|
|
||||||||

* Department of Immunology, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil; and
Fundação E. J. Zerbini, São Paulo, Brazil
Correspondence: Dr. Maria Regina DImpério Lima, Departamento de Imunologia, ICB, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1730, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, CEP-05508-900. E-mail: relima{at}usp.br
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
with weak NO production. Moreover,
IL-12p40KO macrophages are more permissive to Trypanosoma
cruzi replication than their wild-type littermate cells.
Prolonged incubation with rIL-12 fails to reverse the M2 polarization
of IL-12p40KO macrophages. However, TGF-ß1 is directly implicated in
sustaining the M2 profile because its inhibition increases NO release
from IL-12p40KO macrophages. IFN-
deficiency is apparently not the
reason for TGF-ß1 up-regulation, because rIFN-
KO macrophages
produce normal amounts of this cytokine. These findings raise the
possibility that IL-12 has a central role in driving macrophage
polarization, regulating their intrinsic ability to respond against
intracellular parasites.
Key Words: macrophage polarization TGF-ß1 nitric oxide IL-12p40KO Trypanosoma cruzi
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(IFN-
),
such as leishmaniasis [14
] and tuberculosis
[15
]. The ability of IL-12 to direct the differentiation
pattern of T cells suggests that this cytokine bridges innate and
adaptive immunity, influencing the development of immune responses and,
therefore, the degree of susceptibility to infection
[16
].
It is generally accepted that the central role of IL-12 in host defense
against many intracellular pathogens arises from its capacity to
stimulate IFN-
secretion by natural killer (NK) and Th1 cells, which
in turn activate phagocytes to control parasite growth
[17
]. Nonetheless, in recent years, macrophages have
also been recognized to respond to IL-12, raising the possibility that
this cytokine can induce macrophage activation through an autocrine
pathway [18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
]. Although minor contamination with T or
NK cells has not always been excluded completely, these studies
demonstrate unequivocally that macrophages not only express IL-12 ß1
and ß2 receptors but also respond to IL-12 by producing IFN-
,
tumor necrosis factor
(TNF-
), and nitric oxide (NO). Besides
having these effects on macrophages, IL-12 has been shown to
down-regulate the expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1
mRNA in monocytes and bone marrow-adherent cells [27
].
Therefore, it is possible that IL-12 influences the
macrophage-activation profile directly, driving them to react against
foreign stimuli with a prominent IFN-
, TNF-
, and NO response or a
dominant TGF-ß1 response.
Recent studies comparing NO and TGF-ß1 secretion among different
mouse strains have provided evidence that macrophages can be divided
into two types, M1 and M2, based on their ability to produce different
types of response [28
]. M1 macrophages from Th1-prone
mouse strains (C57BL/6 and B10D2) are more easily activated to produce
NO with rIFN-
or lipopolysaccharides (LPS). In contrast, M2
macrophages from Th2-prone mouse strains (BALB/c and DBA/2) secrete
TGF-ß1 preferentially. Moreover, macrophages from the "Th1" mouse
strains are more resistant to intracellular parasites than those from
"Th2" mouse strains [29
30
31
]. The mechanism
underlying M1/M2 polarization is not known, but T and B lymphocytes do
not seem to participate in this process because C57BL/6 and BALB/c
severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) macrophages also exhibit a
distinct activation profile [28
]. Unpublished data from
our laboratory have shown that macrophages from IL-12p40-deficient mice
secrete little NO in response to malaria infection. Surprisingly, this
deficient NO production could not be attributed to the inability of
IL-12p40KO-infected mice to set up a Th1 response, because their spleen
cells produce considerable amounts of IFN-
. These data raised the
possibility that the absence of IL-12p40 may have favored macrophage
polarization toward the M2 profile, a possibility supported by the
findings described above concerning the direct effects of IL-12 on
macrophages. Most important, the hypothetical role of IL-12 in M1/M2
polarization could explain the polarized macrophage profile observed in
Th1/Th2-prone mouse strains, because it has been shown that C57BL/6
macrophages produce more IL-12 than BALB/c macrophages
[32
].
To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the capacity of peritoneal
macrophages from IL-12p40KO and C57BL/6 mice to produce NO and TGF-ß1
and to kill intracellular parasites before and after rIFN-
and/or
LPS activation. These molecules were investigated, because their
relative production distinguishes M1 from M2. To assess the involvement
of IL-12p40 in the macrophage ability to kill intracellular parasites,
we evaluated the growth of Trypanosoma cruzi, the
etiological agent of Chagas disease. The T. cruzi model
was chosen based on previous studies showing that IL-12 mediates
resistance against these parasites [33
,
34
]. Moreover, killing of T. cruzi amastigotes
is dependent on the ability of macrophages to release NO, which is
stimulated by IFN-
and inhibited by TGF-ß [35
].
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-/- (IFN-
KO; Jackson
Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME), C57BL/6 (wild-type), 129/Sv, and BALB/c
female mice were bred at the Biotério de Camundongos
Isogênicos, ICB/USP (São Paulo, Brazil) under standard
pathogen-free conditions. T. cruzi trypomastigotes of the
Sylvio-X10/4 strain were purified from a monkey epithelial cell line
(LLC-MK2).
Peritoneal cell suspensions
Four to six mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 5
ml 3% starch (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Five days later,
cells were obtained by peritoneal lavage with chilled RPMI 1640 (Sigma
Chemical Co.).
Adherent-peritoneal cell cultures
Peritoneal cells (106) were incubated for
4 h in RPMI 1640 supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml),
streptomycin (100 µg/ml), 2-mercaptoethanol (50 µM), L-glutamine (2
mM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), and 3% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum
(FCS). All supplements were purchased from Life Technologies
(Rockville, MD). Nonadherent cells were removed by three vigorous
washes with medium.
Phenotypic analysis of total and adherent-peritoneal cells
Adherent-peritoneal cells (106) were stained with
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), or
Cy-chrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to CD4 (H129.19), CD8
(53-6.7), CD45R (B220, RA3-6B2), CD11b (Mac-1, M1/70), I-Ab
(AF6-120.1), CD16/CD32 (Fc
R II/III, 2.4G2), CD80 (B7.1, 1G10), CD86
(B7.2, GL-1), CD119 (IFN-
R
chain, GR20), and/or Pan NK cells
(DX5) from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Cells were analyzed by flow
cytometry using a Facscalibur (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
Detection of NO and TGF-ß1 in culture supernatants
Adherent-peritoneal cells were cultured with 101000 pg/ml
rIFN-
(PharMingen) and/or 10 µg/ml LPS (Sigma Chemical Co.),
and the supernatants were harvested 48 h later. Culture
supernatants were assayed for NO by the Griess reaction. Briefly, 50
µl supernatant was incubated with 50 µl Griess reagent for 5 min at
room temperature, and NO2 concentration was determined by
measuring the optical density at 550 nm in reference to a standard
NaNO2 solution. Latent plus bioactive TGF-ß1 was
quantified by the TGF-ß1 EmaxTM ImunoAssay system
(Promega, Madison, WI). All supernatant samples were activated by acid
treatment before TGF-ß1 determination. TGF-ß1 measured in culture
medium supplemented with 3% FCS ranged from 450 to 550 pg/ml. The
amount of TGF-ß1 produced by adherent cells was determined by
subtracting the TGF-ß1 value of the culture medium from that obtained
in the supernatant sample.
Killing of intracellular T. cruzi parasites
Peritoneal cells (106) were added to tissue culture
chambers (Lab-Tek Chamber Slide, Nunc, Rochester, NY) and incubated for
4 h in supplemented RPMI medium. Adherent cells were further
cultured for 48 h with rIFN-
(1001000 pg/ml) or medium,
infected with T. cruzi at 1:1 ratio for 120 min, and washed
six times to remove extracellular parasites. Cultures were then kept
for an additional 48 h with rIFN-
or medium. After this period,
supernatants were examined for extracellular parasites, and adherent
cells were stained with Giemsa to count intracellular amastigotes.
rIL-12 and anti-TGF-ß1 treatment of adherent-peritoneal cells
Adherent-peritoneal cells (106) were cultured with
2500 pg/ml rIL-12p70 (Bacullo rIL-12 from DNAX). Neutralizing
anti-TGF-ß1 and control chicken immunoglobulin (Ig; R & D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN) were used at 50 µg/ml. Cells were stimulated with
rIFN-
(1000 pg/ml). Some of the cultures were infected with T.
cruzi as described above. Supernatants were harvested 48 h
later to determine NO levels.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by unpaired analysis of
variance (ANOVA). Differences between two groups were considered
significant when P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R II/III (CD16/CD32), B7.1 (CD80), and B7.2
(CD86) were also expressed uniformly on adherent cells from both groups
of mice (Fig. 1B)
. Moreover, a similar number of
CD11b+CD4-CD8-CD45R-
cells were found in these cultures (unpublished results). Microscopy
analysis and staining for nonspecific esterase (>98% positive) were
consistent with the flow cytometry analysis. These results indicate
that the great majority of adherent cells from the peritoneum of
IL-12p40KO and C57BL/6 mice has a macrophage phenotype, with
undetectable numbers of T and B lymphocytes and NK cells.
|
-stimulated IL-12p40KO peritoneal macrophages produce
little NO compared with C57BL/6 macrophages
-induced effector molecule. Adherent-peritoneal cells from
IL-12p40KO and C57BL/6 mice were activated in vitro with different
amounts of rIFN-
, LPS, or both stimuli, and NO levels were
determined in the culture supernatants. Peritoneal macrophages from
BALB/c mice were included as counter-control because they have an M2
profile [28
]. Macrophages from 129/Sv mice were also
analyzed because 129/Sv genes could eventually contribute to the
IL-12p40KO background. Compared with C57BL/6 and 129/Sv cells,
IL-12p40KO macrophages secreted little NO in response to exogenous
IFN-
(Fig. 2 A
). The amount of NO released by IL-12p40KO macrophages was similar
to that produced by BALB/c macrophages stimulated with the same dose of
rIFN-
. The activation of macrophages with LPS plus rIFN-
had a
synergistic effect on NO production, independent of the macrophage
origin (Fig. 2B)
. Under these conditions, the amount of NO secreted by
IL-12p40KO macrophages was significantly lower than that produced by
C57BL/6 cells. Our findings indicate that macrophages from
IL-12p40-deficient mice have a lower ability to secrete NO in response
to rIFN-
, even when concomitantly activated by LPS.
|
stimulation, TGF-ß1 levels remained unchanged,
and differences among groups persisted. Regarding TGF-ß1 and NO
production, the activation pattern of IL-12p40KO macrophages was
similar to the M2 profile of BALB/c macrophages.
|
were infected with trypomastigotes. Parasite
replication was monitored by counting intracellular amastigotes and
released trypomastigotes. Nonstimulated macrophages from IL-12p40KO
mice were permissive to T. cruzi replication (Fig. 4 B
) compared with C57BL/6 macrophages (Fig. 4A)
, harboring 2.5 times
more amastigotes per cell (Fig. 4C)
. When stimulated with rIFN-
,
macrophages of both strains increased their killing capacity (Fig. 4C)
.
However, higher numbers of live amastigotes were still observed inside
IL-12p40KO cells. Moreover, 48 h post-infection, trypomastigotes
were found in culture supernatants from IL-12p40KO macrophages
stimulated with 100 pg/ml rIFN-
at a concentration of 1.6 x
105/ ml, whereas no parasites were detected in the
corresponding C57BL/6 supernatants (unpublished results). In these
experiments, we also evaluated NO production by T.
cruzi-infected macrophages (unpublished results). T.
cruzi alone did not induce NO production but increased
IFN-
-induced NO production, and persisted of the differences was
between IL-12p40KO and C57BL/6 macrophages.
|
or rIFN-
plus rIL-12. Cells kept in culture
without rIL-12 were used as control (day 0). All cells remained in
culture for a total period of 7 days. The dose of rIL-12 used in these
experiments (2500 pg/ml rIL-12p70) stimulated a huge production of
IFN-
by spleen cells (unpublished results). We observed that
activation of IL-12p40KO macrophages in the presence rIL-12 did not
improve their ability to secrete NO (Fig. 5 C
, day 0). Moreover, pretreatment with rIL-12 for 1, 3, or even 5
days was unable to rescue IL-12p40KO macrophages for the NO response
induced by rIFN-
(Fig. 5B)
or rIFN-
plus rIL-12 (Fig. 5C)
.
Unexpectedly, the prolonged rIL-12 treatment resulted in a marked
inhibition of rIFN-
-induced NO response by C57BL/6 macrophages.
Another experiment using a rIL-12 dose of 250 pg/ml showed similar
results (unpublished results). We also treated T.
cruzi-infected IL-12p40KO and C57BL/6 macrophages with rIL-12
(unpublished results). Confirming the previous results with noninfected
cells, this treatment failed to improve NO production by
IL-12p40KO-infected macrophages.
|
-induced
NO response of IL-12p40KO macrophages
-induced NO production by M2 macrophages from Th2 mouse strains
[28
], we evaluated whether this cytokine is implicated
directly in the maintenance of the M2 profile of IL-12p40KO peritoneal
macrophages. The results showed that in the presence of anti-TGF-ß1
antibodies, the amount of NO released by IFN-
-activated IL-12p40KO
macrophages was significantly greater than that secreted by control
Ig-treated cells, whereas only a modest increment occurred in
corresponding C57BL/6 cultures (Fig. 6
). These data indicate that TGF-ß1 suppresses the IFN-
-induced
NO response of IL-12p40KO macrophages.
|
production
-dependent [18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
]. To evaluate whether
IFN-
is involved in the up-regulation of TGF-ß1, we measured its
production by peritoneal macrophages from IFN-
KO, IL-12p40KO, and
C57BL/6 mice stimulated or not with rIFN-
. As shown in Figure 7
, TGF-ß1 production was not augmented in IFN-
KO macrophages
compared with C57BL/6 macrophages, suggesting that IFN-
deficiency
is not responsible for the increased TGF-ß1 production observed in
IL-12p40KO macrophages. These findings are consistent with the fact
that IFN-
could not be detected in the supernatants of nonstimulated
macrophages and that in those from rIFN-
-stimulated cells, the
levels were below the rIFN-
amount added to the cultures
(unpublished results).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced NO response, and an intrinsic
deficiency in inhibiting intracellular T. cruzi growth.
Therefore, mice lacking IL-12p40 have a defective IFN-
production
[13
] and an inadequate macrophage IFN-
response.
Regarding the secretion of TGF-ß1 and NO, the activation pattern
assumed by IL-12p40KO macrophages corresponds to the M2 functional
profile developed by macrophages from Th2 mouse strains
[28
]. M2 polarization of IL-12p40KO macrophages cannot
be reversed by exogenous administration of rIL-12. Conversely, TGF-ß1
up-regulation appears to be implicated in sustaining their M2 profile.
This effect does not seem to result from deficient IFN-
production
but is likely to be a direct consequence of the absence of IL-12p40.
These observations raise the possibility that IL-12 can play a dual
role in the host defense against intracellular pathogens; i.e., in
addition to its involvement in the induction of IFN-
secretion by NK
and Th1 cells [1
, 3
, 10
,
11
], IL-12 could influence M1/M2 polarization prior to
the onset of immune responses, rendering macrophages prone to react
with an effector (NO-dominant or M1) or a tolerant (TGF-ß1-dominant
or M2) profile. In contrast to the current view, macrophages would not
only be influenced by the milieu created during immune responses but
also by the cytokines they produce constitutively. In this regard,
IL-12 would gain a new function in the immune system by orchestrating
the continuous macrophage crosstalk. The mechanisms involved in IL-12p40-mediated polarization of macrophages or their precursors toward a NO- or TGF-ß1-dominant profile are speculative but exciting. Because IL-12 and IL-23 share IL-12p40, both cytokines are putative candidates to induce this process. The possibility that constitutive levels of IL-12 directly drive M1/M2 polarization is supported by recent data showing that macrophages not only express IL-12R ß1 and ß2 [22 , 26 ] but also respond to this cytokine through an autocrine pathway [18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ]. Because IL-23 binds to IL-12Rß1 [5 ], this cytokine could also be involved in macrophage differentiation. Based on our findings, IL-12 and/or IL-23 seem to mediate M1/M2 polarization by directly regulating the production of TGF-ß1, which in turn exerts a negative control over the macrophage NO response. Although IL-23 biological activity is still poorly understood, we discussed our data, taking into account current knowledge concerning the direct effects of IL-12 on macrophages.
Supporting the role of IL-12 in down-regulating TGF-ß1 secretion, it
has recently been shown that IL-12 suppresses TGF-ß1 mRNA expression
in K562, monocytes, and bone marrow cells [27
].
Therefore, the absence of a negative control exerted by IL-12 on
TGF-ß1 synthesis could be a reason why IL-12p40KO peritoneal
macrophages constitutively produce increased amounts of TGF-ß1. The
lack of IL-12-mediated control of TGF-ß1 production could determine
M2 polarization in the early stages of macrophage differentiation, when
these cells are more open to regulation [27
]. The fact
that we failed to rescue IL-12p40KO peritoneal macrophages in their
ability to release NO by supplying the cultures with rIL-12, even
during a prolonged period of time, could be explained by the inhibitory
effect exerted by TGF-ß1 that protects more differentiated cells from
the regulatory effects of IL-12 [27
]. In this case,
modulation of the TGF-ß1 promoter activity by IL-12 does not occur in
the presence of rTGF-ß1, suggesting that in situations where TGF-ß1
is in excess, the effect of TGF-ß1 on autoregulation
[39
] predominates over the effects of other cytokines
such as IL-12. Studies with rat bone marrow-derived cells confirm and
extend this idea by showing that the functional response of macrophages
to cytokines is determined by the first cytokine to which they are
exposed [40
]. These studies showed that pretreatment of
macrophages with TGF-ß completely inhibited NO generation induced by
IFN-
plus TNF-
, but administration of this cytokine a few hours
after IFN-
priming had no effect. The mechanism by which TGF-ß
interferes with IL-12-induced activation has been analyzed in T
lymphocytes and includes inhibition of the Jak-STAT pathway
[41
] and down-regulation of the IL-12 receptor
[42
]. Based on the above considerations, we postulate
that basal levels of IL-12, produced by macrophages themselves or other
cell types, may act during the early phase of macrophage
differentiation and polarize these cells toward the M1 activation
profile. This constitutive IL-12 may play a negative control over the
TGF-ß1 promoter, a phenomenon demonstrated for bone marrow-derived
cells treated with IL-12 [27
]. In M2 macrophages, IL-12
may have no effect on rescuing their ability to secrete NO, probably
because of the excess TGF-ß1 produced by these cells. Experiments
with bone marrow-derived cells are in progress to identify the
developmental stages that are targets for this IL-12 regulatory effect
and the activation pathway involved in macrophage polarization.
Although IFN-
was not detected in our experiments, production of
small amounts of this cytokine during macrophage differentiation may
have influenced their activation profile. However, our data showing
that IL-12p40KO macrophages, but not IFN-
KO macrophages, produce
increased amounts of TGF-ß1 confirm the major role of IL-12/IL-23 in
this process, ruling out the indirect participation of IFN-
. Mills
and coworkers [28
] addressed the possibility that M1/M2
polarization is a consequence of the cytokine milieu in which
macrophages develop. They analyzed the influence of lymphocytes on
M1/M2 polarization by comparing macrophages from SCID mice with a
C57BL/6 or BALB/c background. Their results showed that differences
among macrophages persist in the absence of lymphocytes, supporting the
idea that cytokines produced by Th1 or Th2 cells are not responsible
for the distinct profile developed by these macrophages. The
possibility that IL-12p40KO macrophage phenotype is governed by a gene
originated from the 129/Sv background was also ruled out by the fact
that 129/Sv macrophages have an M1 profile. This is in consonance with
data showing that 129/Sv mice are able to mount an effective Th1
response against Leishmania major
[14
].
That treatment with anti-TGF-ß1 is able to partially restore the NO
response of IL-12p40KO macrophages indicates that continuous production
of this cytokine is necessary to maintain NO suppression. These
findings support the hypothesis that TGF-ß1 plays an important role
in down-regulating the NO released by M2 cells [28
]. The
inefficient production of NO by IL-12p40KO macrophages could be
responsible for their inability to kill intracellular T.
cruzi parasites. This idea is based on a previous observation
showing that TGF-ß inhibits NO-mediated, T. cruzi killing
by IFN-
-activated macrophages [35
]. Therefore, our
data open the possibility that endogenous IL-12/IL-23 levels regulate
TGF-ß1 production and consequently the macrophage susceptibility to
intracellular parasites. Theoretically, TGF-ß1 could limit NO release
in IL-12p40KO macrophages by several mechanisms. TGF-ß1 has been
shown to down-regulate the IFN-
receptor [43
],
suppress the synthesis of cytokines involved in NO production such as
TNF-
[38
], and directly inhibit iNOS expression
[37
] or up-regulate arginase activity
[44
]. We have not observed down-regulation of IFN-
R
chain expression in IL-12p40KO macrophages. The other possibilities
are currently under investigation in our laboratory.
Regardless of the mechanism underlying the M1/M2 bias, the idea that constitutive levels of cytokines produced by macrophages influence their own activation profile may represent a missing element in understanding parasite-host relationships and the development of immune diseases. Macrophage polarization may determine the general pattern of innate immune response against foreign stimuli and consequently the feature of adaptive immunity. Therefore, the notion that the M1/M2 balance is governed by constitutive levels of macrophage cytokines could be a reason why individuals maintaining poor contact with microorganisms have increased chances to suffer from allergic diseases. Further studies on IL-12p40-mediated macrophage polarization may clarify its mechanisms, improving our understanding of immune responses and our ability to modify the outcome of infectious and immune diseases.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Received August 2, 2001; revised October 7, 2001; accepted October 11, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production by T helper 1 cells Eur. J. Immunol. 26,659-668[Medline]
production by CD8+ lymphoid dendritic cells J. Exp. Med. 189,1981-1986
J. Immunol. 167,221-227
J. Immunol. 145,940-944[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Zhu, Y. Bando, S. Xiao, K. Yang, A. C. Anderson, V. K. Kuchroo, and S. J. Khoury CD11b+Ly-6Chi Suppressive Monocytes in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5228 - 5237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Turcotte, S. Gauthier, D. Malo, M. Tam, M. M. Stevenson, and P. Gros Icsbp1/IRF-8 Is Required for Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses against Intracellular Pathogens J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2467 - 2476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. A. Costa, K. C. L. Torres, R. Z. Mendonca, I. Gresser, K. J. Gollob, and I. A. Abrahamsohn Type I IFNs Stimulate Nitric Oxide Production and Resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi Infection. J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 3193 - 3200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Li, N. Chu, A. Rostami, and G.-X. Zhang Dendritic Cells Transduced with SOCS-3 Exhibit a Tolerogenic/DC2 Phenotype That Directs Type 2 Th Cell Differentiation In Vitro and In Vivo J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1679 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |