(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2001;69:105-112.)
© 2001
by Society for Leukocyte Biology
Pivotal role of 5-lipoxygenase in the activation of human eosinophils: platelet-activating factor and interleukin-5 induce CD69 on eosinophils through the 5-lipoxygenase pathway
Tetsuya Urasaki*,
Jun Takasaki
,
Toshiro Nagasawa* and
Haruhiko Ninomiya
* Division of Hematology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba
Institute for Drug Discovery Research, Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
College of Medical Technology, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Correspondence: Haruhiko Ninomiya, M.D., Ph.D., College of Medical Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan. E-mail: hninomiya{at}itan.tsukuba.ac.jp
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
CD69 is an activation-related cell surface molecule on human
eosinophils. It has been reported that interleukin (IL)-5, but not
platelet-activating factor (PAF), can induce CD69 on human eosinophils
in vitro. In this study, PAF induced CD69 intensely on
eosinophils from patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), while
only weakly on those from normal donors. Because HES eosinophils
contain abundant cytosolic phospholipase A2
(cPLA2) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO), we examined the roles of
several enzymes involved in the metabolism of arachidonic acid in the
PAF- or IL-5-induced CD69 expression on eosinophils. The CD69
expression induced by PAF and IL-5 on HES eosinophils and that by IL-5
on normal eosinophils were both inhibited by AA861 and MK-886,
inhibitors of 5-LO activity. In addition, AACOCF3, a
selective cPLA2 inhibitor, inhibited IL-5-induced CD69
expression on normal eosinophils, although it hardly affected either
IL-5- or PAF-induced CD69 expression on HES eosinophils. Moreover, PAF
alone induced CD69 only weakly on normal eosinophils, but exogenous
arachidonic acid remarkably enhanced PAF-induced CD69 expression on
them. These findings suggest that IL-5 activates both cPLA2
and 5-LO but PAF activates only 5-LO. It is suggested that 5-LO plays a
critical role in the induction of CD69 on eosinophils.
Key Words: hypereosinophilic syndrome cytosolic phospholipase A2 arachidonic acid
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Eosinophils are major effector cells contributing to inflammation
in allergic disorders such as asthma and atopic dermatitis
[1
, 2
]. They are activated by diverse
stimuli and release various proinflammatory mediators, i.e.
eosinophil-derived granular basic proteins such as major basic protein,
eosinophil cationic protein, and eosinophil peroxidase, lipid mediators
such as platelet-activating factor (PAF) and leukotriene (LT)
C4, reactive oxygen species, and various cytokines
[3
]. The finding that CD69 expression was observed on
activated eosinophils at inflamed sites but not on peripheral blood
eosinophils suggests that CD69 may be a useful marker for activated
eosinophils [4
].
CD69 is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein with a C-type lectin
binding domain in the extracellular portion of the molecule
[5
]. CD69 is induced in vitro on cells of
most hematopoietic lineages, including T and B lymphocytes, natural
killer (NK) cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils, whereas it is
constitutively expressed on monocytes and platelets [6
].
Human eosinophils strongly express CD69 by in vitro
stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and eosinophilopoietic
cytokines such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
(GM-CSF), interleukin (IL)-3 and IL-5, whereas only weakly with
interferon (IFN)-
, IL-4, IL-13, type IIA phospholipase
A2 (PLA2-IIA) and lysophosphatidic acid
[4
, 7
8
9
10
]. However, it has also been
reported that eosinophils are not induced to express CD69 by
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), IL-2, IL-6, and PAF
[4
, 7
]. Some of the mechanisms by which
CD69 is induced have been clarified in T lymphocytes and NK cells
[6
, 11
]. In stimulation by PMA, the signal
transduction via a protein kinase C (PKC)/Ras/Raf-1 pathway has been
revealed [12
, 13
]. Engagement of T cell
receptors on T cells or IL-2 receptor on NK cells also results in Ras
activation. In eosinophils, PMA should induce CD69 also via the
PKC/Ras/Raf-1 pathway, but the pathway initiated by other physiological
stimulants has been unclear.
Although normal peripheral blood eosinophils do not appear to express
CD69, CD69 expression on peripheral blood eosinophils of
hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), although not in all cases of HES, has
been shown [14
, 15
]. While CD69 expression
has been demonstrated on activated eosinophils in local sites of
various diseases, it has rarely been demonstrated on peripheral blood
eosinophils except for HES eosinophils. We previously reported that
both cytosolic PLA2 (cPLA2) and 5-lipoxygenase
(5-LO) were increased and that cPLA2, in particular, was
activated and translocated to the membranes in HES eosinophils in
vivo [16
]. In a recent study, we found CD69
expression on HES eosinophils without in vitro stimulation
[10
].
In this study, we found strong CD69 induction on peripheral blood
eosinophils from HES patients by in vitro PAF stimulation.
This suggests that this difference in the responses to stimuli between
HES and normal eosinophils could help to elucidate the signal
transduction pathways for CD69 induction in eosinophils. We thus
examined the effects of enzymes involved in the metabolism of
arachidonic acid on PAF- and IL-5-induced CD69 expression and found a
pivotal role of 5-LO in the pathway resulting in CD69 induction on
blood eosinophils.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Materials
PAF (C18) was obtained from Bachem (Bubendorf, Switzerland);
recombinant human (rh) IL-5 and rhIL-3 were obtained from Calbiochem
(La Jolla, CA); rhGM-CSF was obtained from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA);
AA861, indomethacin, arachidonic acid, LTB4,
LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 were obtained
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); AACOCF3, MK-886, and 5-HPETE
were obtained from Biomol Research Laboratories (Plymouth Meeting, PA);
PD98059 was obtained from Research Biochemicals International (Natick,
MA); YM264, a PAF inhibitor, was chemically synthesized using methods
described previously [17
]; 5-HETE and 5-oxo-ETE were
obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI); monoclonal anti-CD69
antibody (Ab) was obtained from Immunotech (Marseille, France); mouse
immunoglobulin (Ig) G was obtained from Cappel (Turnhout, Belgium);
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled goat F(ab)2
anti-mouse Ig and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
F(ab)2 anti-mouse Ig were obtained from BioSource
International (Camarillo, CA); monoclonal anti-5-LO Ab was obtained
from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).
Preparation of eosinophils
Eosinophil isolation was performed by a magnetic cell separation
system (MACS; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Heparinized (10 U/mL)
blood was drawn by venipuncture from two patients with HES and seven
normal volunteers. Informed consent was obtained from the volunteers
and HES patients after receiving appropriate information regarding the
purpose and methods of this study. The HES patients (KS and YK)
exhibited chronic (5 years and 2 years of disease duration,
respectively) eosinophilia (eosinophils, 1040 x
109/L) without any underlying allergic disorders. The
eosinophil-rich fraction was separated as CD16-negative fraction
according to the method of Hansel et al. [18
]. The
purity of eosinophils was always more than 95%, as assessed by
staining with Diff-Quik (Kokusaishiyaku, Kobe, Japan). Cells were kept
on ice until use.
Flow cytometry for assessment of CD69 expression
Expression of CD69 on human eosinophils was measured as follows.
Cell suspensions of 2 x 106/mL were stimulated with
PAF or other stimulants at 37°C for the indicated durations.
Inhibitors were added and preincubated with eosinophils (37°C, 10
min) before the addition of stimulants. The stimulation was terminated
by placing the suspensions on ice and removing the supernatants
immediately after slight centrifugation (4°C, 5 min). The cells
resuspended in flow cytometry (FCM) buffer composed of 137 mM NaCl, 2.7
mM KCl, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM
KH2PO4, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% bovine serum
albumin and 0.02% NaN3, were incubated with 8 µg/mL
anti-CD69 Ab on ice for 30 min. After washing the cells once with FCM
buffer, the cells were reacted with FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse Ig.
Then, the cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer
(EPICS® XL-MCL, Coulter, Miami, FL). Eosinophils were
gated on the basis of their forward- and side-light scatters and cell
debris was excluded from the analysis.
The mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) in the eosinophils were
obtained from the histograms of a population of at least 5,000 cells.
The specific MFI for each population was determined by subtracting the
nonspecific MFI from the MFI when stained with anti-CD69.
Western immunoblotting
Cytosol and membrane fractions of eosinophils were prepared
according to the previously described method [16
].
Briefly, eosinophils suspended at 2 x 107/mL in
Buffer A (80 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 40 mg/mL leupeptin, 25 mg/mL
pepstatin A, 0.2 mM pefablock, 10 mM NaF, 0.2 mM
NH4VO3, 4 mM dithiothreitol in 10 mM HEPES, pH
7.4) were incubated on ice for 30 min. The cells were then sonicated
and centrifuged at 1,000 g at 4°C to remove debris. The
supernatant was centrifuged at 180,000 g at 4°C for 30
min, and then the recovered supernatant (cytosol fraction) and pellet
were collected. The pellet resuspended in Buffer A followed by
sonication was collected as the membrane fraction. The protein amounts
of the samples applied to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (PAGE) were quantified using a Bio-Rad Protein
Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Each sample (25 µg of
protein) was electrophoresed on an SDS-PAGE of 420% gradient
polyacrylamide. The proteins were then transferred to an Immobilon-P
membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) and probed with mouse monoclonal
anti-5-LO Ab (0.5 µg/mL). Signals on the membrane were developed by
enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) using horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse Ig.
Cell viability
Cell viability assessed by trypan blue exclusion was always
greater than 90% even in the highest concentration of inhibitor.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Students unpaired
t test for the comparisons between two groups. Statistical
significance was assumed when P < 0.05 vs. control.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Comparison of CD69 induction on HES and normal eosinophils by PAF
and IL-5
We examined the effects of PAF and IL-5 on CD69 expression on
human peripheral blood eosinophils from HES patients and normal donors.
It has been reported that IL-5 and PAF are positive and negative
inducers for CD69 on eosinophils, respectively. PAF markedly induced
CD69 expression on HES eosinophils, but not on normal eosinophils
(Fig. 1
). In contrast to the findings of PAF, IL-5 markedly induced CD69
expression on both HES and normal eosinophils (Fig. 1)
. The
IL-5-induced CD69 expression reached a plateau level at 50 µg/mL
(data not shown). It has been reported that stimulation of eosinophils
from donors with mild eosinophilia with PAF (1 µM) for up to 2 h
did not induce CD69 expression [7
]. As shown in
Figure 2
, the level of CD69 expression on HES eosinophils by PAF was much
higher than that on normal eosinophils at various concentrations of
PAF. The intensity of CD69 expression induced by PAF on normal
eosinophils was very weak.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Comparison of CD69 induction by PAF or IL-5 between on HES and normal
eosinophils. Eosinophils from HES patients and normal donors were
incubated at 37°C for 3.5 h with 100 nM PAF or 50 ng/mL IL-5.
(A) Representative histograms of the fluorescence intensity of CD69
expression (bold line) on eosinophils after incubation. The
fluorescence intensity of eosinophils stained with the isotype control
Ab is also shown (thin line). As for HES eosinophils, the experiments
were repeated at least three times every 4 weeks and similar findings
were obtained each time. (B) Values are expressed as the mean ±
SD of specific MFI measured in two independent experiments
on two HES patients (HES #1 and HES #2) and five independent
experiments on five normal donors. Each assay was performed in
triplicate.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Dose-dependency of CD69 induction by PAF on both eosinophils from HES
patients and normal donors. Eosinophils from HES patients and normal
donors were incubated in the presence of various concentrations of PAF
for 3.5 h at 37°C. Eosinophils were stained with anti-CD69 Ab,
and its bindings to the cells were measured using flow cytometry.
Induction of CD69 expression is indicated as the mean of specific MFI
(arbitrary units) measured in two independent experiments on two HES
patients (open circles and squares) or as the mean ±
SD of specific MFI measured in five independent experiments
on five normal donors (filled circles). Each assay was performed in
triplicate.
|
|
Involvement of 5-LO in PAF-induced CD69 expression on HES
eosinophils
We previously reported that both cPLA2 and 5-LO were
increased and that cPLA2 was already activated and
translocated to the membranes in eosinophils of HES patients in
vivo [16
]. To verify the possibility that an
increased level of cPLA2 and 5-LO was involved in the
intense CD69 induction on HES eosinophils, we examined the
contributions of pivotal enzymes involved in the metabolism of
arachidonic acid, i.e., cPLA2, 5-LO, and cyclooxygenases
(COXs). We first confirmed the effect of PAF on CD69 induction on HES
eosinophils by its inhibition by a PAF inhibitor, YM264, in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3
). Then, the effects of various inhibitors on PAF-induced CD69
expression on HES eosinophils were examined. Both AA861 and MK-886,
inhibitors of 5-LO activity, inhibited PAF-induced CD69 expression on
HES eosinophils in dose-dependent manners, whereas AACOCF3,
a cPLA2 inhibitor, and indomethacin, a COX inhibitor, did
not (Fig. 3)
. Because both MK-886 and AACOCF3, at a
concentration of 10 µM, induced signals to a high extent, which
seemed to be nonspecific, we omitted these data from Figure 3
and
Figure 4
. In addition, any inhibitors we used in this study did not affect
the results of nonstimulated eosinophils.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Effects of various inhibitors on PAF-induced CD69 expression on HES
eosinophils. Eosinophils from HES patients were pretreated with YM264,
AACOCF3, AA861, MK-886, and indomethacin for 10 min at
37°C. The eosinophils were then incubated with 100 nM PAF for
3.5 h. Induction of CD69 expression is indicated as the mean of
two independent experiments (in triplicate) on two HES patients.
|
|

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Effects of various inhibitors on IL-5-induced CD69 expression on human
eosinophils. Eosinophils from HES patients or normal donors were
preincubated with AA861, MK-886, AACOCF3, and PD98059 for
10 min at 37°C. The eosinophils were then incubated with 50 ng/mL
IL-5 for 3.5 h. Induction of CD69 expression is indicated as the
mean of two independent experiments on two HES patients (A) and as
mean ± SD of five independent experiments on five
normal donors (B). Each assay was performed in triplicate.
*P < 0.05 compared with the buffer control.
|
|
Involvement of 5-LO and cPLA2 in IL-5-induced CD69
expression on human eosinophils
In contrast to the case of PAF, IL-5 markedly induced CD69
expression on both HES and normal eosinophils (Fig. 1)
. We then
examined the effects of various inhibitors of arachidonate
metabolite-forming enzymes on IL-5-induced CD69 expression on both HES
and normal eosinophils. Both inhibitors of 5-LO activity, AA861 and
MK-886, inhibited IL-5-induced CD69 expression on eosinophils from both
HES patients (Fig. 4A)
and normal donors (Fig. 4B)
, and
AACOCF3 hardly influenced the IL-5-induced CD69 expression
on HES eosinophils, as in the case of PAF-induced CD69 expression (Fig. 3)
. However, AACOCF3 inhibited IL-5-induced CD69 expression
on normal eosinophils in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B)
. Moreover,
PD98059, an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
kinase, hardly inhibited IL-5-induced CD69 expression on HES
eosinophils (Fig. 4A)
, but did on normal eosinophils (Fig. 4B)
. These
findings suggest that the activity of cPLA2, activated by
MAP kinase, is involved in the IL-5-induced CD69 expression on normal
human eosinophils but not necessarily for that on HES eosinophils.
Translocation of 5-LO on human eosinophils after treatment with
IL-5 or PAF
In activated leukocytes (neutrophils and monocytes), 5-LO is
translocated from the cytosol predominantly to the nuclear envelope,
where it is localized in close proximity to its activating protein
(5-lipoxygenase-activating protein, FLAP) and cPLA2
[19
]. As shown in Figure 5
, 5-LO was translocated from the cytosol to the membranes after a
1-h incubation in the presence of either IL-5 (50 ng/mL) or PAF (100
nM) in eosinophils from both HES patients and normal donors.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Western immunoblot of 5-LO in human eosinophils. Eosinophils from
patients with HES and normal donors were incubated with or without 50
ng/mL IL-5 or 100 nM PAF in the presence of 1.3 mM Ca2+
(37°C, 1 h). The cells were then fractionated into cytosol and
membrane fractions as described in Materilas and Methods. The fractions
(25 µg of protein) were subjected to SDS-PAGE (420%
polyacrylamide, reduced condition) followed by immunoblotting with
anti-5-LO. The values of HES patients are from one representative
experiment of two patients. The values of normal donors are from one
representative experiment of three experiments.
|
|
Effects of arachidonic acid and 5-LO products on CD69 induction on
human eosinophils
If the difference of PAF-induced CD69 expression between HES and
normal eosinophils (Fig. 2)
was caused by the state of
cPLA2, arachidonic acid, a predominant enzymatic product by
cPLA2, could enhance the PAF-induced CD69 expression on
eosinophils from normal donors. Accordingly, we examined the effect of
arachidonic acid on PAF-induced CD69 expression on eosinophils from
normal donors. Arachidonic acid (1 µM) significantly enhanced PAF
(100 nM and 1 µM)-induced CD69 expression on eosinophils from normal
donors, whereas arachidonic acid (1 µM) or PAF (100 nM and 1 µM)
alone barely induced CD69 expression on eosinophils from normal donors
(Fig. 6
).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Augmentation of CD69 expression by PAF in combination with
arachidonic acid. Eosinophils were incubated with various
concentrations of PAF in the absence (filled circles) or presence
(filled squares) of 1 µM arachidonic acid for 3.5 h at 37°C.
Induction of CD69 expression is indicated as the mean ±
SD of five independent experiments on five normal donors.
Each assay was performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05
compared with the buffer control.
|
|
5-LO and FLAP are both required for cellular LT synthesis, with 5-LO
catalyzing both the synthesis of 5-HPETE from arachidonic acid and the
subsequent synthesis of LTB4, LTC4,
LTD4, and LTE4 [20
]. Moreover,
5(S)-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid (5-HPETE) is converted to
5(S)-hydroxy-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-HETE) and
5-oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-oxo-ETE) by specific enzymes
[20
, 21
]. Thus, we examined the effects of
LTs (LTB4, LTC4, LTD4, and
LTE4) and the other 5-LO products (5-HPETE, 5-HETE, and
5-oxo-ETE) on CD69 induction on blood eosinophils from HES patients and
normal donors. As shown in Figure 7
, 5-HPETE, 5-HETE, and 5-oxo-ETE induced CD69 expression on
eosinophils from both types of donors. Among these substances,
5-oxo-ETE appeared to induce CD69 expression most intensely. No
significant induction of CD69 expression was observed by LTs except by
LTB4, which slightly induced CD69 expression on HES
eosinophils.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Induction of CD69 expression by 5-LO pathway products
on human eosinophils. (A) Eosinophils from HES patients and normal
donors were incubated at 37°C for 3.5 h with 1 µM 5-oxo-ETE.
Representative histograms of the fluorescence intensity of eosinophils
stained with anti-CD69 Ab (bold line) or control Ab (thin line).
5-oxo-ETE induced intense CD69 expression on both HES and normal
eosinophils. (B) Eosinophils from HES patients and normal donors were
incubated at 37°C for 3.5 h with 1 µM 5-LO pathway products
(5-HPETE, 5-HETE, 5-oxo-ETE, LTB4, LTC4,
LTD4, or LTE4). Induction of CD69 is expressed
as the mean of specific MFI in two independent experiments on two HES
patients (left) or as mean ± SD of five independent
experiments on five normal donors (right). Each assay was performed in
triplicate. *P < 0.05 compared with the buffer
control.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
Hartnell et al. reported that stimulation of eosinophils with PAF
(1 µM) for up to 2 h did not induce CD69 expression
[7
]. No other studies concerning the effects of PAF on
the CD69 induction on eosinophils have been available. As shown in
Figure 1
, PAF markedly induced CD69 on HES eosinophils in comparison
with normal eosinophils. When the dose-dependency of the effect of PAF
on the CD69 induction on human eosinophils from normal donors was
examined, the CD69 induction was barely detected after a 3.5-h
incubation at 37°C (Fig. 2)
. We previously reported that both
cPLA2 and 5-LO, involved in the liberation or metabolism of
arachidonate, were increased and cPLA2, in particular, was
already activated and translocated to the membranes of eosinophils of
HES patients in vivo [16
]. AA861 inhibits
5-LO competitively, whereas the inhibition of 5-LO by MK-886 is
mediated by its interaction with FLAP. AA861 and MK-886 inhibited
PAF-induced CD69 expression on HES eosinophils in dose-dependent
manners (Fig. 3)
. However, in the case of HES eosinophils,
AACOCF3 and indomethacin did not inhibit it at all. These
findings suggest a critical role of 5-LO in PAF-induced CD69 expression
on HES eosinophils.
It was unclear whether 5-LO was involved in the CD69 induction on
eosinophils by physiological stimulants other than PAF. IL-5-induced
CD69 expression on blood cells is unique to eosinophils because the
specific receptor for IL-5 is absent on neutrophils and rarely, if
ever, expressed on other cells that express CD69 [22
,
23
]. As shown in Figure 1
, IL-5 markedly induced CD69
expression on eosinophils from both HES patients and normal donors.
Both AA861 and MK-886 inhibited IL-5-induced CD69 expression
dose-dependently in eosinophils from both HES patients and normal
donors (Fig. 4)
, as well as in the case of PAF-induced CD69 expression
on HES eosinophils. We also examined the effects of AA-861 (10 µM) on
IL-3 (5 ng/mL)- or GM-CSF (5 ng/mL)-induced CD69 expression on
eosinophils from both HES patients and normal donors; similar findings
to those in the case of IL-5 were obtained (data not shown). These
findings suggest a critical role of 5-LO in IL-5-induced CD69
expression on both eosinophils. Although AACOCF3 did not
inhibit PAF-induced CD69 expression, AACOCF3 and PD98059
inhibited IL-5-induced CD69 expression on eosinophils from normal
donors, but hardly on those from HES patients (Fig. 4)
. PD98059 is
known to inhibit cPLA2 activation, partially because
phosphorylation of cPLA2 by MAP kinase increases its
enzymatic activity [24
, 25
]. These findings
suggest that there are differences in the MAP kinase activation and the
subsequent cPLA2 activation for the CD69 induction on
eosinophils between HES patients and normal donors.
5-LO is activated by its translocation from the cytosol to the nuclear
membranes and its interaction with FLAP, and this process is regulated
by the level of cytosolic Ca2+ [26
]. The
findings that IL-5- and PAF-induced translocation of 5-LO in both
eosinophil types (Fig. 5)
indicated that IL-5 and PAF activate 5-LO.
Moreover, exogenously added arachidonic acid markedly enhanced
PAF-induced CD69 expression on normal eosinophils (Fig. 6)
. These
findings strongly suggest that 5-LO activation is required for CD69
induction in both HES and normal eosinophils, but cPLA2
activation, supplying arachidonic acid, is required for induction on
normal eosinophils. cPLA2 is also activated by
Ca2+-dependent translocation from the cytosol to the
nuclear membranes, similar to the case of 5-LO, and by phosphorylation
on its serine residues [24
, 27
]. Human
eosinophils generate 5-LO metabolites in only small amounts after
stimulation with receptor agonists such as
N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) and PAF, but
in high yields after stimulation with Ca2+ ionophore
[28
, 29
]. Schatz-Munding et al. explain
this phenomenon in polymorphonuclear leukocytes as follows: release of
Ca2+ from the intracellular pool by receptor agonists is
sufficient for 5-LO activation but is insufficient for
cPLA2 activation to supply arachidonic acid
[30
]. In normal eosinophils, stimulation with PAF would
activate 5-LO but would not generate sufficient 5-LO products because
of the shortage of 5-LO substrate, arachidonic acid, which is produced
by cPLA2, whereas stimulation with IL-5 would activate both
cPLA2 and 5-LO, resulting in sufficient generation of 5-LO
products [31
, 32
]. However, IL-5 may induce
translocation of 5-LO in a different way from PAF, for it has been
reported that IL-5 by itself hardly induces an increase in
intracellular Ca2+ [33
, 34
]. It
has been demonstrated that translocation of 5-LO is a calcium-dependent
process [26
], and in addition, the translocation of 5-LO
requires its phosphorylation by protein tyrosine kinases
[35
, 36
]. Taken together with the previous
studies [32
], although it has not been determined yet
which tyrosine kinase-dependent pathway is involved in the IL-5-induced
5-LO translocation, IL-5 may induce a tyrosine kinase-dependent
redistribution of 5-LO to the eosinophil nucleus. Meanwhile, lipid
bodies are the sites of esterified arachidonate localization in diverse
cell types, including eosinophils, and they may play a major role in
the formation of eicosanoid mediators during inflammation
[37
, 38
]. In eosinophils, increased numbers
of lipid bodies have been demonstrated in patients with HES
[38
]. Abundant lipid bodies are possibly substituted for
novel arachidonate production by cPLA2 in HES eosinophils.
Moreover, 5-LO was shown within eosinophil lipid bodies
[39
, 40
]. Therefore, the lipid bodies may
be the major sites containing substrate for 5-LO in HES eosinophils.
Because 5-LO plays a pivotal role in CD69 induction on human
eosinophils, some of its enzymatic products may be involved in the
induction of CD69 on human eosinophils. The enzymatic products of 5-LO
are classified into two groups: LTs (LTA4,
LTB4, LTC4, LTD4, and
LTE4) and eicosatetraenoic acids (5-HPETE, 5-HETE, and
5-oxo-ETE). Whereas LTs did not induce CD69 expression on human
eosinophils, all the eicosatetraenoic acids examined induced CD69
expression (Fig. 7)
. Among the substances at the same concentration,
5-oxo-ETE induced CD69 most intensely on eosinophils from both HES
patients and normal donors. 5-oxo-ETE is known to be a potent
stimulator of many eosinophil functions, e.g., migration, L-selectin
shedding, surface expression of CD11b, actin polymerization, and
calcium mobilization in cells [41
, 42
]. The
finding of this study is the first demonstration of the effect of
5-oxo-ETE on CD69 expression on human eosinophils. Because eosinophils
can synthesize 5-oxo-ETE from arachidonic acid in addition to 5-HPETE
and 5-HETE [42
], this suggests that endogenous
eicosatetraenoic acids (5-HPETE, 5-HETE, and 5-oxo-ETE) are strongly
involved in the induction of CD69 expression on human eosinophils.
In conclusion, we demonstrated a critical role of 5-LO in CD69
induction by in vitro stimulation such as PAF or IL-5 on
human blood eosinophils. A major contribution of a pathway other than
cPLA2, which supplies arachidonic acids, was suggested to
be involved in the strong CD69 induction in HES eosinophils. It was
suggested that CD69 induction in eosinophils was induced via
arachidonic acid metabolites such as 5-HPETE, 5-HETE, and 5-oxo-ETE.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
|---|
We are grateful to Dr. Masao Katoh (Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co.)
for support throughout this work and to Dr. Toshimitsu Yamada
(Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co.) for generously donating YM264.
Received June 12, 2000;
revised August 21, 2000;
accepted August 22, 2000.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Bousquet, J., Chanez, P., Lacoste, J. Y., Barneon, G., Ghavanian, N., Enander, I., Venge, P., Ahlstedt, S., Simony-Lafontaine, J., Godard, P., Michel, F-P. (1990) Eosinophilic inflammation in asthma N. Engl. J. Med. 323,1033-1039[Abstract]
-
Gleich, G. J. (1990) The eosinophil and bronchial asthma: current understandings J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 85,422-436[Medline]
-
Weller, P. F. (1997) Human eosinophils J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 100,283-287[Medline]
-
Nishikawa, K., Morii, T., Ako, H., Hamada, K., Saito, S., Narita, N. (1992) In vivo expression of CD69 on lung eosinophils in eosinophilic pneumonia: CD69 as a possible activation marker for eosinophils J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 90,169-174[Medline]
-
Lopez-Cabrera, M., Santis, A. G., Fernandez-Ruiz, E., Blacher, R., Esch, F., Sanchez-Mateos, P., Sanchez-Madrid, F. (1993) Molecular cloning, expression, and chromosomal localization of the human earliest lymphocyte activation antigen AIM/CD69, a new member of the C-type animal lectin superfamily of signal-transmitting receptors J. Exp. Med. 178,537-547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marzio, R., Mauel, J., Betz-Corradin, S. (1999) CD69 and regulation of the immune function Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 21,565-582[Medline]
-
Hartnell, A., Robinson, D. S., Kay, A. B., Wardlaw, A. J. (1993) CD69 is expressed by human eosinophils activated in vivo in asthma and in vitro by cytokines Immunology 80,281-286[Medline]
-
Luttmann, W., Knoechel, B., Foerster, M., Matthys, H., Virchow, J. C., Jr., Kroegel, C. (1996) Activation of human eosinophils by IL-13. Induction of CD69 surface
antigen, its relationship to messenger RNA expression, and promotion of
cellular viability J. Immunol. 157,1678-1683[Abstract]
-
Luttmann, W., Matthiesen, T., Matthys, H., Virchow, J. C., Jr (1999) Synergistic effects of interleukin-4 or interleukin 13 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on eosinophil activation in vitro Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 20,474-480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Urasaki, T., Takasaki, J., Nagasawa, T., Ninomiya, H. (2000) Induction of the activation-related antigen CD69 on human eosinophils by type IIA phospholipase A2 Inflamm. Res. 19,177-185
-
Testi, R., DAmbrosio, D., De Maria, R., Santoni, A. (1994) The CD69 receptor: a multipurpose cell-surface trigger for hematopoietic cells Immunol. Today 15,479-483[Medline]
-
DAmbrosio, D., Cantrell, D. A., Frati, L., Santoni, A., Testi, R. (1994) Involvement of p21ras activation in T cell CD69 expression Eur. J. Immunol. 24,616-620[Medline]
-
Taylor-Fishwick, D.A., Siegel, J. N. (1995) Raf-1 provides a dominant but not exclusive signal for the induction of CD69 expression on T cells Eur. J. Immunol. 25,3215-3221[Medline]
-
Kawano, M., Muramoto, H., Tsunoda, S., Koni, I., Mabuchi, H., Yachie, A., Miyawaki, T. (1996) Absence of CD69 expression on peripheral eosinophils in episodic angioedema and eosinophilia Am. J. Hematol. 53,43-45[Medline]
-
Enokihara, H., Koike, T., Nakamura, Y., Saito, K., Furusawa, S. (1999) Identification of surface molecules on eosinophils
and lymphocytes in blood from patients with eosinophilia Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 114(Suppl. 1),72-74
-
Urasaki, T., Ninomiya, H., Takasaki, J., Kawauchi, Y., Nagasawa, T., Masuho, Y. (1999) Cytosolic phospholipase A2, increased and activated in the eosinophils of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome in vivo, is involved in the augmented release of leukotriene C4 Inflamm. Res. 48,36-40[Medline]
-
Yamada, T., Tomioka, K., Saito, M., Horie, M., Mase, T., Hara, H., Nagaoka, H. (1990) Pharmacological properties of YM264, a potent and orally active antagonist of platelet-activating factor Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 308,123-136[Medline]
-
Hansel, T. T., De Vries, I. J., Iff, T., Rihs, S., Wandzilak, M., Betz, S., Blaser, K., Walker, C. (1991) An improved immunomagnetic procedure for the isolation of highly purified human blood eosinophils J. Immunol. Meth. 145,105-110[Medline]
-
Woods, J. W., Evans, J. F., Ethier, D., Scott, S., Vickers, P. J., Hearn, L., Heibein, J. A., Charleson, S., Singer, I. I. (1993) 5-lipoxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein are localized in the nuclear envelope of activated human leukocytes J. Exp. Med. 178,1935-1946[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peters-Golden, M. (1998) Molecular mechanisms of leukotriene synthesis: the changing paradigm Clin. Exp. Allergy 28,1059-1065[Medline]
-
Powell, W. S., Gravelle, F., Gravel, S. (1994) Phorbol myristate acetate stimulates the formation of 5-oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid by human neutrophils by activating NADPH oxidase J. Biol. Chem. 269,25373-25380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Migita, M., Yamaguchi, N., Mita, S., Higuchi, S., Hitoshi, Y., Yoshida, Y., Tomonaga, M., Matsuda, I., Tominaga, A., Takatsu, K. (1991) Characterization of the human IL-5 receptors on eosinophils Cell. Immunol. 133,484-497[Medline]
-
Murata, Y., Takaki, S., Migita, M., Kikuchi, Y., Tominaga, A., Takatsu, K. (1992) Molecular cloning and expression of the human interleukin 5 receptor J. Exp. Med. 175,341-351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lin, L. L., Wartmann, M., Lin, A. Y., Knopf, J. L., Seth, A., Davis, R. J. (1993) cPLA2 is phosphorylated and activated by MAP kinase Cell 72,269-278[Medline]
-
Gijon, M. A., Leslie, C. C. (1999) Regulation of arachidonic acid release and cytosolic phospholipase A2 activation J. Leukoc. Biol. 65,330-336[Abstract]
-
Pouliot, M., McDonald, P. P., Krump, E., Mancini, J. A., McColl, S. R., Weech, P. K., Borgeat, P. (1996) Colocalization of cytosolic phospholipase A2, 5-lipoxygenase, and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein at the nuclear membrane of A23187-stimulated human neutrophils Eur. J. Biochem. 238,250-258[Medline]
-
Clark, J. D., Lin, L. L., Kriz, R. W., Ramesha, C. S., Sultzman, L. A., Lin, A. Y., Milona, N., Knopf, J. L. (1991) A novel arachidonic acid-selective cytosolic PLA2 contains a Ca2+-dependent translocation domain with homology to PKC and GAP Cell 65,1043-1051[Medline]
-
Owen, W. F., Jr, Soberman, R. J., Yoshimoto, T., Sheffer, A. L., Lewis, R. A., Austen, K. F. (1987) Synthesis and release of leukotriene C4 by human eosinophils J. Immunol. 138,532-538[Abstract]
-
Tamura, N., Agrawal, D. K., Townley, R. G. (1988) Leukotriene C4 production from human eosinophils in vitro. Role of eosinophil chemotactic factors on eosinophil activation J. Immunol. 141,4291-4297[Abstract]
-
Schatz-Munding, M., Hatzelmann, A., Ullrich, V. (1991) The involvement of extracellular calcium in the formation of 5-lipoxygenase metabolites by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes Eur. J. Biochem. 197,487-493[Medline]
-
Zhu, X., Muñoz, N. M., Kim, K. P., Sano, H., Cho, W., Leff, A. R. (1999) Cytosolic phospholipase A2 activation is essential for beta 1 and beta 2 integrin-dependent adhesion of human eosinophils J. Immunol. 163,3423-3429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cowburn, A. S., Holgate, S. T., Sampson, A. P. (1999) IL-5 increases expression of 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein and translocates 5-lipoxygenase to the nucleus in human blood eosinophils J. Immunol. 163,456-465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Coeffier, E., Joseph, D., Vargraftig, B. B. (1991) Activation of guinea pig eosinophils by human recombinant IL-5 Selective priming to platelet-activating factor-acether and interference of its antagonists. J. Immunol. 147,2595-2602
-
van der Bruggen, T., Kok, P. T., Raaijmakers, J. A., Verhoeven, A. J., Kessels, R. G., Lammers, J. W., Koenderman, L. (1993) Cytokine priming of the respiratory burst in human eosinophils is Ca2+ independent and accompanied by induction of tyrosine kinase activity J. Leukoc. Biol. 53,347-353[Abstract]
-
Lepley, R. A., Muskardin, D. T., Fitzpatrick, F. A. (1996) Tyrosine kinase activity modulates catalysis and translocation of cellular 5-lipoxygenase J. Biol. Chem. 271,6179-6184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lepley, R. A., Fitzpatrick, F. A. (1996) Inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase blocks activation and redistribution of 5-lipoxygenase in HL-60 cells Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 331,141-144[Medline]
-
Weller, P. F., Ackerman, S. J., Nicholson-Weller, A., Dvorak, A. M. (1989) Cytoplasmic lipid bodies of human neutrophilic leukocytes Am. J. Pathol. 135,947-959[Abstract]
-
Weller, P. F., Monahan-Earley, R. A., Dvorak, H. F., Dvorak, A. M. (1991) Cytoplasmic lipid bodies of human eosinophils Subcellular isolation and analysis of arachidonate incorporation. Am. J. Pathol. 138,141-148
-
Bozza, P. T., Yu, W., Penrose, J. F., Morgan, E. S., Dvorak, A. M., Weller, P. F. (1997) Eosinophil lipid bodies: specific, inducible intracellular sites for enhanced eicosanoid formation J. Exp. Med. 186,909-920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bozza, P. T., Yu, W., Cassara, J., Weller, P. F. (1998) Pathways for eosinophil lipid body induction: differing signal transduction in cells from normal and hypereosinophilic subjects J. Leukoc. Biol. 64,563-569[Abstract]
-
Powell, W. S., Gravel, S., Halwani, F. (1999) 5-oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid is a potent stimulator of L-selectin shedding, surface expression of CD11b, actin polymerization, and calcium mobilization in human eosinophils Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 20,163-170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Powell, W. S., Chung, D., Gravel, S. (1995) 5-Oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid is a potent stimulator of human eosinophil migration J. Immunol. 154,4123-4132[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Christmas, N. Carlesso, H. Shang, S.-M. Cheng, B. M. Weber, F. I. Preffer, D. T. Scadden, and R. J. Soberman
Myeloid Expression of Cytochrome P450 4F3 Is Determined by a Lineage-specific Alternative Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 27, 2003;
278(27):
25133 - 25142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bandeira-Melo, L. J. Woods, M. Phoofolo, and P. F. Weller
Intracrine Cysteinyl Leukotriene Receptor-mediated Signaling of Eosinophil Vesicular Transport-mediated Interleukin-4 Secretion
J. Exp. Med.,
September 16, 2002;
196(6):
841 - 850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|