid [pcDNA3/hemagglutinin (HA)] using an electroporation method. At 48 h post-transfection, cells were cultured in the presence of 500 µg/ml G418 (Gibco-BRL). After 21 days in selective medium, individual G418-resistant colonies were isolated.

RNA interference (RNAi) expression
Individual DNA fragments containing sequences encoding the proteins of c-Jun and SHP to be targeted by RNAi were amplified by PCR from human genomic DNA and cloned in both orientations into the pCRII-Tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO) cloning vector by using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Sense and antisense clones were used as templates to generate single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) with a Ribomax kit (Promega, Madison, WI). ssRNA was resuspended in annealing buffer (5 mM KCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4), and equal quantities of sense and antisense ssRNAs were annealed by heating to 95°C for 5 min and slow cooling for 12–18 h to generate double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), which was stored at –80°C. Briefly, 2 x 106 cells were plated into a 60-mm diameter dish. After 1 h, FBS-containing medium was removed and replaced with 2 ml serum-free medium. Approximately 40 µg dsRNA (as little as 10 µg has been tested and found to be effective) was added per dish and mixed by swirling. After 30 min, 4 ml medium containing 10% FBS, 100 U penicillin per ml, and 100 µg streptomycin per ml was added. Cells were assayed at a specified day following addition of dsRNA. Western blotting was routinely carried out for RNAi-treated cells to evaluate the level of the targeted protein.


arrow
RESULTS
 
SHP expressions is up-regulated during TPA-induced monocyte differentiation of HL-60 cells
Extensive approaches have demonstrated the presence of SHP mRNA in a wide variety of tissues, with highest expression in heart, brain, liver, lung, and adrenal gland [12 ]. In addition to the tissue localization, SHP mRNA is highly expressed in monocyte/macrophage in unpublished data. Until now, several studies show that a variety of nuclear receptors are predominantly expressed in hematopoietic cells including granulocyte and monocyte. To clarify if SHP production correlated with monocytic progression, we analyzed the Western blot for protein expression during monocyte differentiation. The amount of SHP protein was induced in a time-dependent manner of TPA-derived differentiation progression (Fig. 1A ). To determine whether the induction of SHP expression reflects an increase in mRNA levels or enhanced SHP protein stability, Northern blots were performed using total RNA from HL-60 cells cultured in the absence or presence of TPA for 3 days. The increase in CD11b expression was optimal upon treatment with TPA (data now shown). As shown in Figure 1B , SHP mRNA induction was enhanced upon treatment with TPA (+17.5-fold compared with control cells). Arrest in cell proliferation is considered as a prerequisite to cell differentiation [18 ]. In our culture conditions, the untreated HL-60 cell population had a doubling time of roughly 24 h, and the TPA treatments inhibited proliferation. Surface expression of CD11b and CD71 were described to positively and negatively correlate with the process of HL-60 cell differentiation, respectively. These results indicate that a transcriptional regulation level mediates the induction of SHP expression in TPA-derived monocytic differentiation. Taken together, these data suggest that induction of cell differentiation is a prerequisite for SHP synthesis stimulated by TPA. We thus investigated which intracellular pathway triggered SHP production and was involved in the early steps of the differentiation process.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The induction of monocytic differentiation increases mRNA and protein expression of SHP. (A) HL-60 cells were treated with TPA for 3 days. Approximately 50 µg cell lysate protein from each sample was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes. Duplicate membranes were subjected to Western blot analysis by using antibodies specific for SHP or TBP as indicated. TBP expression is shown as a protein-loading control. (B) The mRNA expression of SHP is increased after monocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells. Total RNA (20 µg) extracted from HL-60 cells prior to and after TPA treatment was probed with SHP cDNAs. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression is shown directly below.

c-Jun increases the transcriptional activation of the SHP promoter
To gain insight about the differentiation signaling effects on the transcriptional activation of the SHP promoter, we first analyzed a transient transfection assay using the SHP promoter as a reporter construct with TPA treatment. The result of Figure 2A shows that TPA increased the luciferase activity derived from SHP promoter transactivation. Gene-specific transcriptional activation is a multistep process, which requires numerous protein factors and DNA elements, including enhancers and the core promoter. TPA signal transduction pathways are mediated, at least in part, by AP-1 proteins consisting of Jun and Fos [19 20 21 ]. These prompted us to examine whether c-Jun regulates the SHP expression at the transcriptional level. For this purpose, a reporter construct containing a SHP promoter fragment fused with the luciferase reporter gene was transiently cotransfected into the HL-60 cells along with an expression vector for the protooncogene c-jun or the empty vector as a control. As shown in Figure 2A , overexpression of c-Jun in HL-60 cells resulted in a sevenfold transactivation depending on the SHP promoter fragment tested. The greatest induction of transactivation by c-Jun was achieved with a proximal promoter that extends 2080 bases 5' and eight bases 3' to the transcription initiation site of the SHP gene (–2080/+8 SHP luciferase). Transactivation of the –2080/+8 SHP promoter by c-Jun was dose-dependent and was also observed in other cell lines such as the human liver carcinoma HepG2 cells and CV1 cells to levels comparable with the ones achieved in HL-60 cells (data not shown). These findings suggest that the transactivation of the SHP promoter by c-Jun does not depend on cell-specific auxiliary factors.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. c-Jun increases the gene expression of the SHP promoter. (A) SHP promoter reporter plasmids were transfected into HL-60 cells. Forty-eight hours after transfection in the absence or presence of several concentrations of TPA, as indicated, cells were harvested for luciferase (luc) activities. (B) HL-60 cells were transfected with 1 µg native SHP promoter-luciferase plasmid alone or along with 1 µg of the mammalian expression vector of c-Jun. Forty-eight hours after transfecting, luciferase assay was performed as described in Materials and Methods. All the transfection results were normalized to ß-galactosidase activity, and the presented results represented the average of three independent experiments, with fold induction over the level observed with the reporter alone. CREB, cyclic AMP response element-binding protein; C/EBPß, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein ß. (C) HL-60 cells were transfected with a series of deleted promoter reporter plasmids and treated with TPA for 24 h. After harvesting the cells, luciferase assay was performed with normalization by ß-galactosidase activity.

To identify the responsive SHP promoter site for c-Jun, we deleted the SHP promoter region sequentially as shown in Figure 2B . Based on cotransfection of c-Jun expression plasmid and a series of SHP-deleted promoter constructs into HeLa cells, the SHP promoter region (–270 to –227) was counted as a c-Jun responsive site in the transactivation assay through luciferase reporter expression (Fig. 2B) .

c-Jun binds on TRE sequence of the SHP promoter
To examine whether an increase of the transactivation of the SHP promoter by c-Jun expression results from the direct DNA binding activity of c-Jun on the SHP promoter, we applied to EMSA by using the TRE sequence of the SHP promoter. The increasing amounts of GST-c-Jun protein clearly bound to SHP-TRE, and the DNA protein complex was abolished by using the wild-type SHP-TRE oligonucleotide probe but not with the mutant one as shown in Figure 3 . To further confirm the induced c-Jun-SHP/TRE complex during monocytic differentiation by TPA treatment, we prepared the immunoprecipitated c-Jun protein by using antibody against c-Jun using TPA-treated HL-60 cells for each time interval. The result of Figure 3B showed that the DNA protein complex of SHP-TRE and c-Jun was gradually increased in the differentiating cell extracts in a time-dependent manner. These results indicate that c-Jun increases the SHP expression at the transcriptional level through direct DNA binding following by TPA-induced monocytic differentiation.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. DNA binding of c-Jun on the SHP promoter. (A) Bacterially expressed and purified GST-c-Jun was incubated as indicated, followed by addition of a probe. For competition assays, the following nonradioactive competitor oligonucleotides were added to the reaction mixture at a 100-fold molar excess prior to the addition of the probe. (B) HL-60 cells were treated with TPA for 3 days. After preparation of nuclear extracts from pretreated cells and TPA-treated cells upon the time course, EMSA was examined with the SHP-TRE probe.

Extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling increase the SHP expression
c-Jun is known for being phosphorylated by ERK, JNK, and p38 kinase [22 23 24 25 ]. From the above results, c-Jun binds to the SHP promoter and activates the gene expression of the SHP promoter. To delineate which signaling pathway regulates c-Jun activation for SHP gene expression, we evaluated the transactivation yield of the SHP promoter activity after cotransfection of each coding gene for MKK1 (ERK-activating kinase), MKK4 (JNK-activating kinase), and MKK6 (p38-activating kinase) in cells. The overexpression of MKK1 and MKK4 but not MKK6 increased the SHP promoter activity in transient transfection assay (Fig. 4A ). Consistent with this result, the specific inhibitor of ERK and JNK, PD98059 and SP600125, largely decreased the transactivation acitivty of the SHP promoter in TPA-treated cells but not by p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580 (Fig. 4A) . To further confirm whether the c-Jun-mediated SHP promoter transactivation is dependent on a direct DNA protein-binding activity, we applied an EMSA analysis using the TPA-treated HL-60 cell nuclear extract in the absence or presence of a series of specific kinase inhibitors of ERK, JNK, and p38 kinase. The DNA binding activity of c-Jun on the SHP-TRE site dramatically decreased by PD98059 and SP600125, which are specific inhibitors of ERK and JNK, respectively, but was not significantly changed by the p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580 (Fig. 4B) . These results suggest that TPA-induced ERK and JNK activation signaling subsequently activate c-Jun protein by specific phosphorylation, leading to increased SHP gene expression in a monocytic differentiation procedure.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. ERK and JNK signaling increase the SHP expression. (A) Cultured cells were transfected with the indicated expression plasmids and assayed for reporter activity using a SHP promoter reporter. All results were normalized to ß-galactosidase activity and represent the mean of three independent experiments (error bars show SD of the mean). Cells were left untreated or treated with 20 nM TPA for 24 h in the absence or presence of 50 µM PD98059 (PD; ERK inhibitor), 5 µM SP600125 (SP; JNK inhibitor), and 10 µM SB203580 (SB; p38 kinase inhibitor). (B) A double-stranded oligonucleotide probe containing the TRE site of the SHP promoter was used in electrophoretic mobility shift analysis. Nuclear extracts (10 µg) of HL-60 cells treated with each kinase inhibitor were added in a binding reaction.

SHP and c-Jun expression are required for the induction of monocytic differentiation
To test whether an increase in the expression of SHP accelerates the process of monocytic differentiation in the absence or presence of differentiation inducer TPA, we cultured HL-60 cells with TPA for 3 days. After a further day in culture, we maintained the cells in TPA to induce their differentiation. After various periods of time, we determined the proportion of monocyte by staining for nonspecific esterase with morphological features characteristic of monocyte (data not shown).

Expression of the SHP transgene did not significantly affect the spontaneous differentiation rate of HL-60 cells in the absence of TPA. In the presence of TPA, however, SHP greatly accelerated monocytic differentiation; after 3 days in the presence of TPA, for example, only ~35% of control cells had differentiated into monocytes, whereas >95% of the SHP-overexpressing cells had done so (data not shown). In the other approach for the confirmation of monocytic differentiation in the SHP-stable transfectant cells, we investigated the monocyte-derived TNF-{alpha} protein expression by using Western blot assay (Fig. 5A ). Thus, the level of SHP expression is apparently normally limiting for TPA-dependent monocytic differentiation.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. SHP and c-Jun expression are required for the induction of monocytic differentiation. (A) HL-60 cells were stably transfected with the mammalian expression plasmid encoding HA-SHP (SHP transfect) and expression plasmid without any insert as a control (Con. transfect), and were screened by Western blotting assay using anti-HA antibody. After isolation of the positive, HA-SHP-stable transfectant, Western blotting assay using TNF-{alpha} and TBP antibodies was analyzed. TBP expression was counted as a protein-loading control. (B) Wild-type and RNAi-expressed cells were treated with TPA and determined the differentiation yield by scoring nonspecific esterase (NSE) activity, and quantified data are presented. RNAi can target specific genes for SHP and c-Jun. Silencing of endogenous SHP and c-Jun was monitored by Western blot (WB) analysis of whole-cell extracts from control or RNAi cells. All results are typical of three independent experiments.

To confirm the monocytic differentiation of cells transfected with SHP and c-Jun stably, we stained the cells for NSE, which identifies the monocytic phenotype [26 ]. The results of Figure 5B showed that the stable transfection of SHP and c-Jun resulted in a highly significant increase in the expression of this monocytic marker NSE. The increase in NSE positivity in cotransfected cells is similar in magnitude to the increase seen after 24 h of exposure to TPA, an inducer of monocytic phenotype (Fig. 5B) . Together, these results confirm that c-Jun and SHP expression promote monocytic differentiation. When clones highly expressing wild-type SHP were treated with TPA, they likewise underwent monocytic development, as assessed by detection of NSE staining, with ~96% of the cells staining positively for nonspecific esterase (Fig. 5B) , suggesting that the SHP or c-Jun overexpression is sufficient to mediate monopoiesis induced by TPA.

To further determine the physiological requirements for SHP and c-Jun in monocytic differentiation, we have used RNAi methodology to reduce the level of endogenous SHP and c-Jun protein in HL-60 culture cells. RNAi causes degradation of a specific mRNA, which in turn, causes a reduction in the level of the encoded protein. In brief, RNAi was carried out by adding dsRNA, corresponding to a nucleotide region of the SHP and c-Jun mRNA to HL-60 cells and culturing the cells for 3 days prior to analysis. We refer to these cells as SHP and c-Jun RNAi cells. Western blot analysis of whole-cell extracts with an antibody directed against SHP and c-Jun showed that RNAi treatment resulted in near elimination of the SHP and c-Jun protein (Fig. 5B , lower). To monitor the physiological effect of the loss of SHP and c-Jun, we analyzed SHP and c-Jun RNAi cells for monocytic differentiation by using cytochemical determination of monocytic NSE. The addition of RNAi of SHP and c-Jun into cultured HL-60 cells was unable to induce monopoiesis (Fig. 5B) . In this case, less than one-third of the cells was positive upon NSE staining in a TPA-treated cell fraction. Loss of SHP and c-Jun caused a severe effect in monocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells by TPA treatment. Control cells were well induced to differentiate into monocytic cells by the same TPA treatment. Taken together, these results indicate that SHP and c-Jun are positive transcriptional regulators of monocytic differentiation.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
From a regulatory point of view, the process of cell differentiation conceptually could be composed of two steps: the commitment to differentiation and the subsequent expression of genes that determine the phenotype of differentiated cells. The control of commitment is crucial for the timing of differentiation, whereas the control of subsequent gene expression is crucial for the determination of the particular differentiated phenotype.

Kim et al. [27 ] identified SHP as a novel transcription coactivator of nuclear factor (NF)-{kappa}B and have further presented the experimental results indicating that targeted expression of SHP appears to function as a distinct regulatory component of the transcriptional activities of NF-{kappa}B in oxidized low-density lipoprotein-treated, resting macrophage cells.

Coexpression of Jun and SHP was also observed in heart, kidney, epididymus, prostate, and pancreas in addition to monocyte/macrophage. Based on this coexpression and its ability to transactivate the SHP promoter, we conclude that Jun is a potential regulator of SHP expression. The biological effects of TPA are mediated, at least in part, by the generation of active AP-1 complexes, which are predominantly composed of heterodimers of Jun/Fos. Activation of the Jun/Fos AP-1 complexes is often mediated by phosphorylation of the protein components, thus resulting in enhanced AP-1 function [9 , 10 , 13 , 14 ]. A variety of extracellular signals activates a combination activation of kinases and phosphatases, subsequently regulating positively and negatively a certain panel of transcription factors. This network cooperation of signaling components and transcription factors gives a clue to form a cascade action of gene expression machinery in a cellular differentiation procedure. Here, for the monocytic differentiation at the early differentiation stage, c-Jun may function as a master gene regulator for inducing the expression of some key transcription factors including SHP. c-Jun cooperates with PU.1 to regulate several monocytic genes via adjacent cis DNA elements or via direct interaction. Notably, c-Jun, JunB, and JunD levels increase during monocytic differentiation [28 ], and exogenous c-Fos or c-Jun induced partial monocytic differentiation in M1 and U937 cells and increased the responsiveness of U937 cells to TPA [28 , 29 ], an agent that stimulates the monocytic differentiation of several myeloid cell lines and directly induces the c-Jun promoter via binding sites for c-Jun:activating transcription factor 2 (ATF-2) dimers. TPA or other stimuli activate JNKs, which in turn, phosphorylate c-Jun and ATF-2 and increase their transactivating potency.

The issue of granulocyte versus monocytic lineage choice also must be resolved. The findings that Jun and Maf family members can each induce the monocyte lineage in cell lines and that these proteins interact with AP-1 consensus sites lead to the speculation that Maf:Maf, Maf:Jun, Maf:Fos, Jun:Jun, or Jun:Fos dimers initiate monopoiesis in conjunction with PU.1 [30 ]. The continued presence of C/EBPs to maintain elevated PU.1 levels may be required as well. In the absence of Maf or Jun proteins, C/EBPs and PU.1 may specify the granulocyte lineage. Many questions remain unanswered regarding the transcriptional regulation of monocyte development. There may be additional, important transcriptional regulators of myeloid genes remaining to be uncovered via detailed investigation of promoters and distal enhancers and be lineage-restricted coactivators or corepressors, which participate in lineage specification. With respect to key transcription factors, further clarification of the regulatory network is needed.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Research Foundation (No. 2002-070-C00068). We thank Dr. Hueng-Sik Choi for the SHP promoter constructs.

Received December 29, 2003; revised May 7, 2004; accepted May 14, 2004.


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Shivdasani, R. A., Orkin, S. H. (1996) The transcriptional control of hematopoiesis Blood 87,4025-4039[Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Tenen, D. G., Hromas, R., Licht, J. D., Zhang, D. E. (1997) Transcription factors, normal myeloid development and leukemia Blood 90,489-519[Free Full Text]
  4. 3
  5. Orkin, S. H. (1995) Transcription factors and haematopoietic development J. Biol. Chem. 270,4955-4958[Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Shivdasani, R. A., Orkin, S. H. (1996) The transcriptional control of haematopoiesis Blood 87,4025-4039
  8. 5
  9. Tamayo, P., Slonim, D., Mesirov, J., Zhu, Q., Kitareewan, S., Dmitrovsky, E., Lander, E. S., Golub, T. R. (1999) Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96,2907-2912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 6
  11. Shiffman, D., Mikita, T., Tai, J. T., Wade, D. P., Porter, J. G., Seilhamer, J. J., Somogyi, R., Liang, S., Lawn, R. M. (2000) Large scale gene expression analysis of cholesterol-loaded macrophages J. Biol. Chem. 275,37324-37332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Suzuki, T., Hashimoto, S., Toyoda, N., Nagai, S., Yamazaki, N., Dong, H. Y., Sakai, J., Yamashita, T., Nukiwa, T., Matsushima, K. (2000) Comprehensive gene expression profile of LPS-stimulated human monocytes by SAGE Blood 96,2584-2591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Krichevsky, A. M., Metzer, E., Rosen, H. (1999) Translational control of specific genes during differentiation of HL-60 cells J. Biol. Chem. 274,14295-14305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Seol, W., Chung, M., Moore, D. D. (1997) Novel receptor interaction and repression domains in the orphan receptor SHP Mol. Cell. Biol. 17,7126-7131[Abstract]
  18. 10
  19. Seol, W., Hanstein, B., Brown, M., Moore, D. D. (1998) Inhibition of estrogen receptor action by the orphan receptor SHP (short heterodimer partner) Mol. Endocrinol. 12,1551-1557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Seol, W., Choi, H. S., Moore, D. D. (1996) An orphan nuclear hormone receptor that lacks a DNA binding domain and heterodimerizes with other receptors Science 272,1336-1339[Abstract]
  22. 12
  23. Johansson, L., Bavner, A., Thomsen, J. S., Farnegardh, M., Gustafsson, J. A., Treuter, E. (2000) The orphan nuclear receptor SHP utilizes conserved LXXLL-related motifs for interactions with ligand-activated estrogen receptors Mol. Cell. Biol. 20,1124-1133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Johansson, L., Thomsen, J. S., Damdimopoulos, A. E., Spyrou, G., Gustafsson, J. A., Treuter, E. (1999) The orphan nuclear receptor SHP inhibits agonist-dependent transcriptional activity of estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and ERß J. Biol. Chem. 274,345-353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 14
  27. Lee, Y. K., Dell, H., Dowhan, D. H., Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M., Moore, D. D. (2000) The Orphan nuclear receptor SHP inhibits hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 and retinoid X receptor transactivation: two mechanisms for repression Mol. Cell. Biol. 20,187-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. 15
  29. Lu, T. T., Makishima, M., Repa, J. J., Schoonjans, K., Kerr, T. A., Auwerx, J., Mangelsdorf, D. J. (2000) Molecular basis for feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis by nuclear receptors Mol. Cell. 6,507-515[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. 16
  31. Gupta, S., Stravitz, R. T., Dent, P., Hyelmon, P. B. (2001) Down-regulation of cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) gene expression by bile acids in primary rat hepatocytes is mediated by the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway J. Biol. Chem. 276,15816-15822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. 17
  33. Jiang, Y., Chen, C., Li, Z., Guo, W., Gegner, J. A., Lin, S., Han, J. (1996) Characterization of the structure and function of a new mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38) J. Biol. Chem. 271,17920-17926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Peiretti, F., Lopez, S., Deprez-Beauclair, P., Bonardo, B., Juhan-Vague, I., Nalbone, D. (2001) Inhibition of p70S6 kinase during transforming growth factor-1/vitamin D3-induced monocyte differentiation of HL-60 cells allows tumor necrosis factor to stimulate plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 synthesis J. Biol. Chem. 276,32214-32219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Meighan-Mantha, R. L., Wellstein, A., Riegel, A. T. (1997) Differential regulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 activity during 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate-induced differentiation of HL-60 cells Exp. Cell Res. 234,321-328[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. 20
  39. Pulverer, B. J., Hughes, K., Franklin, C. C., Kraft, A. S., Leevers, S., Woodgett, J. R. (1993) Co-purification of mitogen-activated protein kinases with phorbol ester-induced c-Jun kinase activity in U937 leukaemic cells Oncogene 8,407-415[Medline]
  40. 21
  41. Karin, M. (1995) The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases J. Biol. Chem. 270,16483-16486[Free Full Text]
  42. 22
  43. Hibi, M., Lin, A., Smeal, T., Minden, A., Karin, M. (1993) Identification of an oncoprotein- and UV-responsive protein kinase that binds and potentiates the c-Jun activation domain Genes Dev. 7,2135-2148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. 23
  45. Smeal, T., Hibi, M., Karin, M. (1994) Altering the specificity of signal transduction cascades: positive regulation of c-Jun transcriptional activity by protein kinase A EMBO J. 13,6006-6010[Medline]
  46. 24
  47. Franklin, C. C., Unlap, T., Adler, V., Kraft, A. S. (1993) Multiple signal transduction pathways mediate c-Jun protein phosphorylation Cell Growth Differ. 4,377-385[Abstract]
  48. 25
  49. Pulverer, B. J., Kyriakis, J. M., Avruch, J., Nikolakaki, E., Woodgett, J. R. (1991) Phosphorylation of c-Jun mediated by MAP kinases Nature 353,670-674[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. 26
  51. Yam, L. T., Li, C. Y., Crosby, W. H. (1971) Cytochemical identification of monocytes and granulocytes Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 55,283-290[Medline]
  52. 27
  53. Kim, Y. S., Han, C. Y., Kim, S. W., Kim, J. H., Lee, S. K., Jung, D. J., Park, S. Y., Kang, H., Choi, H. S., Lee, J. W., Pak, Y. K. (2001) The orphan nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner as a novel coregulator of nuclear factor-B in oxidized low density lipoprotein-treated macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 J. Biol. Chem. 276,33736-33740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. 28
  55. Lord, K. A., Abdollahi, A., Hoffman-Liebermann, B., Leibermann, D. A. (1993) Proto-oncogenes of the fos/jun family of transcription factors are positive regulators of myeloid differentiation Mol. Cell. Biol. 13,841-851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. 29
  57. Szabo, E., Preis, L. H., Birrer, M. J. (1994) Constitutive cJun expression induces partial macrophage differentiation in U-937 cells Cell Growth Differ. 5,439-446[Abstract]
  58. 30
  59. Hegde, S. P., Zhao, J., Ashmun, R. A., Shapiro, L. H. (1999) c-Maf induces monocytic differentiation and apoptosis in bipotent myeloid progenitors Blood 94,1578-1589[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. B. Hartman, K. Lai, and M. J. Evans
Loss of small heterodimer partner expression in the liver protects against dyslipidemia
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 193 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. E. Oropeza, L. Li, and A. McLachlan
Differential Inhibition of Nuclear Hormone Receptor-Dependent Hepatitis B Virus Replication by the Small Heterodimer Partner
J. Virol., April 15, 2008; 82(8): 3814 - 3821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.1203658v1
76/5/1082    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cheong, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cheong, J.