Journal of Leukocyte Biology Myeloid cells, immune suppression, tumor immunology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prosper, F.
Right arrow Articles by Verfaillie, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prosper, F.
Right arrow Articles by Verfaillie, C. M.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2001;69:307-316.)
© 2001 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Regulation of hematopoiesis through adhesion receptors

Felipe Prosper* and Catherine M. Verfaillie{dagger}

* Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, University of Valencia, Spain; and
{dagger} Stem Institute, and Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Correspondence: Catherine M. Verfaillie, M.D., Professor of Medicine, Box 806 UMHC, 420 Delaware St., SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: verfa001{at}tc.umn.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS...
 REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND...
 CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Normal steady-state hematopoiesis takes place in the bone marrow microenvironment. Soluble factors as well as contact interactions between the hematopoietic cells and the marrow microenvironment dictate the fate of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors. Over the last decade it has become clear that cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions through adhesion receptors play a major role in the hematopoietic process. They are required for the residence of stem cells and progenitors in the marrow, as well as for homing of stem and progenitor cells to the marrow in the setting of stem cell transplantation. Furthermore, adhesion receptors play an important role in regulation of cell behavior, either through direct activation of signal pathways important for cell survival, cell growth, and cell fate decision-making processes, or by modulating responses to growth factors. Insights in the abnormalities seen in these interactions in diseases of the hematopoietic system will help to develop better therapeutic strategies based on the pathogenesis of these diseases.

Key Words: bone marrow • stem cells


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS...
 REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND...
 CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Hematopoiesis is a complex process in which hematopoietic stem cells self replicate and differentiate to generate all the different mature blood cells. Under steady-state conditions, stem cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells reside in the bone marrow (BM) medullary cavity in contact with the bone marrow microenvironment [1 ]. Most, if not all, the factors required for the orderly development of stem cells are present in the BM microenvironment [2 ]. These include mesenchymal cells as well as other hematopoietic cells that secrete hematopoietic cytokines and extracellular matrix components. More than 40 different growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines interact with stem and progenitor cells through specific receptors and regulate proliferation, differentiation, and cell fate [3 ]. Hematopoietic growth factors are produced by mesenchymal cells and hematopoietic cells and are present in cell-bound forms, bound to the extracellular matrix (ECM) or in solution [4 5 6 7 ]. Stem and progenitor cells express adhesion receptors that provide specific cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions [8 9 10 11 ]. Aside from retaining stem and progenitor cells in the BM, engagement of adhesion receptors on stem and progenitor cells by BM stromal ligands also plays an important role in the regulation of the hematopoietic process [12 13 14 15 ] (Fig. 1 ). Adhesive interactions serve as growth or survival signals but also may modulate growth factor-dependent signals [16 ]. In addition, cytokines and growth factors affect adhesive interactions between stem and progenitor cells and their adhesive ligands in the BM, providing a further level of regulation of hematopoiesis [17 ]. A number of studies have demonstrated that diseases of the hematopoietic system are characterized by abnormal adhesive interactions that result in abnormal regulation of growth, differentiation, or survival [18 , 19 ].



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Role of adhesion receptors in hematopoiesis. Adhesion molecules expressed by HSC participate in regulation of homing and retention of hematopoietic progenitors within the BM and regulation of growth and survival through interactions with their ligands.

 
More than 20 different adhesion receptors have been identified on stem and progenitor cells [20 21 22 23 24 ]. Based on domain structure and function, adhesion molecules can be divided into integrins, cadherins, selectins, members from the mucin-like family, and members of the immunoglobulin family of receptors [10 ]. ß1- and ß2-integrins are responsible for interactions between cells and extracellular matrix components, such as fibronectin, collagen, laminin, and thrombospondin, or cell surface-expressed adhesion molecules, including vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) [20 , 21 , 24 25 26 27 ]. Progenitors also express the sialomucins CD34, CD43, CD45-RA, P-selectin ligand-1 (PSGL-1), CD164, and podocalyxin-like protein-1 (PCLP-1) [28 ]. Although there is evidence that sialomucins play a role in hematopoiesis, the ligands for these receptors are not all known [15 ]. CD34+ cells express cell adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin family, including platelet-endothelial-(PE)CAM-1 [29 ], and express L-selectin [30 ]. The CD44 receptor, which supports adhesion to hyaluronate, is expressed on virtually all cells of hematopoietic origin [31 ] and participates in the adhesion of hematopoietic cells with the extracellular matrix in cooperation with the ß1 integrins [32 ] (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Normal CD34+ Cells

 

    ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS IN TRAFFICKING OF HEMATOPOIETIC CELLS IN THE BONE MARROW
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS...
 REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND...
 CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although stem cell transplantation has successfully been done for more than 30 years we do not know how stem cells infused intravenously home to the marrow microenvironment. It is believed that adhesion molecules contribute to retention of stem and progenitor cells in the BM and are essential for homing of stem and progenitor cells to the BM. Except perhaps for lectins [33 ], no adhesion receptor has been identified that is exclusively present on stem cells. Likewise, no adhesive ligand, except perhaps for hemonectin [34 ], has been identified that is exclusively present in the BM microenvironment. Extravasation of mature leukocytes has been extensively studied. This requires tethering of neutrophils to endothelial-expressed addressins via selectins, firm integrin-mediated attachment, and subsequent integrin-mediated migration through the endothelium and the extracellular space, a series of events that are enhanced significantly by chemotactic agents [35 36 37 38 39 40 ]. It is thought that similar mechanisms guide entry of stem cells in the marrow space and that one of the chemotactic agents that attracts stem cells to the BM space is the marrow-specific chemokine stromal cell derived factor-1{alpha} (SDF-1{alpha}) [41 42 43 ]. Even less well understood is the finding that a number of adhesion receptors thought to be instrumental in homing of stem and progenitor cells to the BM are also thought to be responsible for mobilization of stem and progenitor cells in the blood. Which receptors or what signals provide specificity to the direction of either entering or leaving the BM space is not known (Fig. 2 ).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Role of adhesion receptors implicated in homing and mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors. HSC/HPC express a number of adhesion receptors on their surface that allow them to interact with a large number of adhesive ligands. In the setting of transplantation, it is thought that hematopoietic cells tether to ligands on endothelial cells via selectins and fucans. This then results in the activation of integrins, which allow firm adhesion and transmigration through the endothelium. The chemokine SDF-1{alpha} that binds to the CXCR4 receptor has been implicated in providing specificity of this activation process. Adhesion to fibronectin and possibly VCAM-1 through ß1-integrins participate in more permanent anchoring of hematopoietic cells to the BM niche. The mobilization process requires de-adhesion of progenitors from the BM. ß1, ß2, and c-kit are implicated in mobilization of hematopoietic cells through an unknown mechanism.

 
Integrins
In vivo experiments have shown a dominant role for ß1-integrins in the retention of stem and progenitor cells in the BM and for trafficking of stem and progenitor cells between the blood and BM in the adult [23 , 24 , 42 , 44 , 45 ] (Fig. 2) . Absence of stem and progenitor cells in the fetal liver of ß1-integrin-/- mice indicates that ß1-integrins are important for trafficking of stem cells between the different hematopoietic organs during development [46 ]. This was confirmed further by a recent study showing that ß1-integrin-/- stem cells fail to engraft but are sequestered in the circulation [47 ]. A number of studies have shown that the interaction between ß1-integrins and their ligands (VCAM-1 and fibronectin) participates in the mobilization of progenitor cells into the blood [11 , 23 , 48 , 49 ]. Ligands for ß1-integrins are also expressed in a number of tissues outside of the BM. Therefore, other ligand-receptor pairs must provide the specificity of BM-stem and progenitor cell interactions.

Some studies have implicated interactions between ß2-integrins and their ligands, ICAM-1 and ICAM-2, in mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors [50 , 51 ]. However, unlike mature neutrophils evidence for a role of LFA-1 or other ß2-integrins in HSC homing is lacking. Patients with leukocyte adhesion deficiency, due to mutations in ß2-integrin, do not have obvious defects in the hematopoietic stem cell pool, and mobilization of stem and progenitor cells in the blood can be achieved [52 ].

Selectins
Selectins are a family of glycoproteins that mediate leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions. Known ligands for the selectins include sulfated oligosaccharides, especially those rich in fucose residues, as well as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Stem and progenitor cells express L-selectin (Fig. 2) . The bone marrow endothelial ligand for L-selectin is unknown, although MECA79-positive ligands [53 ], such as CD34 and PCLP-1, have been found on high endothelial venules. Moreover, a MECA79-negative but sialic acid-dependent ligand for L-selectin on CD34+ has been recently identified [54 ]. A recent study showed that the ligand on CD34+ cells may represent that hematopoietic cell L-selectin ligand is a specialized glycoform of CD44, which requires sialofucosylated N-linked glycans and is sulfation-independent [55 ]. The role of L-selectin on CD34+ cells is not known. Selectin-deficient mice have varying degrees of leukocytosis, and P- and E-selectin-deficient mice have an increased propensity of infections, due to decreased rolling of neutrophils over endothelium [56 ]. However, there is no good evidence that L-selectin-/- mice have obvious defects in the hematopoietic stem cell compartment [57 ]. Sulfated fucans, branched and linear, mobilize stem and progenitor cells [58 ]. However, mobilization of stem and progenitor cells was similar in L-selectin-deficient mice (and P-/-E-/- or L-/-P-/-E-/- mice) and wild-type controls, suggesting that fucan-dependent mobilization is not caused by blocking selectin-mediated binding/migration via sulfated fucans. A clinical study has suggested a role for L-selectin in homing and engraftment, as the level of L-selectin expression on CD34+ cells predicted faster recovery of platelet counts after transplantation [59 ].

E-selectin and P-selectin are expressed on endothelial cells, and may serve as ligands for stem and progenitor migration. As is true for L-selectin-/- mice, E-selectin-/- and P-selectin-/- animals do not display an obvious hematopoietic progenitor defect [56 , 60 , 61 ]. However, a recent study has suggested a possible role for E- and P-selectin expressed in the BM microenvironment in stem cell homing [62 ] (Fig. 2) . Homing and engraftment of stem cells in lethally irradiated P- and E-selectin-deficient mice were significantly reduced, and were further compromised when a function-blocking anti-VCAM-1 antibody was added. This suggests not only that selectins play a role in homing but also that there may be cooperation between different adhesion receptors in progenitor trafficking, as has been shown for neutrophil migration into tissue [39 , 40 ]. Again, as E- and P-selectin are expressed in multiple tissues, it remains unclear what co-receptors are responsible for the specificity of stem and progenitor cell-BM interactions.

Sialomucins
Sialomucins represent an emerging family of glycoproteins expressed by stem and progenitor cells that may play a role in the interactions between stem and progenitor cells and BM [15 ]. The CD34 antigen was the first sialomucin to be described on progenitors, and is also expressed on the majority of stem cells [63 64 65 66 ]. Some studies have provided evidence that CD34 may play a role in progenitor adhesion. However, the exact role of CD34 in stem and progenitor cell interaction with the BM is still unclear [65 ]. The subpopulation of murine and human stem cells that does not express CD34 antigens on the cell surface, is capable of engrafting [66 , 67 ]. This suggests that CD34 may not be required for homing and engraftment of stem and progenitor cells to the BM.

CD43 is a transmembrane sialomucin expressed on the majority of progenitor cells, including myeloid and lymphoid-committed and primitive progenitors [68 , 69 ]. Its role in adhesion of progenitor cells to stroma is unknown. CD162, or the P-selectin glycoprotein ligand (PSGL-1), is the sole receptor for P-selectin on immature progenitors and contributes significantly to adhesion of HPC to endothelial cells, suggesting a potential role in the initial steps of homing [70 ].

Finally, CD164 is expressed both on CD34+ progenitor cells and on BM stromal cells [71 ]. Three different epitopes of CD164 have been described, with class-I and -II being expressed on hematopoietic cells at different stages of differentiation [72 ]. For instance, lymphocytes express class-I epitopes, whereas endothelium in high-endothelium venules are class II-positive, suggesting reciprocal homing functions in this tissue [73 , 74 ]. Such ontogeny-dependent, differentiation-dependent, and tissue-specific expression pattern of the different isoforms of this receptor may provide a certain degree of specificity in homing of HPC, although in vivo studies will be needed to clarify this [71 72 73 74 ].

Chemokines
Approximately 10% of stem cells home to the BM microenvironment [75 ]. The other 90% of cells are likely retained in other vascular beds. As pointed out above, few if any of the adhesion receptors and their ligands are expressed exclusively on progenitor and stem cells or in the BM microenvironment. One would therefore expect even lower levels of homing/engraftment in the BM.

Chemokines are 70- to 100-amino acid-long polypeptides, containing four cysteine residues [76 ]. The family has diverged into two groups: the C-X-C or {alpha} chemokines in which the first two of the four cysteine residues are separated by an additional amino acid and the C-C or ß chemokines in which the first two cysteine residues are adjacent to each other. Originally, they were considered as inducible mediators of inflammation, but in recent years, several chemokines have been identified that are expressed constitutively and function in the physiological traffic and homing of leukocytes as well as stem and progenitor cells [77 ]. The chemokine, SDF-1, and its receptor, CXCR-4 [78 ], have been implicated in the homing and mobilization of human CD34+ cells (Fig. 2) . The chemokine SDF-1{alpha}, which binds to the CXCR4 receptor, increases cell migration: SDF-1{alpha}-/- or CXCR4-/- mice have hematopoiesis in the fetal liver, but stem cells are unable to migrate to the BM. Therefore it is believed that SDF-1{alpha} is the major chemoattractant for stem and progenitor cells in the BM [79 , 80 ]. This can be measured in vitro, where migration of normal progenitor cells through endothelium or fibronectin-coated transwells is significantly enhanced when SDF-1{alpha} is present in the compartment opposite to the cell compartment [41 , 43 , 81 ]. Furthermore, there is now solid evidence that SDF-1{alpha} is responsible for homing of stem and progenitor cells to the BM microenvironment when human CD34+ cells are transplanted into NOD-SCID mice [42 ]. SDF-1{alpha} affects the function of a number of adhesion receptors, including ß1- and ß2-integrins allowing stem and progenitor cells to roll over and eventually adhere to the endothelium expressing SDF-1{alpha} and extravasate into the BM space [36 , 42 , 81 ].


    REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND SURVIVAL OF PROGENITORS BY ADHESION RECEPTORS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS...
 REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND...
 CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Besides their role in trafficking and location, adhesion receptors transmit signals from the extracellular milieu into the cell. Signaling via integrins has been most extensively studied in biological systems other than the hematopoietic system [25 , 26 , 82 , 83 ]. Because integrins, like all adhesion receptors, do not have intrinsic kinase activity, activation of signal pathways requires recruitment of non-receptor kinases [84 85 86 ]. Integrins activate the focal adhesion kinase [85 ] or the related kinase, Pyk-2 [87 , 88 ], which serve to bind and activate a number of Src-homology domain (SH)2 and SH3 containing adaptor proteins [89 90 91 92 ], and activate the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway and the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [93 , 94 ], both of which mediate growth and survival regulatory signals (Fig. 3 ). Less is known about signaling that occurs via other receptors, including CD44, selectins, and sialomucins.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Signaling through integrins. Integrins are non-tyrosine kinase receptors that transmit signals into the cell by recruiting non-receptor kinases. Integrins activate the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) or the related kinase, Pyk-2, forming focal adhesion contacts that serve to bind and activate a number of Src-homology domain (SH)2 and SH3 containing adaptor proteins and activate the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway as well as small GDP/GTPases such as Rho or Rac. Activation of signal transduction pathways regulate adhesion and migration, proliferation (cell cycle), and survival (apoptosis). Other signals produced by cytokines and chemokines regulate via outside-in mechanism the affinity and avidity of integrins, thus providing a further level of control.

 
Direct evidence for a role of adhesive interactions between hematopoietic progenitors and ECM components has been provided by studies showing that proliferation of committed progenitors as well as long-term culture-initiating cells [12 , 14 , 95 ] is inhibited when CD34+ cells are cultured in contact with stroma. When direct contact between progenitors and stromal cells is prevented, increased proliferation of hematopoietic progenitors is observed [95 ]. The mechanism(s) involved in adhesion-mediated proliferation inhibition are not completely understood. A number of studies showed that integrins, selectins, and mucins may all participate in contact-mediated effects on progenitor proliferation, differentiation, and survival.

Integrins
Adhesion of progenitor cells to BM extracellular components through ß1-integrins inhibits cell proliferation [13 , 96 ] by inhibiting G1/S progression, when tested in the presence of serum and low concentrations of cytokines, conditions that may mimic the physiological BM environment. ß1-dependent adhesion of CD34+ cells is associated with up-regulation of the cell cycle inhibitor p27Kip, decreased expression of cyclin E, and decreased cyclin E-cdk2 activity [16 , 97 ]. Growth inhibition seen in the hematopoietic system differs from what has been observed in most other biological systems, as adhesion is a requirement for cell cycle progression for most adherent cell types [98 ]. ß1-mediated cell cycle inhibition and increased p27Kip expression is antagonized by addition of higher (nanogram rather than picogram) concentrations of cytokines, which may be required in vivo to accelerate hematopoiesis when there is an increased need for mature blood elements [16 , 17 ] (Fig. 4 ). Furthermore, addition of cytokines and other growth factors present in sera affects progenitor adhesion [17 , 99 ]. Thus, both outside-in (growth inhibition) and inside-out signaling (cytokine-mediated changes in adhesion) occurs via ß1-integrins. Therefore, the behavior of stem and progenitor cells in a complex microenvironment is influenced by the combined effects of cytokine and adhesion receptor-mediated interactions. All studies described here were done using in vitro assays for primitive and more committed progenitors. Whether integrin stimulation also affects hematopoietic stem cell proliferation is not yet known and will require enumeration of transplantable cells cultured with or without integrin stimulation.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Cell cycle regulation in hematopoietic progenitors by integrins. In normal hematopoietic progenitors engagement of ß1-integrins induces a cell cycle blockade at G1/S phase, which is associated with increased expression of p27Kip, and down-regulation of cyclin E/cdk2 activity. Which signal transduction pathway is implicated in adhesion-mediated cell cycle control is unknown but may involve protein kinase C, PI3K/AKT, or MAPK.

 
Yet other studies have shown that engagement of integrins on stem and progenitor cells participates in the prevention of apoptosis of CD34+ cells [100 ]. This observation may explain the improved engraftment of stem and progenitor cells after transduction with retroviral vectors in contact with stroma or fibronectin compared with transduction without stroma or fibronectin [101 , 102 ].

Which signal transduction pathways are implicated in ß1-dependent regulation of cell cycle progression, and survival in hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells still needs to be determined.

Sialomucins
Cell adhesion through members of the sialomucin family of receptors can also regulate progenitor proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. Engagement of CD164 on CD34+ cells prevents recruitment of quiescent progenitor cells into cycle when stimulated with a cocktail of cytokines and induces apoptosis of a fraction of CD34+CD38- cells [71 ]. Engagement of P-selectin via antibodies or with immobilized or soluble ligand for PSGL-1 has marked growth-inhibitory effect of HPC, implicating P-selectin in regulation of HPC cell cycle [70 ]. Likewise, engagement of CD43 inhibits CD34+ cell growth and induces death of committed but not primitive progenitors [68 , 103 ]. What effects these receptors have on hematopoietic stem cell proliferation is not yet known and will require transplantation of stem cells cultured with or without mucin-receptor simulation in vivo.

Another example of mucin-mediated signaling in progenitors is prevention of terminal differentiation of myeloid cells seen after enforced expression of CD34 [104 ]. Consistent with this finding, CD34-/- mice showed a significantly decreased number of progenitors in the yolk sack or fetal livers, possibly related to premature terminal differentiation [105 ].

Like integrins, mucin cytoplasmic tails lack tyrosine kinase activity, so interactions through other signaling and adaptor proteins are required [15 , 106 ]. The nature of downstream signaling from mucins in progenitors is still unclear, even though there is recent evidence that mucins interact with the cytoskeleton through the actin-binding proteins ezrin and moesin and that stimulation of mucin receptors induces activation of protein tyrosine kinases, the phospholipase C/phosphoinositides, and G proteins signaling pathways [69 ].


    CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL EXPRESSION AND FUNCTION OF ADHESION RECEPTORS TO HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS...
 REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND...
 CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
There is a significant body of evidence that abnormal expression or function of cell adhesion molecules contributes to the aberrant behavior observed in a number of hematological diseases. For instance, the type of adhesion receptors expressed on leukemic cells often differs from that on non-leukemic cells at the same stage of differentiation [18 , 107 108 109 110 111 ]. It has been postulated that this may allow leukemic cells to exit the marrow prematurely and to migrate in and be supported by non-hematopoietic microenvironments [18 , 107 ].

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)
We and others have shown that although ß1-integrins are present on CML CD34+ cells, integrin function is defective [18 , 19 , 99 , 112 ]. CML CD34+ cells adhere significantly less well to stromal feeders and to fibronectin [18 , 107 ] than their normal counterparts. In contrast to normal progenitors, engagement of {alpha}4ß1 and {alpha}5ß1 integrins on CML CD34+ cells does not affect the growth of CML progenitors. ß1-integrin engagement in CML CD34+ cells does not affect p27Kip expression and function [16 ], likely due to the fact that p27Kip is located in the cytoplasmic compartment of the cell instead of in the nucleus where it is unable to inhibit the cell cycle. Of note, treatment of CML CD34+ cells with agents known to induce hematological and sometimes cytogenetic remissions is associated with normalization of ß1-integrin function [113 ]. For instance, treatment of CML CD34+ cells with interferon-{alpha} in vitro, improves the adhesive [19 ] and signaling [114 ] function of {alpha}4ß1 and {alpha}5ß1 integrins. Likewise, treatment of CML CD34+ cells with BCR/ABL specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors [115 ], which also results in hematological responses in most patients and in some patients in cytogenetic responses [116 , 117 ], restores ß1-integrin-dependent adhesion and adhesion-mediated growth regulation. In normal hematopoiesis, adhesion to the bone marrow microenvironment is required to prevent stem cell and progenitor apoptosis. As the p210BCR/ABL inhibits apoptosis [118 , 119 ], CML progenitors, but not normal progenitors may be capable of surviving in the absence of contact with the microenvironment. This has led to the thesis that defective adhesion through {alpha}4ß1 and {alpha}5ß1 integrins in CML is in part responsible for the abnormal premature circulation of CML CD34+ cells in the blood [120 , 121 ]. Lack of integrin-mediated regulation of CML progenitor growth and increased ability of CML CD34+ cells to survive in the absence of interactions with the BM microenvironment may contribute to the massive expansion of the malignant stem and progenitor cell population in CML. Finally, there is also evidence that abnormal expression of chemokine receptors as well as abnormal responses to chemokine stimulation may contribute to aberrant circulation and growth of the leukemic cells in CML [122 ].

As sialomucins are a second set of adhesion receptors known to affect cell growth and cell survival [64 , 66 , 67 , 99 ], it is possible that defects in signaling from this class of receptors may also be involved in the abnormal proliferation of CML progenitors. Preliminary studies by Levesque and Simmons suggest that normal growth inhibition seen after engagement of PSGL-1 may not occur in CML [Levesque and Simmons, personal communication].

A number of other adhesion receptors, including CD44 [31 , 123 , 124 ] and L-selectin [125 ] have also been implicated in abnormal trafficking and growth of CML leukemic blasts. However, it is much less well understood how differences in expression or function of these receptors contribute to the abnormal hematopoietic process in CML than what is currently known for integrins.

B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL)
Adhesive defects have also been described in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia [126 , 127 ]. Normal B cell development occurs in the BM microenvironment. ß1-integrins play an important role in regulating growth and survival of immature B cell precursors. In a recent study, expression and function of ß1- and ß2-integrins was studied in 20 patients with B-lineage acute ALL [126 ]. Even though {alpha}4ß1 and {alpha}Lß2 were uniformly expressed in CD10+ ALL blast, adhesion was severely impaired in 85% of the patients. Furthermore, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate was not able to activate LFA-1- or VLA4-mediated adhesion in 10 and 7 patients, respectively. Thus, as has been seen in CML, the mutations underlying development of B cell ALL may obviate the need for integrin-mediated interactions required for normal growth and survival of B cell precursors. Indeed, a number of studies have shown a role for integrin-mediated interactions in abnormal regulation of proliferation and apoptosis in ALL [127 ]. For instance, the B-ALL-derived cell line, BLIN-2, can be cultured on VCAM-1-negative fibroblast, suggesting that {alpha}4ß1/VCAM interactions are not required for BLIN-2 growth or survival.

Other studies have shown that interactions between {alpha}4ß1 and its ligand, VCAM, may play a role in chemotherapy resistance [128 ]. B-ALL cells undergo cell cycle arrest in G1 phase of the cell cycle and eventually go into apoptosis when incubated with cytarabine or etoposide. However, contact with stroma prevented both cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of B-ALL cells [128 ]. Interaction with fibronectin did not enhance survival of ALL cells during chemotherapy exposure. However, interaction with the other ligand of the {alpha}4ß1 integrin, VCAM, provided maximal protection from cytarabine and etoposide-induced cell death. Although the molecular mechanisms of this effect are unknown, these observations suggest a role for the BM microenvironment in modulating the response of B-lineage ALL cells to chemotherapy.

B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
B-CLL-leukemic cells express ß1- and ß2-integrins, including {alpha}3, {alpha}4, and {alpha}5. They also express LFA-1 (receptor for ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and ICAM-3), L-selectin, and CD44 [129 130 131 ], even though expression varies significantly between patients [132 ]. Differences have been associated with the clinical behavior of the disease [132 ]. B-CLL associated with the 11q deletion is characterized by extensive lymphadenopathy, rapid disease progression, and short progression-free survival. In comparison with B-CLL leukemic cells from patients that do not have the 11q deletion, expression of the ß2 integrins CD11a/CD18, CD11c/CD18, CD31, CD48, or LFA-3 was significantly reduced in patients with B-CLL with the 11q deletion and low-level expression of the {alpha}4 integrin was correlated with a decreased overall survival.

B-CLL cells are characterized in vivo by their prolonged survival and resistance to apoptosis. In vitro, however, B-CLL cells undergo rapid apoptosis. Recently it has been demonstrated that adhesion to BM stroma prevents apoptosis in B-CLL but does not rescue normal B cells from undergoing apoptosis in in vitro cultures [133 ]. Apoptosis is prevented at least in part through interactions between the {alpha}4ß1 integrin and fibronectin and is associated with an elevated Bcl2/Bax ratio [134 ]. Adhesive interactions between ß1 integrins and fibronectin may also contribute to chemotherapy resistance in B-CLL [Garcia-Pardo, personal communication]. Whether B-CLL cells from patients with the 11q deletion, that express less {alpha}4 integrins required for B cell-stromal interactions [132 ], have the capacity to survive in the absence of interactions with the BM microenvironment is not known.

Multiple myeloma
The last disease, again B cell in origin, for which there is ample evidence for a role of BM stroma in the development and progression of diseases as well as development of drug resistance, is multiple myeloma. Excellent reviews have been recently published [135 , 136 ] and these will be briefly summarized here. Differences in expression of adhesion molecules between normal plasma cells, multiple myeloma cells, and plasma cell leukemia have been used for diagnostic purposes. For instance, acquisition of CD56, CD58, and the receptor for hyaluronan-mediated motility (RHAMM), as well as loss of CD11a is associated with malignant transformation [137 ]. As is true for other hematopoietic malignancies, there is evidence that adhesion receptor-mediated interactions contribute to the pathogenesis of myeloma. The {alpha}4ß1 integrin supports plasma cell adhesion to VCAM-1 and fibronectin, providing anchoring for plasma cells to the BM [138 , 139 ]. The interaction between {alpha}4ß1 and VCAM-1 enhances the production of osteoclast-stimulating [140 ] and protects plasma cells from drug induced apoptosis [138 , 139 ]. Prevention of drug-induced apoptosis by integrin engagement is associated with p27Kip up-regulation [138 ]. Interactions via CD40 on plasma cells and CD40-L expressed in the BM results in the production of interleukin-6 [141 ], which is required for the survival and growth of the plasma cells. Thus, as is the case in other malignancies, adhesion receptor-mediated interactions are not only important for the localization of plasma cells in the BM microenvironment, but also affect growth and survival of plasma cells.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS...
 REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND...
 CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
In summary, cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions through adhesion receptors plays a major role in the hematopoietic process. Not only are adhesive interactions responsible for the residence of the primitive hematopoietic cell pool in the marrow, but they are also responsible for "homing" of stem and progenitor cells to the marrow in the setting of stem cell transplantation. Because no bone marrow-specific ligands have been identified and no hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell-specific receptors are known, the specificity of interactions between progenitors and marrow elements must be mediated by yet to be identified receptor ligand pairs. Alternatively, the specificity may be imparted by additional signals from for instance cytokines or chemokines, such as SDF-1{alpha} that are expressed specifically in the marrow and influence activation status of adhesion receptors in the marrow microenvironment. Aside from anchoring cells in a given microenvironment, adhesion receptors also play an important role in regulation of cell behavior, either through direct activation of signal pathways important for cell survival, cell growth, and cell fate decision-making processes, or by modulating responses to growth factors. Future studies characterizing the signals arising from cell adhesion receptors on hematopoietic progenitors will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms that govern the tightly regulated process of normal hematopoietic cell proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, insights into the abnormalities seen in diseases of the hematopoietic system will help to develop better therapeutic strategies based on the pathogenesis of the disease.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported in part through grants from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL-49930 and RO1-DK-53673) and the Bone Marrow Transplant Research Fund to C. M. V. and a grant from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS 98/0863) to F. P. C. M. V. is a scholar of the Leukemia Society of America.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ROLE OF ADHESION RECEPTORS...
 REGULATION OF PROLIFERATION AND...
 CONTRIBUTION OF ABNORMAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Schofield, R. (1983) The stem cell system Biomed. Pharmacother. 37,375-380[Medline]
  2. Lemischka, I. R. (1997) Microenvironmental regulation of hematopoietic stem cells Stem Cells. 15(1),63-68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Watowich, S. S., Wu, H., Socolovsky, M., et al (1996) Cytokine receptor signal transduction and the control of hematopoietic cell development Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12,91-128[Medline]
  4. Long, M., Briddell, R., Walter, A., et al (1992) Human hematopoietic stem cell adherence to cytokines and matrix molecules J. Clin. Invest. 90,251-262
  5. Roberts, R., Gallagher, J., Spooncer, E., et al (1988) Heparan sulphate bound growth factors: a mechanism for stromal cell mediated haemopoiesis Nature 332,376-379[Medline]
  6. Gordon, M., Riley, G., Watt, S., et al (1987) Compartmentalization of a haematopoietic growth factor (GM-CSF) by glycosaminoglycans in the bone marrow microenvironment Nature 326,403-406[Medline]
  7. Gupta, P., Oegema, T., Verfaillie, C. (2000) Differences in the LTC-IC maintaining capacity of stromal cells correlates with patterns of sulfation of their heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans Blood In press
  8. Simmons, P., Levesque, J., Zannettino, A. (1997) Adhesion molecules in haemopoiesis Baillieres Clin. Haematol. 10,485-492[Medline]
  9. Yoder, M., Williams, D. (1995) Matrix molecule interactions with hematopoietic stem cells Exp. Hematol. 23,961-967[Medline]
  10. Verfaillie, C., Hurley, R., Bhatia, R., et al (1994) Role of bone marrow matrix in normal and abnormal hematopoiesis Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 16,201-216[Medline]
  11. Papayannopoulou, T., Craddock, C. (1997) Homing and trafficking of hemopoietic progenitor cells Acta Haematol 97,97-109[Medline]
  12. Eaves, C., Cashman, J., Kay, R., et al (1991) Mechanisms that regulate the cell cycle status of very primitive hematopoietic cells in long-term human marrow cultures. II. Analysis of positive and negative regulators produced by stromal cells within the adherent layer Blood 78,110-117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hurley, R. W., McCarthy, J. B., Verfaillie, C. (1995) Direct adhesion to bone marrow stroma via fibronectin receptors inhibits hematopoietic progenitor proliferation J. Clin. Invest. 96,511-512
  14. Verfaillie, C., Catanzarro, P. (1996) Direct contact with stroma inhibits proliferation of long-term culture initiating cells Leukemia 10,498-506[Medline]
  15. Simmons, P., Zannettino, A., Levesque, J., et al (1998) Mucin-like molecules as regulators of hematopoiesis Exp. Hematol. 26,69a
  16. Jiang, Y., Prosper, F., Verfaillie, C. M. (2000) Opposing effects of engagement of integrins and stimulation of cytokine receptors on cell cycle progression of normal human hematopoietic progenitors Blood 95,846-854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Levesque, J. P., Leavesley, D. I., Niutta, S., et al (1995) Cytokines increase human hemopoietic cell adhesiveness by activation of very late antigen (VLA)-4 and VLA-5 integrins J. Exp. Med. 181,1805-1814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Verfaillie, C. M., McCarthy, J. B., McGlave, P. B. (1992) Mechanisms underlying abnormal trafficking of malignant progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia: decreased adhesion to stroma and fibronectin but increased adhesion to the basement membrane components laminin and collagen type IV J. Clin. Invest. 90,1232-1241
  19. Bhatia, R., Wayner, E. A., McGlave, P. B., et al (1994) Interferon-alpha restores normal adhesion of chronic myelogenous leukemia hematopoietic progenitors to bone marrow stroma by correcting impaired beta 1 integrin receptor function [see comments] J. Clin. Invest. 94,384-391
  20. Simmons, P., Masinovsky, B., Longenecker, B., et al (1992) Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expressed by bone marrow stromal cells mediates the binding of hematopoietic progenitor cells Blood 80,388-397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Verfaillie, C., McCarthy, J., McGlave, P. (1991) Differentiation of primitive human multipotent hematopoietic progenitors into single lineage clonogenic progenitors is accompanied by alterations in their interaction with FN J. Exp. Med. 174,693-703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Papayannopoulou, T., Nakamato, B. (1993) Systemic treatment of primates with anti-VLA4 leads to an immediate egress of hemopoietic progenitors to periphery Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90,9374-9380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Papayannopoulou, T., Priestley, G., Scott, L., et al (1991) Role of VCAM-1 in mobilization and in homing of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Distinct Features Blood 92,505a
  24. Williams, D., Rios, M., Stephens, C., et al (1991) Fibronectin and VLA-4 in haematopoietic stem cell-microenvironment interactions Nature 352,438-441[Medline]
  25. Aota, S., Yamada, K. (1997) Integrin functions and signal transduction Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 400B,669-682
  26. Giancotti, F. (1997) Integrin signaling: specificity and control of cell survival and cell cycle progression Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9,691-700[Medline]
  27. Teixido, J., Hemler, M. E., Greenberger, J. S., et al (1992) Role of beta 1 and beta 2 integrins in the adhesion of human CD34hi stem cells to bone marrow stroma J. Clin. Invest. 90,358-367
  28. Sassetti, C., Tangemann, K., Singer, M. S., et al (1998) Identification of podocalyxin-like protein as a high endothelial venule ligand for L-selectin: parallels to CD34 J. Exp. Med. 187,1965-1975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Watt, S., Gschmeissner, S., Bates, P (1995) PECAM-1: its expression and function as a cell adhesion molecule on hemopoietic and endothelial cells Leuk. Lymph. 17,229-241[Medline]
  30. Mohle, R., Murea, S., Kirsch, M., et al (1995) Differential expression of L-selectin VLA-4 and LFA-1 on CD34+ progenitor cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood during G-CSF-enhanced recovery Exp. Hematol. 23,1535-1542[Medline]
  31. Ghaffari, S., Dougherty, G., Lansdorp, P., et al (1995) Differentiation associated changes in CD44 isoform expression during normal hematopoiesis and their alteration in chronic myeloid leukemia Blood 86,2976-2985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Verfaillie, C. M., Benis, A., Iida, J., et al (1994) Adhesion of committed human hematopoietic progenitors to synthetic peptides from the C-terminal heparin-binding domain of fibronectin: cooperation between the integrin alpha 4 beta 1 and the CD44 adhesion receptor Blood 84,1802-1811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hardy, C. (1995) The homing of hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow Am. J. Med. Sci. 309,260[Medline]
  34. Campbell, A. D., Long, M. W., Wicha, M. S. (1987) Haemonectin, a bone marrow adhesion protein specific for cells of granulocyte lineage Nature 329,744-746[Medline]
  35. Mazo, I., Gutierrez-Ramos, J., Frenette, P., et al (1998) Hematopoietic progenitor cell rolling in bone marrow microvessels: parallel contributions by endothelial selectins and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 J. Exp. Med. 188,465-473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Weber, C., Alon, R., Moser, B., et al (1996) Sequential regulation of alpha 4 beta 1 and alpha 5 beta 1 integrin avidity by CC chemokines in monocytes: implications for transendothelial chemotaxis J. Cell Biol. 134,1063-1073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Varki, A. (1997) Selectin ligands: will the real ones please stand up? J. Clin. Invest. 100,S31-S40
  38. Porter, J., Hogg, N. (1997) Integrin cross talk: activation of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 on human T cells alters alpha4beta1- and alpha5beta1-mediated function J. Cell Biol. 138,1437-1448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Rossiter, H., Alon, R., Kuppers, T. (1997) Selectins T-cell rolling and inflammation Mol. Med. Today 3,214-220[Medline]
  40. Tedder, T., Steeber, D., Chen, A., et al (1995) The selectins: vascular adhesion molecules FASEB J 9,866-871[Abstract]
  41. Mohle, R., Bautz, F., Rafii, S., et al (1998) The chemokine receptor CXCR-4 is expressed on CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors and leukemic cells and mediates transendothelial migration induced by stromal cell-derived factor-1 Blood 91,4523-4531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Peled, A., Petit, I., Kollet, O., et al (1999) Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4 Science 283,845-848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Jo, D. Y., Rafii, S., Hamada, T., et al (2000) Chemotaxis of primitive hematopoietic cells in response to stromal cell-derived factor-1 J. Clin. Invest. 105,101-111[Medline]
  44. van der Loo, J., Xiao, X., McMillin, D., et al (1998) VLA-5 is expressed by mouse and human long-term repopulating hematopoietic cells and mediates adhesion to extracellular matrix protein fibronectin J. Clin. Invest. 102,1051-1061[Medline]
  45. Papayannopoulou, T., Craddock, C., et al (1995) The VLA4/VCAM adhesion pathway defines contrasting mechanisms of lodging of transplanted murine hematopoietic progenitors between bone marrow and spleen Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92,9647-9652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Hirsch, E., Iglesias, A., Potocnik, A. J., et al (1996) Impaired migration but not differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells in the absence of beta1 integrins Nature 380,171-175[Medline]
  47. Potocnik, A. J., Brakebusch, C., Fassler, R. (2000) Fetal and adult hematopoietic stem cells require beta1 integrin function for colonizing fetal liver, spleen, and bone marrow Immunity 12,653-663[Medline]
  48. Papayannopoulou, T. (2000) Mechanisms of stem-/progenitor-cell mobilization: the anti-VLA-4 paradigm Semin. Hematol. 37(2),11-18[Medline]
  49. Papayannopoulou, T., Priestley, G. V., Nakamoto, B. (1998) Anti-VLA4/VCAM-1-induced mobilization requires cooperative signaling through the kit/mkit ligand pathway Blood 91,2231-2239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Pruijt, J., van Kooyk, Y., Figdor, C., et al (1998) Anti-LFA-1 blocking antibodies prevent mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells induced by interleukin-8 Blood 91,4099-4108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Fibbe, W. E., Pruijt, J. F., van Kooyk, Y., et al (2000) The role of metalloproteinases and adhesion molecules in interleukin-8-induced stem-cell mobilization Semin. Hematol. 37,19-24[Medline]
  52. Anderson, D., Springer, T. (1987) Leukocyte adhesion deficiency: an inherited defect in the Mac-1 LFA-1 and p15095 glycoproteins Annu. Rev. Med. 38,175-187[Medline]
  53. Sackstein, R., Fu, L., Allen, K. (1997) A hematopoietic cell L-selectin ligand exhibits sulfate-independent binding activity Blood 89,2773-2782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Sackstein, R., Dimitroff, C. J. (2000) A hematopoietic cell L-selectin ligand that is distinct from PSGL-1 and displays N-glycan-dependent binding activity Blood 96,2765-2774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Dimitroff, C. J., Lee, J. Y., Fuhlbrigge, R. C., et al (2000) A distinct glycoform of CD44 is an L-selectin ligand on human hematopoietic cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,13841-13846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Robinson, S. D., Frenette, P. S., Rayburn, H., et al (1999) Multiple, targeted deficiencies in selectins reveal a predominant role for P-selectin in leukocyte recruitment Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96,11452-11457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Jung, U., Ramos, C., Bullard, D., et al (1998) Gene-targeted mice reveal importance of L-selectin-dependent rolling for neutrophil adhesion Am. J. Physiol. 274,H1785-H1791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Sweeney, E. A., Priestely, G. V., Nakamoto, B., et al (2000) Mobilization of stem/progenitor cells by sulfated polysaccharides does not require selectin presence Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,6544-6549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Dercksen, M., Gerritsen, W., Rodenhuis, S., et al (1995) Expression of adhesion molecules on CD34+ cells: CD34+ L-selectin+ cells predict a rapid platelet recovery after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Blood 85,3313-3322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Wagner, D. (1995) P-selectin knockout: a mouse model for various human diseases Ciba Found. Symp. 189,2-14[Medline]
  61. Labow, M., Norton, C., Rumberger, J., et al (1994) Characterization of E-selectin-deficient mice: demonstration of overlapping function of the endothelial selectins Immunity 1,709-716[Medline]
  62. Frenette, P., Wagner, D. (1997) Insights into selectin function from knock-out mice Thromb. Haemost. 78,60-69[Medline]
  63. Young, P., Baumhueter, S., Lasky, L. (1995) The sialomucin CD34 is expressed on hematopoietic cells and blood vessels during murine development Blood 85,96-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Bhatia, M., Bonnet, D., Dick, J. E. (1997) Identification of a novel CD34 negative population of primitive human hematopoietic cells capabale of repopulating NOD/SCID mice Blood 90,1134a
  65. Healy, L., May, G., Gale, K., et al (1995) The stem cell antigen CD34 functions as a regulator of hemopoietic cell adhesion Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92,12240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Bhatia, M., Bonnet, D., Murdoch, B., et al (1998) A newly discovered class of human hematopoietic cells with SCID-repopulating activity Nat. Med. 4,1038-1045[Medline]
  67. Verfaillie, C. M., Almeida-Porada, G., Wissink, S., et al (2000) Kinetics of engraftment of CD34(-) and CD34(+) cells from mobilized blood differs from that of CD34(-) and CD34(+) cells from bone marrow Exp. Hematol. 28,1071-1079[Medline]
  68. Bazil, V., Brandt, J., Chen, S., et al (1996) A monoclonal antibody recognizing CD43 (leukosialin) initiates apoptosis of human hematopoietic progenitor cells but not stem cells Blood 87,1272-1281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Serrador, J., Nieto, M., Alonso-Lebrero, J., et al (1998) CD43 interacts with moesin and ezrin and regulates its redistribution to the uropods of T lymphocytes at the cell-cell contacts Blood 91,4632-4641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Levesque, J. P., Zannettino, A. C., Pudney, M. (1999) PSGL-1-mediated adhesion of human hematopoietic progenitors to P-selectin results in suppression of hematopoiesis I. Immunity 11,369-378
  71. Zannettino, A., Buhring, H., Niutta, S., et al (1998) The sialomucin CD164 (MGC-24v) is an adhesive glycoprotein expressed by human hematopoietic progenitors and bone marrow stromal cells that serves as a potent negative regulator of hematopoiesis Blood 92,2613-2622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Watt, S., Buhring, H., Rappold, I., et al (1998) CD164 a novel sialomucin on CD34(+) and erythroid subsets is located on human chromosome 6q21 Blood 92,849-866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Doyonnas, R., Yi-Hsin Chan, J., Butler, L. H., et al (2000) CD164 monoclonal antibodies that block hemopoietic progenitor cell adhesion and proliferation interact with the first mucin domain of the CD164 receptor J. Immunol. 165,840-851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Watt, S. M., Butler, L. H., Tavian, M., et al (2000) Functionally defined CD164 epitopes are expressed on CD34(+) cells throughout ontogeny but display distinct distribution patterns in adult hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic tissues Blood 95,3113-3124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. van Hennik, P. B., de Koning, A. E., Ploemacher, R. E. (1999) Seeding efficiency of primitive human hematopoietic cells in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency mice: implications for stem cell frequency assessment Blood 94,3055-3061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Ahuja, S. K., Gao, J. L., Murphy, P. M. (1994) Chemokine receptors and molecular mimicry Immunol. Today 15,281-287[Medline]
  77. Campbell, J. J., Butcher, E. C. (2000) Chemokines in tissue-specific and microenvironment-specific lymphocyte homing Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12,336-341[Medline]
  78. Ganju, R. K., Brubaker, S. A., Meyer, J., et al (1998) The a-chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1a, binds to the transmembrane G-protein-coupled CXCR-4 receptor and activates multiple signal transduction pathways J. Biol. Chem. 273,23169-23175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Nagasawa, T., Hirota, S., Tachibana, K., et al (1996) Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1 Nature 382,635[Medline]
  80. Ma, Q., Jones, D., Borghesani, P., et al (1998) Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95,9448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Naiyer, A. J., Jo, D. Y., Ahn, J., et al (1999) Stromal derived factor-1-induced chemokinesis of cord blood CD34(+) cells (long-term culture-initiating cells) through endothelial cells is mediated by E-selectin Blood 94,4011-4019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Howe, A., Aplin, A., Alahari, S., et al (1998) Integrin signaling and cell growth control Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10,220-231[Medline]
  83. Yamada, K. (1997) Integrin signaling Matrix Biol 16,137-141[Medline]
  84. Hannigan, G., Dedhar, S. (1997) Protein kinase mediators of integrin signal transduction J. Mol. Med. 75,35-44[Medline]
  85. Guan, J. (1997) Focal adhesion kinase in integrin signaling Matrix Biol 16,195-200[Medline]
  86. LaFlamme, S., Homan, S., Bodeau, A., et al (1997) Integrin cytoplasmic domains as connectors to the cell’s signal transduction apparatus Matrix Biol 16,153-161[Medline]
  87. Zeng, C., Xing, Z., Bian, Z. C., et al (1998) Differential regulation of Pyk2 and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) J. Biol. Chem. 273,2384-2389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Sieg, D. J., LLic, D., Jones, K. C., et al (1998) Pyk2 and Src-family protein-tyrosine kinases compensate for the loss of FAK in fibronectin-stimulated signaling events but Pyk2 does not fully function to enhance FAK- cell migration Eur. Mol. Biol. Org. J. 17,5933-5947[Medline]
  89. Vuori, K., Hirai, H., Aizawa, S., et al (1996) Induction of p130cas signaling complex formation upon integrin-mediated cell adhesion: a role for Src family kinases Mol. Cell Biol. 16,2606-2613[Abstract]
  90. Hildebrand, J., Schaller, M., Parsons, J. (1995) Paxillin a tyrosine phosphorylated focal adhesion-associated protein binds to the carboxyl terminal domain of focal adhesion kinase Mol. Biol. Cell 6,637-647[Abstract]
  91. Chen, H., Appeddu, P., Parsons, J., et al (1995) Interaction of focal adhesion kinase with cytoskeletal protein talin J. Biol. Chem. 270,16695-16701
  92. Sattler, M., Salgia, R., Shrikhande, G., et al (1997) Differential signaling after ß1 integrin ligation is mediated through binding of CRKL to p120CBL and p110HEF1 J. Biol. Chem. 272,14320-14326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  93. Morino, N., Mimura, T., Hamasaki, K., et al (1995) Matrix/integrin interaction activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase p44erk-1 and p42erk-2 J. Biol. Chem. 270,269-274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  94. Shimizu, Y., Hunt, S. I. (1996) Regulating integrin-mediated adhesion: one more function for PI 3-kinase? Immunol. Today 17,565-573[Medline]
  95. Verfaillie, C. (1992) Direct contact between progenitors and stroma is not required for human in vitro hematopoiesis Blood 79,2821-2826[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Hurley, R., McCarthy, J., Verfaillie, C. (1997) Monoclonal antibody crosslinking of the alpha 4 or beta 1 integrin inhibits committed clonogenic hematopoietic progenitor proliferation Exp. Hematol. 25,321-328[Medline]
  97. Jiang, Y., Zhao, R. C. H., Verfaillie, C. M. (2000) Inactivation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p27, is responsible for overriding the integrin-mediated inhibition of CML CD34+ cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,10538-10543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  98. Juliano, R. (1996) Cooperation between soluble factors and integrin-mediated cell anchorage in the control of cell growth and differentiation Bioessays 18,911-917[Medline]
  99. Bazzoni, G., Carlesso, N., Griffin, J., et al (1996) Bcr/Abl expression stimulates integrin function in hematopoietic cell lines J. Clin. Invest. 98,52-62
  100. Wang, M. W., Consoli, U., Lane, C. M. (1998) Rescue from apoptosis in early (CD34-selected) versus late (non-CD34-selected) human hematopoietic cells by very late antigen 4- and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) 1-dependent adhesion to bone marrow stromal cells Cell Growth Diff 9,102-112
  101. Moritz, T., Dutt, P., Xiao, X., et al (1996) Fibronectin improves transduction of reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by retroviral vectors: evidence of direct viral binding to chymotryptic carboxy-terminal fragments Blood 88,855-862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  102. Dao, M. A., Hashino, K., Kato, I., et al (1998) Adhesion to fibronectin maintains regenerative capacity during ex vivo culture and transduction of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells Blood 92,4612-4621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  103. Bazil, V., Brandt, J., Tsukamoto, A., et al (1995) Apoptosis of human hematopoietic progenitor cells induced by crosslinking of surface CD43 the major sialoglycoprotein of leukocytes Blood 86,502-512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  104. Fackler, M. J., Krause, D. M., Smith, O. M., et al (1995) Full-length but not truncated CD34 inhibits hematopoietic cell differentiation of M1 cells Blood 85,3040-3047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  105. Cheng, J., Baumhueter, S., Cacalano, G. (1996) Hematopoietic defects in mice lacking the sialomucin CD34 Blood 87,479-488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  106. Devine, P., McKenzie, I. (1992) Mucins: structure function and associations with malignancy Bioessays 14,619-624[Medline]
  107. Gordon, M., Dowding, C., Riley, G., et al (1987) Altered adhesive interactions with marrow stroma of haematopoietic progenitor cells in chronic myeloid leukaemia Nature 328,342-345[Medline]
  108. Paietta, E. (1996) Adhesion molecules in acute myeloid leukemia Leukoc. Res. 20,795-798
  109. Bendall, L., Kortlepel, K., Gottlieb, D. (1993) Human acute myeloid leukemia cells bind to bone marrow stroma via a combination of beta-1 and beta-2 integrin mechanisms Blood 82,3125-3133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  110. Manabe, A., Murti, K., Coustan-Smith, E., et al (1994) Adhesion-dependent survival of normal and leukemic human B lymphoblasts on bone marrow stromal cells Blood 83,758-766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  111. Lemoine, F., Dedhar, S., Lima, G., et al (1990) Transformation-associated alterations in interactions between pre-B cells and fibronectin Blood 76,2311-2320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  112. Lundell, B. I., McCarthy, J. B., Kovach, N. L., et al (1996) Activation-dependent alpha5beta1 integrin-mediated adhesion to fibronectin decreases proliferation of chronic myelogenous leukemia progenitors and K562 cells Blood 87,2450-2458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Kantarjian, H., Giles, F., O’Brien, S., et al (1998) Clinical course and therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia with interferon-alpha and chemotherapy Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 12,31-43[Medline]
  114. Bhatia, R., McCarthy, J. B., Verfaillie, C. M. (1996) Interferon-alpha restores normal beta 1 integrin-mediated inhibition of hematopoietic progenitor proliferation by the marrow microenvironment in chronic myelogenous leukemia Blood 87,3883-3891[Abstract/Free Full&nb