|
|
||||||||
Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
Correspondence: John D. Loike, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 650 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10027. E-mail: jdl5{at}columbia.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-stimulated neutrophils produced H2O2 when they adhered to fibrinogen-coated surfaces but not when they adhered to collagen I-, collagen IV-, or Matrigel-coated surfaces. In contrast, LTB4- or IL-8-stimulated neutrophils did not produce H2O2 when they adhered to any of these surfaces. fMLP and TNF-
were much more potent than LTB4 and IL-8 in stimulating neutrophils to up-regulate and to activate their
Mß2 integrins, as measured by the binding of specific monoclonal antibodies. Pretreatment of neutrophils with pertussis toxin completely blocked their production of H2O2 on fibrinogen-coated surfaces in response to fMLP and their migration through Matrigel in response to fMLP, LTB4, and IL-8. These data show that although the fMLP, LTB4, and IL-8 receptors are coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G
proteins, they signal neutrophils to initiate qualitatively different effector functions. We propose that the qualitative differences in effector functions signaled by different chemoattractants reflect qualitative differences in using G-protein ß and/or
subunits or other factors by their cognate receptors.
Key Words: H2O2 fMLP LTB4 integrins fibrin
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
) stimulate neutrophils to adhere loosely to and migrate through three-dimensional gels composed of collagen I, collagen IV (CIV), or Matrigel [2
, 3
]. In contrast, only LTB4 and IL-8 stimulate neutrophils to migrate through fibrin gels [2
, 3
]. fMLP and TNF-
stimulate neutrophils to bind tightly to fibrin gels, thereby blocking chemotaxis [2
].
Chemoattractants stimulate neutrophil adhesion and chemotaxis differentially by affecting expression and activation of integrins [3
, 4
]. For example, fMLP and TNF-
, but not LTB4 or IL-8, activate neutrophil ß1 integrins as measured by binding of 15/7, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that recognizes an activation epitope on ß1 integrins [3
]. Interactions of these activated ß1 integrins with matrix-associated ligands generate outside-in signals that increase the tightness of neutrophil adhesion to specific matrix proteins (i.e., fibrin) and block chemotaxis. Consistent with this, anti-ß1 integrin antibodies block tight adhesion between fMLP- or TNF-
-stimulated neutrophils and fibrin-coated surfaces and allow these cells to migrate through fibrin gels [3
]. Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that specific chemoattractants inhibit neutrophil chemotaxis by activating specific integrins.
Chemoattractant-stimulated integrin activation also plays a pivotal role in neutrophil microbicidal responses such as H2O2 production. Studies have shown that TNF-
stimulates neutrophils to produce H2O2 when they adhere to specific matrix proteins such as vitronectin, fibronectin, and fibrinogen (Fg), but not when they are in suspension or adherent to stearic acid-coated surfaces [5
, 6
]. Interactions between specific ß2 integrins and these matrix proteins are required for TNF-
-stimulated H2O2 secretion, because anti-ß2 integrin antibodies block this response [6
], and ß2 integrin-deficient neutrophils from patients with leukocyte-adhesion deficiency fail to produce H2O2 in response to TNF-
[6
].
The studies demonstrated here were designed to test three hypotheses. First, do LTB4, IL-8, fMLP, and TNF-
exert differential effects on the expression and activation of ß2 integrins? Second, is there any relationship between the effects of chemoattractants on the expression and/or activation of ß2 integrins and their capacity to stimulate neutrophils to secrete H2O2? Third, do the chemoattractant receptors that mediate these responses do so through pertussis toxin-sensitive heterotrimeric G proteins? The data presented support an affirmative answer to all three questions. Intriguingly, they suggest that proteins other than pertussis toxin-sensitive G
i subunits are responsible for the differential stimulation of neutrophil-effector functions that follow binding of LTB4, IL-8, and fMLP to their cognate seven-transmembrane spanning receptors.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
M (MAC-1) and TNF-
were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). CBRM1/5 was a generous gift of Dr. Timothy Springer (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and mAb24 was kindly provided by Dr. Nancy Hogg (Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK). IB4 was used as described [7
]. 22F12C [8
] was obtained from ICOS (Seattle, OR). fMLP, LTB4, and Ficoll-Hypaque were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). IL-8 was from Chemicon (Temecula, CA). Unless otherwise noted, fMLP was used at 10-6 M, LTB4 was used at 10-7 M, TNF-
was used at 10-8 M, and IL-8 was used at 10-7 M. CIV was from Fluka (Milwaukee, WI), collagen I was from Upstate Biotechnology, Matrigel was from Becton-Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ), and Fg was from American Diagnostics (Greenwich, CT). Control isotype-matched antibodies [immunoglobulin IgG1 and IgG2b] were from Sigma Chemical Co., as were all other reagents.
Cells
Neutrophils were isolated as described [9
] from fresh, heparinized blood of healthy adults after informed consent. Cells (>95%) in each preparation were neutrophils, as determined by Wright-Giemsa staining [9
]. Neutrophils were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 5.5 mM glucose, 0.1% albumin, 0.5 mM Mg++, and 1 mM Ca++ (neutrophil buffer) and were maintained at 4°C until use.
H2O2 production
Wells were coated with matrix proteins by the addition of either 50 µl PBS containing 1 mg/ml Fg, 60 µl PBS containing 1 mg/ml rat-tail collagen I, 45 µl PBS containing 0.5 mg/ml Matrigel, or 50 µl PBS containing 50 µg CIV to each well of 96-well, 5-mm diameter-well, flat-bottom, polystyrene, tissue-culture plates (Becton-Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ). The plates were incubated for 60 min at 37°C and PBS, and its content of unbound proteins was aspirated. Neutrophil buffer (175 µl) containing 10 nmoles Amplex Red (Molecular Probes, Eugene OR), 0.21 units of horseradish peroxidase (HRP; Molecular Probes), 100 nmoles sodium azide (NaN3), and the appropriate stimulant(s) and inhibitor(s) was placed in each well, followed by the addition of 25 µl neutrophil buffer containing 75,000 neutrophils. Thus, each well (final volume, 200 µl) contained 50 µM Amplex Red, 1.05 units/ml HRP, and 500 µM sodium azide. The plates then were incubated at 37°C for the times indicated. Fluorescence in each well was measured in a Cytofluor II fluorometer using an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission-detection wavelength of 590 nm as described [10
]. For each experiment, sufficient H2O2 was placed into wells containing Amplex Red, HRP, and NaN3 to generate standard curves, which then were used to convert the arbitrary fluorescence units into nanomoles H2O2 produced by neutrophils under various conditions.
Fluorescein-activated cell-sorter (FACS) analysis
FACS analysis was performed as described [3
]. Briefly, neutrophils (105 cells/200 µl neutrophil buffer) were incubated in suspension at 37°C for 30 min in the presence or absence of fMLP (10-7 M) or LTB4 (10-7 M), transferred to 96-well polystyrene tissue-culture microtiter plates (Corning, Corning, NY), incubated for 30 min at 4°C in 200 µl neutrophil buffer containing the indicated primary antibody (2 µg/ml), washed three times with neutrophil buffer at 4°C, incubated further for 30 min at 4°C with Alexa-488-conjugated or phycoerythrin-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse F(ab')2 in 200 µl neutrophil buffer, washed three times again with neutrophil buffer at 4°C, and resuspended at 4°C in 300 µl PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin and 0.3 mg/ml propidium iodide to determine cell viability. The contribution of dead cells (usually <2%) was removed from the final data analysis. The mean fluorescence intensity of 35 x 103 cells was determined using a Becton-Dickinson FACSCalibur.
Chemotaxis assays
Chemotaxis of neutrophils through fibrin gels was performed as described [2
]. Briefly, cell-culture inserts (pore size, 8 µm; Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) were overlaid with 100 µl PBS containing 1 mg/ml Fg in the presence of 0.1 unit thrombin. The inserts were incubated at 37°C to allow fibrin-gel formation. One unit of PPACK (Calbiochem-Novabiochem, San Diego, CA) was added to inhibit thrombin, and the gels were washed with 250 µl PBS to remove PPACK and inactivated thrombin. Neutrophils (106) in 100 µl neutrophil buffer were placed in the upper compartment of each Fg-coated insert and incubated for 06 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 95% air/5% CO2. At the times and concentrations specified, chemoattractants, antibodies, and/or peptides were added to the top and/or bottom compartments in 500 µl neutrophil buffer. At the end of incubations, chambers were shaken to dislodge neutrophils from the lower surface of the inserts. The medium in each lower compartment was collected, and the number of neutrophils was determined using a Coulter Counter.
Adhesion assays
Adhesion assays were performed as described previously [11
, 12
]. Briefly, 25 µl Fg (2 mg/ml in PBS) was spotted onto the center of 6-cm bacterial Petri dishes (Fisher 1007) for 90 min at room temperature. Plates were blocked with Tween 20 as described previously [11
]. Neutrophils (4x106) were suspended in Hanks balanced saline solution containing 10 mM Hepes and 1 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.3) and were preincubated with CBRM1/5 for 10 min at room temperature. Then, cells were added to the dishes, treated with fMLP or control buffer (such that the final volume in each dish was 3 ml), and allowed to adhere for the indicated times. Nonadherent cells were removed as described [12
], and the number of adherent cells per 40x ocular field was counted.
Statistical analysis
Students t-test was used where appropriate when comparing the effects of various antibodies or pertussis toxin on the indicated neutrophil-effector functions.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in suspension produce no detectable H2O2 above background (refs. [5
, 6
], and unpublished results). Neutrophils plated on collagen I-, CIV-, Matrigel-, or Fg-coated surfaces or uncoated plastic produced little H2O2 in response to 10-910-6 M LTB4, 10-82.5 x 10-7 M IL-8, or buffer alone (Fig. 1A
and 1B
, and unpublished results). fMLP- or TNF-
-stimulated neutrophils produced 0.81.5 and 0.51.0 nmoles H2O2, respectively, in 3 h when plated on Fg-coated surfaces (Fig. 1A)
and in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B)
. Thus, H2O2 production by neutrophils depends on the nature of the stimulant and the specific extracellular matrix protein to which they have adhered.
|
- or fMLP-stimulated neutrophils adherent to Fg-coated surfaces (Fig. 1C)
. Most of the H2O2 produced by TNF-
- or fMLP-stimulated neurophils occurred within 60 min of plating these cells on Fg-coated surfaces. No detectable amounts of H2O2 above background were produced by LTB4-stimulated neutrophils (Fig. 1A
1B
1C)
.
Numerous studies have shown that Ras, Erk, p38, p90rsk and other signaling proteins whose activity is regulated by formyl peptide receptors become activated within seconds or minutes of binding of formyl peptides to their cognate receptors [13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
]. Yet, chemoattractant-stimulated neutrophils do not begin H2O2 production until 30 min later. Therefore, we examined whether this delay was a result of chemoattractant-receptor signaling or cell-matrix interactions. Neutrophils preincubated with fMLP (Fig. 1D)
for 20 min in suspension before plating on Fg also exhibited a 30-min delay before initiating H2O2 secretion. This indicates that the delay in onset of H2O2 secretion does not reflect signals or processes activated by ligation of fMLP receptors alone. Moreover, neutrophils plated on Fg-coated surfaces for 20 min before the addition of fMLP still exhibited an
30-min delay before the onset of H2O2 production (unpublished results). These findings indicate that the delay in initiation of an oxidative burst does not depend on the settling time or initial adherence of neutrophils onto Fg-coated surfaces [11
, 12
] or the time required for signals to be activated by chemoattractant receptors [13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
]. Rather, the delay correlates with secondary, postadhesive events such as cell spreading [6
] and chloride-ion efflux [22
]. Our findings suggest that the delay in onset of H2O2 production depends on a convergence of signals arising from fMLP receptors and from adhesion-promoting receptors.
Interactions between neutrophil ß2 integrins and Fg are required for fMLP- or TNF-
-stimulated H2O2 production
Nathan et al. demonstrated [5
, 6
] that antibodies that block ß2 integrins inhibit H2O2 production by TNF-
-stimulated neutrophils adherent to Fg-coated surfaces. We confirmed this result (Fig. 2
). Similarly, ß2 integrin-blocking antibodies such as IB4 [7
] and 22F12C [8
] inhibited H2O2 production by fMLP-stimulated neutrophils on Fg-coated surfaces (Fig. 2)
. Isotype-matched, control antibody had no effect on H2O2 production by fMLP- or TNF-
-stimulated neutrophils, and IB4 (or 22F12C) had no effect on H2O2 production by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-stimulated neutrophils (Fig. 2)
. Control experiments showed that IB4 also blocked fMLP- or TNF-
-stimulated H2O2 production, even in the presence of the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H-89 (Fig. 2)
. This rules out the possibility [23
] that this mAb blocks neutrophil functions in our system by stimulating increases in intracellular cAMP levels and inducing PKA-mediated protein phosphorylation.
|
, and fMLP stimulate expression and activation of ß2 integrins differentially
and fMLP) with those that do not (e.g., LTB4 and IL-8) on ß2 integrin expression and activation. Neutrophils treated with LTB4, IL-8, TNF-
, or fMLP exhibited increased surface expression of
Mß2 integrins (Fig. 3A
3B
3C
and 3F
, and refs. [2
, 4
]). At the concentrations used, TNF-
and fMLP were nearly equally potent in stimulating
Mß2 integrin expression and did so to a much greater extent than LTB4 or IL-8.
|
Mß2 activation can be detected using antibodies (e.g., mAb24 [24
] and CBRM1/5 [12
]) that bind to conformation-dependent neoepitopes on ß2 integrins. By this measure, fMLP and TNF-
activated
Mß2 integrins (Fig. 3E
and 3F)
. In contrast, LTB4 (Fig. 3D
and 3F)
or IL-8 (Fig. 3F)
did not.
CBRM1/5 has been shown to block the short-term adhesion (4-min incubation) of fMLP-stimulated neutrophils to Fg-coated surfaces (ref. [12
], and Fig. 4A
). However, CBRM1/5 did not block long-term adhesion (30-min incubation) of fMLP-stimulated neutrophils to Fg-coated surfaces (Fig. 4A)
and had no effect on the length of delay between the addition of fMLP or TNF-
and the initiation of H2O2 production by neutrophils adherent to Fg-coated surfaces (unpublished results). CBRM1/5 slightly increased (P<0.05) the maximal amount of H2O2 produced by fMLP-stimulated neutrophils adherent to these surfaces after 3 h (Fig. 4B)
; the mechanism by which CBRM1/5 exerts this effect is unknown.
|
-stimulated neutrophils through Fg-containing matrices [3
]. The migration-inhibitory effect of fMLP and TNF-
is reversed by anti-ß1 integrin antibodies [3
]. Because fMLP and TNF-
also stimulated H2O2 production on fibrin(ogen), we examined whether ß1 integrins also send outside-in signals to stimulate H2O2 secretion. However, neither 5 nor 30 µg/ml AiiB2 [25
] or P4C10 [26
] anti-ß1-blocking mAb blocked H2O2 production by fMLP or TNF-
-stimulated neutrophils on Fg-coated surfaces (Fig. 5
, and unpublished results).
|
i/o, blocks virtually all signals initiated by the fMLP receptor [29
, 31
, 32
]. However, all of these studies focused on the effects of pertussis toxin on fMLP-stimulated neutrophils in suspension.
We therefore examined the effects of pertussis toxin on fMLP-, LTB4-, or IL-8-stimulated neutrophil adhesion to Fg-coated surfaces and on the up-regulation of integrins that neutrophils use to adhere to these surfaces. Treatment of neutrophils with pertussis toxin (0.55 µg/ml) for 1 h did not inhibit fMLP-stimulated, adhesion-dependent H2O2 production (Fig. 6A
). In contrast, pretreatment of neutrophils with 0.5 µg/ml pertussis toxin for
3 h inhibited H2O2 production completely by fMLP-stimulated neutrophils adherent to Fg (Fig. 6A)
; it did not affect the ability of PMA or TNF-
to stimulate H2O2 production or the inability of LTB4 and IL-8 to stimulate H2O2 production (Fig. 6A
, and unpublished results). Pertussis toxin also completely blocked LTB4- and IL-8-stimulated migration through fibrin and CIV (Fig. 6B , and unpublished results) and fMLP-stimulated migration through Matrigel (Fig. 6B)
. Finally, pertussis toxin significantly reduced LTB-4, IL-8-, and fMLP-stimulated ß2 integrin up-regulation (Fig. 7A
, and unpublished results), and fMLP stimulated ß2 activation (Fig. 7B)
. As expected, pertussis toxin did not affect TNF-
-stimulated ß2 integrin up-regulation (Fig. 7A)
. Thus, Gi activation is necessary for all LTB4-, IL-8-, and fMLP-stimulated neutrophil functions examined here.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[6
, 33
], stimulates neutrophils adherent to Fg-containing matrices to secrete H2O2 in a ß2 integrin-dependent manner. LTB4 and IL-8 did not stimulate neutrophils adherent to Fg-containing matrices to secrete H2O2, and none of these chemoattractants stimulated neutrophils adherent to CIV or Matrigel to secrete H2O2. These data suggest that two signals are necessary to stimulate neutrophils to produce H2O2: ligation of specific chemoattractant receptors and interaction of ß2 integrins with cognate ligands on extracellular matrix proteins. This paradigm is reminiscent of the two-signal hypothesis of adaptive immunity: Two different classes of receptors must be ligated on B or T cells for efficient activation of these cells [34
].
The most striking and important finding shown here is that fMLP, LTB4, and IL-8 all bind to Gi-coupled cell-surface receptors [27
28
29
30
31
32
], yet they activate different intracellular signal cascades [15
] and stimulate different cellular functions (Figs. 1
and 3
, and ref. [3
]). Although the receptors for fMLP, LTB4, and IL-8 are all heptahelical Gi-coupled receptors, the signal cascades and cell functions stimulated by ligation of fMLP receptors are much more similar to those stimulated by ligation of TNF-
trimeric receptors than those stimulated by ligation of LTB4 and IL-8 receptors. For example, fMLP and TNF-
stimulate neutrophils to produce H2O2 on Fg-coated surfaces (Fig. 1)
, activate ß1 and ß2 integrins (Figs. 3
and 7)
, cause cessation of neutrophil chemotaxis through fibrin gels [2
, 3
], stimulate neutrophils to form tight zones of apposition with fibrin matrices [2
, 3
], and activate p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [15
]. LTB4 and IL-8 do not stimulate any of these effects in neutrophils.
Yet, pertussis toxin blocked all LTB4- and fMLP-stimulated neutrophil functions studied here. That is, it blocked the capacity of LTB4 and fMLP to stimulate expression of ß2 integrins (Fig. 7A) , of LTB4 and fMLP to stimulate neutrophils to migrate through Matrigel (Fig. 6B) , of LTB4 to stimulate neutrophils to migrate through fibrin gels (Fig. 6B) , of fMLP to activate ß2 integrins (Fig. 7B) , and of fMLP to stimulate neutrophils to produce H2O2 on fibrin(ogen)-containing matrices (Fig. 6A) . How could the activation of the same G protein by different stimuli result in different functional responses?
First, there may be different thresholds of Gi activation for chemotaxis and H2O2 production, similar to the T-cell-receptor activation thresholds that are thought to govern thymic T-cell selection [35 ]. For example, at any given concentration, fMLP stimulates a much higher level of Gi activation in neutrophils than LTB4 [36 ]. At concentrations ranging from nM to µM, fMLP and LTB4 stimulate neutrophil chemotaxis through gels formed of collagen I, CIV, or Matrigel [2 ]. However, concentrations of 0.11 µM were required for fMLP to stimulate neutrophils to produce H2O2 (Fig. 1B) . This suggests that the threshold of Gi activation required for H2O2 production is higher than for chemotaxis. Assuming that this is correct and that fMLP and LTB4 receptors activate the same Gi subunits, then very high LTB4 concentrations should activate Gi to about the same extent as 0.1 µM fMLP and thereby stimulate H2O2 production. This model also predicts that low fMLP concentrations should activate Gi to the same extent as LTB4 concentrations that are sufficient to promote chemotaxis through fibrin matrices. Yet, even micromolar concentrations of LTB4 did not stimulate H2O2 production (Fig. 1B) , and subnanomolar (0.1 nM) fMLP did not stimulate chemotaxis through fibrin gels [2 ]. Therefore, differences between the functional effects of fMLP versus LTB4 on neutrophils cannot be ascribed simply to different activation thresholds of the same Gi heterotrimer. Instead, there must be something qualitatively different about the signals initiated by fMLP receptors and those initiated by LTB4 receptors.
Second, it is possible that different seven-transmembrane-spanning chemoattractant receptors couple to different G
i subunits. The sole instance of such selectivity was described by Senogles [37
], who demonstrated that alternative splice forms of the D2 dopamine receptor selectively couple to different G
i subunits. Neutrophils express at least two different G
i subunits, G
i2 and G
i3 [38
, 39
]. However, to our knowledge, there are no instances shown in which G
i2 and G
i3 activate different signal cascades or cellular functions. Because both of these subunits are sensitive to pertussis toxin, there are no specific pharmacological inhibitors to determine whether these receptors couple to different G
i subunits in neutrophils.
Third, the fMLP and LTB4 receptors might couple with similar affinity to each of the G
i subunits but preferentially couple to different ß
subunits. At least 5 different Gß subunits and 12 different G
subunits have been identified and characterized [40
]. In fact, experiments with antisense oligonucleotides have shown that the muscarinic M4 and somatostatin receptors couple to different Gß
subunits, although both receptors couple to G
o [41
, 42
]. Azpiazu et al. [43
] have shown that molecular contacts between Gß
subunits and heptahelical receptors are necessary for G-protein activation, indicating that heptahelical receptors could have structural specificity for particular Gß
subunits. Moreover, different Gß
subunits have been shown to activate certain effector enzymes preferentially (e.g., phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and phospholipase C [44
]). Consistent with this concept, a Gß3 mutant has been found that enhances chemotaxis of human neutrophils in response to IL-8 and fMLP [45
, 46
] but does not affect fMLP-stimulated superoxide production. Taken together, these findings suggest that different receptors that activate the same G
subunits could nonetheless stimulate different signal cascades and cellular functions by preferentially coupling to and activating different ß
subunits.
Heptahelical receptors can couple directly to effector proteins other than heterotrimeric G proteins [47
, 48
]. In many instances, G proteins must be activated before these receptors can bind and/or activate other effectors. For example, Luttrell et al. [47
] and McDonald et al. [48
] have shown that following G-protein activation, specific ß-arrestins bind to ß-adrenergic receptors, thereby activating Src and MAPK. Furthermore, the studies of Neptune et al. [49
] show that it is the heptahelical receptor and not the G
subunit that determines the cellular function that is stimulated by binding ligands to G-protein-coupled receptors.
Although we favor the possibility that chemoattractant receptors couple selectively to different ß
subunits, presently, our data do not allow us to distinguish between these possibilities. Nonetheless, they clearly show that there are qualitative differences between the effector functions activated by ligation of fMLP receptors versus those activated by ligation of LTB4 and IL-8 receptors. The simplest explanation for these differences is that these heptahelical Gi-coupled chemoattractant receptors initiate qualitatively different signals.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Received May 12, 2001; revised November 19, 2001; accepted December 3, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Sato, K. Iwabuchi, I. Nagaoka, Y. Adachi, N. Ohno, H. Tamura, K. Seyama, Y. Fukuchi, H. Nakayama, F. Yoshizaki, et al. Induction of human neutrophil chemotaxis by Candida albicans-derived {beta}-1,6-long glycoside side-chain-branched {beta}-glucan J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 80(1): 204 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lokuta and A. Huttenlocher TNF-{alpha} promotes a stop signal that inhibits neutrophil polarization and migration via a p38 MAPK pathway J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2005; 78(1): 210 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Moreno, G. Pereira-da-Silva, C. Oliver, M. C. Jamur, A. Panunto-Castelo, and M. C. Roque-Barreira The Macrophage-derived Lectin, MNCF, Activates Neutrophil Migration through a Pertussis Toxin-sensitive Pathway J. Histochem. Cytochem., June 1, 2005; 53(6): 715 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Fuhler, G. J. Knol, A. L. Drayer, and E. Vellenga Impaired interleukin-8- and GRO{alpha}-induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase result in decreased migration of neutrophils from patients with myelodysplasia J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 77(2): 257 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Zhelev, A. M. Alteraifi, and D. Chodniewicz Controlled Pseudopod Extension of Human Neutrophils Stimulated with Different Chemoattractants Biophys. J., July 1, 2004; 87(1): 688 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Garrison, A. Hojgaard, R. Margraf, J. J. Weis, and J. H. Weis Surface Translocation of Pactolus Is Induced by Cell Activation and Death, but Is Not Required for Neutrophil Migration and Function J. Immunol., December 15, 2003; 171(12): 6795 - 6806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kim, C. C. Marchal, J. Penninger, and M. C. Dinauer The Hemopoietic Rho/Rac Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav1 Regulates N-Formyl-Methionyl-Leucyl-Phenylalanine-Activated Neutrophil Functions J. Immunol., October 15, 2003; 171(8): 4425 - 4430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||