

* Department of Immunology and Parasitology, Yamagata University, School of Medicine;
Department of Anatomy, Shinshu University, School of Medicine, Matsumoto; and
Department of Nursing, Yamagata University, School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
Correspondence: Fujiro Sendo, Department of Immunology and Parasitology, Yamagata University, School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan. E-mail: fsendo{at}med.id.yamagata-u.ac.jp
|
|
|---|
Key Words: integrin electron microscopy localization
|
|
|---|
It is interesting that GPI-80 is highly homologous with Vanin-1, which has been reported to be localized in perivascular tissue of the mouse thymus and to be involved in prethymic cell homing to the thymus [4 ]. Both GPI-80 and Vanin-1 have approximately 40% homology with human biotinidase [5 ], suggesting that there is a superfamily of biotinidases that may be involved in leukocyte trafficking.
In the previous study using a confocal fluorescence microscopy, we found that (1) GPI-80 was localized on pseudopodia and adherent portions of polarized neutrophils, (2) that it was associated with CD11b/CD18 in resting neutrophils and moved to lamellipodia upon activation of these cells while CD11b/CD18 became localized on uropods, and (3) that this dissociation is dependent on extracellular calcium [Sendo, unpublished results].
In this study, we tried to obtain morphological information relating our previous experimental results on GPI-80 and we used backscatter electron images obtained by high-resolution, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). We examined the topographical distribution of GPI-80 on the surface of human neutrophils.
|
|
|---|
Antibodies
Our previously described anti-GPI-80 monoclonal antibody (mAb),
3H9 (IgG1) [1
], was used in this study. A mAb, TCY-3,
against Trypanosoma cruzi antigen, which does not
cross-react with human neutrophils was used as an IgG1 control mAb. In
the first experiments shown in Figure 1
, we used 15-nm colloidal gold particles conjugated with sheep
anti-mouse IgG purchased from E-Y Laboratories (SanMateo, CA). In later
experiments we used 10-nm particles (Funakoshi, Tokyo, Japan) because
we found that labeling with 10-nm colloidal gold particles was more
efficient than with 15-nm ones.
![]() View larger version (118K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Localization of GPI-80 on the apical cell surface. (AC) low
magnification of neutrophils observed by BSE imaging. Immediately after
stimulation by fMLP, neutrophils had a round shape and random
distribution of GPI-80 on the cell surface (A, 0 min). In the early
phase of fMLP activation, cells displayed spreading margins on the
substratum, and GPI-80 accumulation on their peripheral surfaces
(arrows, B, 15 min). At 90 min of incubation, cells had a round shape
with few projections on their surfaces, and the distribution of GPI-80
was diffuse and decreased in number (C, 90 min). (DI) At high
magnification, GPI-80 was distributed diffusely in some parts of the
specimen (E), but in other parts in a clustered form (G and I,
arrowheads). (D, F, and H) SE images. (E, G, and I) backscatter images
of D, F, and H, respectively. Bars, 1.0 µm (AC), 0.3 µm (D and
E), and 0.1 µm (FI).
|
Electron microscopy
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine the
immunolocalization of GPI-80 on the apical surface of neutrophils,
cells were seeded on glass coverslips in a 48-well flat-bottom culture
plate (Falcon). For the observation of the ventral surface, cells were
seeded onto a combination of two attached membranes. The upper ones
were 10 µm thick PC MEMB 110615 membranes having multiple holes 10
µm in diameter (Nomura Micro-Science, Kanagawa, Japan) and the lower
ones (PC MEMB 110606) had no holes. The lower membrane was incubated
with 0.2% fibrinogen in the plate (Falcon) to coat the surface with
fibrinogen at 37°C for 2 h. After washing three times with PBS,
the upper membrane was overlaid on the treated lower membrane, and they
were again treated with fibrinogen at 37°C for 2 h and then
washed with PBS. After addition of 2 x 106/mL
neutrophils, the plates were centrifuged (200 g) for 3 min
at 4°C and incubated at 37°C for 15 min in 5% CO2 in
air. We chose 15 min of incubation because many neutrophils adhered at
this time. After the incubation, the two membranes were separated and
the upper one was put upside down. Both membranes were washed twice
with UW solution and incubated with 1% FBS/UW for 5 min at room
temperature. We used the Boyden chamber technique [9
],
as modified by Zigmond and Hirsch [10
], to observe the
ventral surface of migrating neutrophils. The two compartments of the
chamber (Nomura Micro-Science) were separated by a cellulose acetate
filter with a pore size of 8 µm (Poretics, Livermore, CA).
Neutrophils (2 x 106/mL, 200 µL) in the upper
chamber were incubated for 15 min at 37°C, with 10-6 M
fMLP in the lower compartment, and then the filters were stripped off.
After blocking, the samples were incubated with 100 µL of 3H9 (10
µg/mL) for 30 min at 4°C and were then washed twice with UW
solution. They were labeled with immunogold by incubation at 4°C with
colloidal gold conjugated with goat anti-mouse IgG (diluted 1:10 in UW
solution) for 30 min and were then washed twice with UW solution. Then
the specimens were treated with 2.5% glutaraldehyde containing sodium
cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 M), rinsed several times with the same
buffer, and treated with 1% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer. They
were dehydrated in graded ethanol, immersed in isoamylacetate, critical
point-dried with CO2, and coated with carbon using a CC-40F
carbon coater (Meiwa Shouji, Tokyo, Japan). The cells were observed in
FESEM by high-resolution backscatter electron (BSE) imaging using a YAG
detector as well as secondary electron (SE) imaging. To quantify the
number of gold particles, we counted them on five cells in randomly
chosen 15 squares (2.25 cm2) using 8,000-fold magnified
photographs.
|
|
|---|
When the distribution of GPI-80 on the surfaces was determined more precisely with high magnification, in some parts of the specimen (Fig. 1E) GPI-80 was distributed diffusely, but in other parts in a clustered form (Fig. 1G and 1I) .
Ventral surfaces
We examined the distribution of GPI-80 on the ventral surfaces of
cells adhering to the lower membranes after stripping off the upper
membranes as described in Materials and Methods. Many flattened large
projections were observed in some parts of the specimens, suggesting
that these areas are the ventral surfaces that adhered to the lower
membranes (Fig. 2A
). On the adhering surfaces very few GPI-80 were detected (Fig. 2B
and 2C)
. The reason for the scanty number of GPI-80 on these surfaces
could not be ascribed to being ripped off when the two membranes were
separated because no GPI-80 was detected on the surfaces of the lower
membranes after being stripped from the upper membranes, and numerous
CD18 were detected on the ventral surfaces of adhering cells (data not
shown). On the other hand, GPI-80 in relatively small number was
diffusely detected on the surfaces of small round projections, which
may not have adhered to the lower membranes (Fig. 2D
and 2E) .
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. Localization of GPI-80 on the ventral cell surface. A typical ventral
surface is shown in A. (B and D) higher magnifications of framed areas
in A. (B and C) few GPI-80 were detected on the flattened surfaces of
large projections, suggesting a tight cell-substratum contact area of
the neutrophil (arrowheads). (D and E) on the small round projections,
relatively small numbers of GPI-80 were detected (arrowheads). (A, B,
and D) SE images. (C and E) BSE images of B and D, respectively. Bars,
1.0 µm (A), and 0.2 µm (BE).
|
![]() View larger version (114K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. Clustered distribution of GPI-80 on the forward surfaces of migrating
neutrophils. (AG) features of a migrating neutrophil observed from
the apical sides of the upper chamber. (A) a complete picture of a
migrating neutrophil. (B and D) higher magnifications of framed areas
in A. Few GPI-80 are observed on the surface of the adherent portions
in B and C. (E) BSE imaging of D. Clusters of GPI-80 are observable
(arrowheads). (F) higher magnifications of framed areas in D. (G) BSE
imaging of F. Clusters of GPI-80 are observed on the forward surfaces
of a migrating neutrophil (arrowheads). (HL) features of a migrating
neutrophil observed from the ventral sides of the lower chamber. (H) a
tip of a migrating neutrophil. (I and K) higher magnifications of
framed areas in H and I, respectively. J and L are BSE imaging of I and
K, respectively. Clusters of GPI-80 are observed on the forward
surfaces of a migrating neutrophil (arrowheads). A, B, D, F, H, I, and
K are SE images. C, E, G, J, and L are BSE images of B, D, F, I, and K,
respectively. Bars, 10 µm (A), 0.3 µm (B, C, D, E, H, I, and J),
and 0.1 µm (F, G, K, and L).
|
|
|
|---|
Sparse distribution of GPI-80 on ventral surfaces adhering to ligands on the membranes was an unexpected result, since in a previous study we demonstrated that 3H9 (a mAb to GPI-80) modulates ligand binding avidity of ß2 integrin, which should be abundantly localized on the surfaces of leukocytes adhering to ligands. Sparse distribution of GPI-80 on the ventral adhering surfaces and clustering one on the forward surfaces of migrating neutrophils may suggest that GPI-80 is not actually involved in modulation of cell adherence but rather only of cell locomotion. However, we cannot be sure of this, because the experimental procedure we used to observe GPI-80 expression on ventral surfaces in the present study is not the ideal condition for this purpose. As described in Materials and Methods, the upper membranes on which neutrophils were placed were 10 µm thick. Under this condition, we actually investigated the ventral surfaces of neutrophils that migrated through the hole of the upper membranes in distances of at least 10 µm, but not those of neutrophils adhering to the surface of the upper membranes. To this end, we will need revised techniques.
In conclusion, the present result showing a clustered distribution of GPI-80 on the forward surfaces of migrating neutrophils may suggest not only a role for this novel GPI-anchored protein in leukocyte migration but also a certain role for GPI-anchored proteins in general. Molecules in this group are easily able to form clusters because of their high lateral mobility when such changes are required for certain biological activities of cell membranes.
Received August 10, 1999; revised June 22, 2000; accepted June 23, 2000.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. G. de Almeida, L. B. Chiarini, J. P. da Silva, P. M. R. e Silva, M. A. Martins, and R. Linden The cellular prion protein modulates phagocytosis and inflammatory response J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 77(2): 238 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Funaro, E. Ortolan, B. Ferranti, L. Gargiulo, R. Notaro, L. Luzzatto, and F. Malavasi CD157 is an important mediator of neutrophil adhesion and migration Blood, December 15, 2004; 104(13): 4269 - 4278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yoshitake, Y. Takeda, T. Nitto, and F. Sendo Cross-linking of GPI-80, a possible regulatory molecule of cell adhesion, induces up-regulation of CD11b/CD18 expression on neutrophil surfaces and shedding of L-selectin J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2002; 71(2): 205 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||