Journal of Leukocyte Biology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ameredes, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ameredes, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, W. J.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2001;70:730-736.)
© 2001 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Increased nitric oxide production by airway cells of sensitized and challenged IL-10 knockout mice

Bill T. Ameredes*,{dagger}, Ruben Zamora{ddagger}, Kevin F. Gibson*, Timothy R. Billiar{ddagger}, Barbara Dixon-McCarthy*, Simon Watkins{dagger} and William J. Calhoun*

* Asthma, Allergy, and Airway Research Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine,
{ddagger} Department of Surgery, and
{dagger} Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania

Correspondence: Bill T. Ameredes, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Cell Biology and Physiology, Asthma, Allergy, and Airway Research Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 628NW Montefiore University Hospital, 3459 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail: ameredesbt{at}msx.upmc.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10 suppresses inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS); therefore, NO production should increase in the absence of IL-10. Production of NO (as nitrite) by bronchoalveolar lavage cells of IL-10 knockout (-/-) mice was assessed after ovalbumin sensitization and airway challenge (S/C) and was compared with the IL-10-sufficient, wild-type (WT) C57Bl6. Eosinophil recruitment occurred in S/C WT and IL-10-/- mice, suggesting allergic airway inflammation. Alveolar macrophages (per g mouse) were unchanged (~3x104 cells) with the exception of a doubling in the S/C IL-10-/- mice (~6x104 cells, P<0.05). NO production (per million cells) was doubled in cells from S/C IL-10-/- (15.3 µM) mice compared with WT (7.6 µM, P<0.05). Inhibition of iNOS by L-N5-(1-iminoethyl)-ornithine reduced NO production in all S/C mice, confirming that the increase was a result of up-regulation of iNOS. We conclude that IL-10 is a critical cytokine regulating iNOS in murine airway cells and that its absence can lead to up-regulation of iNOS and development of allergic airway inflammation.

Key Words: allergen • bronchoalveolar lavage • C57BL6 mice • macrophage • nitrite • ovalbumin


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Interleukin (IL)-10 is a cytokine that is known to have anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative properties [1 2 3 ]. Its production by macrophages and other cells of monocyte lineage is induced by exposure to pro-inflammatory Th1 cytokines and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-{alpha}) [4 ], which have been triggered by the presence of allergens or pro-inflammatory mediators. With production of IL-10, a negative feedback loop allows down-regulation of TNF-{alpha} [5 ] and subsequent resolution of the inflammatory response [6 ]. This resolution may include the effect of IL-10 to inhibit eosinophil survival and cytokine production [7 ], which has significant ramifications for diseases such as asthma, characterized by immune cell infiltration into the airway.

However, the ability of airway-immune cells to produce IL-10 has been shown to be reduced in asthmatics [8 , 9 ]. It is possible that lack of this anti-inflammatory cytokine may allow the pro-inflammatory mechanisms to dominate unchecked, resulting in persistent airway inflammation and possibly airway remodeling. An animal model of this situation is the transgenic IL-10 knockout (-/-) mouse, which has an inability to produce IL-10 [10 ] and is considered a good model in which to study inflammation [11 ]. We used this animal model to better understand the potential inflammatory mechanisms within the airways.

In addition to its anti-proliferative properties, IL-10 is known to suppress cellular production of nitric oxide (NO), a critical molecular signal in the inflammatory process, which is likely linked to asthma, airway inflammation, and possibly airway remodeling [12 , 13 ]. In the airway, inducible NO synthase (iNOS) can be up-regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines and is considered a marker of airway inflammation in asthma [14 ]. IL-10 has been shown to reduce iNOS levels and NO production in a murine macrophage cell line [15 ], further supporting the idea that it has anti-inflammatory properties in airway-immune cells. However, in the presence of an allergen-potentiated inflammatory stimulus, the pattern of iNOS activity by airway-immune cells of the IL-10-/- mouse is unknown. Based on the known suppressive effect of IL-10 on iNOS induction and NO production [15 ], we postulated that iNOS activity and therefore NO production might be elevated in airway cells from mice lacking the ability to produce IL-10. The results are consistent with this postulate, suggesting that a lack of IL-10 may be an important factor in the development of asthma and airway inflammation through NO-dependent pathways.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
General
Male C57Bl6 mice of the wild-type (WT) and the IL-10-/- strain (on a C57Bl6 background) were obtained at 6 weeks of age (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) and housed under identical conditions in a specific pathogen-free (SPF)/barrier animal facility at the University of Pittsburgh. The IL-10-/- mice were certified as double-knockout IL-10 null-mutants (IL-10-/-), originating from a strain produced by Kuhn et al. [10 ]. All mice were allowed to age to 8–10 weeks and were then subjected to a series of experimental protocols described below. This aging window was instituted to allow the mice to grow to a sufficient size (20–30 g), such that airway cell recovery from each mouse would be enhanced. Because of the tendency of IL-10-/- mice to develop enterocolitis with age [10 ], all IL-10-/- mice were monitored routinely for evidence of rectal prolapse and failure to gain weight throughout the study. Although housing under SPF conditions significantly attenuates this tendency [10 ], any mice demonstrating these symptoms were not studied. All procedures and protocols used in these studies were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, which conforms to guidelines recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Allergen sensitization and airway challenge
Two groups of mice (WT and IL-10-/-, n=16/group) comprised a set that was allergen-sensitized and airway-challenged (S/C). Sensitization was achieved by using 0.5 ml injections, interperitoneally (i.p.), of ovalbumin (50 µg/ml, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; Grade VI) and alum (1 mg/ml) as a mild adjuvant dissolved in normal saline. All mice were injected once/day over a period of 7 days. This set of mice was subjected to a 10-min airway-allergen challenge (48 h later), using ovalbumin/saline aerosol (5 mg/ml) once/day over a period of 7 days. The aerosol was delivered to eight unanesthetized mice simultaneously, using a DeVilbiss nebulizer (particle size<3.5 µm) connected to a mixing chamber, which in turn was connected to eight aerosolization chambers (Buxco Electronics, Sharon, CT). This aggressive sensitization and challenge protocol was purposely chosen to maximize eosinophilia in the airway [16 ] and the potential for inflammation-driven induction of iNOS within the airway [17 ]. Two other sets of WT and IL-10-/- mice were also studied, those that were unsensitized/unchallenged or naive (U/U, n=8/group) and those that were subjected to the sensitization injections alone (S/U, n=4/group).

Cell isolation and culture
Forty-eight hours after the last aerosol challenge, the mice were anesthetized with Metofane, and open-chested bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed using sterile, endotoxin-free, normal saline to obtain airway cells from both lungs. Unfractionated BAL cells were used to expedite processing and enhance viability. It also allowed the airway cell population milieu to remain intact, providing a more physiologic assay of cell signaling and cell contact interactions, resultant of the allergic treatment regime. The cells were immediately centrifuged (10°C, 450 x g), washed, isolated, and placed in a 96-well polystyrene culture plate with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 10% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. Media containing added nitrate, such as RPMI-1640, was avoided to enhance the probability that measured nitrite production was solely a result of cellular activity [18 ]. Cell culture plating density was 300,000–500,000 cells/well, in a total volume of 250 µL/well. The plate was then placed in a humidified incubator (10% CO2 at 37°C) for 24 h. The conditioned media was collected after 24 h, snap-frozen (-80°C), and later assayed or assayed immediately after collection. In the first set of experiments (n=8 mice/group, WT and IL-10-/-, respectively), conditioned media from unstimulated cells and cells treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1000 ng/ml) and interferon gamma (IFN-{gamma}, 100 U/ml) was collected. In the second set of experiments (n=8 mice/group, WT and IL-10-/-, respectively), stimulated and spontaneous production of nitrite was measured after selective iNOS inhibition by L-N5-(1-iminoethyl)-ornithine (L-NIO; 80 µM; Sigma Chemical Co.) [19 ]. All samples were assayed in duplicate, and the mean of the duplicates was taken as the value for that sample. A small aliquot of the original BAL sample was used to determine the differential cell counts using Diff-Quik staining (Scientific Products, McGaw Park, IL), and another aliquot was used for cell viability, using the Trypan blue exclusion method. Typically, 200–300 cells were counted per slide to make these assessments. Cell numbers were expressed per body weight of mouse to normalize for size differences among mice.

Nitrite measurement
Nitrite production by cultured airway cells was measured as an index of iNOS activity, using a standard Griess assay [20 ]. The resultant colorimetric reaction was assessed using a plate reader that converted optical density values to concentrations of nitrite. A standard curve was produced for known nitrite concentrations from 0.5–20 µM, which was linear for concentrations >=2 µM and for which the lower limit of reliable detection fell between 1 and 2 µM. Therefore, sample values <2 µM were considered to be beneath the limit of detectability of the assay. Final nitrite values were adjusted to reflect nitrite production per 1 million cells. Nitrite content of cell-free culture medium with serum added was always far below the level of detectability (typically 0–0.5 µM), suggesting that measurable nitrite production above the level of detectability was a result of cellular activity as a function of the treatment group [18 ].

iNOS mRNA quantification
The quantification of iNOS mRNA was performed by Northern gel analysis on RNA extracted from the lungs. Whole lungs were removed immediately after BAL, placed in Ultraspec (Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, TX), homogenized, and frozen at -80°C for later RNA extraction. mRNA was extracted with chloroform, followed by phosphate-buffered saline and isopropanol precipitation. The subsequent pellet was washed twice with 70% ethanol/diethyl pyrocarbonate water. The pellet was reconstituted in DEPC water, and the concentration of mRNA was measured spectrophotometrically. A 10 µL aliquot of the mRNA sample was loaded into a formaldehyde/agarose gel with an ethidium bromide buffer. Separation of mRNA was achieved by application of a current of 125V for 2.5 h. The gel was washed with water to remove the formaldehyde and ethidium bromide, and the mRNA was transferred with overnight incubation to a nylon membrane (GeneScreen, NEN Lifescience, Boston, MA). The mRNA was cross-linked to the membrane, hybridized for 2–4 h, and probed with an iNOS-specific radioactive (32P) probe (cDNA iNOS probe, Alexis, San Diego, CA) during a 24-h incubation. The membrane was washed, blotted dry, and placed on a phosphor-image development cassette for 24 h. Subsequent quantification of bound radiation label was provided by computerized phosphor-image analysis (Storm 2000, ImageQuest, Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA), with resultant densitometry values adjusted for 18S loading and expressed as fractional increases with reference to control.

iNOS protein determination
Presence of iNOS protein within cultured BAL cells was determined after cold, 70% ethanol-fixation onto glass slides and subsequent staining using a primary rabbit anti-iNOS antibody coupled to a flourescent goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Junction City, OR). Cells were observed at 40x magnification under flourescent microscopy (Olympus BX51) with a standard fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) crystal using a 488 nm excitation wavelength. Images of the cells were obtained using software (Optronics Magnafire, Spectra Services, Webster, NY) running on an IBM-PC-compatible pentium computer.

Statistics
Spontaneous and stimulated cell values of nitrite were compared within WT or IL-10-/- groups by using a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test (SigmaStat, Jandel Corp., San Rafael, CA) with values of P < 0.05 considered significant. Nonparametric rank-sum tests were used to make all other comparisons across groups and treatments with values of P < 0.05 considered significant. Mean values for all other groups that were beneath the limit of nitrite assay detectability were graphically represented as "N.D." or had means shown if a value for one or more of the individual samples exceeded the detectability limit and remained within three standard deviations of the mean of their respective groups.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
BAL differential cell counts and viability
Cells recovered from BAL typically were found to be over 95% viable (Table 1 ). Greater than 90% of the cells recovered from U/U (naive) and S/U WT and IL-10-/- mice were alveolar macrophages, and eosinophils comprised <1% of the recovered cells. The total number of cells recovered and a shift toward eosinophilia were observed in both groups of S/C mice, indicating that a significant airway-inflammatory response occurred in association with the S/C stimulus. Although elevated in both S/C groups, this increase was not different between the WT and IL-10-/- mice. However, the number of airway macrophages, lymphocytes, and neutrophils was significantly elevated in the S/C IL-10-/- mice compared with the S/C WT mice, suggesting an enhanced influx of these cells in the absence of IL-10.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. BAL Cell Counts and Differentials of Cells Assessed for Nitrite Production

 
Nitrite production
Spontaneous production of nitrite by airway-immune cells from naive (U/U), sensitized only (S/U), and sensitized + challenged (S/C) WT and IL-10-/- mice typically was below levels of assay detectability (Fig. 1 ). Simulated cells from naive IL-10-/- mice displayed some capacity toward nitrite production, however it was not statistically different from the spontaneous case. With sensitization only, nitrite production of cells from the stimulated S/U WT mice was not increased over those of the naive WT mice, however stimulated cells from S/U IL-10-/- mice produced more nitrite (6.1 µM, P<0.05) than naive counterparts. This increase was numerically greater than that of stimulated cells from WT mice (0.3 µM) but was not statistically significant (P=0.066). This was likely because the S/U group was comprised of only four subjects per treatment, which may have influenced the power of the within-treatment/across-group comparison. However, nitrite production of stimulated cells from WT (7.6 µM) and IL-10-/- (15.3 µM) mice of the S/C group was significantly elevated compared with both respective spontaneous production levels and stimulated nitrite production of their S/U counterparts. Most importantly, nitrite production by the stimulated airway cells of the S/C IL-10-/- group was doubled, compared with that of the stimulated S/C WT group (P<0.05).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Nitrite levels produced by airway immune cells from naive (U/U), sensitized-only (S/U), and sensitized + airway-challenged (S/C) WT (wild-type) and IL-10 knockout (-/-) mice. N.D. = not detected; {wedge}, P < 0.05 IL-10-/- S/U compared with IL-10-/- naive; +, P < 0.05 compared with respective S/C spontaneous (spont) group; {dagger}, P < 0.05 stimulated (stim) WT S/C compared with respective stimulated S/U group; {ddagger}, P < 0.05 stimulated IL-10-/- S/C compared with respective stimulated S/U and naive groups; *, P < 0.05 stimulated S/C IL-10-/- compared with stimulated S/C WT; nitrite levels are expressed as values per 1 million cells.

 
Spontaneous and stimulated nitrite production of naive mouse airway-immune cells, incubated with iNOS inhibitor L-NIO, remained below levels of detectability similar to the uninhibited case. Likewise, spontaneous and stimulated nitrite production by cells from WT and IL-10-/--sensitized + challenged mice was reduced below levels of detectability when incubated with L-NIO (Fig. 1) in contrast to the elevation in nitrite observed without iNOS inhibition.

iNOS mRNA
iNOS mRNA was elevated in the lungs of the S/C IL-10-/- mice compared with those of the U/U IL-10-/- mice (Fig. 2 ). Lane-loading of these samples was nearly identical, as indicated by the 18S densitometry values; therefore, the darkness density provides a good visual quantitation of the increase in mRNA in these samples. Actual quantitation indicated that iNOS mRNA (25S) was up-regulated by 76% in the sensitized and challenged IL-10-/- mouse lungs.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. iNOS mRNA levels in naive (U/U) and sensitized and challenged (S/C) IL-10-/- mouse lungs. Band densitometry values indicate 18S mRNA loading. Graph at bottom shows relative increase in iNOS mRNA, as determined by fluorescence imaging densitometry.

 
iNOS protein
Figure 3 shows a comparison of cultured, stimulated BAL cells from WT and IL-10-/- mice from U/U and S/C groups. Visible iNOS identification was observed in BAL cells from the WT U/U mice. However, as shown by the green fluorescence intensity, iNOS protein was found to be greatest in the S/C IL-10-/- mouse BAL cells. Cells from the S/C WT and U/U IL-10-/- mice were minimally fluorescent, indicating minimal iNOS protein within those cells.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. iNOS protein in cultured, stimulated BAL cells from (A) naive wild-type, (B) naive IL-10-/-, (C) sensitized + airway-challenged WT, and (D) sensitized + airway-challenged IL-10-/-. Faint to dark blue color indicates cell nuclei as a result of secondary antibody stain; green is iNOS protein as a result of anti-iNOS antibody stain. Original magnification = 40x.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The main findings of this study were that systemic sensitization and airway challenge produced increased numbers of macrophages in the BAL fluid of IL-10-/- mice; following sensitization and challenge, stimulated iNOS activity, as assessed by nitrite production, was significantly increased in cells from IL-10-/- mice compared with WT mice; these elevated nitrite levels were associated with increased iNOS mRNA and iNOS protein in sensitized and challenged IL-10-/- mouse lungs and BAL cells; and this increased nitrite production could be eliminated by a potent inhibitor of iNOS activity, L-NIO. These results were obtained with an airway allergen provocation that increased total airway-immune cells and airway eosinophils, signifying allergic airway inflammation in WT and IL-10-/- mice.

BAL differential cell-count shifts
The BAL differential cell counts displayed several important properties in these experiments. One property was that eosinophil numbers remained negligible with systemic allergen sensitization alone (S/U) in WT and IL-10-/- mice (Table 1) . This stability suggested that the systemic sensitization alone did not potentiate airway inflammation. However, with airway challenge after sensitization, the eosinophil numbers rose significantly in both groups. In conjunction with the eosinophil numeric stability shown in the naive and S/U groups, this finding indicates that the airway-inflammatory response was a result of the addition of airway-allergen challenge in the setting of prior systemic allergen sensitization. It should be noted that these eosinophil numbers were not statistically different between the WT and IL-10-/- BAL cells that were assessed for nitrite production in the present study. This suggests that the eosinophilic recruitment mechanism produced with airway inflammation is similar in mice congenic in the C57BL6 background.

Another important property of the BAL differential cell counts was that macrophage numbers remained similar across all treatments of the WT mice (~3x104 cells/g mouse) and were not different than that of the naive or S/U IL-10-/- mice. This suggests that significant numbers of macrophages were not recruited to the airway with the airway challenge and subsequent inflammation in the WT mice. However, with S/C treatment, the number of macrophages in the IL-10-/- mice was nearly doubled (~6x104 cells/g mouse), suggesting that macrophage recruitment is an important part of experimental allergen-induced airway inflammation in the absence of IL-10. Thus, this finding is relevant because increased macrophage influx is a feature of human airway inflammation in response to allergen challenge [21 ]. The presence or addition of IL-10 protein and the transfer of the IL-10 gene to the airway have been shown to inhibit recruitment of airway-immune cells in murine models of airway inflammation [6 , 22 ]. Conversely, airway-immune cell recruitment has been shown to be enhanced in IL-10-/- mice and in asthmatic humans in which IL-10 production is suppressed in the setting of allergic airway inflammation [3 , 21 ]. Our findings are similar to the latter and are consistent with the idea that a lack of IL-10 results in increased infiltration of airway macrophages as a result of airway inflammation.

iNOS induction
We observed that production of nitrite by airway cells was significantly increased by sensitization and challenge in WT and IL-10-/- mice, suggesting that such treatments induce expression of iNOS. Further, enhanced production of nitrite in IL-10-/- mice was more than double that seen in the WT control mice, which suggests that endogenous IL-10 may down-regulate expression of iNOS, as postulated by Warner and colleagues [23 ]. The L-NIO experiments indicate that increased nitrite production was related to increased iNOS activity. These findings were further supported by the fact that increased iNOS mRNA and protein were observed in tissue and cells from the S/C IL-10-/- mice.

It is likely that the source of nitrite production in the cell cultures from S/C mice was the alveolar macrophages present in the airway-immune cell isolate. This idea is supported by the fact that macrophages are known to produce significant amounts of nitrite when stimulated by IFN-{gamma} and LPS [15 , 23 ]. In all cases in the present study, macrophages constituted the majority of the cells obtained from the airways (up to 97%), even when significant numbers of eosinophils were recruited as part of the inflammatory process. The fact that macrophage numbers were only increased in the S/C IL-10-/- mice is further suggestive that they were a likely source of elevated nitrite production in this group. Consideration of the fact that the nitrite levels were adjusted for cell numbers across all samples and groups, this finding of macrophage doubling and nitrite-output doubling is suggestive that the response to inflammation in our model may be dependent on macrophage-activation state in addition to macrophage-recruitment numbers in the absence of IL-10. This possibility is consistent with evidence that alveolar macrophages from asthmatics are activated in response to allergen [24 ], potentially supporting their role in allergic airway inflammation and the production of NO.

Our findings of increased nitrite production by ex vivo BAL cells are consistent with the idea that allergic inflammation can potentiate cytokine-stimulated NO production in these cells. This may have relevance in the case of asthma, in which NO is considered to be a marker of airway inflammation [14 ], production of pro-inflammatory cytokines is associated with the allergic inflammatory response [4 ], and IL-10 production by recruited airway-immune cells is significantly diminished or absent [8 , 9 ]. A potential dilemma concerning inflammation-driven NO production in the airway stems from its potential to be a bronchodilator. However, we speculate that it is possible that NO may be serving as a cellular signal within the scheme of the inflammatory pathways, as opposed to a generic airway smooth-muscle relaxant under these circumstances. This notion would be consistent with its presence in allergic asthma [4 ], wherein increased bronchoconstriction is known to occur.

Critique of methods: BAL macrophages
Because of the limit of our experimental design, in which we assayed production by all BAL cells collected, we do not know for certain which cell types produced the elevations in nitrite and exacerbations of inflammation that we observed. However, one strength of our design was that the BAL isolate was likely representative of the milieu of cells present in the airway under each experimental condition. We have focused on the macrophage as the likely source cell for iNOS up-regulation in the absence of IL-10 in our knockout model. However, there are other studies that indicate some controversy. For instance, NO production was shown to be increased as a function of IL-10 dose in murine bone marrow-derived macrophage cell cultures [25 ], and IL-10 has been shown to only weakly inhibit release of reactive nitrogen intermediates from murine peritoneal macrophages [26 ]. In general, the consistency of our results with prior studies of iNOS up-regulation in alveolar macrophages [15 , 23 ] suggests that the effect of IL-10, or its lack, is in part dependent on the source and treatment of the macrophage cells. In addition, there has been a historical divergence as to whether the classic up-regulation of iNOS and NO production in mouse macrophages provides an adequate model of mechanisms in human macrophages typically thought to be refractory to this up-regulation [27 ]. However, more recent studies using improved and more sensitive techniques have indicated that up-regulation of iNOS and NO production does occur in human macrophages, particularly in certain disease states [16 ]. That airway NO levels are increased in asthma, wherein IL-10 capacity of airway-immune cells is markedly compromised [8 , 9 ]. Similar to that seen in the present study, macrophages aggressively infiltrate the segmentally antigen-challenged human airway [21 ]. These two facts suggest that the IL-10-/- mouse model is likely relevant to understanding mechanisms in airway inflammation.

Critique of methods: iNOS up-regulation
We measured nitrite levels as an indicator of NO production and as an index of NOS induction and activity within the airway-immune cells isolated by BAL. The relationship between nitrite production and NOS content within mouse macrophages has been shown to be reasonably consistent [15 ]. Those findings, together with the elimination of nitrite production by L-NIO, enhance our confidence that the significantly elevated nitrite levels in the S/C IL-10-/- cells were a result of enhanced induction of NOS in the absence of IL-10. This supports the idea that the process of inflammation was modulated differently in the IL-10-/- mice, being exacerbated without the anti-inflammatory influence of IL-10 present. However, another interpretation that cannot be ruled out is that of enhanced sensitivity of the cells from the S/C mice to IFN-{gamma} and LPS stimulation as a result of airway inflammation in the absence of IL-10. Further elucidation of the specifics of this mechanism awaits subsequent study.

Summary
In summary, we show that in a murine model of allergic sensitization and challenge, IL-10 appears to be an important regulatory factor for NO production and presumably expression of iNOS [15 ]. The increased accumulation of macrophages in the IL-10-/- mouse airway suggests that alveolar macrophages may be an important source of this up-regulation of iNOS and NO production and further confirms the critical role played by macrophages in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation. This set of observations is consistent with the concept that IL-10 has multiple regulatory mechanisms in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation and that further elucidation of these mechanisms may be of benefit in understanding the regulation of airway inflammation in asthma.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported by a grant from the American Respiratory Alliance of Western Pennsylvania. The authors thank Buxco Electronics for its generous donation of instrumentation and the consultation of Mr. Morton Lomask and Ms. Nadine Mills in the preliminary studies leading to this work.

Received December 18, 2000; revised June 11, 2001; accepted June 27, 2001.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Berkman, N., John, M., Roesems, G., Jose, P. J., Barnes, P. J., Chung, K. F. (1995) Inhibition of macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha expression by IL-10. Differential sensitivities in human blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages J. Immunol. 155,4412-4418[Abstract]
  2. Driscoll, K. E., Carter, J. M., Howard, B. W., Hassenbein, D., Burdick, M., Kunkel, S. L., Strieter, R. M. (1998) Interleukin-10 regulated quartz-induced pulmonary inflammation in rats Am. J. Physiol. 275,L887-L894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Grünig, G., Corry, D. B., Leach, M. W., Seymour, B. W. P., Kurup, V. P., Rennick, D. M. (1997) Interleukin-10 is a natural suppressor of cytokine production and inflammation in a murine model of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis J. Exp. Med. 185,1089-1099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wandiworanun, C., Strober, W. (1993) Predominant role of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in human monocyte IL-10 synthesis J. Immunol. 151,6853-6861[Abstract]
  5. de Waal Malefyt, R., Abrams, J., Bennett, B., Figdor, C. G., de Vries, J. E. (1991) Interleukin-10 (IL-10) inhibits synthesis by human monocytes: an autoregulatory role of IL-10 produced by monocytes J. Exp. Med. 174,1209-1220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zuany-Amorim, C., Hail;aee, S., Leduc, D., Dumarey, C., Huerre, M., Vargaftig, B. B., Pretolani, M. (1995) Interleukin-10 inhibits antigen-induced cellular recruitment into the airways of sensitized mice J. Clin. Investig. 95,2644-2651
  7. Takanashi, S., Nonaka, R., Xing, Z., O’Byrne, P., Dolovich, J., Jordana, M. (1994) Interleukin 10 inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced survival and cytokine production by human peripheral blood eosinophils J. Exp. Med. 180,711-715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Borish, L., Aarons, A., Rumbyrt, J., Cvietusa, P., Negri, J., Wenzel, S. (1996) Interleukin-10 regulation in normal subjects and patients with asthma J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 97,1288-1296[Medline]
  9. Calhoun, W. J., Hinton, K. L., Brick, J. J., Sharma, A. J., Rosen, W. (1996) Spontaneous and stimulated IL-10 release by alveolar macrophages (AM) but not blood monocytes (BM) is reduced in allergic asthmatics (AA) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 153,A881(abstract)
  10. Kuhn, R., Lohler, J., Roanoke, D., Rajewsky, K., Muller, W. (1993) Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis Cell 75,263-274[Medline]
  11. Roanoke, D., Davidson, N., Berg, D. (1995) Interleukin-10 gene knock-out mice: a model of chronic inflammation Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 76,S174-S178[Medline]
  12. Hamid, Q., Springall, D. R., Riveros-Moreno, V., Chanez, P., Howarth, P., Redington, A., Bousquet, J., Godard, P., Holgate, S., Polak, J. M. (1993) Induction of nitric oxide synthase in asthma Lancet 342,1510-1513[Medline]
  13. Kallio, E. A., Koskinen, P. K., Aavik, E., Vaali, K., Lemstöm, K. B. (1997) Role of nitric oxide in experimental obliterative bronchiolitis (chronic rejection) in the rat J. Clin. Investig. 100,2984-2994[Medline]
  14. Jatakanon, A., Lim, S., Kharitonov, A., Chung, K. F., Barnes, P. J. (1998) Correlation between exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophils and methacholine responsiveness in patients with mild asthma Thorax 53,91-95[Abstract]
  15. Cuhna, F. Q., Moncada, S., Liew, F. Y. (1992) Interleukin-10 (IL-10) inhibits the induction of nitric oxide synthase by interferon-{gamma} in murine macrophages Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 182,1155-1159[Medline]
  16. Tomaki, M., Zhao, L., Lundahl, J., Sjöstroand, M., Jordana, M., Linden, A., O’Byrne, P., Lötvall, J. (2000) Eosinophilopoiesis in a murine model of allergic airway eosinophilia: involvement of bone marrow IL-5 and IL-5 receptor {alpha}1 J. Immunol. 165,4040-4050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Liu, S. F., Haddad, E. B., Adcock, I., Salmin, M., Koto, H., Gilbey, T., Barnes, P. J., Chung, K. F. (1997) Inducible nitric oxide synthase after sensitization and allergen challenge of Brown Norway rat lung Br. J. Pharmacol. 121,1241-1246[Medline]
  18. Weinberg, J. B. (1998) Nitric oxide production and nitric oxide synthase type 2 expression by human mononuclear phagocytes: a review Mol. Med. 4,557-591[Medline]
  19. McCall, T. B., Feelisch, M., Palmer, R. M. J., Moncada, S. (1991) Identification of N-iminoethyl-L-ornithine as an irreversible inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase Br. J. Pharmacol. 102,234-238[Medline]
  20. Zamora, R., Matthys, K. E., Herman, A. G. (1997) The protective role of thiols against nitric oxide-mediated cytotoxicity in murine macrophage J774 cells Eur. J. Pharmacol. 321,87-96[Medline]
  21. Calhoun, W. J., Reed, H. E., Moest, D. R., Stevens, C. A. (1992) Enhanced superoxide production by alveolar macrophages and airspace cells, airway inflammation, and alveolar macrophage density changes follow segmental antigen bronchoprovocation in allergic subjects Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145,317-325[Medline]
  22. Stämpfli, M. R., Cwiartka, M., Gajewska, B. U., Alvarez, D., Ritz, S. A., Inman, M. D., Xing, Z., Jordana, M. (1999) Interleukin-10 gene transfer to the airway regulates allergic mucosal sensitization in mice Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 21,586-596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Warner, R. L., Paine, L. R., III, Christensen, P. J., Marletta, M. A., Richards, M. K., Wilcoxen, S. E., Ward, P.A. (1995) Lung sources and cytokine requirements for in vivo expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 12,649-661[Abstract]
  24. Calhoun, W. J., Bush, R. K. (1990) Enhanced reactive oxygen species metabolism of airspace cells and airway inflammation following antigen challenge in human asthma J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 86,306-313[Medline]
  25. Corradin, S. B., Fasel, N., Buchmüller-Rouiller, Y., Ransijn, A., Smith, J., Mauël, J. (1993) Induction of macrophage nitric oxide production by interferon-{gamma} and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} is enhanced by interleukin-10 Eur. J. Immunol. 23,2045-2048[Medline]
  26. Bogdan, C., Vodovotz, Y., Nathan, C. (1991) Macrophage deactivation by interleukin 10 J. Exp. Med. 174,1549-1555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Albina, J. E. (1995) On the expression of nitric oxide synthase by human macrophages—why no NO J. Leukoc. Biol. 58,643-649[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
H.-P. Yu, Y.-C. Hsieh, T. Suzuki, T. Shimizu, M. A. Choudhry, M. G. Schwacha, and I. H. Chaudry
Salutary effects of estrogen receptor-beta agonist on lung injury after trauma-hemorrhage
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): L1004 - L1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. T. Ameredes, R. Zamora, J. M. Sethi, H.-L. Liu, L. K. Kohut, A. L. Gligonic, A. M. K. Choi, and W. J. Calhoun
Alterations in Nitric Oxide and Cytokine Production with Airway Inflammation in the Absence of IL-10
J. Immunol., July 15, 2005; 175(2): 1206 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
B. T. Ameredes, J. M. Sethi, H.-L. Liu, A. M. K. Choi, and W. J. Calhoun
Enhanced nitric oxide production associated with airway hyporesponsiveness in the absence of IL-10
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): L868 - L873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. A. Walford, R.-L. Moussignac, A. W. Scribner, J. Loscalzo, and J. A. Leopold
Hypoxia Potentiates Nitric Oxide-mediated Apoptosis in Endothelial Cells via Peroxynitrite-induced Activation of Mitochondria-dependent and -independent Pathways
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4425 - 4432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
B. T. Ameredes, L. E. Otterbein, L. K. Kohut, A. L. Gligonic, W. J. Calhoun, and A. M. K. Choi
Low-dose carbon monoxide reduces airway hyperresponsiveness in mice
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): L1270 - L1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Ramachandran, D. R. Moellering, E. Ceaser, S. Shiva, J. Xu, and V. Darley-Usmar
Inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis results in increased endothelial cell susceptibility to nitric oxide-induced apoptosis
PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 6643 - 6648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ameredes, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ameredes, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, W. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS