Published online before print November 21, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


* Department of Molecular Cell Biology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis, Amsterdam
1 Correspondence: Department of Molecular Cell Biology, VU Medical Center, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: HE.de_Vries.cell{at}med.vu.nl
|
|
|---|
Key Words: GTPase brain endothelium cytoskeleton
|
|
|---|
For cells to migrate, a coordinated remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton is required. Studies primarily performed in fibroblasts and other nonhemopoietic cells have shown that the small GTPases RhoA, Rac, and Cdc42 are essential mediators of actin reorganization [3 , 4 ]. This has also revealed that the different GTPases have distinct effects on cellular morphology and behavior. In particular, Rac1 has a part in the formation of lamellipodia and membrane ruffling, and Cdc42 induces the assembly of filopodia. Additionally, RhoA regulates the assembly of actin stress fibers and focal adhesion sites [3 , 4 ]. In monocytes, inhibition of RhoA activation using a C3 exoenzyme has been shown to reduce transmigration across endothelial monolayers [5 ], suggesting that RhoA activation is required in this process. In the same study, no effect of RhoA inhibition on monocyte adhesion was observed, whereas others found such effects [6 ]. Moreover, Cdc42 has been reported to play a role in monocyte transendothelial migration [7 ]. In the present study, we have studied the role of the small GTPases in monocyte transendothelial migration by using monocytic cells that overexpress constitutively activated or dominant-negative forms of RhoA, Rac1, or Cdc42. Our results demonstrate that activation of RhoA promotes monocyte adhesion as well as transmigration and therefore show that RhoA activation is not only required but is also sufficient as a regulator of these processes. Moreover, our results show that these effects are mediated by p160 ROCK, a serine/threonine kinase effector of RhoA.
|
|
|---|
Monocyte migration assay
The migratory capacity of transduced NR8383 cells to cross a monolayer of brain EC was assessed using time-lapse video microscopy as described previously [10
]. The well-characterized, immortalized rat brain EC line GP8.3 [11
] was used as an in vitro model for brain endothelium and was cultured on collagen-coated multiwell plates as described [10
, 11
]. Briefly, transduced NR8383 cells (3.5x105/ml) were added to 96-well plates containing control or stimulated brain EC monolayers [with 100 ng/ml interleukin (IL)-1ß and 200 U/ml interferon-
(IFN-
) for 48 h to up-regulate vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) expression on the EC as assessed by fluorescein-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis]. Monocytes were allowed to settle and migrate over a 4-h period. Migrated monocytes (phase-dark) could be readily distinguished from those remaining on the EC cell surface by their highly refractive (phase-bright) morphology. The level of migration was calculated as the percentage of migrated monocytes of the total monocytes within the field. To identify the role of the adhesion molecules, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) and VCAM, migration of empty vector (EV) Zeo and V14RhoA cells across control and cytokine-stimulated EC [48 h with IL-1ß (100 ng/ml) and IFN-
(200 U/ml)] was also assessed in the presence of blocking antibodies (10 µg/ml) against the adhesion molecules VCAM and ICAM and isotype-matched antibodies (as described before in ref. [12
]).
Adhesion assay
The adhesion of monocytes was performed as described previously [10
]. Briefly, transduced NR8383 were fluorescently labeled with 1 µM 2',7'-biscarboxyethyl-5(6) carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethylester (Molecular Probes), and 1x106 cells/ml were added to nonstimulated and stimulated EC monolayers (100 ng/ml IL-1ß and 200 U/ml IFN-
for 48 h), which were allowed to adhere for 1 h. After the incubation, nonadherent cells were removed by gently washing the monolayers with prewarmed medium, and the percentage of adhered cells was determined by lysing the cells with 0.1 M NaOH and by measuring the fluorescence intensity in a Tecan X-Fluorscan (excitation wavelength, 485 nm; emission wavelength, 535 nm).
Flow cytometry
For flow cytometry, single-cell suspensions of the rat monocytic cell line NR8383 were washed three times in ice-cold PBS/0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and where indicated, incubated for 30 min at 4°C with primary monoclonal antibodies (mAb), WT-1 [anti lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1); IgG2a isotype; gift from Dr. T. Tamatani, Department of Immunology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan] or TA-2 [anti very late antigen (VLA)-4; IgG1 isotype; Serotec, Oxford, UK] at 5 µg/ml. After three washes in ice-cold PBS/0.1% BSA, primary antibody binding was detected using rabbit
mouse F(ab')2 conjugated with phycoerythrin (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) for 30 min at 4°C. After three washes, cells were immediately analyzed on a flow cytometer (FACScan, Becton Dickinson, Oxnard, CA).
Beads assay
Carboxylate-modified TransFluorSpheres (488/645 nm, 1.0 µm; Molecular Probes) were coated with VCAM-Fc as described previously [13
]. The fluorescent bead-adhesion assay was performed as described in ref. [13
]. In brief, cells were resuspended in adhesion buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, and 0.5% BSA] at a final concentration of 5 x 106 cells/ml. Ligand-coated fluorescent beads (20 beads/cell) were added, and a suspension of 50 thousand cells was incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Adhesion was determined by measuring the percentage of cells, which have bound, fluorescent beads, by flow cytometry using FACScan (Becton Dickinson).
Statistics
Data are expressed as mean and SD. Significant differences between groups were determined by two-way ANOVA analysis.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Expression of constitutively active V14RhoA, V12Rac1, and V12Cdc42 and dominant-negative N19RhoA, N17Rac1, and N17Cdc42 in the monocytic cell line NR8383. Western blot analysis of total protein lysates (100 µg protein/lane) of the single-cell lines. Blots were immunoprobed with Myc antibody to determine the expression of the Myc-tagged proteins. (B) Expression of constitutively active V14RhoA influences cytoskeletal organization. A typical example of the cytoskeletal organization, as stained for actin by rhodamine phalloidin, of monocytes expressing constitutive, active V14RhoA compared their corresponding EV Zeo.
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. Migration and adhesion of monocytes expressing small GTPases on brain endothelial monolayers. (A) Migration of monocytes expressing constitutively active V14RhoA, V12Rac1, and V12Cdc42 and dominant-negative N19RhoA, N17Rac1, and N17Cdc42 across confluent monolayers of brain EC. Migration is expressed as the percentage of their corresponding EV (100% values for EV Zeo and EV Neo were 12±2.6% and 10±2.8%, respectively). Data are the mean and SD of four independent experiments each containing at least 12 individual wells. *, P < 0.05, indicates significant differences compared with their respective EV control. (B) Adhesion of monocytes expressing V12Cdc42, N17Cdc42, V14RhoA, N19RhoA, V12Rac1, and N17Rac1 and their corresponding vector (EV Zeo and EV Neo) to control EC monolayers (ctrl) and cytokine-stimulated EC monolayers (stim) was determined. Adhesion of EV-transduced cells to unstimulated EC monolayers was regarded as 100% (29±3.6% for EV Zeo and 32±3.9% for EV Neo of the total number of cells added). Data are the mean ± SD of four independent experiments each containing six individual wells. *, P < 0.05, indicates significant differences compared with their respective EV control. (C) Involvement of adhesion molecules VCAM and ICAM in the migration of monocytes expressing small GTPases across control and cytokine-stimulated brain endothelial monolayers. Cellular migration is expressed as the percentage of the migration of EV Zeo-transduced cells across unstimulated EC. Isotype-matched control antibodies showed no effect on the migration (data not shown). Data are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments, each containing eight individual wells. *, P < 0.01, indicates significant differences compared with their migration in the absence of blocking antibodies.
|
We tested this ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (1, 10, and 100 µM) and wortmannin (WM; 5 and 100 nM) and LY294002 (1.4 and 28 µM), inhibitors of PI-3K, in our in vitro adhesion and migration assays (Fig. 3 ). In the presence of Y-27632 (10 µM), the enhanced migration of V14RhoA-expressing cells was significantly (P<0.05) reduced by 42% to the level of migration of EV Zeo (control). At a concentration of 100 µM Y27632, migration of the control cells (EV Zeo) and V14RhoA and N19RhoA cells was significantly (P<0.05) reduced by 79% (n=16). However, at this concentration, it has been described that Y 27632 µM also influences other signaling cascades [21 ]. Preincubation of the endothelium with Y-27632 (10 µM) does not influence the migration of monocytes across the endothelial cell layer. PI-3K inhibitors WM (5 nM) and LY294002 (1.4 µM) only induced a reduction (P<0.01; n=16) in the migration of RhoV14-expressing cells (Fig. 3A) , which is in agreement with Fine et al. [2 ]. No significant effect of Y-27632 (10 µM) or WM (5 and 100 nM) or LY294002 (1.4 and 28 µM) was observed on the migration of NR8383 cells expressing N19RhoA or the EV Zeo. The enhanced adhesion of V14RhoA cells was also significantly reduced (P<0.01; n=24) to control levels in the presence of the inhibitor of ROCK (Fig. 3B) , whereas this inhibitor did not affect adhesion of the EV Zeo-transduced cells and the N19RhoA cells.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. Effects of inhibition of ROCK and PI-3K on the adhesion and migratory capacity of monocytes expressing constitutively active V14RhoA and dominant-negative N19RhoA. (A) Transendothelial migration of monocytes expressing V14RhoA and N19RhoA and of EV-transduced monocytes was measured in the presence of the ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (Y 1, 10, 100 µM; a kind gift of Welfide Corp., Osaka, Japan) and the PI-3K inhibitors WM (5 nM) and LY294002 (LY; 1.4 µM). Data here are expressed as a percentage of migration of the EV Zeo-transduced cells (100% values were 8.7±2.6%). Data are the mean ± SD of four independent experiments of at least four individual wells. *, P < 0.01, indicates significant inhibitory effects to its respective control. (B) Adhesion of monocytes expressing V14RhoA, N19RhoA, and EV Zeo to EC was measured in the absence or presence of the ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (10 µM). Data are expressed as the percentage of the values obtained with EV Zeo-transduced monocytes. Adhesion of EV Zeo-transduced cells to unstimulated EC was regarded as 100%, which was 31 ± 4.1% of the total number of cells added. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of 12 individual wells. *, P < 0.01, indicates a significant inhibitory effect of Y27632 compared with its respective control.
|
To elucidate the functional involvement of integrins in the diapedesis process, migration of V14RhoA-expressing cells and the EV Zeo cells (serving as control) was performed in the presence of mAb against VCAM and ICAM-1, which block interactions with their specific ligands VLA-4 and LFA-1. It was found that only anti-VCAM mAb resulted in a significant inhibition of V14RhoA-expressing cells and control cells (P<0.05, n=24; Fig. 2C ). This relatively important role for VLA-4/VCAM interaction in our system has been reported previously [12 ] and may be related to the typical nature of brain endothelial cells [24 ]. As the relative extent of inhibition did not differ significantly between V14RhoA and control cells, the contribution of the VLA-4/VCAM interaction was apparently not altered after RhoA activation. To investigate whether the observed increased migration of V14RhoA cells was mediated by an altered affinity/avidity status of VLA-4 for VCAM, we performed a binding assay using fluorescent beads coated with VCAM-Fc fusion protein as described before [13 ]. However, there was no difference in the binding of V14RhoA cells compared with the control cells (not shown), suggesting that VLA-4 on V14RhoA cells has no altered affinity and/or avidity for VCAM. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the enhanced migration and adhesion observed with constitutively activated RhoA were not a result of an enhanced expression and/or affinity of VLA-4.
|
|
|---|
Cdc42 has been suggested to play a role in transendothelial migration as well. Overexpression of dominant-negative and active forms of Cdc42 in human monocytes has been shown to inhibit their chemokine-induced migration across human umbilical vein EC (HUVEC) [7 ]. In line with these observations, we indeed observed inhibition of migration with the active form of Cdc42. Cdc42 activity is needed for the dynamic organization of the cytoskeleton, predominantly in the formation of filopodia in macrophages. It is suggested that the active form of Cdc42 and probably filopodia are required for gradient sensing and cell polarization [14 ] rather than cellular migration, a process that requires Rho activation as shown in this study. Surprisingly, no significant effects of the constitutively active and dominant-negative Rac1 were observed in our assays. So far, no reports exist on the exact role of Rac1 in the transendothelial migration of monocytes, but it has been reported that Rac plays a role in the macrophage chemotaxis [14 ]. Taken together, our data show that Rac1 does not affect the spontaneous transendothelial migration of monocytes but that RhoA and Cdc42 have distinct roles in this process.
The role of the small GTPases in regulation of adhesion is controversial. We have shown that expression of active RhoA increases the adhesion of monocytes to the endothelium, which can be completely blocked by inhibition of ROCK with Y-27632. This is in line with Yoshida et al. [6 ] who showed that C3 exoenzyme-treated U937 cells have a reduced adhesion to HUVEC. However, other reports have shown that RhoA is not required for initial adhesion of monocytes but is important for the tail retraction of monocytes and de-adhesion of leukocytes [5 , 25 ]. Differences in results might be a result of differences in the monocytic cell populations used and/or the conditions of the adhesion assay, for instance, the stringency of washing. We show that overexpression of constitutively active RhoA increases adhesion, which can be completely blocked by inhibiting ROCK. However, inhibition of ROCK has no effect on the adhesion of control cells, suggesting that there might be a threshold for RhoA activation before ROCK activation can occur.
As it was important to reveal the mechanism by which activation of the RhoA/ROCK pathway was promoting adhesion and migration, we investigated the involvement of integrins, in particular, VLA-4, which by interacting with endothelial VCAM, plays a role in these processes (Fig. 2C , ref. [23 ]). Our results show that RhoA activation did not affect VLA-4 expression, its affinity or avidity for VCAM, nor the contribution of the VLA-4/VCAM interaction in monocyte migration. This essentially excludes VLA-4 as an (major) effector of the RhoA activation-induced promotion of adhesion and migration. Clearly, future work is necessary to resolve this issue.
In conclusion, the small GTPases RhoA and Cdc42 have distinct effects on monocyte adhesion and migration across brain endothelium in vitro. This study is the first to show that expression of constitutively active RhoA in monocytes is sufficient to enhance adhesion and migration across monolayers of endothelial cells, a process that is mediated via ROCK. Inhibition of RhoA/ROCK signaling in monocytes may reduce monocytic recruitment into inflamed tissue and may thereby have beneficial effects in various conditions of inflammation, such as autoimmunity and allergies.
Received February 3, 2003; revised September 16, 2003; accepted October 7, 2003.
|
|
|---|
6ß4 integrin and cAMP metabolism J. Cell Biol. 148,253-258This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. B. Haudek, D. Gupta, O. Dewald, R. J. Schwartz, L. Wei, J. Trial, and M. L. Entman Rho kinase-1 mediates cardiac fibrosis by regulating fibroblast precursor cell differentiation Cardiovasc Res, June 5, 2009; (2009) cvp135v3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-W. Wang, P.-Y. Liu, N. Oyama, Y. Rikitake, S. Kitamoto, J. Gitlin, J. K. Liao, and W. A. Boisvert Deficiency of ROCK1 in bone marrow-derived cells protects against atherosclerosis in LDLR-/- mice FASEB J, October 1, 2008; 22(10): 3561 - 3570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Li, T. Syrovets, S. Paskas, Y. Laumonnier, and T. Simmet Mature Dendritic Cells Express Functional Thrombin Receptors Triggering Chemotaxis and CCL18/Pulmonary and Activation-Regulated Chemokine Induction J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1215 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schaafsma, I. S. T. Bos, A. B. Zuidhof, J. Zaagsma, and H. Meurs The inhaled Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 protects against allergen-induced acute bronchoconstriction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and inflammation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): L214 - L219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chiba, J. Arima, H. Sakai, and M. Misawa Lovastatin inhibits bronchial hyperresponsiveness by reducing RhoA signaling in rat allergic asthma Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): L705 - L713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hidaka, Y. Suzuki, M. Yamashita, T. Shibata, Y. Tanaka, S. Horikoshi, and Y. Tomino Amelioration of Crescentic Glomerulonephritis by RhoA Kinase Inhibitor, Fasudil, through Podocyte Protection and Prevention of Leukocyte Migration Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2008; 172(3): 603 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Fernandes, P. J. Henry, and R. G. Goldie Review: Rho kinase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2007; 1(1): 25 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Segain, M. Rolli-Derkinderen, N. Gervois, D. Raingeard de la Bletiere, G. Loirand, and P. Pacaud Urotensin II is a New Chemotactic Factor for UT Receptor-Expressing Monocytes J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 901 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kajimoto, K. Hashimoto, S. N. Bonnet, A. Haromy, G. Harry, R. Moudgil, T. Nakanishi, I. Rebeyka, B. Thebaud, E. D. Michelakis, et al. Oxygen Activates the Rho/Rho-Kinase Pathway and Induces RhoB and ROCK-1 Expression in Human and Rabbit Ductus Arteriosus by Increasing Mitochondria-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species: A Newly Recognized Mechanism for Sustaining Ductal Constriction Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1777 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Rahat, B. Marom, H. Bitterman, L. Weiss-Cerem, A. Kinarty, and N. Lahat Hypoxia reduces the output of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in monocytes by inhibiting its secretion and elevating membranal association J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 79(4): 706 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Simoes and I. M. Fierro Involvement of the Rho-Kinase/Myosin Light Chain Kinase Pathway on Human Monocyte Chemotaxis Induced by ATL-1, an Aspirin-Triggered Lipoxin A4 Synthetic Analog J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1843 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Soderstrom, S. D. Nyberg, and J. E. Eriksson CD95 capping is ROCK-dependent and dispensable for apoptosis J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2005; 118(10): 2211 - 2223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J.A. Hendriks, J. Alblas, S. M.A. van der Pol, E. A.F. van Tol, C. D. Dijkstra, and H. E. de Vries Flavonoids Influence Monocytic GTPase Activity and Are Protective in Experimental Allergic Encephalitis J. Exp. Med., December 20, 2004; 200(12): 1667 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||