science pharmaceutical expo biotech jobs
Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.1003454 on January 2, 2004

Published online before print January 2, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.1003454v1
75/4/624    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rose, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2004;75:624-630.)
© 2004 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Combined activation of innate and T cell immunity for recognizing immunomodulatory properties of therapeutic agents

Bettina Rose, Christian Herder, Heike Löffler, Hubert Kolb and Stephan Martin1

German Diabetes Research Institute at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany

1Correspondence: German Diabetes Research Institute, Clinical Department, Auf’m Hennekamp 65, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail: martin{at}ddfi.uni-duesseldorf.de


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Complex syndromes such as atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes are disorders that are associated with inflammatory processes involving innate and adaptive immunity. Emerging knowledge about the pathological consequences of immune imbalances in a wide range of disease settings is expected to help to identify novel therapeutic targets. However, current test systems for immunomodulatory drugs tend to be too simplistic, as they rely only on cells of the innate- or the adaptive-immune system, or they are complex, in vivo models, which are not suitable for screening purposes. Using a modified mixed lymphocyte culture (MMLC) assay for combined analysis of innate and adaptive immunity, we show that this assay is very sensitive for the presence of low concentrations of immunomodulatory agents. Low-dose lipopolysaccharide stimulation of cells from two unrelated donors yields a strong cytokine response including interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18, which induce interferon-{gamma} as a potential analysis parameter. As the MMLC assay is based on the mutual interaction of cells of the innate and adaptive immunity, it enables the monitoring of cytokine release under almost physiological conditions and might be of interest for the characterization of known and novel drugs concerning their immunomodulatory potency.

Key Words: immunomodulation • immune mediators • LPS • adaptive immunity


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Recent studies revealed the prominent role for inflammation and immune response in diseases such as atherosclerosis and (noninsulin-dependent) type 2 diabetes, which are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in developed countries [1 , 2 ]. Emerging knowledge concerning the predictive value and the pathophysiological implications of elevated serum levels of immune mediators such as C-reactive protein [3 4 5 ] and interleukin (IL)-6 [4 , 6 ] might therefore pave the way for early intervention trials. These should focus on the preventive modulation of immune imbalances shown to precede disease manifestation rather than treating acute and chronic symptoms of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. It is interesting that some of the currently used drugs for the therapy of atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes have indeed been demonstrated to reduce serum levels of inflammation markers [7 8 9 ].

However, the development of a broader panel of immunomodulatory drugs depends on the availability of simple but valid and reliable assay systems. The majority of assay systems uses cells of the innate-immune system such as macrophages and dendritic cells or T cell clones belonging to the adaptive branch of the immune system. In these cell lines as well as in isolated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), strong and/or unphysiological stimuli such as phytohemagglutinin or anti-CD3 antibodies are required to induce measurable responses. Whereas these approaches reveal details of molecular mechanisms of interaction between drugs and specific cell types, the aim of this project was the establishment and analysis of an in vitro test system that enables the screening for substances with immunomodulatory properties under more physiological conditions, allowing for mutual interactions between innate- and adaptive-immune responses.

To establish a valid test system for the analysis of immunomodulatory properties of a wide range of drugs, we combined antigen-presenting cell (APC)-mediated and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated stimuli to activate innate and adaptive immunity simultaneously in a modified mixed lymphocyte culture (MMLC). We analyze the molecular mechanism of interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}) induction and demonstrate the feasibility of the MMLC system for the characterization of immunomodulation by cytokines and other therapeutically interesting substances.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Preparation of PBMC
PBMC were isolated from sodium heparinate whole blood of healthy blood donors. After density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll Paque-Plus (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), interphase cells were collected, washed twice with Hanks’ balanced saline solution (Gibco, Karlsruhe, Germany), and resuspended at a final concentration of 2 x 106 cells/ml in RPMI-1640 medium with Glutamax (Gibco) containing 5% heat-inactivated human serum (selected lot with low intrinsic stimulating activity in PBMC cultures).

MMLC culture conditions and reagents
For allogeneic cell activation, we used two-way MLC. PBMC from different healthy adult blood donors were mixed in equal numbers (5x105 from each donor) and cultured at 450 µl/well in pyrogen-free, 48-well culture plates (Falcon, Heidelberg, Germany). LPS from Escherichia coli 026:B6 (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany), recombinant cytokines, and antibodies were added to a final volume of 500 µl. We incubated triplicate cultures under identical conditions without change of medium for up to 5 days at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. The cell viability at the end of the incubation period was shown to exceed 90% by the trypan blue dye exclusion test. Culture supernatants were harvested and stored in aliquots at −20°C until cytokine determination.

Human recombinant IL-12 and IL-4 and mouse anti-human IL-12 monoclonal antibody (mAb) were obtained from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany). Human recombinant IL-18 and mouse anti-human IL-18 mAb were purchased from MBL (Nagoya, Japan). All mAb were specific for the appropriate cytokine without cross-reactivity with other human cytokines. Hydrocortisone was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.

Cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The IFN-{gamma} ELISA was based on a matched mAb pair purchased from Endogen (Woburn, MA) and human recombinant IFN-{gamma} protein (PharMingen, Heidelberg, Germany) as standard. The detection limit was 4 pg/ml.

Thymidine proliferation assay
For proliferation analysis, cells were incubated in round-bottom plates at a final concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml. LPS was added in 15 µl to a final concentration of 0.1 ng/ml and a total volume of 150 µl. After 5 days of incubation, each well was pulsed with [3H] thymidine (TRA120 obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) corresponding to 1 µCi per well in a volume of 50 µl. After 18 h, cells were harvested, washed, transferred to glass fiber membranes (Canberra Packard, Schwadorf, Austria), and counted in scintillation mix (Canberra Packard) in an imaging reader (Canberra Packard).

RNA isolation and reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction
Total RNA from PBMC was stabilized and isolated using the PAXgeneTM blood RNA system (PreAnalytix, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RT was performed using Ominscript RT kit from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). In brief, the mixture contained 4 µl 10x RT buffer, 0.5 mM deoxy-unspecified nucleoside 5'-triphosphate, 20 U RNase inhibitor (Promega, Mannheim, Germany), 8 U Omniscript RT, 1 µM oligo-dT primer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), 20 µl sample RNA, and RNase-free water to a total volume of 40 µl. cDNA was aliquoted and stored at −20°C until use.

Quantitative cytokine mRNA analysis
The quantification of cytokine mRNA molecules was performed on an ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detector system (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) using the modified method as described earlier [10 ]. In brief, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) master mix contained 5 µl 10x TaqMan buffer A (10x: 100 mM KCl, 100 nM Tris-HCl, 100 mM EDTA, 600 nM passive reference A, pH 8.3), 3.5–5.5 mM MgCl2 (all from Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA), 200 µM deoxy-adenosine 5'-triphospahte, -cytidine 5'-triphosphate, -guanosine 5'-triphosphate, and 400 µM -uridine 5'-triphosphate, 100–200 nM forward and reverse primer, 100–200 nM fluorogenic probe (all from Applied Biosystems), 1.25 U AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer), and RNase-free water in a total volume of 40 µl. Water control (10 µl), diluted standards, or unknown cDNA template were added to a final volume of 50 µl. The following sequence-specific primer pairs and fluorogenic probes were obtained from Applied Biosystems: ß-actin: 5'-ATT GCC GAC AGG ATG CAG AA-3'; 5'-GCC GAT CCA CAC GGA GTA CT-3'; 5'-FAM-CAA GAT CAT TGC TCC TCC TGA GCG CA-tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA)-3'; IFN-{gamma}: 5'-TGA ATG TCC AAC GCA AAG CA-3'; 5'-CCT TGA AAC AGC ATC TGA CTC CTT-3'; 5'-FAM-TGG CGA CAG TTC AGC CAT CAC TTG GA-TAMRA-3'. The same master mix was used for samples and standards to reduce tube-to-tube variation. For standard preparation, cDNA fragments of ß-actin and IFN-{gamma} were cloned into the pCR2.1 plasmid (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Serial tenfold plasmid dilutions (1x107–1x101 molecules) were used in triplicates to generate standard curves. PCR conditions were 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C for DNA polymerase activation, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C with a final hold for 2 min at 25°C. The fluorescence signals of each well were collected every 7 s, and threshold cycles were set at 10 SD above the baseline fluorescence. The ß-actin content of test samples was defined as normalization factor. Standardized cytokine mRNA quantities (cytokine copies/104 ß-actin copies) were determined by dividing the interpolation-derived values from the cytokine standard curve by the normalization factor.

Statistics
Cytokine levels determined by ELISA are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates from a representative experiment out of three using different pairs of PBMC donors unless indicated otherwise. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism Version 3.02 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). For mean comparisons, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t-test or one-way ANOVA and an appropriate post-test were used as indicated. P values <0.05 were considered significant.


arrow
RESULTS
 
LPS enhances IFN-{gamma} production in MMLC
To investigate the interaction between innate and specific immunity, we first studied the kinetics of IFN-{gamma} secretion of untreated PBMC and allogeneic-activated PBMC (MMLC) over 5 days of incubation (Table 1 ). The basal concentration of IFN-{gamma} in culture supernatants was below 0.1 ng/ml. No increase of IFN-{gamma} levels could be observed in unstimulated PBMC, whereas the activation in MLC resulted in elevated cytokine levels with maximum levels at days 4 and 5 up to 7 ng/ml. For the activation of cells of the innate immunity, we added 10 ng/ml LPS to PBMC. LPS raised the IFN-{gamma} release in PBMC continuously over 5 days up to 22 ± 1 ng/ml. The addition of 0.1 ng/ml LPS to MMLC resulted in higher IFN-{gamma} levels than in PBMC alone activated with 10 ng/ml LPS. This enhanced cytokine secretion was caused solely by LPS, as preincubation of LPS with PmB completely blocked the additional cytokine release (Table 1) . As the IFN-{gamma} response to the different stimuli tested here increased continuously until day 5, we selected the suboptimal stimulation until day 4 for further analyses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Kinetics of IFN-{gamma} Production (ng/ml) after LPS Stimulation and Treatment with Polymyxin B (PmB)

Furthermore, we investigated whether LPS could increase the IFN-{gamma} production in a dose-dependent manner. The addition of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/ml LPS to MMLC resulted in a clear, dose-dependent increase of IFN-{gamma} release compared with LPS-untreated MMLC (Fig. 1 ). Compared with basal levels in three independent MMLC experiments, IFN-{gamma} levels were only slightly increased by 0.01 ng/ml LPS (1.6-fold), whereas LPS stimuli of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/ml led to 6.2-, 10.1-, and 10.8-fold elevated IFN-{gamma} levels (P<0.01 for all three stimulations).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Dose-dependency of LPS-mediated IFN-{gamma} release in MMLC on day 4. For MMLC culture, PBMC of two unrelated donors were mixed in equal numbers. Different concentrations of LPS were added at the onset of culture. All cultures were performed in triplicates; supernatants were harvested after 4 days. One representative experiment out of three is shown (analysis with ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test; **, P<0.01, compared with untreated MLC).

For further investigations, we selected LPS concentrations of 0.1 and 1 ng/ml. The analysis of IFN-{gamma} mRNA amounts revealed an enhanced transcription in the presence of LPS, as IFN-{gamma} mRNA levels in the LPS-stimulated MMLC were two- to threefold higher than in untreated MMLC (Fig. 2 ). This increase of IFN-{gamma} mRNA and protein levels is not a result of an elevated cell number, as LPS did not enhance the proliferation of cells compared with untreated MMLC as measured by thymidine incorporation after 5 days of incubation (Fig. 3 ). Thus, LPS dose-dependently enhances IFN-{gamma} transcription and protein synthesis without inducing cell proliferation.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Kinetics of IFN-{gamma} in untreated and LPS-treated MMLC. LPS (1 ng/ml) was added at the onset of culture. At each time point, cells were harvested for IFN-{gamma} mRNA analysis (lines). At days 1, 2, 4, and 5, culture supernatant was stored for IFN-{gamma} determination by ELISA (bars). IFN-{gamma} protein levels of untreated MMLC (open squares, open bars) and LPS-treated MMLC (circles, shaded bars) are expressed as means ± SD (**, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001; unpaired two-tailed t-test).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of LPS and allogeneic activation on thymidine incorporation. For MMLC culture, PBMC of two unrelated donors were mixed in equal numbers and compared with PBMC cultures of only one donor. LPS (0.1 ng/ml) was added at the onset of culture. After 5 days of incubation, cultures were pulsed with 1 µCi [3H] thymidine per well and analyzed after 18 h. Data are given as means ± SD of four independent experiments performed in triplicates and were compared by ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-test (**, P<0.01).

Involvement of IL-12 and IL-18 in LPS-mediated IFN-{gamma} release
To identify the mediators of IFN-{gamma} release in MMLC, the effect of neutralizing mAb against IL-12 and IL-18 was studied. First, we tested the required amount of mAb in MMLC to reduce IFN-{gamma} release induced by the corresponding cytokine. Antibody concentrations of 1 µg/ml anti-IL-12 mAb and anti-IL-18 mAb were sufficient to reduce the IL-12-enhanced IFN-{gamma} production by 70% and the IL-18-enhanced IFN-{gamma} production by 50% (Fig. 4A ).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of anti-IL-12 Ab and anti-IL-18 Ab in LPS- and cytokine-treated MMLC. Neutralizing mAb against IL-12 or IL-18 were added at the onset of culture to corresponding recombinanat (r)IL-12- and IL-18-treated (A) or to LPS-treated MMLC (B). Supernatants were harvested after 4 days. Values are expressed as means ± SD of triplicates of one representative experiment out of three. Data were compared by unpaired two-tailed t-test (A) and ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-test (B; **, P<0.01; ***; P<0.001, compared with mAb-untreated culture).

The effect of anti-IL-12 and anti-IL-18 mAb in LPS-treated MMLC is illustrated by a representative experiment in Figure 4B . In a total of three independent experiments, the same amount of anti-IL-12 mAb in LPS-stimulated MMLC led to a decrease of IFN-{gamma} production to 57.4 ± 1.4% (P<0.05, n=3, repeated measures ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test), whereas the addition of anti-IL-18 mAb alone resulted in a decrease to 83.4 ± 1.7% (n=3), which was not statistically significant. The treatment with anti-IL-12 and anti-IL-18 mAb yielded IFN-{gamma} levels of 51.6 ± 8.8% (P<0.01, compared with LPS-treated MLC) and therefore, did not result in significant, synergistic effects of both antibodies. It is interesting that the same pattern could be detected in MMLC without LPS treatment: In the same set of three experiments, anti-IL-12 mAb and anti-IL-18 mAb reduced IFN-{gamma} secretion to 55.9 ± 23.7% (P<0.01) and 72.4 ± 23.7% (P<0.05), respectively. In the presence of mAb, the IFN-{gamma} concentration was 47.6 ± 15.4% (P<0.01). Thus, the IFN-{gamma} release in low-dose, LPS-treated and in LPS-untreated MMLC seems to depend mainly on IL-12 and to a lesser extent on IL-18.

We further analyzed the effects of recombinant IL-12 and IL-18 on IFN-{gamma} release in MMLC. The addition of IL-12 and IL-18 to MMLC in different concentrations resulted in a dose-dependent increase of IFN-{gamma} release up to tenfold compared with untreated MMLC. Whereas only trace amounts of IL-12 induced a strong cytokine release, the doses of IL-18 required for comparable results were 2000-fold higher (Fig . 5A and 5B ). Adding both cytokines simultaneously to MMLC in nonstimulating concentrations increased the IFN-{gamma} levels significantly compared with the single cytokines (Fig. 5C) . This suggests a synergy of both cytokines requiring high amounts of IL-18 and very low concentrations of IL-12.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of IL-12 and IL-18 on IFN-{gamma} secretion in MMLC on day 4. rIL-12 (A) or rIL-18 (B) was added individually or in combination (C) at the onset of culture. Supernatants were harvested after 4 days. Values are expressed as means ± SD of triplicates of one representative experiment of three experiments. Data were compared by ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test (A and B; compared with untreated MMLC) or with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-test (C; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001).

IL-4 and hydrocortisone inhibit IFN-{gamma} production in the presence of LPS
To examine whether immunomodulatory approaches can influence the outcome of combined innate- and adaptive-immune reactivity, we added increasing concentrations of IL-4 and analyzed IFN-{gamma} release into the supernatant after 4 days. Recombinant IL-4 could almost block LPS-mediated IFN-{gamma} release when added in physiologically occurring concentrations of 20 ng/ml and below (Fig. 6A ). Additionally, we tested the effect of the highly immunosuppressive steroid hydrocortisone on cytokine release. Hydrocortisone blocked even in low concentrations 85% of IFN-{gamma} release after LPS activation (Fig. 6B) . Therefore, the MMLC test system described here is sensitive to very low levels of selective immunomodulatory drugs and general immunosuppressive agents.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Modification of IFN-{gamma} secretion by IL-4 and hydrocortisone in MMLC on day 4. IL-4 (A) and hydrocortisone (B) were added simultaneously with LPS at the onset of cultures. Supernatants were harvested after 4 days. IFN-{gamma} values are expressed as means ± SD of triplicates of one representative experiment out of two. Data were compared with LPS-treated MMLC cultures by ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test (**, P<0.01).


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
The MLC as described by Perussia et al. [11 ] has initially been suggested as a surrogate assay for the characterization of graft rejection in transplantation settings. In MLC, PBMC from two donors are cocultured, whereby usually the irradiated APC from one donor serves to stimulate immune cells of the second donor. IFN-{gamma} secreted by T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells, which have been activated by innate-immune cells, is the predominant cytokine in MLC [12 ]. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) differences are responsible for the induction of IFN-{gamma} release, but no clear correlation between number of HLA differences and IFN-{gamma} amount could be shown [13 ]. Although the clinical value of this system initially proposed as an in vitro model for the prediction of graft rejection in transplantation remains controversial [14 15 16 ], the MLC is nevertheless an important model for alloactivation of T cells upon stimulation by APC primarily belonging to innate immunity. As the MLC represents a complex system containing all hematopoietic cell types of innate and adaptive immunity, it should be possible to adapt this system for other immunological purposes, which require a combination of physiological conditions yielding valid and reliable results and would otherwise need in vivo experiments. Our objective was the development of a MMLC assay that could be used for the characterization of known drugs and the screening for novel, therapeutic agents with immunomodulatory properties that might be of interest for the treatment of inflammatory processes that are associated with atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes (Fig. 7 ).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the interaction between innate and adaptive immunity in MMLC. Allogeneic stimulation induces an adaptive T cell response via major histocompatiblity complex/peptide–T cell receptor interaction. The addition of LPS strongly increases the activation state and expression of costimulatory signals by innate-immune cells (APC) and thereby potentiates T cell activation and IFN-{gamma} secretion. These conditions mimic local or systemic inflammation in vivo and therefore provide an appropriate test for immunomodulatory drugs.

To induce a stronger immune response while avoiding unphysiological stimuli, our experimental approach is based on nonirradiated PBMC from pairs of unrelated donors in the presence of very low concentrations of LPS, which comprises membrane glycolipids of Gram-negative bacteria and binds to CD14, a membrane-anchored protein that is mainly expressed by myeloid cells. Preceding association with LPS-binding protein increases the binding affinity for LPS. Subsequently, the complex aggregates with Toll-like receptor 4, which leads to the activation of intracellular signaling cascades, resulting in the activation of the nuclear transcription factor-{kappa}B and transcription of cytokine-encoding genes [17 , 18 ]. Upon activation with LPS, human monocytes and macrophages secrete IL-6, IL-1ß, and the T helper cell type 1 (Th1)-promoting cytokines IL-12 and IL-18 [19 ]. In combination with IFN-{gamma}, these innate immunity-derived cytokines in turn induce T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion. In addition to the induction of Th1-immune mediators, LPS has also been reported to induce Th2 reactivity. In animal models of autoimmune diabetes, LPS can suppress as well as enhance autoimmune diabetes [20 21 22 23 ]. Which of the two prevails depends on the cell type treated with LPS (in vitro and in cell transfer studies) and the immunological state of the organism treated with LPS [21 ].

In cocultures of nonirradiated PBMC from pairs of unrelated, healthy donors, we found that the expected cytokine release could be elevated dose-dependently by very low LPS levels (100 pg/ml corresponding to 50 pg/106 cells) without enhancing cell proliferation. These data are in contrast to previous observations, which described increased cell proliferation in classical, one-way MLC by LPS doses of only 5 pg/ml corresponding to 20 pg LPS/106 cells [24 , 25 ] but might be explained by differences in medium composition. In our study, the cell-culture medium was supplemented with 5% human serum from a lot that has been selected for low stimulating activity in MMLC assays and might contain agents that increase the threshold dose for LPS-induced proliferation.

The LPS-mediated IFN-{gamma} release in the MMLC system is mainly mediated by IL-12 and to a lesser extent by IL-18. IL-12 and IL-18 share important functional similarities. IL-12 is considered as the main IFN-{gamma}-inducing cytokine in T cells and promotes Th1 differentiation [26 ]. IL-18 acts on Th1 cells and synergizes with IL-12 in T cell activation and IFN-{gamma} induction but can also activate NK cells independently of IL-12 [27 , 28 ]. Contrary to our findings, Kohka and co-workers [29 ] reported almost complete blocking of LPS-enhanced IFN-{gamma} release in MLC by neutralizing mAb against IL-12 or IL-18, suggesting redundant effects of both cytokines. However, their MLC was based on high-dose LPS activation (5 µg/ml), which represents a nonbiological concentration of LPS. Such an extreme stimulus might result in different mechanisms of IFN-{gamma} induction compared with very low-dose LPS stimulation protocols [29 ].

It is conceivable that additional immune mediators besides IL-12 and IL-18 trigger optimal IFN-{gamma} release upon allogeneic and/or LPS stimulation in MMLC. It is interesting that LPS has been demonstrated to stimulate regulatory T cells independently of interaction with innate-immune cells [30 ], and LPS-activated monocytes also produce IL-15 and other cytokines that can contribute to optimal IFN-{gamma} release by NK cells in synergy with IL-12 [31 ]. Therefore, the MMLC system as described here reflects the complexity of the physiological in vivo situation and should allow for the identification of immunomodulatory substances. The sensitivity of the test system is exemplified by addition of different doses of the Th2 cytokine IL-4 and hydrocortisone. As described previously [32 ], IL-4 counteracts IFN-{gamma} release, which might be a result of effects on different cell types. IL-4 acts on monocytes by decreasing CD14 expression and therefore impairing LPS binding [33 ] and by inhibiting LPS-induced expression of IL-12 p40, leading to considerably lower IL-12 p70 and p40 protein release [34 ]. Furthermore, IL-4 decreases the expression of the high-affinity IL-12 receptor on T cells [35 ]. Similar to low-dose IL-4 treatment, a concentration of only 1 µg/ml hydrocortisone sufficed to strongly inhibit IFN-{gamma} production in LPS-activated MMLC.

In the strict sense, the LPS-activated MMLC mimics the situation of transplant patients having received standard conditioning regimens including total body irradiation. The combination of conditioning-related toxicity and the release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12 during graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) leads to damage of the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent leakage of LPS into the circulation [36 , 37 ]. Analysis of a murine GVHD model demonstrated that LPS accumulated in liver and spleen and also appeared in serum at concentrations of up to 6 ng/ml [38 ].

Taken together, our findings elucidate the mechanisms in MMLC of allogeneic activation and stimulation by very low LPS concentrations of 0.1 and 1 ng/ml, which represent a physiological stimulus. We found that IL-12 and to a lesser extent IL-18 are important mediators of activation, which are presumably released by cells of innate immunity. This leads to subsequent activation of adaptive immunity, which can be measured as IFN-{gamma} release. Immunomodulatory agents such as IL-4 and hydrocortisone can interfere at low concentrations with the interplay of innate and adaptive immunity, leading to an altered IFN-{gamma} response. Therefore, the MMLC system offers the required complexity of an immunological test system in combination with low expense in terms of financial resources and time.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
B. R. and C. H. contributed equally to this study. The Federal Ministry of Health, the Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology, and the Ministry of School, Science and Research of the State of North-Rhine-Westfalia supported this study. We are grateful to S. Müller-Scholze and P. Hanifi-Moghaddam for help with the ELISA and to Dr. G. Meierhoff for help with the thymidine cell-proliferation assay. We are indebted to all colleagues in the German Diabetes Research Institute who donated blood for this study.

Received October 1, 2003; revised December 4, 2003; accepted December 8, 2003.


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Beckman, J. A., Creager, M. A., Libby, P. (2002) Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management JAMA 287,2570-2581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Zimmet, P. Z., McCarty, D. J., de Courten, M. P. (1997) The global epidemiology of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome J. Diabetes Complications 11,60-68[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Koenig, W., Sund, M., Frohlich, M., Fischer, H. G., Lowel, H., Doring, A., Hutchinson, W. L., Pepys, M. B. (1999) C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men: results from the MONICA (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992 Circulation 99,237-242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Pradhan, A. D., Manson, J. E., Rifai, N., Buring, J. E., Ridker, P. M. (2001) C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus JAMA 286,327-334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Schmidt, M. I., Duncan, B. B., Sharrett, A. R., Lindberg, G., Savage, P. J., Offenbacher, S., Azambuja, M. I., Tracy, R. P., Heiss, G. (1999) Markers of inflammation and prediction of diabetes mellitus in adults (atherosclerosis risk in communities study): a cohort study Lancet 353,1649-1652[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Harris, T. B., Ferrucci, L., Tracy, R. P., Corti, M. C., Wacholder, S., Ettinger, W. H., Jr, Heimovitz, H., Cohen, H. J., Wallace, R. (1999) Associations of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly Am. J. Med. 106,506-512[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Phillips, M. I., Kagiyama, S. (2002) Angiotensin II as a pro-inflammatory mediator Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 3,569-577[Medline]
  14. 8
  15. van de Ree, M. A., Huisman, M. V., Princen, H. M., Meinders, A. E., Kluft, C. (2003) Strong decrease of high sensitivity C-reactive protein with high-dose atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Atherosclerosis 166,129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. 9
  17. Kinlay, S., Selwyn, A. P. (2003) Effects of statins on inflammation in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes Am. J. Cardiol. 91,9B-13B[Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Kruse, N., Pette, M., Toyka, K., Rieckmann, P. (1997) Quantification of cytokine mRNA expression by RT PCR in samples of previously frozen blood J. Immunol. Methods 210,195-203[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. 11
  21. Perussia, B., Mangoni, L., Engers, H. D., Trinchieri, G. (1980) Interferon production by human and murine lymphocytes in response to alloantigens J. Immunol. 125,1589-1595[Abstract]
  22. 12
  23. Novelli, F., Giovarelli, M., Reber-Liske, R., Virgallita, G., Garotta, G., Forni, G. (1991) Blockade of physiologically secreted IFN-{gamma} inhibits human T lymphocyte and natural killer cell activation J. Immunol. 147,1445-1452[Abstract]
  24. 13
  25. Cantell, K., Koskimies, S., Hirvonen, S. (1990) Production of interferon in mixed leukocyte cultures from two individuals J. Interferon Res. 10,331-335[Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Harmon, W. E., Parkman, R., Lavin, P. T., Grupe, W. E., Ingelfinger, J. R., Yunis, E. J., Levey, R. H. (1982) Comparison of cell-mediated lympholysis and mixed lymphocyte culture in the immunologic evaluation for renal transplantation J. Immunol. 129,1573-1577[Abstract]
  28. 15
  29. Cartwright, N. H., Demaine, A. G., Hurlock, N. J., McGonigle, R. J., Rowe, P. A., Shaw, J. F., Szydlo, R. M., Kaminski, E. R. (2000) Cytokine secretion in mixed lymphocyte culture: a prognostic indicator of renal allograft rejection in addition to HLA mismatching Transpl. Immunol. 8,109-114[Medline]
  30. 16
  31. Burke, G. W., Allouch, M., Cirocco, R., Markou, M., Gomez, C., Contreras, N., Esquenazi, V., Roth, D., Nery, J., Miller, J. (1994) Rejection in HLA-identical living related donor kidney transplants: lack of predictive immunologic parameters Transplantation 57,750-751[Medline]
  32. 17
  33. Netea, M. G., van Deuren, M., Kullberg, B. J., Cavaillon, J. M., Van der Meer, J. W. (2002) Does the shape of lipid A determine the interaction of LPS with Toll- like receptors? Trends Immunol. 23,135-139[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. 18
  35. Ulevitch, R. J., Tobias, P. S. (1995) Receptor-dependent mechanisms of cell stimulation by bacterial endotoxin Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13,437-457[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. 19
  37. Romagnani, S. (1997) The Th1/Th2 paradigm Immunol. Today 18,263-266[Medline]
  38. 20
  39. Sai, P., Rivereau, A. S. (1996) Prevention of diabetes in the nonobese diabetic mouse by oral immunological treatments. Comparative efficiency of human insulin and two bacterial antigens, lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli and glycoprotein extract from Klebsiella pneumoniae Diabetes Metab. 22,341-348[Medline]
  40. 21
  41. Balasa, B., Van Gunst, K., Sarvetnick, N. (2000) The microbial product lipopolysaccharide confers diabetogenic potential on the T cell repertoir of BDC2.5/NOD mice: implications for the etiology of autoimmune diabetes Clin. Immunol. 95,93-98[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. 22
  43. Tian, J., Zekzer, D., Hanssen, L., Lu, Y., Olcott, A., Kaufman, D. L. (2001) Lipopolysaccharide-activated B cells down-regulate Th1 immunity and prevent autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice J. Immunol. 167,1081-1089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. 23
  45. Scott, F. W., Roswell, P., Wang, G. S., Burghardt, K., Kolb, H., Flohé, S. (2002) Oral exposure to diabetes-promoting food or immunomodulators in neonates alters gut cytokines and diabetes Diabetes 51,73-78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. 24
  47. Spear, G. T., Marshall, P., Teodorescu, M. (1986) Increase in proliferation and cytotoxic cell development in human mixed lymphocyte cultures in the presence of very low concentrations of LPS: role of IL-1 and prostaglandin E2 Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 38,32-46[Medline]
  48. 25
  49. Spear, G. T., Teodorescu, M. (1984) Enhancement of human MLR by very low concentrations of lipopolysaccharide and blocking of this enhancement by polymyxin B J. Immunol. Methods 73,321-327[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. 26
  51. Trinchieri, G. (1995) Interleukin-12: a proinflammatory cytokine with immunoregulatory functions that bridge innate resistance and antigen-specific adaptive immunity Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13,251-276[Medline]
  52. 27
  53. Micallef, M. J., Ohtsuki, T., Kohno, K., Tanabe, F., Ushio, S., Namba, M., Tanimoto, T., Torigoe, K., Fujii, M., Ikeda, M., Fukuda, S., Kurimoto, M. (1996) Interferon-{gamma}-inducing factor enhances T helper 1 cytokine production by stimulated human T cells: synergism with interleukin-12 for interferon-{gamma} production Eur. J. Immunol. 26,1647-1651[Medline]
  54. 28
  55. Okamura, H., Kashiwamura, S., Tsutsui, H., Yoshimoto, T., Nakanishi, K. (1998) Regulation of interferon-{gamma} production by IL-12 and IL-18 Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10,259-264[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. 29
  57. Kohka, H., Iwagaki, H., Yoshino, T., Kobashi, K., Urushihara, N., Yagi, T., Tanimoto, T., Kurimoto, M., Akagi, T., Tanaka, N. (1999) Involvement of interleukin-18 (IL-18) in mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 19,1053-1057[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. 30
  59. Caramalho, I., Lopes-Carvalho, T., Ostler, D., Zelenay, S., Haury, M., Demengeot, J. (2003) Regulatory T cells selectively express Toll-like receptors and are activated by lipopolysaccharide J. Exp. Med. 197,403-411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. 31
  61. Carson, W. E., Ross, M. E., Baiocchi, R. A., Marien, M. J., Boiani, N., Grabstein, K., Caligiuri, M. A. (1995) Endogenous production of interleukin 15 by activated human monocytes is critical for optimal production of interferon-{gamma} by natural killer cells in vitro J. Clin. Invest. 96,2578-2582
  62. 32
  63. Danzer, S. G., Kirchner, H., Rink, L. (1994) Cytokine interactions in human mixed lymphocyte culture Transplantation 57,1638-1642[Medline]
  64. 33
  65. Ruppert, J., Friedrichs, D., Xu, H., Peters, J. H. (1991) IL-4 decreases the expression of the monocyte differentiation marker CD14, paralleled by an increasing accessory potency Immunobiology 182,449-464[Medline]
  66. 34
  67. Snijders, A., Hilkens, C. M., van der Pouw Kraan, T. C., Engel, M., Aarden, L. A., Kapsenberg, M. L. (1996) Regulation of bioactive IL-12 production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes is determined by the expression of the p35 subunit J. Immunol. 156,1207-1212[Abstract]
  68. 35
  69. Gollob, J. A., Kawasaki, H., Ritz, J. (1997) Interferon-{gamma} and interleukin-4 regulate T cell interleukin-12 responsiveness through the differential modulation of high-affinity interleukin-12 receptor expression Eur. J. Immunol. 27,647-652[Medline]
  70. 36
  71. Hill, G. R., Teshima, T., Gerbitz, A., Pan, L., Cooke, K. R., Brinson, Y. S., Crawford, J. M., Ferrara, J. L. (1999) Differential roles of IL-1 and TNF-{alpha} on graft-versus-host disease and graft versus leukemia J. Clin. Invest. 104,459-467[Medline]
  72. 37
  73. Yabe, M., Yabe, H., Hattori, K., Shimizu, T., Matsumoto, M., Morimoto, T., Yasuda, Y., Inoue, H., Kato, S., Nishimura, T. (1999) Role of interleukin-12 in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease in bone marrow transplant patients Bone Marrow Transplant 24,29-34[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. 38
  75. Price, K. S., Nestel, F. P., Lapp, W. S. (1997) Progressive accumulation of bacterial lipopolysaccharide in vivo during murine acute graft-versus-host disease Scand. J. Immunol. 45,294-300[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Skurk, C. Herder, I. Kraft, S. Muller-Scholze, H. Hauner, and H. Kolb
Production and Release of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor from Human Adipocytes
Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1006 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.1003454v1
75/4/624    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rose, B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.