Journal of Leukocyte Biology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.0803402 on December 4, 2003

Published online before print December 4, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0803402v1
75/3/478    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Heneka, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Heneka, M. T.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2004;75:478-485.)
© 2004 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative actions of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on T lymphocytes derived from MS patients

Stephan Schmidt*, Edin Moric*, Martina Schmidt*, Magdalena Sastre*, Douglas L. Feinstein{dagger} and Michael T. Heneka*,1

* Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Germany; and
{dagger} Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago

1 Correspondence: Neurologische Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: m.heneka{at}uni-bonn.de


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) belong to a nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. The PPAR-{gamma} isoform is expressed in human T lymphocytes, and oral administration of PPAR-{gamma} agonists ameliorates the clinical course and histopathological features in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model for multiple sclerosis, suggesting a potential role for PPAR-{gamma} agonists in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. To assess a potential therapeutic role of PPAR-{gamma} agonists in multiple sclerosis, we compared the immunomodulatory effects of the thiazolidinedione (TZD) drugs pioglitazone (PIO) and ciglitazone and the non-TZD PPAR-{gamma} agonist GW347845 on human T leukemia cells (Jurkat cells) and phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) derived from 21 multiple sclerosis patients and 12 healthy donors. PIO, ciglitazone, and GW347845 suppressed PHA-induced T cell proliferation by 40–50% and secretion of interferon-{gamma} and tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, by 30–50%. Inhibition of proliferation was increased to ~80% and that of proinflammatory cytokine secretion, to 80–90% when PBMCs were first preincubated with PPAR-{gamma} agonists and re-exposed at the time of PHA stimulation, indicating a sensitizing effect of PPAR-{gamma} agonists. Inhibition of proliferation was also observed in the tetanus toxoid-specific T cell line KHS.TT2, albeit to a lesser extent. The antiproliferative effects of PIO and GW347845 were accompanied by a decrease of cell viability. Electron microscopy and Western blot analysis revealed DNA condensation and down-regulation of bcl-2, suggesting the induction of apoptosis in activated T lymphocytes. In summary, the data support the potential use of PPAR-{gamma} agonists as immunomodulatory, therapeutic agents for autoimmune diseases.

Key Words: EAE • IFN-{gamma} • TNF-{alpha}


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), and activation of autoreactive CNS antigen-specific T cells in the peripheral immune system plays a pivotal role in the initiation of the inflammatory events leading to demyelination and axonal loss [1 , 2 ]. In accordance with this concept, current therapeutic agents for the treatment of relapsing remitting-MS (RR-MS), such as recombinant interferon-ß (IFN-ß) and glatiramer acetate (GA), exert their therapeutic effects primarily by interfering with mechanisms of T cell activation and migration [3 ]. Although IFN-ß and GA have a significant impact on the number of relapses and the inflammatory activity, as assessed by cranial magnetic resonance imaging, the clinical efficacy of these treatments is limited, prompting the search for additional therapeutic options [3 ].

Several studies have examined the possibility that the recently discovered anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative properties of insulin-sensitizing, oral antidiabetic agents might provide benefit in animal models of MS [4 5 6 ]. The first showed that the thiazolidinedione (TZD) derivative troglitazone provided some improvement in the clinical symtpoms of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in C57BL/6 mice immunized with a myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptide [4 ]. In our studies [5 ], we observed significant improvement in the clinical course of MOG-induced EAE with oral administration of the TZD pioglitazone (PIO) as well as the investigational drug GW347845 (GW). These drugs, which are structurally distinct agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR-{gamma}), reduced the incidence and severity of clinical symptoms when given before EAE induction and attenuated clinical signs when provided after disease onset [5 ]. The beneficial effects of PIO and GW were paralleled by a decrease of perivascular infiltrates and demyelination, as well as by reduced chemokine mRNA levels in brain. The third study [6 ] reported that the PPAR-{gamma} TZD agonist ciglitazone was protective in active and adoptive forms of EAE in SJL mice. In our studies and the ciglitazone study, effects on T cell function were observed. For example, we demonstrated that PIO reduced the capacity of T cells to synthesize and secrete IFN-{gamma} [5 ].

Ligand-dependent activation of PPAR-{gamma}, a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of transcription factors [7 ], reduces inflammatory gene expression and protects neurons from immunostimulated cell death [8 9 10 11 ]. As murine and human T cells express PPAR-{gamma} [12 13 14 15 16 17 ], and TZDs can inhibit interleukin (IL)-2 production [17 ] and mitogen-induced proliferation of human T and Jurkat cells, it seems likely that PPAR-{gamma} is involved in the immunoregulation of T lymphocytes [17 ]. In the present study, we investigated the immunomodulatory effects of PIO, ciglitazone, and GW on human T cells derived from MS patients and healthy donors (HDs) as well as Jurkat cells and determined T cell proliferative responses in one MS patient treated with oral PIO.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients and HDs
Twenty-one MS patients (16 females and five males) fulfilling established diagnostic criteria [18 , 19 ] as well 12 HDs (six females and six males) were included in the study. Thirteen MS patients had RR; six, secondary progressive; and two, primary progressive disease. All patients with RR-MS had stable disease. The mean age of MS patients was 37.9 ± 9.4 years (range, 16–53) and that of HDs, 35.0 ± 4.0 years (range, 29–42). The mean expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was 3.4 ± 2.1 (range, 1.0–8.0), and the mean duration of disease was 9.1 ± 7.3 years (range, 1–25). Informed consent was obtained from all patients and HDs. One patient with secondary progressive MS (EDSS, 8.0), not responding to conventional immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment, gave written consent to oral treatment with PIO (Actos®), 15 mg three times daily (tid). Blood samples were taken before and after 2 months of treatment.

Isolation and culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and Jurkat cells
PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll standard density gradient centrifugation (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) and were cultured at 1 x 105 cells per well in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all from Gibco, Berlin, Germany) and 5% autologous serum in the presence of phytohemaglutinin (PHA; 5 µg/ml). Jurkat cells (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany) were grown in supplemented RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum at 1 x 105 cells per well.

As previous studies demonstrated antiproliferative effects of the lower-affinity PPAR-{gamma} agonists ciglitazone and troglitazone on human T cells in vitro [17 ], further experiments focused on higher-affinity PPAR-{gamma} ligands PIO and GW.

To investigate a possible effect of short-term versus long-term exposure of PBMCs to PPAR-{gamma} agonists, four different types of culture conditions were designed: PHA stimulation and concomitant administration of PIO (30 µM) or GW (1 µM) for 48 h; preincubation of PBMCs with PIO (15 µM) or GW (0.5 µM) for 48 h and additional administration of PIO (15 µM) or GW (0.5 µM) at the time of PHA stimulation for 48 h; PHA stimulation of PBMCs and administration of PIO (30 µM) or GW (1 µM) after 6, 12, 24, and 48 h; and preincubation of PBMCs with PIO (15 µM) or GW (0.5 µM) for 48 h and PHA stimulation and additional administration of PIO (15 µM) or GW (0.5 µM) after 6, 12, 24, and 48 h.

Isolation of antigen-specific T cell lines
A tetanus toxoid (TT)-specific T cell line (KHS.TT2) of a HD was generated using the "split-well" cloning technique as described previously [20 ]. TT was purchased from Behringwerke (Marburg, Germany).

To assess a possible sensitizing effect of PPAR-{gamma} agonists observed after PHA stimulation, antigen-specific restimulation was performed with concomitant administration of PIO (10 µM) and GW (1 µM) as well as after preincubation of TT-specific T cells with PIO (5 µM) and GW (0.5 µM) for 48 h. Another dose of PIO (5 µM) and GW (0.5 µM) was added at the time of the antigen-specific restimulation for 48 h.

Proliferation assays
T cell proliferative responses were determined using a nonradioactive proliferation assay measuring the incorporation of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) as described [21 , 22 ]. BrdU (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) was added to the cultures for 24 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm on an Optimax enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). All proliferation assays were performed in duplicate.

Viability assays
Cell viability was assessed by tetrazolium salt 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazoliumbromide bromide (MTT) assay. For MTT assays, PBMCs were seeded at 1 x 105/cells per well and cultured as described above. MTT (10% vol/vol; 5 mg/ml phosphate-buffered saline) was added for 2 h. After washing with dimethyl sulfoxide, the absorbance was measured at 550 nm on an Optimax ELISA reader (Molecular Devices).

ELISA
Cell-culture supernatants were collected 24, 48, and 72 h after PHA stimulation, centrifuged, and stored at –80°C until assayed. Cytokine measurements were performed using commercially available ELISAs (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The detection limits were 10 pg/ml for IL-4, 4.4 pg/ml for tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF-{alpha}), and 8 pg/ml for IFN-{gamma}. All measurements were performed in duplicate, and mean values of the two measurements were used for statistical analysis. Supernatants were used undiluted for the determination of IL-4 and were diluted tenfold for the determination of TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}. Absorbances were measured at 450 nm on an Optimax ELISA reader (Molecular Devices).

Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed by using standard procedures. For the detection of PPAR-{gamma} expression, incubation with primary anti-PPAR-{gamma} antibody #210-118 (Alexis Biochemicals, Grünberg, Germany) was performed at 1:500 dilution overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibody [horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) from Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany] was diluted at 1:2500 and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. For the detection of Bcl-2, incubation with primary antibody (monoclonal mouse anti-human Bcl2 antibody, Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA) was performed at 1:100 dilution for 2 h at room temperature. The secondary antibody (HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG from Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) was diluted at 1:30,000 for 1 h at room temperature. Antibody binding was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) using Hyperfilm-ECL (Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany).

Electron microscopy
Cell pellets were fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde with 0.1 M hepes buffer at pH 7.5, dehydrated with ethanol, and embedded with Spurr. Ultrathin sections were examined using a Zeiss 900 electron microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Immunofluoresence
After PHA stimulation, T cells were transferred to 10 cm dishes (Costar, Cambride, MA) at 1 x 106/ml and were fixed with acetone/methanol (1:1) at 4°C for 5 min. Monoclonal mouse anti-human cytochrome C IgG antibody (Promega, Madison, WI) at a 1:50 dilution was applied for 60 min at 37°C. The secondary rhodamine (Texas Red)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) was diluted at 1:200 and added for 30 min at room temperature. Stained cells were covered with Dabco (Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) and Moviol 4-88 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), and immunofluorescence of cytochrome C was visualized using a Nikon microscope (Nikon, Düsseldorf, Germany).

Statistical analysis
Group comparisons were performed using Student’s unpaired t-test (two-sample test) or one-way ANOVA with subsequent post-hoc Tuckey tests (multiple comparison test). Calculations were performed with the GraphPad Prism software package (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Results are given as mean ± SEM.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists PIO and GW on PHA-stimulated human T cells in vitro
Constitutive expression of PPAR-{gamma} was demonstrated by Western blotting in T lymphocytes derived from MS patients and HDs (not shown). PHA-induced proliferation of PBMCs and proliferative responses of Jurkat cells were inhibited by ciglitazone and PIO in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1 ). Control experiments with vehicle revealed no significant effect on PHA-induced T cell proliferation (not shown). The antiproliferative effects of PIO and GW on PHA-induced proliferation were significantly increased when PBMCs were preincubated with PIO and GW before PHA stimulation, followed by a second dose at the time of PHA stimulation (Fig. 2 ). This sensitizing effect was also observed in a series of preincubation experiments demonstrating that re-exposure to PIO and GW as late as 48 h after PHA stimulation still resulted in a significant inhibition of T cell proliferative responses (Fig. 3 ).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on Jurkat cells. Unstimulated Jurkat cells were incubated with ciglitazone (open bars) and PIO (solid bars) for 48 h at the indicated concentrations. Proliferation is expressed as the percentage of the maximal response. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, Treated versus nontreated Jurkat cells.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on PHA-induced T cell proliferation. PBMCs of 15 MS patients were stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and incubated with PIO (30 µM) and GW (1 µM) for 48 h (open bars). Alternatively, PBMCs were pretreated with 15 µM PIO and 0.5 µM GW for 48 h before PHA stimulation and were cultured for another 48 h in the presence of 15 µM PIO and 0.5 µM GW (solid bars). Proliferation is expressed as indicated in Figure 1 . ***, P < 0.001, Proliferative response in pretreated versus nonpretreated PBMCs.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Preincubation with PPAR-{gamma} agonists increases the susceptibility to inhibit PHA-induced T cell proliferation. PBMCs of four MS patients were stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml). PIO (30 µM) and GW (1 µM) were added 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after PHA stimulation (open bars). Alternatively, PBMCs were pretreated with 15 µM PIO and 0.5 µM GW for 48 h. PBMCs were then stimulated with PHA for 48 h, and PIO (15 µM) or GW (0.5 µM) was added 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after PHA stimulation (solid bars). (A) Experiments with PIO and (B) with GW. Proliferation is expressed as indicated in Figure 1 . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Proliferative response in pretreated versus nonpretreated PBMCs.

 
The sensitizing effects of PPAR-{gamma} treatment were also confirmed in one MS patient who had been treated with PIO (15 mg tid) over a period of 2 months. T cell proliferation of this patient was only moderately affected by exposure to PPAR-{gamma} agonists in vitro before PIO treatment. However, after 2 months of oral PIO medication, the inhibitory effect on T cells was significantly increased (Fig. 4 ).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Oral treatment with PIO increases subsequent inhibition of PHA-induced T cell proliferation upon re-exposure in vitro. PBMCs of one MS patient were stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and incubated with PIO (30 µM) or GW (1 µM) for 48 h. Open bars, Proliferative responses before oral drug treatment; solid bars, after 2 months of oral treatment with PIO (15 mg tid). Proliferation is expressed as indicated in Figure 1 . *, P < 0.05, Proliferative response after oral treatment with PIO versus proliferative response before treatment.

 
Antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonist PIO on the antigen-specific human T cell line KHS.TT2
PIO also exhibited antiproliferative properties on the TT-specific human T cell line KHS.TT2. Although the magnitude of inhibition was less pronounced than that observed after PHA stimulation of PBMCs, pretreatment of TT-specific T cell lines with PIO for 48 h and re-exposure at the time of antigen-specific restimulation increased the antiproliferative effects (Fig. 5 ).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on antigen-specific T cell proliferation. The TT-specific T cell line KHS.TT2 was restimulated in the presence of autologous PBMCs and TT (5 µg/ml). PIO (10 µM) and GW (1 µM) were added at the time of the antigen-specific restimulation for 48 h (open bars). Alternatively, T cell lines were pretreated with PIO (5 µM) and GW (0.5 µM) 48 h before the antigen-specific restimulation, and PIO (5 µM) and GW (0.5 µM) were added at the time of the antigen-specific restimulation for 48 h (solid bars). Proliferation is expressed as indicated in Figure 1 . *, P < 0.05, Proliferative response in pretreated versus nonpretreated T cell lines.

 
Inhibition of IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} secretion of PHA-stimulated T cells by PPAR-{gamma} agonists PIO and GW
The antiproliferative effects of PIO and GW on MS-derived T cells were accompanied by a highly significant reduction of IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} secretion, which again, was most pronounced after preincubation of PBMCs with PIO and GW (Fig. 6 ). IL-4 levels were below detection level in all samples tested.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. PPAR-{gamma} agonists inhibit IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} secretion of PHA-stimulated T cells. PBMCs of six MS patients were stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and incubated with PIO (30 µM) and GW (1 µM) for 48 h (open bars). Alternatively, PBMCs were pretreated with 15 µM PIO and 0.5 µM GW for 48 h before PHA stimulation and were cultured for another 48 h in the presence of 15 µM PIO and 0.5 µM GW (solid bars). Supernatants were collected 48 h after PHA stimulation, and ELISA measured IFN-{gamma} (A) and TNF-{alpha} (B) secretion. Cytokine secretion is expressed as the percentage of the maximal response. ***, P < 0.001, Proliferative response in pretreated versus nonpretreated PBMCs.

 
Cell viability and induction of apoptosis in human PHA-stimulated T cells by treatment with PPAR-{gamma} agonists PIO and GW
The antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists PIO and GW were associated with decreased viability as demonstrated by MTT assays over time (Fig. 7 ) and were accompanied by a release of cytochrome C from the mitochondria as shown by immunofluorescence (Fig. 8C and 8D ). Moreover, condensation of nuclear DNA in PHA-stimulated T cells indicated that induction of apoptosis contributes to the antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on human T cells in vitro (Fig. 8A) . Apoptotic cell death was further suggested by down-regulation of Bcl-2 (Fig. 8B) .



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. The antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists PIO and GW are accompanied by decreased cell viability. PBMCs of 13 subjects (nine MS patients, four HDs) were stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and incubated with PIO (30 µM) and GW (1 µM) for 48 (A) and 72 h (B). Proliferation is expressed as indicated in Figure 1 . Cell viability as assessed by MTT assay is expressed as percentage of the maximal cell viability. Solid bars, Proliferation; open bars, cell viability. ***, P < 0.001, Proliferation in treated versus untreated PHA-stimulated PBMCs; *, P < 0.05, viability in treated versus untreated PHA-stimulated PBMCs (A). ***, P < 0.001, Proliferation in treated versus untreated PHA-stimulated PBMCs; *, P < 0.05, viability in treated versus untreated PHA-stimulated PBMCs (B).

 


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Induction of apoptosis in PHA-stimulated T cells, as indicated by DNA condensation (original magnification, x12,000) 24 h after treatment with 1 µM PIO (A). Down-regulation of Bcl-2 48 h after treatment with 30 µM ciglitazone (B); diffuse release of cytochrome C into the cytoplasm (original magnification, x100) 24 h after treatment with 30 µM PIO (D) as opposed to localized immunofluorescence of cytochrome C in untreated, resting T cells (C).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study demonstrates that the structurally distinct, synthetic PPAR-{gamma} ligands PIO, GW, and ciglitazone inhibit proliferative responses and proinflammatory cytokine secretion of mitogen-stimulated PBMCs derived from MS patients and HDs. Additionally, antiproliferative effects were demonstrated in Jurkat cells and the TT-specific T cell line KHS.TT2. Inhibition of proliferation as well as IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} secretion were most pronounced after preincubation of PBMCs with PIO and GW, suggesting a sensitizing effect of these drugs. In support of this assumption, the antiproliferative effects of PIO in vitro were increased in one MS patient treated with PIO (15 mg tid) for 2 months. The induction of apoptosis seems to contribute to the antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory action of PPAR-{gamma} agonists in vitro.

PPAR-{gamma} was primarily characterized in adipocytes as a key regulator of lipid metabolism [7 , 23 ] but was also identified in murine and human T cells, suggesting a possible involvement in the regulation of T cell activation [12 13 14 15 16 , 24 ]. Recent experimental work has focused on the clinical and immunomodulatory effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on EAE [4 5 6 ]. As protection from EAE is paralleled by a significant decrease of perivascular infiltrates within the CNS [4 , 5 ], it is likely that PPAR-{gamma} agonists exert their immunomodulatory effects, at least in part, by interfering with the activation of T cells.

In the present study, constitutive expression of PPAR-{gamma} was demonstrated in T cells derived from MS patients and HDs in accordance with previous reports [12 , 13 , 15 , 17 ]. Here, we demonstrate a profound antiproliferative effect of two structurally distinct and highly selective PPAR-{gamma} agonists, PIO and GW, on PHA-induced T cell proliferation. As the TZD PIO and the non-TZD GW exert antiproliferative effects of a similar magnitude, it is likely that these effects are PPAR-{gamma}-mediated. Induction of apoptosis seems to contribute significantly to these anti-inflammatory effects [13 14 15 ]. Although the most pronounced, antiproliferative effects of the TZD derivatives ciglitazone and PIO peaked at concentrations of 10–100 µM as described previously [12 13 14 15 16 17 ], induction of apoptotic cell death by PIO in single T cells was observed at 1 µM PIO, indicating that treatment effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists are already detectable at low concentrations.

Inhibition of proliferation was paralleled by a significant decrease of proinflammatory cytokine secretion such as IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}. Previous studies demonstrated that PPAR-{gamma} agonists inhibit IL1-ß, IL-6, and TNF-{alpha} expression in human periperal blood monocytes [25 ], decrease IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} production in mitogen-stimulated murine splenocytes [12 , 13 , 17 , 26 ], and down-regulate IFN-{gamma}-induced chemokine expression in endothelial cells [27 ].

As a principal and new finding, we demonstrate that the extent of the immunomodulatory effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists was significantly enhanced when PBMCs were pretreated with PIO or GW, suggesting that prestimulation of PPAR-{gamma} increases further ligand-induced receptor activation. It is interesting that this sensitizing effect of PPAR-{gamma} agonists does not seem to be restricted to the in vitro situation, as an increased, antiproliferative effect of PPAR-{gamma} agonists was observed in one MS patient who received oral PIO medication for 2 months. Although this remains a single observation, translation into a therapeutic scenario for MS patients suggests that long-term treatment with PPAR-{gamma} agonists might be used to down-regulate peripheral T cell responses, opening the possibility of further medication in the case of acute clinical deterioration. In line with this hypothesis, we demonstrate that pretreatment of PBMCs with PIO and GW not only increased the magnitude of the antiproliferative effects but also extended the maximal time span during which significant antiproliferative effects are achievable when a second dose of PIO and GW is given after PHA stimulation. However, the molecular mechanisms of this sensitizing effect remain to be elucidated. One might speculate that ligand-dependent stimulation of PPAR-{gamma} may result in auto-induced up-regulation of the receptor, resulting in an enhanced DNA-binding activity. Ongoing experiments using Western blot detection and electrophoretic mobility shift assay to detect changes in PPAR-{gamma} expression and altered DNA binding of PPAR-{gamma} derived from nuclear protein extracts of T cells pretreated with PPAR-{gamma} agonists will help to clarify this issue.

In conclusion, this is the first study demonstrating significant antiproliferative effects of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on human T cells derived from MS patients. Given the pathogenetic importance of activated T cells in MS and the anti-inflammatory and clinically beneficial effects of PIO and GW in various murine EAE models, PPAR-{gamma} agonists may provide a novel, therapeutic principle in MS treatment.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This study was supported by a grant from the Gemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung (Project No. 1.319.110/02/04) to S. S. and M. T. H. and grants from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society to D. L. F.

Received August 26, 2003; revised October 9, 2003; accepted October 14, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Martin, R., McFarland, H. F., McFarlin, D. E. (1992) Immunological aspects of demyelinating diseases Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10,153-187[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Hohlfeld, R., Meinl, E., Weber, F., Zipp, F., Schmidt, S., Sotgiu, S., Goebels, N., Voltz, R., Spuler, S., Iglesias, A., Wekerle, H. (1995) The role of autoimmune T lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis Neurology 45(Suppl. 6),S33-S38[Abstract]
  3. Hohlfeld, R. (1997) Biotechnological agents for the immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis. Principles, problems and perspectives Brain 120,865-916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Niino, M. K., Iwabuchi, K., Kikuchi, S., Ato, M., Morohashi, T., Ogata, A., Tashiro, K., Onoe, K. (2001) Amelioration of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6 mice by an agonist of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} J. Neuroimmunol. 116,40-48[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Feinstein, D. L., Galea, E., Gavriluk, V., Brosnan, C. F., Whitacre, C. C., Dumitrescu-Ozimek, L., Landreth, G. E., Pershadsingh, H. A., Weinberg, G., Heneka, M. T. (2002) PPAR-{gamma} agonists prevent experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Ann. Neurol. 51,694-702[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Natarjan, C., Bright, J. J. (2002) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} agonists inhibit experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by blocking IL-12 production, IL-12 signaling and Th1 differentiation Genes Immun. 3,59-70[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Willson, T. M., Brown, P. J., Sternbach, D. D., Henke, B. R. (2000) The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery J. Med. Chem. 43,527-550[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Heneka, M. T., Feinstein, D. L., Galea, E., Gleichmann, M., Wullner, U., Klockgether, T. (1999) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} agonists protect cerebellar granule cells from cytokine-induced apoptotic cell death by inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase J. Neuroimmunol. 100,156-168[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Heneka, M. T., Klockgether, T., Feinstein, D. (2000) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} ligands reduce neuronal inducible nitric oxide synthase expression and cell death in vivo J. Neurosci. 20,6862-6867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Combs, C. K., Johnson, D. E., Karlo, J. C., Cannady, S. B., Landreth, G. E. (2000) Inflammatory mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease: inhibition of ß-amyloid-stimulated proinflammatory responses and neurotoxicity by PPAR{gamma} agonists J. Neurosci. 20,558-567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Landreth, G. E., Heneka, M. T. (2001) Anti-inflammatory actions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} agonists in Alzheimer’s disease Neurobiol. Aging 22,937-944[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Wang, P., Anderson, P. O., Chen, S., Paulsson, K. M., Sjögren, H. O., Li, S. (2001) Inhibition of the transcription factors AP-1 and NF-{kappa}B in CD4 T cells by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} ligands Int. Immunopharmacol. 1,803-812[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Harris, S. G., Phipps, R. P. (2001) The nuclear receptor PPAR {gamma} is expressed by mouse T lymphocytes and PPAR {gamma} agonists induce apoptosis Eur. J. Immunol. 31,1098-1105[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Harris, S. G., Phipps, R. P. (2002) Prostaglandin D2, its metabolite 15-d-PGJ2, and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-{gamma} agonists induce apoptosis in transformed, but not normal, human T lineage cells Immunology 105,23-34[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Clark, R. B., Bishop-Bailey, D., Estrada-Hernandez, T., Hla, T., Puddington, L., Padula, S. J. (2000) The nuclear receptor PPAR{gamma} and immunoregulation: PPAR{gamma} mediates inhibition of helper T cell responses J. Immunol. 164,1364-1371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Clark, R. B. (2002) The role of PPARs in inflammation and immunity J. Leukoc. Biol. 71,388-400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yang, X. Y., Wang, L. H., Chen, T., Hodge, D. R., Resau, J. H., DaSilva, L., Farrar, W. L. (2000) Activation of human T lymphocytes is inhibited by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) agonists J. Biol. Chem. 275,4541-4544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Poser, C. M., Paty, D. W., Scheinberg, L., McDonald, W. I., Davis, F. A., Ebers, G. C., Johnson, K. P., Sibley, W. A., Silberberg, D. H., Tourtellotte, W. W. (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols Ann. Neurol. 13,227-231[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. McDonald, W.I., Compston, A., Edan, G., Goodkin, D., Hartung, H.P., Lublin, F.D., McFarland, H.F., Paty, D.W., Polman, C.H., Reingold, S.C., Sandberg-Wollheim, M., Sibley, W., Thompson, A., van den Noort, S., Weinshenker, B.Y., Wolinsky, J.S. (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Ann. Neurol. 50,121-127[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Pette, M., Fujita, K., Kitze, B., Whitaker, J. N., Albert, E., Kappos, L., Wekerle, H. (1990) Myelin basic protein specific T lymphocyte lines from MS patients and healthy individuals Neurology 40,1770-1776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Magaud, J. P., Sargent, I., Mason, D. Y. (1988) Detection of human white cell proliferative responses by immunoenzymatic measurement of bromodeoxyuridine uptake J. Immunol. Methods 106,95-100[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Huong, P. L. T., Kolk, A. H. J., Eggelte, T. A., Verstijnen, C. P., Gilis, H., Hendriks, J. T. (1991) Measurement of antigen-specific lymphocyte proliferation using 5-bromo-deoxyuridine incorporation J. Immunol. Methods 140,243-248[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Berger, J., Moller, D. E. (2002) The mechanisms of action of PPARs Annu. Rev. Med. 53,409-435[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Kielian, T., Drew, P. D. (2003) Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} agonists on central nervous system inflammation J. Neurosci. Res. 71,315-325[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Jiang, C., Ting, A. T., Seed, B. (1998) PPAR-{gamma} agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines Nature 391,82-86[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Cunard, R., Ricote, M., DiCampli, D., Archer, D. C., Kahn, D. A., Glass, C. K., Kelly, C. J. (2002) Regulation of cytokine expression by ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors J. Immunol. 168,2795-2802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Marx, N., Mach, F., Suaty, A., Leung, J. H., Sarafi, M. N., Ransohoff, R., Libby, P., Plutzky, J., Luster, A. D. (2000) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} activators inhibit IFN-{gamma}-induced expression of the T cell-active CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC in human endothelial cells J. Immunol. 164,6503-6508[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Hazra, R. K. Batra, H. H. Tai, S. Sharma, X. Cui, and S. M. Dubinett
Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone Decrease Prostaglandin E2 in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells by Up-Regulating 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 1715 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. E. Rockwell, N. T. Snider, J. T. Thompson, J. P. Vanden Heuvel, and N. E. Kaminski
Interleukin-2 Suppression by 2-Arachidonyl Glycerol Is Mediated through Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Independently of Cannabinoid Receptors 1 and 2
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 101 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
R Bordet, P Gele, P Duriez, and J-C Fruchart
PPARs: a new target for neuroprotection.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 77(3): 285 - 287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Han and J. Roman
Rosiglitazone suppresses human lung carcinoma cell growth through PPAR{gamma}-dependent and PPAR{gamma}-independent signal pathways.
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 430 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Klotz, M. Schmidt, T. Giese, M. Sastre, P. Knolle, T. Klockgether, and M. T. Heneka
Proinflammatory Stimulation and Pioglitazone Treatment Regulate Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Levels in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Healthy Controls and Multiple Sclerosis Patients
J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 4948 - 4955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C.J. Loy, S. Evelyn, F.K. Lim, M.H. Liu, and E.L. Yong
Growth dynamics of human leiomyoma cells and inhibitory effects of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} ligand, pioglitazone
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 11(8): 561 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
B. L. F. Kaplan, Y. Ouyang, C. E. Rockwell, G. K. Rao, and N. E. Kaminski
2-Arachidonoyl-glycerol suppresses interferon-{gamma} production in phorbol ester/ionomycin-activated mouse splenocytes independent of CB1 or CB2
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2005; 77(6): 966 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Cunard, Y. Eto, J. T. Muljadi, C. K. Glass, C. J. Kelly, and M. Ricote
Repression of IFN-{gamma} Expression by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}
J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7530 - 7536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.0803402v1
75/3/478    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Heneka, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Heneka, M. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS