Journal of Leukocyte Biology Myeloid cells, immune suppression, tumor immunology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published online as doi:10.1189/jlb.1003465 on November 21, 2003

Published online before print November 21, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jlb.1003465v1
75/2/267    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimaoka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yonehara, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shimaoka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yonehara, S.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2004;75:267-274.)
© 2004 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Cell surface-anchored SR-PSOX/CXC chemokine ligand 16 mediates firm adhesion of CXC chemokine receptor 6-expressing cells

Takeshi Shimaoka*, Takashi Nakayama{dagger}, Noriko Fukumoto*, Noriaki Kume{ddagger}, Shu Takahashi§, Junko Yamaguchi§, Manabu Minami{ddagger}, Kazutaka Hayashida{ddagger}, Toru Kita{ddagger}, Jun Ohsumi, Osamu Yoshie{dagger} and Shin Yonehara*,1

* Graduate School of Biostudies and Institute for Virus Research and
{ddagger} Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Japan;
{dagger} Department of Microbiology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan; and
§ Biomedical Research Laboratories and
Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Sankyo Co. Ltd., Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

1 Correspondence: Graduate School of Biostudies and Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Shogoin Kawahara-cho 53, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. E-mail: syonehar{at}virus.kyoto-u.ac.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Direct contacts between dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells or natural killer T (NKT) cells play important roles in primary and secondary immune responses. SR-PSOX/CXC chemokine ligand 16 (CXCL16), which is selectively expressed on DCs and macrophages, is a scavenger receptor for oxidized low-density lipoprotein and also the chemokine ligand for a G protein-coupled receptor CXC chemokine receptor 6 (CXCR6), expressed on activated T cells and NKT cells. SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is the second transmembrane-type chemokine with a chemokine domain fused to a mucin-like stalk, a structure very similar to that of fractalkine (FNK). Here, we demonstrate that SR-PSOX/CXCL16 functions as a cell adhesion molecule for cells expressing CXCR6 in the same manner that FNK functions as a cell adhesion molecule for cells expressing CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) without requiring CX3CR1-mediated signal transduction or integrin activation. The chemokine domain of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 mediated the adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells, which was not impaired by treatment with pertussis toxin, a G{alpha}i protein blocker, which inhibited chemotaxis of CXCR6-expressing cells induced by SR-PSOX/CXCL16. Furthermore, the adhesion activity was up-regulated by treatment of SR-PSOX/CXCL16-expressing cells with a metalloprotease inhibitor, which increased surface expression levels of SR-PSOX/CXCL16. Thus, SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is a unique molecule that not only attracts T cells and NKT cells toward DCs but also supports their firm adhesion to DCs.

Key Words: scavenger receptor • metalloprotease • T cells


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The chemokine superfamily consists of small, heparin-binding cytokines that induce directed migration of various types of leukocytes through interactions with a group of seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors [1 ]. More than 40 chemokines have been identified and classified into four subfamilies, C, CC, CXC, and CX3C, based on the motif formed by the conserved cysteine residues in the amino-terminal region. In addition to migration-inducing activity, chemokines have been shown to induce signals that lead to cytoskeletal reorganization and integrin activation for cell adhesion [2 3 4 5 ]. Furthermore, fractalkine (FNK)/CX3C chemokine ligand 1, the first reported transmembrane-type chemokine [6 , 7 ], has been shown to function as a cell adhesion molecule under static and flow conditions without requiring CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1)-mediated signaling or integrin activation [8 , 9 ].

Recently, we have identified and characterized SR-PSOX, a novel scavenger receptor for phosphatidylserine and oxidized low-density lipoprotein and bacteria [10 , 11 ]. Separately, other groups have identified chemokine ligand 16 (CXCL16) [12 , 13 ], the chemokine ligand for a G protein-coupled receptor CXC chemokine receptor 6 (CXCR6) [14 , 15 ], and then SR-PSOX and CXCL16 turned out to be identical. Thus, SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is the second transmembrane-type chemokine with a chemokine domain fused to a mucin-like stalk, a structure very similar to that of FNK [6 , 7 ]. SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is selectively expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages, and its receptor CXCR6 is expressed on naive CD8+ T cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells, and type 1-polarized, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [12 13 14 15 16 ]. It has been proposed that CXCL16 promotes the movement of T cells toward DCs in the splenic red pulp [12 ]. Furthermore, CXCR6-expressing effector T cells were found to be abundant in type 1 inflammatory lesions such as rheumatoid joints and inflamed livers [16 ].

DCs, which capture and process antigens to form major histocompatibility complex peptide complexes, function as professional APCs to T cells. After up-taking antigen and migrating from the periphery to the T cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs, DC contact can initiate primary immune responses via activation of resting T cells. In addition, contacts between DCs and T cells are essential to maintain and restart immune responses of previously activated T cells [17 , 18 ]. Adhesion molecules such as lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 (LFA-3)/CD2, LFA-1/intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and DC-specific ICAM-3-grabbing nonintegrin/ICAM-3 are reported to mediate interactions between DCs and T cells and to provide activation signals via DC–T cell adhesion [19 , 20 ]. Notably, the membrane-anchored chemokine, FNK, whose molecular structure is similar to that of SR-PSOX/CXCL16, can directly function as an adhesion molecule for cells expressing its receptor CX3CR1 [8 , 9 ]. Here, we demonstrate that in a manner very similar to that of FNK, SR-PSOX also functions as a direct adhesion cell molecule for cells expressing its receptor CXCR6. The chemokine domain of SR-PSOX primarily mediates the adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells. The adhesion is not inhibited by pertussis toxin (PTX), the G{alpha}I protein inhibitor, although it effectively suppresses chemotaxis of CXCR6-expressing cells induced by SR-PSOX/CXCL16. Furthermore, the adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells can be enhanced by treatment of SR-PSOX/CXCL16-expressing cells with a metalloprotease inhibitor, which increases the surface expression of SR-PSOX/CXCL16. Thus, SR-PSOX/CXCL16 may play an important role in interactions between DCs and T cells or NKT cells as a chemoattractant as well as a cell adhesion molecule.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials and cells
PTX, wortmannin, and PD098059 were purchased from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (La Jolla, CA). EGTA was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Mouse-activated T cells expressing CXCR6 were prepared as described previously [12 ] with minor modifications. In brief, T cells (2x105 cells/ml) isolated from splenocyte suspensions by magnetic cell sorter were activated by cultivation with RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and mouse interleukin (IL)-2 (4 ng/ml) for 5 days in plastic plates precoated with anti-CD3 (2C11) and anti-CD28 (37.51; PharMingen, San Diego, CA). The activated T cells were then left to rest in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS and IL-2 (2 ng/ml) for 4 days and were used as CXCR6-expressing cells. Transfection of COS-7 cells was performed as described previously [10 ]. L1.2 murine pre-B cells stably expressing CXCR6 (L-CXCR6) or CX3CR1 (L-CX3CR1) were generated as reported previously [8 ].

Monoclonal anti-human (h)- and mouse (m)SR-PSOX antibodies
Female Lewis rats were immunized with mSR-PSOX-Fc fusion protein, produced by COS-7 cells, transfected with a fusion construct consisting of the extracellular domain of mSR-PSOX (amino acids 1–198) fused at its C terminus with an Fc fragment of human immunoglobulin G (IgG)1. Three days after the last immunization, spleen cells were fused with NS-1 mouse myeloma cells as described previously [21 ]. Finally, we generated an anti-mSR-PSOX monoclonal antibody (mAb) 12-81. Anti-hSR-PSOX mAb 22-19-12, 49-36, and 28-12 were generated as described previously [11 ].

Preparation of polyclonal anti-hSR-PSOX antibody
Synthetic peptides corresponding to amino acid residues 42–61 of hSR-PSOX were conjugated to Imject Maleimide-Activated mcKLH (Pierce, Rockford, IL). After the immunization of a rabbit with the conjugates, polyclonal antiserum was collected and purified using a column packed with peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 42–61 of hSR-PSOX.

SR-PSOX-FNK hybrid protein
Plasmids encoding SR-PSOX-FNK hybrid molecules were generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subsequent ligation of DNA fragments into pME18S [22 ] as described previously [21 ]. In brief, the following fragments were amplified by PCR using primers as indicated: DNA encoding the chemokine domain of hSR-PSOX (amino acids 1–118) using primers 5'-TCACTCGAGATGGGACGGGACTTGCGGCC-3' and 5'-TCAGAATTCAGGAAGTAAATGCTTCTGGTGGC-3'; DNA encoding the chemokine domain of hFNK (amino acids 1–206) using 5'-TCACTCGAGAGCTCTGCCGCCTGGCTCTA-3' and 5'-TCAGAATTCTAGGGCAGCAAGCCTGGCGGT-3'; DNA encoding the region containing the mucin, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains of hSR-PSOX (amino acids 120–254) using 5'-TCAGAATTCACCAGCCCCCCAATTTCTCA-3' and 5'-TCACTGCAGTCAGGTATTAGAGTCAGGTG-3'; and DNA encoding the region containing the mucin, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains of hFNK (amino acids 97–397) using 5'-TCAGAATTCACTCGAAATGGCGGCACCTT-3' and 5'-TCACTGCAGACTAGACACAGGCCAGAGGA-3'. PCR fragments of the chemokine domain were digested with XhoI and EcoRI, and PCR fragments of the other domains were digested with EcoRI and PstI. These digested fragments were ligated together into pME18S digested with XhoI and PstI, and expression vectors for four kinds of SR-PSOX-FNK hybrids (S-S, S-F, F-S, and F-F, see Fig. 4A ) were prepared. DNA encoding hSR-PSOX without the mucin domain (amino acids 119–205; {Delta}mucin) was generated by ligating DNA fragments encoding the chemokine domain of hSR-PSOX and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of hSR-PSOX, which were prepared at once by PCR using 5'-GCACAGGACCGGCACAGGAAGTAAATGCTT-3', 5'-TCACTCGAGATGGGACGGGACTTGCGGCC-3', and 5'-GCAGTGGCTGGTTAGTCCTA-3' as primers. These PCR fragments digested with XhoI and HindIII and with adaptor fragments generated by digestion of pME18S with XhoI and HindIII were ligated together into HindIII-digested pME18S-SR-PSOX.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Domain analyses of hSR-PSOX. (A) Schematic illustration of hSR-PSOX-FNK hybrids. The preparation of cDNA encoding these hybrid molecules was described in Materials and Methods. {Delta}Mucin indicates hSR-PSOX without the mucin domain. (B) Adhesion assay. Adhesion of L-control, L-hCXCR6, and L-hCX3CR1 cells to COS-7 cells transfected with the indicated hSR-PSOX-FNK hybrid was evaluated as in Figure 2 . The data shown represent the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments.

 
Chemotaxis and calcium mobilization assays
Chemotaxis assays using transwell plates with 5 µm pore size membrane (Corning Costar, Corning, NY) and calcium mobilization assays were performed as described previously [8 ]. In some experiments, cells were preincubated with PTX (500 ng/ml), wortmannin (100 nM), or PD098059 (50 µM) for 30 min at 37°C.

Cell adhesion assays
Cell adhesion to immobilized SR-PSOX or FNK was measured essentially as described previously [8 ]. In adhesion assays with immobilized chemokines, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates (Corning Costar) were precoated with 10 nM chemokines fused with a secreted form of placental alkaline phosphatase (SEAP). L-CXCR6 cells or mouse-activated T cells were transferred to each well (5x104 cells/well) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature (RT). After being washed, adherent cells were quantified using Picogreen double-strand DNA quantitation reagent (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). In adhesion assays with chemokine-expressing cells, L-CXCR6 or mouse-activated T cells labeled with calcein acetoxymethyl ester (calcein-AM; Molecular Probes) were transferred to 12-well plates (5x105 cells/well), where COS-7 cells expressing SR-PSOX (COS-SR-PSOX cells) were preseeded. After incubation for 60 min at 37°C, nonadherent cells were removed by washing, and fluorescence intensity was measured using Wallac 1420 ARVO fluoroscan (Wallac, Turku, Finland). To analyze effects of various inhibitors, COS-SR-PSOX cells and L-CXCR6 cells were preincubated with PTX (500 ng/ml), wortmannin (100 nM), PD098059 (50 µM), or soluble (s)SR-PSOX-SEAP (20 nM) for 30 min at 37°C.

Expression analysis of SR-PSOX and CXCR6
For flow cytometric analysis of cell surface-expressed hSR-PSOX, cells were detached from dishes with 5 mM EDTA and incubated for 1 h on ice with 20 µg/ml anti-hSR-PSOX mAb, clone 22-19-12, 49-36, or 28-12 or control mouse IgG. After being washed, cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (Cappel, Aurora, OH) on ice for 1 h. After two-times washes, cells were analyzed on an EPICS Elite (Coulter, Hialeah, FL). Flow cytometric analysis of cell surface-expressed mSR-PSOX was similarly performed using the anti-mSR-PSOX mAb 12-81. For flow cytometric analysis of cell surface-expressed hCXCR6, Fc receptors on cells were blocked by treatment with human IgG, and then cells were stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-hCXCR6 mAb (clone 56811). For flow cytometric analysis of mCXCR6, Fc receptors were blocked by FITC-labeled anti-CD16/CD32 (PharMingen), and then cells were stained with SR-PSOX-Fc and PE-labeled goat anti-human Fc{gamma} as described previously [12 ].

Quantification of SR-PSOX by ELISA
ELISA plates were coated with the monoclonal anti-SR-PSOX antibody 28-12 (10 µg/ml, 50 µl/well) by incubating for 2 h at 37°C. After three-times washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20, the plates were blocked with fourfold-diluted BlockAce (Dainippon Seiyaku, Osaka, Japan) for 1 h at RT. After three more washes, appropriately diluted samples or standards (50 µl/well) were loaded and incubated for 2 h at RT. After another three-times washes, rabbit polyclonal anti-SR-PSOX antibody (50 µl/well) against synthetic peptides corresponding to amino acid residues 42–61 of hSR-PSOX (10 µg/ml) was transferred to the plate and incubated for 1 h at RT. After three-times washes with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, anti-rabbit IgG–horseradish peroxidase (50 µl/well), which does not cross-react with mouse IgG (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK), was transferred and incubated for 30 min at RT. After another three washes with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, tetramethylbenzidine substrate buffer (100 µl/well; Dako, Carpinteria, CA) was transferred to each well. After incubation for 5–30 min at RT, stop solution (100 µl/well) was transferred to each well, and the optical density (O.D.) at 450 nm was determined using Wallac 1420 ARVO fluoroscan (Wallac).

Preparation of SR-PSOX-containing samples for ELISA
COS-SR-PSOX cells in 24-well tissue-culture plates were cultured for 24 h with serum-free medium in the presence or absence of the metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001 (10 µM). Then, culture supernatants were collected for quantification of sSR-PSOX. After being washed with PBS, cells were lysed for 30 min with lysis buffer (PBS containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1% protease inhibitor mixture). After clarification of the culture supernatants and cell lysates by centrifugation, ELISA quantified the SR-PSOX. The data shown represent the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Immobilized SR-PSOX/CXCL16 on plastic culture dish mediates adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells
SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is a transmembrane protein with an N-terminal CXC chemokine domain fused to a mucin-like stalk [10 11 12 13 ]. This structure is very similar to that of another transmembrane-type chemokine, FNK [6 , 7 ]. The membrane-anchored form of FNK has been demonstrated to induce firm adhesion of cells expressing its receptor CX3CR1 in static and flow conditions [8 , 9 ]. We, therefore, examined whether the membrane-anchored SR-PSOX/CXCL16 was also capable of mediating firm adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells. First, we examined whether SR-PSOX-SEAP immobilized to plastic culture dishes was capable of trapping L-hCXCR6 cells, whose expression of CXCR6 was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. 1A ). As shown in Figure 1B and 1C , L-hCXCR6 cells indeed bound to immobilized hSR-PSOX-SEAP. Conversely, L-hCX3CR1 cells did not bind to hSR-PSOX-SEAP but bound to hFNK-SEAP. Neither L-hCXCR6 cells nor L-hCX3CR1 cells bound to control-immobilized SEAP. The adhesion of L-hCXCR6 cells was inhibited by shSR-PSOX. Similarly, L-mCXCR6 cells, whose expression of mCXCR6 was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. 1A) and reverse transcriptase-PCR (data not shown), selectively bound to immobilized mSR-PSOX-SEAP in a manner sensitive to smSR-PSOX (Fig. 1D) . We further demonstrated specific adhesion of normal mouse T cells expressing CXCR6 (Fig. 1A) , which were prepared by activation in vitro with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28, to immobilized mSR-PSOX-SEAP, again in a manner sensitive to smSR-PSOX (Fig. 1E) .



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immobilized SR-PSOX/CXCL16 on plastic dish mediates cell adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells. (A) Flow cytometric analysis. Surface expression of hCXCR6 on control murine L1.2 cells (L-control cells) and murine L-hCXCR6 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with anti-hCXCR6 mAb 56811 (bold line) or control IgG (dotted line). Surface expression of mCXCR6 on L-control cells, murine L-mCXCR6 cells, and mouse-activated T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry using SR-PSOX-Fc as described in Materials and Methods. Mouse-activated T cells were prepared by in vitro activation with CD3 and CD28 as described in Materials and Methods. (B–E) Assay of adhesion to immobilized SR-PSOX-SEAP on plastic culture dishes. L-control, L-hCXCR6, and L-hCX3CR1 cells were transferred to plastic culture dishes precoated with control-SEAP, hSR-PSOX-SEAP, or hFNK-SEAP and were incubated for 30 min at RT (B and C). L-control and L-mCXCR6 cells (D) and mouse-activated T cells (E) were incubated in wells precoated with control SEAP or mSR-PSOX-SEAP and were incubated for 30 min at RT. After the washes of plates, adherent cells were observed under light microscopy (B) and quantified using Picogreen double-strand DNA quantitation reagent (C–E). In blocking experiments, shSR-PSOX and smSR-PSOX, respectively (20 nM), were preincubated with SR-PSOX-SEAP-coated plates, L-hCXCR6 or L-mCXCR6 cells, and mouse-activated T cells for 30 min. The data shown represent the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments.

 
Adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells to SR-PSOX/CXCL16-expressing cells
We then examined adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells to the membrane-anchored chemokines expressed on COS-7 cells. L-hCXCR6 cells selectively bound to COS-7 cells transfected with hSR-PSOX/CXCL16 (COS-hSR-PSOX cells), whose expression was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. 2A ), and L-hCX3CR1 cells selectively bound to those expressing FNK (COS-hFNK cells; Fig. 2B and 2C ). Adhesion of L-hCXCR6 cells to COS-hSR-PSOX cells was inhibited by shSR-PSOX. Neither L-CXCR6 nor L-CX3CR1 bound to control COS-7 cells (COS-control cells). As shown in Figure 2D and 2E , L-mCXCR6 cells and mouse-activated T cells selectively bound to COS-mSR-PSOX/CXCL16, whose expression was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. 2A) . Collectively, similar to the membrane-anchored FNK [8 , 9 ], the membrane-anchored SR-PSOX/CXCL16 was indeed capable of mediating adhesion of cells expressing its receptor CXCR6.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. SR-PSOX/CXCL16-expressing cells mediate adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells. (A) Flow cytometric analysis. COS-7 cells were transfected with control vector (COS-control cells) or hSR-PSOX (COS-hSR-PSOX cells) or mSR-PSOX (COS-mSR-PSOX) cells, respectively. The transient expression of hSR-PSOX or mSR-PSOX on these COS-7 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with anti-hSR-PSOX mAb 28-12 or anti-mSR-PSOX mAb 12-81 (bold lines) or with control antibody (dotted line) as described in Materials and Methods. (B–E) Adhesion assay with SR-PSOX-expressing COS-7 cells. L-control, L-hCXCR6, and L-hCX3CR1, labeled with calcein-AM, were incubated with COS-control, COS-hSR-PSOX, or COS-hFNK cells for 60 min at 37°C (B and C). L-mCXCR6 (D) or mouse-activated T cells (E) were labeled with calcein-AM and then incubated with COS-control or COS-mSR-PSOX cells for 60 min at 37°C. After the washes of plates, adherent cells were observed under light microscopy (upper panels) and fluorescence microscopy (lower panels; B), and fluorescence intensity was quantified as described in Materials and Methods (C–E). In blocking experiments, shSR-PSOX or smSR-PSOX (20 nM) was preincubated with COS-SR-PSOX cells and L-CXCR6 or mouse-activated T cells for 30 min. The data shown represent the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments.

 
CXCR6-mediated signal transduction is not required for adhesion induced by SR-PSOX/CXCL16
As shown in Figure3A and 1B , PTX, a potent inhibitor of the G{alpha}i class of G proteins, effectively suppressed responses of L-hCXCR6 cells to hSR-PSOX-SEAP in chemotaxis and calcium-mobilization assays as described previously [12 ]. Chemotaxis but not calcium mobilization was also slightly inhibited by the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI-3K) inhibitor wortmannin, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor PD098059 did not show any significant inhibition of chemotaxis or calcium mobilization. The effects of wortmannin on chemotaxis and calcium mobilization are very similar to those shown in T lymphoblasts stimulated with another chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor 1/CXCL12 [23 ]. Conversely, the adhesion of L-hCXCR6 cells to immobilized hSR-PSOX-SEAP or COS-hSR-PSOX cells was not inhibited by PTX, wortmannin, or PD098059 (Fig. 3C and 3D) . We also confirmed that EGTA did not suppress the adhesion of L-hCXCR6 cells to hSR-PSOX-SEAP-coated plates (Fig. 3C) . Therefore, the adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells to SR-PSOX/CXCL16 did not require signaling via PTX-sensitive G proteins or PI-3K downstream of chemokine receptors or calcium-dependent activation of integrins. These data were very similar to those reported for adhesion of CX3CR1-expressing cells mediated by membrane-anchored FNK [8 ]. In addition, L-hCXCR6 cells were shown to bind not only to the immobilized extracellular domain of SR-PSOX on plastic culture dishes (Fig. 1) but also to the cytoplasmic domain-truncated SR-PSOX expressed on COS-7 cells (data not shown). These results indicate that the cytoplasmic domain of SR-PSOX is not required for adhesion between cells expressing SR-PSOX and those expressing CXCR6, although SR-PSOX has a predictable phosphorylation site in the cytoplasmic domain [12 ].



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Signal transduction through chemokine receptor is not required for SR-PSOX-CXCR6-induced cell adhesion. (A) Examination of chemotaxis by standard transwell assays. hSR-PSOX-SEAP (10 nM) was analyzed for its chemotactic activity against L-hCXCR6 cells preincubated with PTX (500 ng/ml), wortmannin (100 nM), or PD098059 (50 µM) for 30 min. (B) Calcium mobilization assay. L-hCXCR6 cells preincubated with or without the indicated inhibitors for 30 min, were loaded with fura-PE3-AM and stimulated with hSR-PSOX-SEAP (10 nM). The intracellular concentration of calcium was monitored using fluorescence ratio (F340/F380). Values in the absence of inhibitor were set as 100%. (C, D) Cell adhesion assays. Adhesion of L-hCXCR6 cells to hSR-PSOX-SEAP-coated plates (C) or COS-hSR-PSOX cells (D) was measured as described in Figures 1 and 2 . Cells were preincubated with or without the indicated inhibitors for 30 min. Values in the absence of inhibitor were set as 100%. (A–D) The data shown represent the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05.

 
Domain analyses of SR-PSOX for adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells
SR-PSOX/CXCL16 and FNK have two extracellular domains, namely a chemokine domain and a mucin-stalk domain. The chemokine domain of SR-PSOX without the mucin-stalk domain efficiently induced chemotaxis of CXCR6-expressing cells (data not shown). To clarify which domains of SR-PSOX were necessary for the adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells, we generated SR-PSOX-FNK hybrids by shuffling the chemokine domains and mucin domains of hSR-PSOX and FNK, as described in Materials and Methods (Fig. 4A ). COS-7 cells were transfected with the expression vectors for these hybrid proteins, and their similar levels of surface expression were confirmed by flow cytometry [11 ]. L-hCXCR6 cells but not L-hCX3CR1 cells bound to COS-7 cells expressing the hybrid with the chemokine domain of hSR-PSOX and the mucin domain of FNK (Fig. 4B) , and L-hCX3CR1 cells but not L-hCXCR6 cells bound to COS-7 cells expressing the hybrid with the chemokine domain of FNK and the mucin domain of hSR-PSOX/CXCL16. It is interesting that COS-7 cells expressing SR-PSOX without its mucin domain had impaired adhesion activity (Fig. 4B) , although its cell-surface expression was confirmed by flow cytometry [11 ]. These results are very similar to those reported for cell adhesion mediated by membrane-anchored FNK [8 , 24 , 25 ] and indicate that the specificity for CXCR6 is determined by the chemokine domain of SR-PSOX/CXCL16, and the mucin domain of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is necessary for the effective presentation of the chemokine domain.

Enhancing effect of metalloproteinase inhibitor on cell adhesion mediated by SR-PSOX/CXCL16
FNK was reported to be prototypically released from the cell surface by the function of metalloproteinase, and the soluble form thus generated functions as a chemoattractant similar to other members of the chemokine family [26 , 27 ]. Given the possibility of a similar processing of the membrane-anchored SR-PSOX/CXCL16, we examined the effect of metalloproteinase inhibitor on the ratio of soluble-to-membrane-bound forms of SR-PSOX/CXCL16. The release of sSR-PSOX from COS-hSR-PSOX cells was clearly inhibited by a metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001, and cell-surface and cell-associated hSR-PSOX expression was increased by the treatment (Fig. 5A 5B 5C 5D ). This prompted us to examine the effect of the metalloproteinase inhibitor on SR-PSOX/CXCL16-mediated adhesion activity. As expected from the increased cell-surface expression of SR-PSOX, more L-hCXCR6 cells were found to bind to GM6001-treated COS-hSR-PSOX cells than untreated COS-hSR-PSOX cells (Fig. 5E) .



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001 on expression and adhesion-inducing activity of SR-PSOX/CXCL16. (A) Standard curve for quantification of hSR-PSOX by ELISA. The standard curve was drawn by using hSR-PSOX-SEAP as described in Materials and Methods. The data shown represent the average of the duplicate. (B) Effect of metalloproteinase inhibitor on the release of shSR-PSOX. shSR-PSOX generated in the culture medium of COS-hSR-PSOX cells was quantified by ELISA after cultivation for 24 h with or without the metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001 (10 µM). COS-control cells showed an undetectable level of shSR-PSOX (data not shown). The data represent the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. P < 0.01. (C) Effect of metalloproteinase inhibitor on the amount of cell-associated hSR-PSOX. ELISA determined the amounts of cell-associated hSR-PSOX in solubilized COS-hSR-PSOX cells after cultivation for 24 h with or without GM6001 (10 µM). COS-control cells showed an undetectable level of cell-associated hSR-PSOX (data not shown). The data shown represent the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. P < 0.01. (D) Effect of metalloproteinase inhibitor on the cell-surface expression of hSR-PSOX. Representative flow cytometric data of hSR-PSOX on COS-hSR-PSOX cells were shown after cultivation for 24 h with or without GM6001 (10 µM). The surface expression of hSR-PSOX on COS-hSR-PSOX cells was analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with anti-SR-PSOX mAb 22-19-12 (bold line) or control IgG (dotted line). (E) Adhesion assay for COS-7 cells. The adhesion of L-hCXCR6 cells to COS-hSR-PSOX cells after cultivation for 24 h with or without GM6001 (10 µM) was measured as in Figure 2 . P < 0.05.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
As FNK, the first reported transmembrane chemokine, mediates not only chemotaxis but also adhesion in CX3CR1-expressing cells, SR-PSOX/CXCL16, the second reported transmembrane chemokine, can also be predicted to function as a cell adhesion molecule for CXCR6-expressing cells. Recently, we reported in brief that immobilized SR-PSOX/CXCL16 induces direct adhesion of CXCR6-expressing plasma cells [28 ], although we did not examine the mechanism in detail. In the present study, we precisely showed the direct adhesion of CXCR6-expressing cells not only to immobilized SR-PSOX/CXCL16 on plastic culture dish (Fig. 1) but also to SR-PSOX/CXCL16-expressing cells (Fig. 2) . In addition, the chemokine domain of SR-PSOX was proven to determine the specificity for CXCR6-expressing cells (Fig. 4) . Furthermore, we demonstrated that metalloproteinase regulates the release of sSR-PSOX/CXCL16 from the membrane-anchored form and thus down-regulates the activity of SR-PSOX-expressing cells to bind CXCR6-expressing cells (Fig. 5) .

SR-PSOX and CXCR6 regulate the processes of chemotaxis as well as direct adhesion. The G{alpha}i protein blocker, PTX, can inhibit CXCR6-mediated migratory activity, however, by indicating that activation of G{alpha}i protein is necessary for the induction of the chemotactic response. In contrast, adhesion occurs even in the presence of PTX (Fig. 3) . These findings are similar to those reported for FNK [8 ]. Indeed, the adhesion between cells expressing SR-PSOX and those expressing CXCR6 can be induced, independent of the activation of G protein or the activation of integrins.

COS-7 cells expressing SR-PSOX without its mucin domain were shown to have impaired adhesion activity, although COS-7 cells expressing a hybrid with the chemokine domain of hSR-PSOX and the mucin domain of FNK efficiently bind L-hCXCR6 cells (Fig. 4) . These results indicate that the chemokine domain of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 only determines specificity for CXCR6, and the mucin domain of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is necessary for the efficient adhesion. The mucin domain of FNK was also shown to contribute to the efficient adhesion activity of CX3CR1-expressing cells (Fig. 4B) . However, the mucin domain is unlikely to determine the specificity of the cell adhesion directly, as the mucin domain of FNK when substituted for that of SR-PSOX is functional in terms of adhesion activity for CXCR6-expressing cells. Cell adhesion is mediated by direct protein–protein interactions, which may require some distance from the cell surface as discussed previously [8 , 24 , 25 ]. Thus, the mucin domain of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 may function as a necessary presenting structure of the chemokine domain, which provides some distance from the cell surface for the chemokine domain to interact with CXCR6 on the surface of target cells.

We have shown the multiple functions of SR-PSOX/CXCL16, which include the scavenger receptor activity, the chemotaxis-inducing activity, and the direct cell-adhesion activity. We therefore suggest that SR-PSOX/CXCL16 plays multifunctional roles in DCs. The soluble form of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 generated by metalloproteinase cleavage recruits CXCR6-expressing, activated T cells and NKT cells via its chemotactic activity in cooperation with other chemokines. Then, the membrane-anchored form of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 on DCs can function as a cell-surface adhesion molecule for CXCR6-expressing T and NKT cells in cooperation with other adhesion molecules. Such adhesion may lead to bidirectional stimulatory signals and may contribute to the formation of docking sites for the activation of antigen-specific, primary and secondary T cell responses. Thus, SR-PSOX/CXCL16 may play a role in DC functions for primary and secondary immune responses. These possibilities are currently under investigation.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government. We thank Drs. K. Sakamaki and K. K. Lee for helpful comments.

Received October 9, 2003; accepted October 14, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Zlotnik, A., Yoshie, O. (2000) Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity Immunity 12,121-127[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Goda, S., Imai, T., Yoshie, O., Yoneda, O., Inoue, H., Nagano, Y., Okazaki, T., Imai, H., Bloom, E. T., Domae, N., Umehara, H. (2000) CX3C-chemokine, fractalkine-enhanced adhesion of THP-1 cells to endothelial cells through integrin-dependent and -independent mechanisms J. Immunol. 164,4313-4320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Campbell, J. J., Hedrick, J., Zlotnik, A., Siani, M. A., Thompson, D. A., Butcher, E. C. (1998) Chemokines and the arrest of lymphocytes rolling under flow conditions Science 279,381-384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pachynski, R. K., Wu, S. W., Gunn, M. D., Erle, D. J. (1998) Secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokine (SLC) stimulates integrin {alpha} 4 ß 7-mediated adhesion of lymphocytes to mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) under flow J. Immunol. 161,952-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Campbell, J. J., Qin, S., Bacon, K. B., Mackay, C. R., Butcher, E. C. (1996) Biology of chemokine and classical chemoattractant receptors: differential requirements for adhesion-triggering versus chemotactic responses in lymphoid cells J. Cell Biol. 134,255-266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pan, Y., Lloyd, C., Zhou, H., Dolich, S., Deeds, J., Gonzalo, J. A., Vath, J., Gosselin, M., Ma, J., Dussault, B., Woolf, E., Alperin, G., Culpepper, J., Gutierrez-Ramos, J. C., Gearing, D. (1997) Neurotactin, a membrane-anchored chemokine upregulated in brain inflammation Nature 387,611-617[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Bazan, J. F., Bacon, K. B., Hardiman, G., Wang, W., Soo, K., Rossi, D., Greaves, D. R., Zlotnik, A., Schall, T. J. (1997) A new class of membrane-bound chemokine with a CX3C motif Nature 385,640-644[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Imai, T., Hieshima, K., Haskell, C., Baba, M., Nagira, M., Nishimura, M., Kakizaki, M., Takagi, S., Nomiyama, H., Schall, T. J., Yoshi, O. (1997) Identification and molecular characterization of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which mediates both leukocyte migration and adhesion Cell 91,521-530[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Fong, A. M., Robinson, L. A., Steeber, D. A., Tedder, T. F., Yoshie, O., Imai, T., Patel, D. D. (1998) Fractalkine and CX3CR1 mediate a novel mechanism of leukocyte capture, firm adhesion, and activation under physiologic flow J. Exp. Med. 188,1413-1419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Shimaoka, T., Kume, N., Minami, M., Hayashida, K., Kataoka, H., Kita, T., Yonehara, S. (2000) Molecular cloning of a novel scavenger receptor for oxidized low density lipoprotein, SR-PSOX, on macrophages J. Biol. Chem. 275,40663-40666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Shimaoka, T., Nakayama, T., Kume, N., Takahashi, S., Yamaguchi, J., Minami, M., Hayashida, K., Kita, T., Ohsumi, J., Yoshie, O., Yonehara, S. (2003) Cutting edge: SR-PSOX/CXC chemokine ligand 16 mediates bacterial phagocytosis by APCs through its chemokine domain J. Immunol. 171,1647-1651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Matloubian, M., David, A., Engel, S., Ryan, J. E., Cyster, J. G. (2000) A transmembrane CXC chemokine is a ligand for HIV-coreceptor Bonzo Nat. Immunol. 1,298-304[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Wilbanks, A., Zondlo, S. C., Murphy, K., Mak, S., Soler, D., Langdon, P., Andrew, D. P., Wu, L., Briskin, M. (2001) Expression cloning of the STRL33/BONZO/TYMSTRligand reveals elements of CC, CXC, and CX3C chemokines J. Immunol. 166,5145-5154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Deng, H. K., Unutmaz, D., KewalRamani, V. N., Littman, D. R. (1997) Expression cloning of new receptors used by simian and human immunodeficiency viruses Nature 388,296-300[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Liao, F., Alkhatib, G., Peden, K. W., Sharma, G., Berger, E. A., Farber, J. M. (1997) STRL33, a novel chemokine receptor-like protein, functions as a fusion cofactor for both macrophage-tropic and T cell line-tropic HIV-1 J. Exp. Med. 185,2015-2023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kim, C. H., Kunkel, E. J., Boisvert, J., Johnston, B., Campbell, J. J., Genovese, M. C., Greenberg, H. B., Butcher, E. C. (2001) Bonzo/CXCR6 expression defines type 1-polarized T-cell subsets with extralymphoid tissue homing potential J. Clin. Invest. 107,595-601[Medline]
  17. Banchereau, J., Steinman, R. M. (1998) Dendritic cells and the control of immunity Nature 392,245-252[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Guermonprez, P., Valladeau, J., Zitvogel, L., Thery, C., Amigorena, S. (2002) Antigen presentation and T cell stimulation by dendritic cells Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20,621-667[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Bleijs, D. A., Geijtenbeek, T. B., Figdor, C. G., van Kooyk, Y. (2001) DC-SIGN and LFA-1: a battle for ligand Trends Immunol 22,457-463[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Montoya, M. C., Sancho, D., Vicente-Manzanares, M., Sanchez-Madrid, F. (2002) Cell adhesion and polarity during immune interactions Immunol. Rev. 186,68-82[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Yonehara, S., Ishii, A., Yonehara, M. (1989) A cell-killing monoclonal antibody (anti-Fas) to a cell surface antigen co-downregulated with the receptor of tumor necrosis factor J. Exp. Med. 169,1747-1756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sakamaki, K., Miyajima, I., Kitamura, T., Miyajima, A. (1992) Critical cytoplasmic domains of the common ß subunit of the human GM-CSF, IL-3 and IL-5 receptors for growth signal transduction and tyrosine phosphorylation EMBO J. 11,3541-3549[Medline]
  23. Sotsios, Y., Whittaker, G. C., Westwick, J., Ward, S. G. (1999) The CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor activates a Gi-coupled phosphoinositide 3-kinase in T lymphocytes J. Immunol. 163,5954-5963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fong, A. M., Erickson, H. P., Zachariah, J. P., Poon, S., Schamberg, N. J., Imai, T., Patel, D. D. (2000) Ultrastructure and function of the fractalkine mucin domain in CX(3)C chemokine domain presentation J. Biol. Chem. 275,3781-3786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Haskell, C. A., Cleary, M. D., Charo, I. F. (2000) Unique role of the chemokine domain of fractalkine in cell capture. Kinetics of receptor dissociation correlate with cell adhesion J. Biol. Chem. 275,34183-34189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tsou, C. L., Haskell, C. A., Charo, I. F. (2001) Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}-converting enzyme mediates the inducible cleavage of fractalkine J. Biol. Chem. 276,44622-44626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Garton, K. J., Gough, P. J., Blobel, C. P., Murphy, G., Greaves, D. R., Dempsey, P. J., Raines, E. W. (2001) Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}-converting enzyme (ADAM17) mediates the cleavage and shedding of fractalkine (CX3CL1) J. Biol. Chem. 276,37993-38001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Nakayama, T., Hieshima, K., Izawa, D., Tatsumi, Y., Kanamaru, A., Yoshie, O. (2003) Cutting edge: profile of chemokine receptor expression on human plasma cells accounts for their efficient recruitment to target tissues J. Immunol. 170,1136-1140[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Hermand, F. Pincet, S. Carvalho, H. Ansanay, E. Trinquet, M. Daoudi, C. Combadiere, and P. Deterre
Functional Adhesiveness of the CX3CL1 Chemokine Requires Its Aggregation: ROLE OF THE TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAIN
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2008; 283(44): 30225 - 30234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
Y. Lu, J. Wang, Y. Xu, A. E. Koch, Z. Cai, X. Chen, D. L. Galson, R. S. Taichman, and J. Zhang
CXCL16 Functions as a Novel Chemotactic Factor for Prostate Cancer Cells In vitro
Mol. Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 6(4): 546 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Huang, X.-Y. Zhu, M.-R. Du, and D.-J. Li
Human Trophoblasts Recruited T Lymphocytes and Monocytes into Decidua by Secretion of Chemokine CXCL16 and Interaction with CXCR6 in the First-Trimester Pregnancy
J. Immunol., February 15, 2008; 180(4): 2367 - 2375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Shimaoka, K.-i. Seino, N. Kume, M. Minami, C. Nishime, M. Suematsu, T. Kita, M. Taniguchi, K. Matsushima, and S. Yonehara
Critical Role for CXC Chemokine Ligand 16 (SR-PSOX) in Th1 Response Mediated by NKT Cells
J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8172 - 8179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Wu, C. Xie, H. W. Wang, X. J. Zhou, N. Schwartz, S. Calixto, M. Mackay, C. Aranow, C. Putterman, and C. Mohan
Elevated Urinary VCAM-1, P-Selectin, Soluble TNF Receptor-1, and CXC Chemokine Ligand 16 in Multiple Murine Lupus Strains and Human Lupus Nephritis
J. Immunol., November 15, 2007; 179(10): 7166 - 7175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
A. W T van Lieshout, J. Fransen, M. Flendrie, A. M M Eijsbouts, F. H J van den Hoogen, P. L C M van Riel, and T. R D J Radstake
Circulating levels of the chemokine CCL18 but not CXCL16 are elevated and correlate with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1334 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. M. Freeman, J. L. Curtis, and S. W. Chensue
CC Chemokine Receptor 5 and CXC Chemokine Receptor 6 Expression by Lung CD8+ Cells Correlates with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severity
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 171(3): 767 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
J. Barlic and P. M. Murphy
Chemokine regulation of atherosclerosis
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 82(2): 226 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Hundhausen, A. Schulte, B. Schulz, M. G. Andrzejewski, N. Schwarz, P. von Hundelshausen, U. Winter, K. Paliga, K. Reiss, P. Saftig, et al.
Regulated Shedding of Transmembrane Chemokines by the Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 10 Facilitates Detachment of Adherent Leukocytes
J. Immunol., June 15, 2007; 178(12): 8064 - 8072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Hojo, K. Koizumi, K. Tsuneyama, Y. Arita, Z. Cui, K. Shinohara, T. Minami, I. Hashimoto, T. Nakayama, H. Sakurai, et al.
High-Level Expression of Chemokine CXCL16 by Tumor Cells Correlates with a Good Prognosis and Increased Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Colorectal Cancer
Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 67(10): 4725 - 4731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. E. Garcia, L. D. Truong, P. Li, P. Zhang, R. J. Johnson, C. B. Wilson, and L. Feng
Inhibition of CXCL16 Attenuates Inflammatory and Progressive Phases of Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Antibody-Associated Glomerulonephritis
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2007; 170(5): 1485 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Kulig, B. A. Zabel, G. Dubin, S. J. Allen, T. Ohyama, J. Potempa, T. M. Handel, E. C. Butcher, and J. Cichy
Staphylococcus aureus-Derived Staphopain B, a Potent Cysteine Protease Activator of Plasma Chemerin
J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3713 - 3720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. M. Aslanian and I. F. Charo
Targeted Disruption of the Scavenger Receptor and Chemokine CXCL16 Accelerates Atherosclerosis
Circulation, August 8, 2006; 114(6): 583 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Gursel, I. Gursel, H. S. Mostowski, and D. M. Klinman
CXCL16 Influences the Nature and Specificity of CpG-Induced Immune Activation
J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1575 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K. J. Garton, P. J. Gough, and E. W. Raines
Emerging roles for ectodomain shedding in the regulation of inflammatory responses
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2006; 79(6): 1105 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Huang, X.-Y. Zhu, M.-R. Du, X. Wu, M.-Y. Wang, and D.-J. Li
Chemokine CXCL16, a scavenger receptor, induces proliferation and invasion of first-trimester human trophoblast cells in an autocrine manner
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1083 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
T. Hara, T. Katakai, J.-H. Lee, Y. Nambu, N. Nakajima-Nagata, H. Gonda, M. Sugai, and A. Shimizu
A transmembrane chemokine, CXC chemokine ligand 16, expressed by lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells has the potential to regulate T cell migration and adhesion
Int. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 18(2): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Hase, T. Murakami, H. Takatsu, T. Shimaoka, M. Iimura, K. Hamura, K. Kawano, S. Ohshima, R. Chihara, K. Itoh, et al.
The Membrane-Bound Chemokine CXCL16 Expressed on Follicle-Associated Epithelium and M Cells Mediates Lympho-Epithelial Interaction in GALT
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 43 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Lindstedt, K. Lundberg, and C. A. K. Borrebaeck
Gene Family Clustering Identifies Functionally Associated Subsets of Human In Vivo Blood and Tonsillar Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 4839 - 4846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Jiang, T. Shimaoka, S. Kojo, M. Harada, H. Watarai, H. Wakao, N. Ohkohchi, S. Yonehara, M. Taniguchi, and K.-i. Seino
Cutting Edge: Critical Role of CXCL16/CXCR6 in NKT Cell Trafficking in Allograft Tolerance
J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2051 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
O. Quehenberger
Thematic Review Series: The Immune System and Atherogenesis. Molecular mechanisms regulating monocyte recruitment in atherosclerosis
J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1582 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. Xu, W. Xu, Y. Chu, Y. Gong, Z. Jiang, and S. Xiong
Involvement of Up-Regulated CXC Chemokine Ligand 16/Scavenger Receptor That Binds Phosphatidylserine and Oxidized Lipoprotein in Endotoxin-Induced Lethal Liver Injury via Regulation of T-Cell Recruitment and Adhesion
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2005; 73(7): 4007 - 4016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]