Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
1Correspondence: University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, 2011 Zonal Avenue, HMR 711, Los Angeles, CA 90033-1034. E-mail: dhorwitz{at}hsc.usc.edu
|
|
|---|
Key Words: IL-10 TGF-Beta IL-2 autoimmunity CD4+ CD25+ regulatory cells
|
|
|---|

, and natural killer T (NKT) cell.
Suppressor T cell subsets can originate in the thymus or can develop from T cells activated in the periphery (Fig. 1
). CD4+ cells that constitutively express the
chain of the IL-2 receptor (CD25) originate in the thymus and have a poorly understood, contact-dependent, cytokine-independent mechanism of action. These CD4+ CD25+ Tr cells were first demonstrated in 1995 [3
] and have been referred to as "professional" or "natural" Tr cells [8
, 9
]. These Tr cells constitute a unique lineage, although their expression of
ß T cell receptors (TCR) does not differ from conventional T cells. CD4+ CD25+Tr cells are different than thymus-derived NKT Tr cells, which have restricted usage of TCR. We will call these natural T regulatory cells "Trn" to differentiate them from other Tr cell subsets generated in the periphery.
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Differentiation pathways for T helper and T regulatory cells. Naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (not shown) differentiate in the thymus. The T cells selected include low-affinity TCR self-reactive T cells and high-affinity TCR self-reactive natural CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cells (Trn). Both conventional and Trn are exported to the periphery where they respond to specific antigens. Conventional CD4+ and CD8+ cells become either specific T helper or T regulatory cell subsets depending upon the affinity of their TCR to antigen, the strength of the costimulatory signals provided by antigen-presenting cells, and the cytokine milieu. Specific subsets of T helper cells and T regulatory cells each produce a characteristic profile of cytokines. Th1 cells and Th2 cells produce predominantly IFN- or IL-4 while Tr1 and Tr2 cells produce predominantly IL-10 or TGF-ß. Trn have a cytokine-independent, contact-dependent mechanism of action in vitro. In the periphery, IL-2 and TGF-ß can also induce CD4+ cells to become Trn-like cells that have a phenotype and functional properties indistinguishable from natural, thymus-derived CD4+ CD25+ Trn cells. In addition to the pathways shown, it is possible that Th1 cells or Th2 cells can be induced to become Tr2 cells by stimulation with IL-2 and TGF-ß.
|
As will be discussed below, two other CD4+ Tr subsets are generated in the periphery have a cytokine-dependent mechanism of action. One has been called type 1, or T regulatory-1 (Tr1) cells; these produce predominantly IL-10 [13 14 15 ] (Table 1 ). The other subset was identified following the induction of oral tolerance and produces predominantly TGF-ß. These cells were named T helper-3, or Th3 cells, to distinguish them from Th1 and Th2 cells [16 , 17 ]. Since Th3 cells, however, function as suppressor rather than helper cells, we prefer to call these cells type 2, or T regulatory-2 (Tr2) cells, so as to group them with other T regulatory cells (Table 1) .
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 1. General Properties of CD4+ and CD8+ T Regulatory and Helper Subsets
|
CD8+ cells can also be divided into effector and regulatory subsets. CD8+ effector cells have cytotoxic activity and can produce either IFN-
(Tc1) or IL-4 (Tc2). CD8+ Tr cells, by contrast, lack cytotoxic activity and produce either IL-10 or TGF-ß (see below). CD8+ Tr cells are also hyporesponsive to secondary stimulation [24
].
We consider that the various populations of Tr cells constitute an interacting network for the following reasons. First, CD4+ CD25+ Trn cells facilitate the generation of Tr1 cells and Tr2 cells by a phenomenon known as "infectious tolerance" [25 26 27 ]. Second, while Trn cells primarily target CD8+ cells and prevent them from becoming activated and developing cytotoxic activity [28 , 29 ], our laboratory has found that CD8+ Tr cells primarily target CD4+ cells and prevent their expansion following antigenic stimulation [30 ]. The converse was also true; CD8+ Tr cells were not as potent as CD4+ Tr cells in suppressing CD8+ cells. Therefore, although the functional activities of all Tr subsets overlap, we suggest that each probably targets certain cell populations. Finally, our view that Tr subsets can be grouped into specific subsets must be viewed with some caution. The properties of the various Tr subsets described to date have been elucidated from in vitro studies. One cannot exclude the possibility that Trn cells or the Trn-like cells described herein, which have cytokine-independent mechanism of action, become cytokine-producing cells following adoptive transfer in vivo.
|
|
|---|
The principal difference between Th cells and Tr cells is that the former proliferate in response to antigen, whereas the latter are generally unresponsive, at least in vitro (Table 1) . Th cells are responsible for host defense against bacteria and intracellular infections, while Tr cells act as feedback regulators of Th cells. Harmful antiself-injury triggered by persistent immune responses is, thereby, prevented. Although all Tr subsets inhibit both Th1 cells and Th2 cells, cytokines produced by the Th subsets inhibit each other by immune deviation.
Although T cell receptor engagement is not sufficient for activation, Tr cells do proliferate when TCRs are cross-linked in the presence of IL-2 [33 ]. Tr1 cells also proliferate in the presence of IL-15 [18 ]. In addition, anergic CD4+ CD25+cells proliferate vigorously when transferred to lymphopenic mice [34 ]. Moreover, mouse Tr cells generated ex vivo with IL-2 and TGF-ß proliferate when transferred to nonlymphopenic syngeneic mice [35 ]. Trn cells and Tr2 cells can retain their suppressive properties after exposure to IL-2, whereas Tr1 cells lose this function when anergy is broken and become Th cells (Horwitz et al., unpublished results). Thus, although Tr cells are anergic in vitro, they expand in vivo.
Whether T cells develop helper or regulatory function following antigen stimulation is multifactorial and depends upon the affinity of the antigen for the T cell receptor (TCR), the costimulating properties of the antigen-presenting cells, and the cytokines in the micro environment. High-affinity binding favors Th or Trn differentiation, while, as stated above, altered peptide ligands with decreased binding affinity favor the development of Tr-2 cells [32 ]. Antigen-presenting cells (APC), dendritic cells (DC) in particular, have a major role in T cell differentiation. DC1 and DC2 subsets control the generation of Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively [36 ]. Some workers have proposed that another dendritic cell subset (DCr) that secretes IL-10 rather than IL-12 directs naïve T cells to a Tr1 subtype [36 , 37 ]. Finally, a self-maintaining regulatory loop has been proposed in which tolerogenic DC induce Tr cells, and these cells program the generation of new tolerogenic DC from progenitors [38 ].
|
|
|---|
Tr1 cells can also be generated by stimulating mouse or human naïve CD4+ cells with vitamin D3 and dexamethasone [41 ]. These cells produce high levels of IL-10 and some IL-4. The latter disappeared upon neutralization of Th2 cytokines in primary culture. The adoptive transfer of these Tr1 cells prevented central nervous system inflammation.
Other investigators have generated Tr1 ex vivo by stimulating CD4+ cells with anti-CD3 and the complement regulator anti-CD46 [42 ]. Cross-linking CD46 with C3b also produced the same result. These IL-10-producing cells also proliferated vigorously, unlike the Tr1 induced with IL-10 and immature DC. Thus, Tr1 cells can be generated by inducing CD4+ cells to become unresponsive, or by activating them with complement fragments where they retain their ability to proliferate.
Finally, IL-10 can be used to induce anergic CD4+ cells that do not produce cytokines but suppress the activation of other T cells through a contact-dependent mechanism. Following treatment of dendritic cells with IL-10, CD4+ and CD8+ cells become unresponsive. These anergic T cells act as suppressor cells by competing with other antigen-stimulated T cells for the membrane of APCs and for locally produced IL-2. These suppressor cells have a contact-dependent mechanism of action, do not produce cytokines, and are irradiation insensitive. Allospecific T cells rendered unresponsive in this manner block T cell proliferation in an antigen-specific manner in vitro [43 ]. Moreover, the adoptive transfer of anergic T cells to the recipients of allogeneic skin grafts leads to prolonged skin graft survival. Thus, anergic T cells can function as antigen-specific suppressor cells both in vitro and in vivo [44 ].
|
|
|---|
production by both CD4+ and CD8+ cells [49
]. TGF-ß accelerates activation-induced cell death of some T cells [50
, 51
] but protects others from apoptosis [52
, 53
]. Thus, TGF-ß not only has inhibitory effects on T cell and B cell function but can induce several Tr subsets with the potential to suppress immune-induced inflammation [54
]. In the mid-1990s, TGF-ß was shown to induce both mouse and human CD8+ cells to become suppressor cells. Mouse CD8+ cells stimulated with staphylococcal enterotoxin B and TGF-ß1 secreted increased levels of TGF-ß and IL-10 and inhibited the proliferation of other T cells [55 ]. Independently, we learned that TGF-ß had an important role in the generation of human CD8+ suppressor cells. Using a model in which we could induce T cell-dependent antibody production without accessory cells, we found that CD4+ cells, by themselves, could not induce CD8+ cells to suppress antibody production. The addition of NK cells to the cultures, however, led to potent suppressor activity. Subsequent studies revealed that NK cells produced active TGF-ß when they interact with CD8+ cells, and this cytokine was needed for CD8+ cells to become suppressors of antibody production [56 , 57 ]. In other studies, a brief exposure of CD8+ cells to IL-2 and TGF-ß led to potent suppressive activity. In unpublished studies, we have found that the suppressive activity is of CD8+ cells is cytokine dependent and that neutralizing anti-TGF-ß monoclonal antibodies sometimes, but not always, abolishes suppressive activity. Because others have shown that CD8+ suppressor cells can produce IL-10 and TGF-ß [24 , 55 ], it is likely that both cytokines have an important role in the suppressive effects of these cells.
In the late 1990s, we turned our attention from the inhibition of antibody production to the suppression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity and found that the predominant effect of TGF-ß was on CD4+ cells rather than CD8+ cells. Surprisingly, the phenotype and functional properties of the CD4+ Tr subset induced by TGF-ß were indistinguishable from CD4+ CD25+ Trn. In these studies we stimulated naïve CD4+ cells with allogeneic irradiated non-T stimulator cells and TGF-ß. The addition of less than 10 percent of these TGF-ß conditioned cells to fresh autologous responder T cells strongly blocked the activation of CD8+ cells and prevented them from developing cytotoxic activity. This suppressive activity was contact dependent and not affected by neutralizing antibodies to IL-10 and TGF-ß. When the CD25+ subset was isolated and expanded 5 to 10 fold in IL-2, the addition of less than 1% of these cells to fresh responder T cells markedly suppressed the development of cytotoxity.
The ability of TGF-ß to induce Trn-like cells was IL-2 dependent. Partial neutralization of IL-2 abolished the induction of suppressive activity (Horwitz et al., unpublished observations). While we used naïve CD4+ cells (which rarely express CD25) to become suppressor cells in our initial study [29 ], we have recently induced allo-stimulated total CD4+ CD25- cells to develop Trn-like activity. This effect required the addition of both IL-2 and TGF-ß to the cultures (Horwitz et al., unpublished observations). Finally, the combination of IL-2 and TGF-ß enhances the suppressive effects of purified CD4+ CD25+ mouse Tr cells [58] and the corresponding human subset (our unpublished observations).
It has become apparent that the ability of a small number of CD4+CD25+ cells induced ex vivo to have remarkably potent suppressive effects is due to their capacity to recruit other T cells to develop suppressive activity. Others have shown that CD4+ CD25+ T cells can induce CD25- T cells to become Tr1 or Tr2 cells by infectious tolerance [26 , 27 ]. Studies in progress indicate that Trn-like cells induced ex vivo can also induce human CD4+ CD25- cells to become suppressor cells that produce IL-10 and TGF-ß (Horwitz et al., unpublished observations). The ability to generate potent suppressor cells ex vivo that also have the ability to educate other T cells to develop suppressive activity may have important therapeutic implications.
As stated above, certain thymic CD4+ cells with high affinity TCRs for self-antigen become Trn rather than being deleted. It is not unlikely that these CD4+cells are recognizing self-antigens on thymic epithelial cells in the presence of TGF-ß. This cytokine has been previously reported to have a role in thymic T cell differentiation [59 ]. Thymic epithelial cells can express tissue-specific self-antigens, and some can produce TGF-ß [60 , 61 ]. Thus, if self-reactive CD4+ T cells respond to self-antigens in a milieu containing TGF-ß, they may become CD25+Trn rather than being negatively selected.
A role for TGF-ß in the generation of Tr2 has also been documented. Recent studies from our laboratory have revealed that stimulation of CD4+ CD25- cells with low-dose staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) and TGF-ß induces a CD25+ Tr subset that produces TGF-ß, but not IL-2, IFN-
, or IL-10 [23
]. The addition of 5% of these CD4+ CD25+ cells markedly suppressed T cell-dependent antibody production by a mechanism that was TGF-ß dependent. Anti-TGF-ß completely blocked the suppressive activity of these cells. The cytokine profile and mechanism of action of this subset, therefore, was clearly distinguishable from other Tr subsets. Moreover, TGF-ß not only was responsible for the generation of this Tr subset, but it protected them from apoptosis upon further stimulation. Interestingly, the low dose of SEB used to induce T cell activation stimulated CD4+ CD45RO+ cells, but not the CD45RA+ naïve subset. This result suggests that we had induced CD4+ previously activated effector or memory cells to develop regulatory activity. Further studies will be performed to learn whether T cells previously polarized to become Th1 or Th2 cells can become Tr2 cells. Others have described a small subset of mouse CD4+CD25- cells that express the latent form of TGF-ß on their cell surface, and these cells have suppressive activity mediated by this cytokine [62
]. It is likely that the autocrine effects of TGF-ß have induced these lymphocytes to become Tr2 cells.
Although both Tr cells generated by IL-10 and TGF-ß can proliferate in response to IL-2, the consequences of this response on the regulatory effects of these cells is strikingly different. IL-2 releases Tr1 from their anergic state, and they regain the ability to respond to antigen stimulation. By contrast, TGF-ß induced Tr cells retain their suppressive activity after treatment with IL-2 (Horwitz et al., unpublished observations).
The relative contribution of IL-2 and TGF-ß in the generation of Tr cells remains to be elucidated, but both are important. We agree with Papiernik and co-workers who have suggested that IL-2 has an essential role in the generation of suppressor T cells [63 ]. Although IL-2 was originally described as a T cell growth factor, mice with a deficiency of this cytokine or a functional IL-2 receptor develop a lethal lymphoproliferative and autoimmune syndrome [64 65 66 67 ]. This syndrome can be corrected directly by the adoptive transfer of CD4+ CD25+ cells, or indirectly by the transfer of CD4+ CD25- cells. Presumably, the latter provide the IL-2 that is needed for the generation of the suppressor cells. An aggressive lethal lymphoproliferative and autoimmune syndrome also occurs in TGF-ß1 knockout mice [68 ]. Nonetheless, CD4+ suppressor cell precursors apparently develop in both IL-2 and TGF-ß1-deficient mice. IL-2 signaling enables CD4+ CD25+ from IL-2-deficient mice to develop suppressive activity [69 ]. Similarly, CD4+ CD25+cells from TGF-ß1-deficient mice can suppress wild-type T cells [22 ]. In this case the wild-type antigen-presenting cells could serve as a source of TGF-ß. Thus, both IL-2 and TGF-ß1 could be maturation factors for suppressor cell precursors. While IL-2 would promote the growth of these cells, TGF-ß would protect them from activation-induced apoptosis.
In addition to a role in the generation of Tr cells, IL-2 has an important role in their functional activity. Trn cells and Trn-like cells generated ex vivo express CD122 (IL-2Rß chain) and signaling through IL-2R ß is critical for suppressive activity. Mice with a genetic deletion of CD122 spontaneously develop autoimmune disease [70 ]. In our laboratory, neutralizing anti-CD122 antibodies completely abolished the control of endogenous Tr cells on allo-CTL activity (S. G. Zheng and D. A. Horwitz unpublished observation).
|
|
|---|
Another example of the cooperation of IL-10 and TGF-ß is the regulation of T cell responses to mucosal allergens. Specific immunotherapy directed to two major allergens induces CD4+ CD25+ suppressor cells that produce IL-10 and TGF-ß. Neutralization of either cytokine abolishes suppressive activity, a result suggesting the cooperative effects of both are needed for optimal inhibition [74 ]. Other examples of interdependent effects of IL-10 on TGF-ß have also been observed [75 , 76 ].
In addition to synergistic effects, there is evidence that production of IL-10 and TGF-ß is controlled by negative feedback regulatory effects that each of these cytokines has on the other [77 , 78 ]. Thus, a defect in the production of IL-10 or TGF-ß can have deleterious consequences. For example, there is a marked imbalance of IL-10 and TGF-ß in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Levels of IL-10 are high, while lymphocyte production of TGF-ß is decreased [79 , 80 ]. This imbalance may strongly contribute to dysregulated polyclonal B cell activation characteristic of SLE. In autoimmune pancreatitis, a loss of TGF-ß signaling accelerates the progression of this disease [81 ]. In turn, TGF-ß mediated fibrosis in chronic pancreatitis is enhanced in animals that are unable to produce IL-10 [82 ]. For these reasons, we believe that adequate numbers of both Tr1 and Tr2 cells are needed to control immune-induced chronic inflammation.
|
|
|---|
Finally, the availability of IL-2 regulates Tr activity. As discussed above, both the generation and functional activity of Tr cells is dependent upon IL-2 [64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ]. Since one principal effect of Tr cells is to block IL-2 synthesis, shutting down the production of this cytokine will result in feedback inhibition of Tr function.
|
|
|---|
Tr1 cells generated ex vivo can prevent an immune-mediated colitis in lymphopenic mice [10 ]. We have been able to induce both CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells to develop suppressive activity by activating mouse T cells with alloantigens plus the combination of IL-2 and TGF-ß. These T cells prevented a lupus-like disease and doubled the survival of mice that had already developed antidouble-stranded DNA antibodies [35 ]. In addition, these Tr cells have enabled heterotopic heart allografts in mice to beat for 100 days (Horwitz et al., unpublished observation). Blazars group has recently used TGF-ß and IL-10 to induce CD4+ CD25- T cells ex vivo to suppress acute graft vs. host disease in vivo [86 ].
During the next few years, we will have the opportunity to learn whether the adoptive transfer of various autologous Tr subsets induced ex vivo from human blood lymphocytes obtained by pheresis can prevent graft rejection or alter the course of certain autoimmune diseases. The prime candidates are diseases characterized by spontaneous exacerbations and remissions such as systemic lupus and inflammatory bowel disease. Here, Tr cells induced with polyclonal T cell activators can be tested. For diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, antigen-specific Tr would have a much better chance of success. Previously, collagen-specific Tr cells were induced by oral tolerance in anticipation that they would migrate to the rheumatoid joint, where they would be activated by endogenous type II collagen and inhibit joint inflammation via bystander suppression. Oral tolerance, however, had only modest beneficial effects in rheumatoid arthritis [87 ], presumably because of an inadequate number of Tr cells generated. It is possible that collagen-specific Tr cells induced ex-vivo may have greater clinical effects than those induced by oral tolerance. In addition to autoimmune diseases, Tr cells generated ex vivo to block IL-4 production deserve consideration in the treatment of patients with severe steroid-dependent allergic asthma. Another possible use deserves comment. The host immune response against viral infections can result in severe tissue injury, as recently revealed by the SARS virus. Because adoptively transferred Tr cells traffic through the lungs, it is perhaps possible that Tr cells induced ex vivo can blunt the pathologic host response to the SARS virus by blocking T cell activation at that site.
Because of the various physiologic mechanisms to control Tr activity described above, we do not anticipate that the adoptive transfer of Tr cells will impair host defense against pathogenic infectious agents. This therapy, therefore, should be much safer than the corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs currently used for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Finally, since tumor-associated Tr cells may block the various immunologic strategies designed to kill malignant cells, novel approaches to antagonize Tr cells may lead to advances in the treatment of cancer.
Received May 19, 2003; revised July 1, 2003; accepted July 2, 2003.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. W. Mailloux and M. R. I. Young NK-Dependent Increases in CCL22 Secretion Selectively Recruits Regulatory T Cells to the Tumor Microenvironment J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 2753 - 2765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kovar, J. Tomala, H. Chmelova, L. Kovar, T. Mrkvan, R. Joskova, Z. Zakostelska, T. Etrych, J. Strohalm, K. Ulbrich, et al. Overcoming Immunoescape Mechanisms of BCL1 Leukemia and Induction of CD8+ T-Cell-Mediated BCL1-Specific Resistance in Mice Cured by Targeted Polymer-Bound Doxorubicin Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9875 - 9883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Simone, A. Zicca, and D. Saverino The frequency of regulatory CD3+CD8+CD28-CD25+ T lymphocytes in human peripheral blood increases with age J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2008; 84(6): 1454 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dolganiuc and G. Szabo T cells with regulatory activity in hepatitis C virus infection: what we know and what we don't J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2008; 84(3): 614 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sharabi and E. Mozes The Suppression of Murine Lupus by a Tolerogenic Peptide Involves Foxp3-Expressing CD8 Cells That Are Required for the Optimal Induction and Function of Foxp3-Expressing CD4 Cells J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3243 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Passerini, S. E. Allan, M. Battaglia, S. Di Nunzio, A. N. Alstad, M. K. Levings, M. G. Roncarolo, and R. Bacchetta STAT5-signaling cytokines regulate the expression of FOXP3 in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and CD4+CD25- effector T cells Int. Immunol., March 1, 2008; 20(3): 421 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hu, R. S. Arias, R. E. Sadun, Y.-C. Nien, N. Zhang, H. Sabzevari, M.E. C. Lutsiak, L. A. Khawli, and A. L. Epstein Construction and Preclinical Characterization of Fc-mGITRL for the Immunotherapy of Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 579 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Li, N. Perez, S. Karumuthil-Melethil, B. S. Prabhakar, M. J. Holterman, and C. Vasu Enhanced Engagement of CTLA-4 Induces Antigen-Specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ and CD4+CD25 TGF-beta1+ Adaptive Regulatory T Cells J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5191 - 5203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Zheng, J. Wang, P. Wang, J. D. Gray, and D. A. Horwitz IL-2 Is Essential for TGF-beta to Convert Naive CD4+CD25- Cells to CD25+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells and for Expansion of These Cells J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2018 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Inoue and Y. Aramaki Suppression of Skin Lesions by Transdermal Application of CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotides in NC/Nga Mice, a Model of Human Atopic Dermatitis J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 584 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Menoret, L. M. Myers, S.-J. Lee, R. S. Mittler, R. J. Rossi, and A. T. Vella TGFbeta Protein Processing and Activity through TCR Triggering of Primary CD8+ T Regulatory Cells J. Immunol., November 1, 2006; 177(9): 6091 - 6097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hillyer, B. Dao, P. Niemiec, S. Lee, M. Doidge, I. Bemben, T. Neyestani, and B. Woodward Elevated Bioactivity of the Tolerogenic Cytokines, Interleukin-10 and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}, in the Blood of Acutely Malnourished Weanling Mice Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2006; 231(8): 1439 - 1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Cheng, H.-W. Chen, J.-P. Tsai, Y.-P. Lee, Y.-C. Shih, C.-M. Chang, and C.-C. Ting Clonal restriction of the expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ memory T cells by transforming growth factor-{beta} J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2006; 79(5): 1033 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Mayack and L. J. Berg Cutting Edge: An Alternative Pathway of CD4+ T Cell Differentiation Is Induced Following Activation in the Absence of {gamma}-Chain-Dependent Cytokine Signals J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2059 - 2063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G.-J. Ooi, G. Galatowicz, H. M. A. Towler, S. L. Lightman, and V. L. Calder Multiplex Cytokine Detection versus ELISA for Aqueous Humor: IL-5, IL-10, and IFN{gamma} Profiles in Uveitis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 272 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Endharti, M. Rifa' I, Z. Shi, Y. Fukuoka, Y. Nakahara, Y. Kawamoto, K. Takeda, K.-i. Isobe, and H. Suzuki Cutting Edge: CD8+CD122+ Regulatory T Cells Produce IL-10 to Suppress IFN-{gamma} Production and Proliferation of CD8+ T Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7093 - 7097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Skapenko, J. R. Kalden, P. E. Lipsky, and H. Schulze-Koops The IL-4 Receptor {alpha}-Chain-Binding Cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, Induce Forkhead Box P3-Expressing CD25+CD4+ Regulatory T Cells from CD25-CD4+ Precursors J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 6107 - 6116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. O. Krutzik, M. B. Hale, and G. P. Nolan Characterization of the Murine Immunological Signaling Network with Phosphospecific Flow Cytometry J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2366 - 2373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu, Z. Xu, R. C. Fuhlbrigge, V. Pena-Cruz, J. Lieberman, and T. S. Kupper Vaccinia Virus Induces Strong Immunoregulatory Cytokine Production in Healthy Human Epidermal Keratinocytes: a Novel Strategy for Immune Evasion J. Virol., June 15, 2005; 79(12): 7363 - 7370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Abbott, G. H. Palmer, K. A. Kegerreis, P. F. Hetrick, C. J. Howard, J. C. Hope, and W. C. Brown Rapid and Long-Term Disappearance of CD4+ T Lymphocyte Responses Specific for Anaplasma Marginale Major Surface Protein-2 (MSP2) in MSP2 Vaccinates following Challenge with Live A. marginale J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 6702 - 6715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gangi, C. Vasu, D. Cheatem, and B. S. Prabhakar IL-10-Producing CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Play a Critical Role in Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Induced Suppression of Experimental Autoimmune Thyroiditis J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 7006 - 7013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Brusko, C. H. Wasserfall, A. Agarwal, M. H. Kapturczak, and M. A. Atkinson An Integral Role for Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide in Maintaining Peripheral Tolerance by CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5181 - 5186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Kang and P. M. Allen Priming in the Presence of IL-10 Results in Direct Enhancement of CD8+ T Cell Primary Responses and Inhibition of Secondary Responses J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5382 - 5389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bonnefoix, P. Bonnefoix, P. Perron, J.-Q. Mi, W. F. Ng, R. Lechler, J.-C. Bensa, J.-Y. Cahn, and D. Leroux Quantitating Effector and Regulatory T Lymphocytes in Immune Responses by Limiting Dilution Analysis Modeling J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3421 - 3431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Alvaro, M. Lejeune, M. T. Salvado, R. Bosch, J. F. Garcia, J. Jaen, A. H. Banham, G. Roncador, C. Montalban, and M. A. Piris Outcome in Hodgkin's Lymphoma Can Be Predicted from the Presence of Accompanying Cytotoxic and Regulatory T Cells Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2005; 11(4): 1467 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kipnis, H. Avidan, R. R. Caspi, and M. Schwartz Dual effect of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in neurodegeneration: A dialogue with microglia PNAS, October 5, 2004; 101(suppl_2): 14663 - 14669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Rouse and S. Suvas Regulatory Cells and Infectious Agents: Detentes Cordiale and Contraire J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2211 - 2215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vasu, B. S. Prabhakar, and M. J. Holterman Targeted CTLA-4 Engagement Induces CD4+CD25+CTLA-4high T Regulatory Cells with Target (Allo)antigen Specificity J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2866 - 2876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-B. Park, D.-J. Paik, E. Jang, S. Hong, and J. Youn Acquisition of anergic and suppressive activities in transforming growth factor-{beta}-costimulated CD4+CD25- T cells Int. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 16(8): 1203 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Carbonneil, H. Saidi, V. Donkova-Petrini, and L. Weiss Dendritic cells generated in the presence of interferon-{alpha} stimulate allogeneic CD4+ T-cell proliferation: modulation by autocrine IL-10, enhanced T-cell apoptosis and T regulatory type 1 cells Int. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 16(7): 1037 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||