|
|
||||||||
Department of Biology, Microbiology and Immunology Section, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Correspondence: Dr. Klaus D. Elgert, Department of Biology, Microbiology and Immunology Section, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0406. E-mail: kdelgert{at}vt.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
), and nitric oxide (NO).
However, tumors dysregulate Mø through soluble suppressor molecules,
and it is possible that tumors evade paclitaxel-mediated immune
effector function through the production of immunomodulatory molecules
and inhibition of Mø function in situ. Because Mø
activation in the tumor microenvironment is a desirable goal of
anti-tumor immunotherapy, we evaluated whether tumor-derived
immunomodulatory factors dysregulate paclitaxel-mediated Mø
activation. Tumor cell-derived supernatant suppressed paclitaxels
capacity to induce IL-12, TNF-
, and NO production by RAW264.7 Mø.
Tumor factors also dysregulated paclitaxel-induced expression of a
HIV-LTR, promoter-driven luciferase construct in RAW264.7 Mø,
suggesting that tumors may inhibit a broad range of Mø functionality.
Depletion studies revealed that IL-10 and transforming growth
factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1), but not prostaglandin
E2 (PGE2), impaired paclitaxel-mediated
activation, suggesting that abrogation of these factors in
situ might restore paclitaxels activating capacity and enhance
anti-tumor efficacy.
Key Words: immunosuppression tumor necrosis factor
interleukin-12 prostaglandin E2 nitric oxide
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ß tubulin polymers,
leading to rapid neoplastic cell death and inhibition of tumor
progression [3
]. Paclitaxel has been approved to treat
breast, ovarian, and lung cancers as well as AIDS-related Kaposis
sarcoma [4
].
In addition to its antineoplastic activities, paclitaxel imparts cell
cycle-independent effects on immune cell populations, including natural
killer cells [5
], T cells [6
7
], and
macrophages (Mø) [8
9
10
11
12
]. In murine Mø, paclitaxel
stimulates in vitro responses similar to those induced by
bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [13
14
]. Paclitaxel
enhances production of the cytotoxic mediators nitric oxide (NO) and
tumor necrosis factor
(TNF-
) [8
15
] and
expression of the immunostimulatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-12
[12
] by Mø from tumor-distal compartments (including
the spleen and peritoneal cavity). Furthermore, paclitaxel acts as a
second signal for activation of in vitro tumoricidal
activity by interferon-
(IFN-
)-primed, tumor-bearing host (TBH),
murine Mø [8
9
].
To take full advantage of paclitaxels immunostimulatory action, we
must first understand the impediments to Taxol-mediated activation in
context of the tumor microenvironment. Tumors evade anti-tumor immune
effector function, in part, through the production and release of
factors that down-regulate tumor-associated Mø (TAM) cytotoxic and
effector-molecule production [15
16 ]. Tumors maintain
elevated levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2),
transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1), and
IL-10 [15
] in situ, rendering
tumor-associated Mø incapable of IFN-
and LPS-induced NO production
[17
] or IL-12 expression [18
].
Paclitaxels efficacy as a Mø-activating agent in the tumor
microenvironment remains uncertain.
In the present study, we assessed paclitaxels ability to activate Mø
effector functions in the presence of tumor-derived cytokines. We used
the RAW264.7 Mø cell line transfected with a luciferase reporter gene
under the transcriptional control of a nuclear factor-
B
(NF-
B)-responsive HIV-long-terminal repeat (LTR) promoter. This Mø
cell line (referred to as a4) facilitates the characterization of
paclitaxel-mediated Mø activation and factor production in the absence
or presence of tumor-derived factors. Using this as a model of TAM, we
show that tumor-derived factors dysregulate paclitaxel-mediated Mø
activation, limiting Mø production of effector molecules and
immunostimulatory cytokines. Combined with our previous studies, these
data suggest that paclitaxel has immune-activating properties that
could provide immunotherapeutic activity but that are dysregulated by
tumor-derived suppressor molecules. Through an enhanced understanding
of paclitaxels immunopharacologic efficacy, novel therapeutic
maneuvers may restore paclitaxels activating capacity in
situ.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tumor supernatant was obtained by culturing the purified Meth-KDE tumor (4x106 cells/ml at 37°C, 5% CO2) in 24-well culture plates (Corning Cell Wells, Corning, NY) in a total vol of 1.0 ml complete RPMI medium. Cell-free supernatants were collected by centrifugation (400 g, 5 min) at 72 h (optimal time) and passed through a 0.4 micron filter. Fresh Meth-KDE supernatants were depleted of IL-10 or TGF-ß1 as described [15 ]. Briefly, tumor supernatant (1.0 ml) was incubated (2 h at 37°C) in 24-well plates that were coated with cytokine-specific Abs. Prior to addition of the tumor supernatants, plates were coated with anti-IL-10 or anti-TGF-ß1 by adding concentrated Ab preparations to wells, incubating overnight at 4°C, and washing three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Wells were blocked with sterile PBS containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 2 h at room temperature and washed three times with PBS. Meth-KDE supernatants (500 µl/well) were incubated in coated plates or control plates (non-Ab-coated, serum-treated wells) for 2 h at 37°C and then immediately transferred into assays. PGE2-depleted tumor supernatants were prepared by incubating Meth-KDE cells, as described, with 10-7 M indomethacin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), an arachidonic acid pathway inhibitor. Resulting supernatants did not contain detectable PGE2, as measured by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Advanced Magnetics, Boston, MA).
Macrophage cell lines
The RAW264.7 Mø cell line (TIB 71), originally derived from the
ascites of an Abelson leukemia virus, tumor-induced male mouse
[20
], was acquired from ATCC. The RAW264.7 Mø cell line
transfected with a luciferase reporter gene downstream from the
NF-
B-responsive, viral, HIV-1-LTR promoter (a4 Mø)
[21
] was generously provided by Dr. Matthew Sweet
(Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Queensland,
Brisbane, Australia). Briefly, the cell line was established by
electroporation of RAW264.7 Mø with the pMC1NeoPolyA neomycin
phosphotransferase-expression plasmid (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
containing HIV-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) promoter driving
the pGL-2Basic luciferase reporter gene (Promega, Madison, WI). Stable
transfectants, subsequently referred to as a4 cells, were selected by
incubation with 200 µg/ml G418 (Sigma) for 15 days. RAW264.7 Mø and
a4 Mø were maintained by diluting 1:10 in fresh medium every fifth
day.
Media and reagents
RAW264.7 Mø and a4 Mø were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with 2
mM L-glutamine (Sigma). All media contained 50 µg/ml
gentamicin sulfate (Tri-Bio Laboratories, State College, PA), 25 mM
sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), and 25 mM HEPES buffer
(Sigma). RPMI-1640 medium was endotoxin-free (<10 pg/ml) as assessed
by the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Sigma). Cell cultures
were supplemented with complete RPMI medium containing 5% FBS (Atlanta
Biologicals, Norcross, GA). Paclitaxel (CalBiochem, La Jolla, CA) was
dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Mallinckrodt Chemical,
Paris, KY) to 4 mM stock solution and stored at -80°C. Paclitaxel
was diluted to assay concentrations in RPMI-1640 medium immediately
before use. The final concentration of DMSO in cultures was <1%.
Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Escherichia coli serotype
026:B6) was purchased from Sigma. IFN-
(specific activity
2.98x106 U/ml; endotoxin content <10 pg/ml) was purchased
from Genzyme, Inc. (Cambridge, MA). Recombinant TGF-ß1
(100 µg/ml) and rabbit anti-TGFß1 polyclonal Ab (6.5
mg/ml; endotoxin content <10 pg/ml) were generous gifts from
Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). IL-10 (specific activity
7000 U/ml) was acquired from DNAX (Palo Alto, CA), and anti-murine
IL-10 mAbs were obtained from SXC-1 (ATCC; clone HB 10739) hybridoma
supernatants. PGE2 and indomethacin were obtained from
Sigma.
Luciferase assays
To assess reporter gene expression, a4 cell luciferase activity
was measured. First, a4 cells (1x106 cells/well) were
cultured overnight in 24-well, tissue-culture plates in a total vol of
1.0 ml complete medium. Cells were washed with fresh RPMI-1640 and
recultured in a total vol of 1.0 ml with indicated treatment reagents
in complete medium or Meth-KDE tumor supernatants. Culture was
continued for 2 h, then cells were lysed with 20 µl cell lysis
solution (Promega). Cellular debris were removed by centrifugation at
12,000 g for 5 sec, and cell extracts were assayed for total
protein by the Lowry method using Sigma reagents.
Luciferase activity in cell extracts was determined using luciferin (Sigma) substrate in a MgCl2 buffer supplemented with 0.1 M adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP). Luciferin substrate mix (100 µL) was added to 10 µL room-temperature cell extract, and luciferase activity was recorded as relative light units using a Berthold (Bundoora, Australia) automated luminometer. According to the manufacturers recommendation, luciferase activity was assessed for 10 sec, beginning 10 sec after mixing the substrate and cell extract; luciferase-mediated light production was stable and optimal during this period (unpublished results). Activity was standardized to the concentration of protein in the cell extract and shown as relative light units (RLU)/µg total protein.
Mø nitrite production
RAW264.7 Mø (2x105 cells) were cultured in
96-well, flat-bottom, tissue-culture plates (Corning). Each well
contained a total vol of 200 µL, serum-free, RPMI-1640 medium with
indicated treatment reagents added at the start of culture.
Supernatants for nitrite assessment were collected at 24 h
(optimal time) following centrifugation (400 g, 5 min). Mø
viability remained >95% throughout the culture periods as assessed by
the MTT assay [22
], and paclitaxel doses up to 35 µM
did not decrease Mø viability significantly, as assessed by the Alamar
blue (CalBiochem) viability assay [9
] (unpublished
results).
Nitrite levels in culture supernatants were measured using the Griess reagent [23 ]. Briefly, 100 µL Mø supernatants were added to 100 µL Griess reagent (0.1% naphthylenediamine dihydrochloride, 1.0% sulfanilamide, 2.5% H3PO4; Sigma), incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and absorbance read at 570 nm (MR 600 microplate absorbance reader; Dynatech Laboratories, Alexandria, VA).
Cytokine quantification
Cytokine production was induced by culturing Mø, as described
for NO production, for 4 h (TNF-
) or 18 h (IL-12, optimal
culture time). Supernatants were collected and immediately assayed for
cytokine using specific ELISA. IL-12 content was determined using a
p70-specific ELISA (IL-12 DuoSet®; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN)
according to the manufacturers protocol. The ELISA consisted of
anti-mouse IL-12 p70 capture antibody adhered to high-affinity
protein-binding plates (Nunc MaxiSorp® ELISA plates), biotinylated
secondary antibody, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated,
strepavidin-detection reagent. The limit of detection for IL-12 was
approximately 10 pg/ml. TNF-
content was determined using a murine
TNF-
-specific ELISA (Quantikine M, R&D Systems) following the
manufacturers protocol. The limit of detection for TNF-
was 5
pg/ml. ELISA were developed with a Sigma tetramethylbenzidine liquid
substrate system, and absorbance was determined at 450 nm using an
MR-600 microplate reader (Dynex, Alexandria, VA).
Western analysis
For Western analysis of IFN consensus sequence-binding protein
(ICSBP), Mø were cultured, and cellular proteins were prepared for
12 h. Cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.6, containing 10
µg/ml leupeptin and aprotinin (Sigma) and 300 mM NaCl. Membranes were
pelleted by centrifugation (12,000 g), and protein was
determined using the Lowry microtiter method. Protein (15 µg) was
denatured by boiling in 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME; 5%) and separated by
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide chain reaction (SDS-PAGE) using a
10% ProtoGel (National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA) vertical gel,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and blocked using 5% nonfat milk. A
polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse ICSBP Ab (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., South
San Francisco, CA) was used at 2 µg/ml, according to the
manufacturers recommendation. HRP-conjugated, goat anti-rabbit
immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary Ab (Transduction Laboratories,
Lexington, KY) was used at 1:2000 dilution. Bound ICSBP was detected
with Luminol reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Statistics and calculations
Triplicate cultures were tested for nitrite, TNF-
, IL-12, and
luciferase activity. Data are averages of triplicate determinations in
a single experiment, and error bars represent standard error of the
mean (SE). All experiments were repeated at least three
times, and representative experiments are shown. Comparisons were
tested for significance by the Students t-test, and
comparisons are significant at the p < 0.05 level,
unless otherwise stated.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[8
], IL-12 [12
], and NO
[9
]. Production of these proinflammatory and cytotoxic
factors by Mø in the tumor microenvironment could impart distinct
immunologic anti-tumor activity. However, most studies have evaluated
Mø directly ex vivo from normal, healthy hosts. We showed
that recombinant TGF-ß1, IL-10, or PGE2 can
inhibit paclitaxel-induced activation of primary (splenic and
peritoneal exudate) murine Mø [15
] and that tumor
growth retards Mø IL-12 production ex vivo
[12
]. Thus, tumors may evade the immunotherapeutic
effects of paclitaxel by suppressing Mø activation and cytotoxic
effector function. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of tumor-derived
factors on Mø cytokine and NO production in response to paclitaxel
activation.
To evaluate the impact of tumor-derived factors on
paclitaxel-mediated Mø activation, we cultured RAW264.7 Mø,
without or with 72-h Meth-KDE-derived, cell-free supernatants (1:2
dilution). Previously, we showed that these fibrosarcoma cells produce
substantial quantities of TGF-ß1, IL-10, and
PGE2 in culture [15
]. Cytokine production
was determined by analyzing spent medium for IL-12 (Fig. 1A
) and TNF-
(Fig. 1B)
using cytokine-specific ELISA. Paclitaxel
(10 µM, optimal dose in our hands) induced TNF-
and IL-12
production. IFN-
priming enhanced paclitaxel-mediated activation,
which correlates with our ex vivo data from normal mice
[8
12
]. Tumor cell-derived supernatant inhibited IL-12
and TNF-
production, also in parallel with our ex vivo
data showing inhibited IL-12 production by TBH Mø [12
].
Notably, tumor-derived supernatant factors significantly
decreased paclitaxels capacity significantly to induce IL-12
production by IFN-
-primed Mø to only 25.5% of the level achieved
in the absence of tumor-derived immunomodulatory factors. Although
paclitaxel doses as low as 0.1 µM enhanced Mø IL-12 and TNF-
production, doses in excess of 10 µM did not enhance cytokine
production further in the presence of tumor cell-derived supernatants
(unpublished results).
|
(10 U/ml) and paclitaxel (10 µM)
for 24 h enhanced RAW264.7 Mø NO production. Tumor-derived
supernatant suppressed NO production regardless of priming and
activation signals (Fig. 1C)
, and Western analyses revealed that tumor
cell-derived factors inhibited inducible NO synthase (iNOS) expression
(unpublished results). Even in the presence of optimal paclitaxel doses
(10.0 µM) and IFN-
, tumor-derived supernatant decreased Mø NO
production by >29%. In conjunction with IFN-
priming, paclitaxel
is capable of partially overcoming tumor-induced suppression of
ex vivo Mø effector function [8
]; the
current data suggest that paclitaxel, in combination with IFN-
priming, may induce modest NO production. However, kinetic analyses
revealed that paclitaxel-mediated NO production remained suppressed
throughout the course of a 72 h in vitro co-culture
with tumor supernatant (unpublished results), suggesting that
prolonging paclitaxel exposure may not enhance Mø NO production
further in the tumor microenvironment. These data complement ex
vivo results demonstrating that TAM are functionally deactivated
for NO production in the tumor microenvironment [17
].
Collectively, these results suggest that paclitaxel may overcome the
tumor-induced inhibition partly and stimulate low levels of Mø NO
production.
Because tumor-derived factors can inhibit Mø production of
IFN-
-inducible factors, such as IL-12, we assessed the effect of
tumor-derived factors on expression of the recently described
signal-transduction molecule ICSBP. Mø were primed with IFN-
(10100 U/ml) for 24 h. In the absence of tumor-derived factors,
RAW264.7 Mø ICSBP expression was increased in a dose-dependent manner
by IFN-
(Fig. 1D)
. Addition of 72-h Meth-KDE supernatants (1:2
dilution) suppressed IFN-
-induced ICSBP expression significantly,
even when Mø were primed with high doses of IFN-
(100 U/ml). These
data provide evidence that tumors affect Mø function by dysregulating
IFN-
responsiveness through inhibition of the ICSBP
signal-transduction pathway.
Tumor cell-derived factors inhibit paclitaxel-induced activation of
a4 Mø reporter gene expression
A hallmark of Mø activation for anti-tumor effector function is
the rapid induction of NF-
B-mediated signal pathways. Because we
needed a system that would allow for rapid assessment of Mø response
to activating agents in the context of tumor-derived factors, we
acquired the a4 Mø cell line. This line was developed by transfecting
RAW264.7 Mø with the HIV-1-LTR promoter-driving expression of a
luciferase reporter gene construct [21
]. Using 10 µM
paclitaxel [or 50 ng/ml concanavalin A (Con A) as a negative
activation control], we established that optimal luciferase expression
(a measure of reporter gene expression) occurs following 2 h of
incubation with Mø-activating reagents (Fig. 2A
), which agrees with the results of Sweet and Hume
[21
]. To verify that a4 Mø reporter gene expression is
paclitaxel-inducible in a dose-dependent manner, a4 cells
(1.0x106 cells) were cultured in 1.0 ml complete medium
with 0.110 µg/ml LPS (serving as a positive control) or
physiologically relevant doses (0.110 µM) of paclitaxel for 2 h (optimal time). Luciferase activity increased in a dose-dependent
manner in response to LPS activation. In a profile mimicking
LPS-mediated activation, paclitaxel increased a4 Mø luciferase
activity in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2B)
. The dose-dependent
response of the reporter gene in this model resembles LPS closely and
paclitaxel-mediated NO, TNF-
, and IL-12 production profiles shown in
primary murine Mø [12
15
].
|
|
|
|
priming of Mø to
achieve a potent cytotoxic effector response. In a manner similar to TGF-ß1, IL-10 modulated paclitaxel-mediated Mø activation. Depletion of IL-10 (Fig. 5A) from the tumor cell-derived supernatant reversed suppression significantly in LPS- (unpublished results) and paclitaxel-activated cultures. A physiologically relevant dose of recombinant IL-10 (3.0 U/ml) [15 ] suppressed paclitaxel-activated reporter gene expression (Fig. 5A) and NO production (Fig. 5B) . Depletion of IL-10 from supernatants also reconstituted LPS- (unpublished results) and paclitaxel-mediated NO production significantly (Fig. 5B) .
In contrast to TGF-ß1 and IL-10, tumor-derived PGE2 may not play a significant role in tumor-induced suppression of Mø activation. Supernatant from indomethacin (10-7 M)-treated Meth-KDE cells inhibited a4 Mø activation (Fig. 6A ), and exogenous PGE2 (25.0 ng/ml) was only moderately suppressive of paclitaxel-mediated Mø activation compared with TGF-ß1 or IL-10. This is interesting because exogenous PGE2 does inhibit paclitaxel-mediated Mø NO production (Fig. 6B) , and tumor-cell supernatant from indomethacin-treated cultures fails to inhibit NO production (Fig. 6B) . The presence of TGF-ß1 and IL-10 in supernatant could account for the failure of paclitaxel to activate Mø in this culture, but the ability to activate these cells in the presence of exogenous PGE2 demonstrates that PGE2 is not a major suppressor factor in this model. Collectively, these data suggest that Meth-KDE-derived TGF-ß1 (Fig. 4) and IL-10 (Fig. 5) are the primary mediators of tumor-induced suppression of paclitaxel-mediated Mø activation but not NO induction.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[24
], NO
[25
], H2O2 [26
],
reactive oxygen intermediates [27
], and IL-1
[28
] in tumor-distal compartments where they may lack
anti-tumor efficacy but impart immunosuppression. Simultaneously,
tumors maintain high in situ concentrations of suppressor
factors that dysregulate TAM IL-12 [17
18
] and NO
production (unpublished results). Therefore, the differential
activation properties of Mø in the TBH must come into play when
designing optimal anticancer therapiesespecially maneuvers that make
use of reagents with immune-activating properties such as paclitaxel.
Because tumors influence immune cell responses to paclitaxel through
the production of soluble effector molecules, we assessed paclitaxels
ability to activate Mø cytotoxic and effector functions in the
presence of tumor-derived cytokines. Throughout this study, we used a
Mø cell line (RAW264.7) with a luciferase reporter gene (a4 Mø) under
the transcriptional control of the HIV-1-LTR promoter (a
NF-
B-responsive element). The a4 Mø cell line allows for the
characterization of Mø activation and factor production in the absence
or presence of tumor cell-derived factors. This system facilitated an
analysis of Mø response to paclitaxel in the absence or presence of
tumor-derived immunomodulatory factors. Activity of the HIV-1 LTR was
shown to be almost completely dependent on LPS or LPS-like stimuli
[21
], making the a4 cells useful for the study of
LPS-mimetic molecules on Mø activation. The luciferase reporter gene
provides a simple and rapid readout system for activation, and
luciferase activity in a4 Mø lysates increased in a dose-dependent
manner in response to LPS or paclitaxel activation (Fig. 2)
.
Our previous studies [8
9
12
29
] demonstrated that
paclitaxel induces distinct immunologic efficacy when it acts as a
second signal for activation of tumoricidal activity by IFN-
-primed
murine Mø. Therefore, we assessed the effects of tumor-derived factors
on the NF-
B-responsive molecules TNF-
, IL-12, and iNOS using a4
Mø. (In parallel studies with a nontransfected parental line of the a4
cells, RAW264.7, the presence of the reporter construct made no
difference in factor production on activation; unpublished results.)
Paclitaxel and LPS induced TNF-
and IL-12 production, in agreement
with our previous ex vivo data [8
12
],
although tumor cell-derived supernatant inhibited Mø production of
IL-12 (Fig. 1A)
and TNF-
(Fig. 1B)
. Priming with IFN-
(10 U/ml)
and activation with paclitaxel (10 µM) for 24 h enhanced NO
production (Fig. 1C) . Addition of tumor cell-derived factors
down-regulated NO production, even when activated with the optimal dose
of LPS. IFN-
priming modestly increased a4 Mø NO production,
supporting the concept that IFN-
may be critical for mediating Mø
priming and activation for cytotoxic anti-tumor responses in
situ. Given that tumors modulate IFN-
production [18
30
], these data may explain why tumors appear to evade
Mø-mediated anti-tumor cytotoxicity in vivo. Loss of
IFN-
production may result from, or lead to, compromised IL-12
production, and tumor cell-derived factors dysregulate Mø production
of IL-12 (see Fig. 1B ). The dramatic inhibition of Mø IL-12 production
following exposure to tumor supernatants suggests that IL-12 production
in situ may be strongly inhibited, effectively breaking the
link between Mø-mediated innate immunity and T-cell-mediated acquired
immunity. Because specific T-cell anti-tumor cytotoxic responses are
necessary to achieve significant regression of neoplasia, tumor-induced
dysregulation of IL-12 may account for systemic immunosuppression in
the TBH. Another possible mechanism by which tumors modulate Mø
activities may involve the control of IFN-
responsiveness. Because
tumor growth modulates IFN-
-induced Mø production of IL-12, and
ICSBP has been implicated in the control of IL-12 p40 expression
[31
], we assessed whether tumor cell-derived factors
dysregulate the IFN-
signaling pathway through differential
regulation of ICSBP (Fig. 1D)
. Human myeloid cells down-regulate ICSBP
expression spontaneously [32
], and ICSBP knockout mice
display a defect in resistance to infection that derives from a failure
to induce IL-12 expression [33
]. We show that tumor
cell-derived factors inhibit IFN-
-induced Mø expression of ICSBP
in vitro, suggesting a possible lesion in the immune
response during tumor growth. Although the data may suggest that
restoration of IFN-
production in vivo could enhance the
activity of Mø-activating agents such as paclitaxel, tumor-mediated
modulation of ICSBP expression (Fig. 1D)
demonstrates an additional
lesion in IFN-
-mediated signaling in the tumor-bearing host. Because
paclitaxel induces optimal activation as a second signal following
IFN-
priming [11
], tumor-induced dysregulation of
ICSBP may explain the paucity of paclitaxel-induced NO production
in situ or in the presence of immunomodulatory cytokines.
Further studies should investigate the role of ICSBP in tumor-induced
Mø dysfunction.
Using a4 Mø reporter gene expression and factor production as readouts, we assessed the effects of the identified tumor-derived suppressor molecules (TGF-ß1, IL-10, and PGE2) produced by the Meth-KDE fibrosarcoma [15 ] on Mø activation. Because we [8 ] and others [11 ] demonstrated that paclitaxel differentially regulates tumor-induced Mø populations [8 9 29 ], we used the a4 Mø cell line to characterize paclitaxel-mediated Mø activation and factor production in the absence or presence of tumor cell-derived factors. The a4 Mø cell line has the specificity and appropriate functionality for these experiments because the cells respond to paclitaxel-mediated activation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2) . When treated with Meth-KDE-derived supernatant, LPS- or paclitaxel-activated a4 Mø cell response is suppressed by approximately 30%50%, respectively. Notably, paclitaxel failed to induce significant activation of a4 Mø in the presence of tumor supernatants, even when used at the optimal dose level (10 µM). Meth-KDE tumor cell-derived supernatant down-regulated a4 Mø activation in response to LPS or paclitaxel, and depletion of TGF-ß1 (Fig. 4) or IL-10 (Fig. 5) reversed the inhibitory effects of the tumor cell-derived factors partly. In corollary experiments, physiologically relevant levels [15 ] of recombinant TGF-ß1 or IL-10 were added to a4 cells; TGF-ß1 and IL-10 down-regulated a4 Mø luciferase activity (Figs. 4A and 5A) , suggesting that tumor-derived TGF-ß1 and IL-10 may down-regulate Mø activation significantly in situ. Supernatants from indomethacin-treated Meth-KDE cells, which are free of PGE2, inhibited a4 Mø luciferase activity (Fig. 6A) , and exogenous PGE2 only moderately suppressed a4 Mø activation. Collectively, these data suggest that the tumor cell-derived factors TGF-ß1 or IL-10 are the primary mediators of tumor-induced suppression of paclitaxel-mediated Mø activation and that PGE2 plays only a minor role in this model system.
In vivo, Mø exist in tumor-proximal (in situ)
and tumor-distal compartments, and these populations encounter
different types and levels of inhibitory molecules produced by tumors.
Unlike in situ Mø populations, which are constantly exposed
to high levels of tumor-derived immunomodulatory factors, Mø in
tumor-distal compartments may experience only low-level or transient
exposure to these factors. We demonstrated [8
9
15 ]
that tumor-distal Mø produced elevated levels of NO and TNF-
upon
activation with LPS or paclitaxel, suggesting that these populations
are primed by tumor growth for enhanced cytotoxic and effector-molecule
production [8
9
]. These data contrast with our in
vitro results using a4 cells, in which tumor cell-derived factors
modulate activation in response to LPS or paclitaxel. We determined
whether a4 Mø responses to LPS and paclitaxel are differentially
regulated by continuous versus transient exposure to tumor-derived
factors. Pretreatment (4 h) of a4 Mø with tumor supernatant led to a
priming effect, and these cells demonstrated substantial levels of
reporter gene expression on activation (Fig. 7)
. These data suggest
that transient exposure to tumor cell-derived factors may enhance Mø
response to activation, and this scenario may reflect the in
vivo response of tumor-distal immune cells. Cells continuously
treated with tumor-derived factors demonstrated suppressed LPS- and
paclitaxel-induced activation, suggesting that continuous exposure to
these factors prevents a4 Mø activation regardless of the stimulus.
These data complement our work in primary Mø, suggesting that tumor
growth primes distal populations for enhanced cytotoxic and
immunosuppressive molecule production and concurrently suppresses
in situ Mø anti-tumor activity. Continuous stimulation with
certain tumor cell-derived factors may suppress Mø activation, and
transient treatment induces a priming effect. Alternatively, tumors may
produce distinct priming and suppressing factors; in this scenario,
pretreatment (or transient, low-level exposure in tumor-distal
compartments) leads to priming. Simultaneously, continuous culture (or
chronic high-level exposure in situ) overpowers the priming
signals and prevents Mø activation, and our in vitro data
[8
9
15
16
29
] support this model.
Tumor-bearing host immunosuppression remains a major obstacle in cancer therapy. Successful anti-tumor immunity is dependent on the cytokine repertoire present at the tumor site. Tumor cells counteract this repertoire by producing immunosuppressive cytokines, which lead to dysfunctional macrophage killing activity. By defining tumor-induced immunosuppression, measures may be taken to counteract the defect and restore macrophage tumoricidal activity, thus eliminating the tumor. Collectively, these data enhance our understanding of Mø activation in the context of the tumor. These observations suggest that therapies, which disrupt or abrogate tumor production of immunomodulatory factors such as anti-sense-based targeting of TGF-ß1 and IL-10, may improve the efficacy of current chemotherapeutic strategies substantially.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received August 10, 1999; revised August 28, 2000; accepted August 29, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and interleukin-1 in macrophages J. Leukoc. Biol. 52,119-121[Abstract]
production: role of tumor-derived IL-10, TGF-ß, and prostaglandin E2 J. Immunol. 153,1674-1686[Abstract]
production in mammary tumor-bearing mice J. Immunol. 158,280-286[Abstract]
or taxol J. Inflamm. 45,126-135[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Watkins, N. K. Egilmez, J. Suttles, and R. D. Stout IL-12 Rapidly Alters the Functional Profile of Tumor-Associated and Tumor-Infiltrating Macrophages In Vitro and In Vivo J. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 178(3): 1357 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Mullins, R. S. Martins, and K. D. Elgert Tumor-Derived Cytokines Dysregulate Macrophage Interferon-{gamma} Responsiveness and Interferon Regulatory Factor-8 Expression Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2003; 228(3): 270 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |