Published online before print July 16, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





* Division of Microbiology, National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan; and
Department of Metabolic Care and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, and
Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo, Japan
1 Correspondence: Division of Microbiology, National Institute of Health Sciences, 1-18-1 Kamiyoga, Setagaya, Tokyo 158-8501, Japan. E-mail: tanamoto{at}nihs.go.jp
|
|
|---|
B
phosphorylation or protein synthesis, but not by caspase inhibitors. These results indicate that prolonged stimulation of TLR2, TLR4, or TLR9 causes a down-regulation of IRAK-4 protein, which may be mediated through cleavage of IRAK-4 by a protease induced by the activation of nuclear factor-
B.
Key Words: monocytes/macrophages bacterial lipoprotein CpG-DNA lipopolysaccharide protein kinases
|
|
|---|
TLRs and interleukin 1 receptor (IL-1R) share homologies in their cytoplasmic domains, the "Toll/IL-1R (TIR)" domain [7
]. Stimulation of TIR family members causes a TIR domain-containing cytosolic adaptor protein, such as MyD88, or a TIR domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon-ß (TRIF) to be recruited to the receptor complex via homotopic TIRTIR interaction. Signaling of TLR2 and TLR9 depends on the MyD88-dependent pathway [8
, 9
], and TLR3 signaling depends mainly on the TRIF-dependent pathway [10
]. LPS stimulates the MyD88- and the TRIF-dependent pathways [11
, 12
]. MyD88 recruits serine-threonine kinases, IL-1R-associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4), and IRAK-1 to the receptor complex. As a result, IRAK-4 phosphorylates IRAK-1 [13
, 14
], and phosphorylated IRAK-1 associates with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6, leading to the activation of nuclear factor (NF)-
B and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways [14
, 15
].
Although IRAK-1-deficient mice show attenuated responses to TLR stimulation, residual activation of NF-
B and p38 is still observed [16
]. In contrast, no activation was observed in IRAK-4-deficient mice in response to IL-1, LPS, or other bacterial components [17
]. Furthermore, it has been reported that children with inherited IRAK-4 deficiency failed to respond to IL-1, IL-18, or stimulations of TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR9 [18
]. Thus, IRAK-4 is considered to be a key mediator in the TLR/IL-1R signaling pathway. Despite the important role of IRAK-4, the regulation of IRAK-4 protein, including its activation and inactivation processes, is still poorly understood. We report here that prolonged TLR stimulation leads to down-regulation of the IRAK-4 protein.
|
|
|---|
B
(I
B
) antibody was a generous gift from Nancy Rice (NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, MD).
Cell culture
A mouse macrophage-like cell line, RAW 264 (obtained from the Riken Cell Bank, Tsukuba, Japan), was grown in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (Gibco-BRL, Rockville, MD), supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-incubated fetal calf serum (Gibco-BRL), penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml).
Electrophoresis and Western blotting
RAW 264 cells (2x106), seeded in six-well plates, were stimulated for the indicated times and were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. Then, cellular extracts were prepared by adding a lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 10 mM KOH, 5 mM EDTA, 40 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 30 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 nM okadaic acid) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH Mannheim, Germany). The protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method, and the same amount of protein was loaded onto each lane of a discontinuous sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/bisacrylamide ratio, 29:1), according to the method of Laemmli [20
]. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and were subjected to Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. The signals were visualized by using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
RAW 264 cells (2x106) were plated onto 6 cm dishes and stimulated for the indicated times. After washing, total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturers instructions. RNA (0.5 µg) was subjected to RT-PCR using the Super ScriptTM one-step RT-PCR system with platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using the Brilliant SYBR green single-step QRT-PCR master mix (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) on a MX4000 multiplex quantitative PCR system (Stratagene). The following primer pairs were used: IRAK-4, 5'-GTC ATG ACC AGC CGA ATC GTG-3' (sense) and 5'-CAG ACA CTG GTC AGC AGC AGA-3' (antisense); glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, 5'-ATC ACT GCC ACC CAG AAG ACT-3' (sense) and 5'-TCC ACC ACC CTG TTG CTG TAG-3' (antisense). To avoid artifacts as a result of DNA contamination, an intron-spanning primer pair was selected for IRAK-4.
|
|
|---|
32 kD), which appeared to be a cleavage product of IRAK-4, upon the decrease in IRAK-4 (Fig. 1b
, lower). Similar concentrations of LPS, CpG-DNA, and Pam3CSK4 also caused a decrease in IRAK-1 protein (Fig. 1d)
.
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. TLR stimulation leads to a decrease in IRAK-4 and IRAK-1 protein levels. RAW 264 cells were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of LPS, CpG-DNA (CpG), or Pam3CSK4 (CSK4) for 6 h. Cellular extracts were analyzed for IRAK-4 (ac) and IRAK-1 (d) proteins by Western blotting. IRAK-4 was analyzed by three different antibodies (see Materials and Methods). Results are representatives of three independent experiments.
|
B
(Fig. 2b)
. A non-CpG DNA, which carries no CpG motifs, also caused no significant changes in IRAK-4 protein levels, although 1 µg/ml CpG-DNA clearly decreased the protein level in the same experiment (Fig. 2c)
. These results indicate that the decrease in IRAK-4 in response to Pam3CSK4 and CpG-DNA was mediated through TLR2 and TLR9, respectively.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. Ligands for TLR2 and TLR9, but not for TLR3, cause a decrease in the IRAK-4 protein level. RAW 264 cells were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of peptidoglycans (PGBS, PGSA, and PGST; see Materials and Methods) and MALP-2 (a), poly I:C (b), and CpG- as well as non-CpG-DNA (c) for 6 h. Cellular extracts were analyzed for IRAK-4 (a, b upper, c) and I B (b, lower). Results are representatives of three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. The decrease in IRAK-4 occurs more slowly than IRAK-1 activation. RAW 264 cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS, 1 µg/ml CpG-DNA (CpG), or 100 ng/ml Pam3CSK4 (CSK) for the indicated time periods. Cellular extracts were analyzed for IRAK-4 (a, antibody C14) and IRAK-1 (b) by Western blotting. Results are representatives of three independent experiments.
|
We next studied the effects of various protease inhibitors. As TLR stimulation is known to activate caspases [22 ], their involvement was examined first. RAW 264 cells were treated with Z-VAD-FMK (50200 µM) or Z-Asp-CH2-DCB (50200 µM) broad spectrum caspase inhibitors and were then stimulated with CpG-DNA or Pam3CSK4. Neither caspase inhibitor inhibited the decrease in the IRAK-4 level (data not shown). E-64 (100 µM), a cell-permeable serine protease inhibitor, and CA-074 methyl ester (10 µM), a cathepsin B inhibitor, also did not inhibit the decrease in IRAK-4.
As IRAK-1 is known to be degraded by the proteasome in response to IL-1 stimulation [23 ], the effect of the proteasome inhibitors (MG-132 and lactacystin) were examined. Both inhibitors suppressed the decrease in IRAK-4 protein in response to Pam3CSK4 (Fig. 4a ) and CpG-DNA (Fig. 4b) . It is interesting that the smaller molecular weight protein, which appeared upon stimulation, was not observed in the presence of proteasome inhibitors (Fig. 4 , a and b lower). This result supports the notion that the smaller molecular weight protein was a cleavage product of IRAK-4.
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
Figure 4. Effects of various inhibitors on the decrease in IRAK-4. RAW 264 cells were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of Pam3CSK4 (CSK4; a, c, e) or CpG-DNA (CpG; b, d, f) for 6 h in the absence or presence of proteasome inhibitors (20 µM MG132 and 20 µM lactacystin, a, b), protein synthesis inhibitors [5 µg/ml actinomycin D (Act D) and 50 µg/ml cycloheximide (CHX), c, d], or an inducible I B phosphorylation inhibitor (10 µg/ml Bay 117082, e, f). Cellular extracts were analyzed for IRAK-4 by Western blotting with antibody C14 (top panels) and C12 (middle and bottom panels). A broad spectrum caspase inhibitor (100 µM Z-Asp-CH2-DCB) was included throughout the experiments to prevent apoptosis (c, d). Results are representatives of three independent experiments.
|
B and activated protein-1, as TLR stimulation leads to activation of these transcription factors through I
B kinase and MAPK pathways. For this purpose, we used Bay 117082, SP600125, and PD-98059, which inhibit inducible I
B
phosphorylation, Jun-N-terminal kinase, and MAPK kinase, respectively. Bay 117082 inhibited the decrease in IRAK-4 protein and the appearance of the smaller molecular weight protein in response to Pam3CSK4 (Fig. 4e)
and CpG-DNA (Fig. 4f)
. In contrast, SP600125 (20 µM) and PD-98059 (50 µM) had no effects (data not shown). It is therefore likely that NF-
B is involved in the decrease in IRAK-4 protein. |
|
|---|
The IRAK-4 mRNA level was not affected by Pam3CSK4 stimulation, and the decrease in IRAK-4 protein in response to TLR stimulation was accompanied by the appearance of a smaller molecular weight protein (32 kD), which was recognized by an anti-IRAK-4 antibody directed against its C-terminal sequence. In addition, various inhibitors that suppressed the decrease in IRAK-4 protein level also inhibited the appearance of the smaller molecular weight protein. It is, therefore, likely that TLR stimulation induces cleavage of the IRAK-4 protein, leading to the generation of an N-terminal-truncated IRAK-4 protein. The IRAK-4 protein (459 amino acids) consists of an N-terminal death domain (amino acids 20104), which is necessary for the interaction with MyD88, and a C-terminal kinase domain (amino acids 195390) [21 ]. According to their sizes, the smaller molecular weight protein probably lacks the death domain. Therefore, the cleavage of IRAK-4 observed in our study would cause the disruption of the MyD88-dependent signal transduction pathway.
The activation of IRAK-1 is considered to be a downstream event of IRAK-4 in the MyD88-dependent signaling pathway [14
]. However, our study indicates that the decrease in IRAK-4 protein in response to TLR stimulation occurred following activation of IRAK-1. Thus, we examined the possibility that the decrease in IRAK-4 protein was a feedback event induced by the activation of IRAK-1, and we found that protein synthesis inhibitors and an inducible I
B
phosphorylation inhibitor suppressed the decrease in IRAK-4 protein. It is, therefore, likely that protein synthesis and the activation of NF-
B, both of which lie downstream of the activation of IRAK-1, are involved in the decrease in IRAK-4 protein. Proteasome inhibitors also inhibited the decrease in IRAK-4 protein. It is, however, unlikely that the proteasome is involved in the decrease in IRAK-4, as the proteasome generally degrades proteins into peptides with several amino acids, and the decrease in IRAK-4 protein was accompanied by the production of a smaller molecular weight protein, which appears to be a cleavage product of IRAK-4. The proteasome is also known to be involved in the activation of NF-
B [25
], and therefore, the inhibitory effect of proteasome inhibitors on the decrease in IRAK-4 is probably explained by the inhibition of NF-
B activation. All of these results clearly support the notion that IRAK-4 is cleaved at a site between its death and kinase domains by a protease induced by the activation of NF-
B upon TLR stimulation.
IRAK-4 is essential for TLR signaling. Overexpression of dominant-negative IRAK-4 [21 ] and IRAK-4 knockout [17 ] totally abrogated all TLR/IL-1R responses that were studied. Thus, the signal-dependent cleavage of the IRAK-4 protein at a site between its death and kinase domains would disrupt TLR/IL-1R signaling, as it is expected that cleaved IRAK-4 has lost the ability to interact with upstream adaptor molecules. It is known that prolonged stimulations of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 cause homo- and heterotolerance to subsequent stimulation of these TLRs [26 , 27 ]. The activation of IRAK-4 is common to these signaling events. The cleavage of IRAK-4 protein observed in our study may be involved in the induction of tolerance.
Received May 6, 2004; accepted June 19, 2004.
|
|
|---|
B by Toll-like receptor 3 Nature 413,732-738[CrossRef][Medline]
B signaling pathways in mammalian and insect innate immunity Genes Dev. 15,2321-2342
B signaling pathway components J. Immunol. 170,508-519This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Sun, P. E. Fegan, A. S. Desai, J. L. Madara, and M. E. Hobert Flagellin-induced tolerance of the Toll-like receptor 5 signaling pathway in polarized intestinal epithelial cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): G767 - G778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shi, D. White, L. He, R. L. Miller, and D. E. Spaner Toll-like Receptor-7 Tolerizes Malignant B Cells and Enhances Killing by Cytotoxic Agents Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1823 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Fortin, O. Lesur, and T. Fulop Jr Effects of TREM-1 activation in human neutrophils: activation of signaling pathways, recruitment into lipid rafts and association with TLR4 Int. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 19(1): 41 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ma, J. Li, I. Chiu, Y. Wang, J. A. Sloane, J. Lu, B. Kosaras, R. L. Sidman, J. J. Volpe, and T. Vartanian Toll-like receptor 8 functions as a negative regulator of neurite outgrowth and inducer of neuronal apoptosis J. Cell Biol., October 23, 2006; 175(2): 209 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||