Department of Microbiology and Immunology, the Graduate Center for Toxicology, and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
Correspondence: Dr. Alan M. Kaplan, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, 800 Rose Street, Room MS 411, Lexington, KY 40536-0084. E-mail: akaplan{at}pop.uky.edu
|
|
|---|
, and IL-6 at days 3, 7, and 14 post-BLM inoculation, regardless
of whether eosinophils were depleted by anti-IL-5. Finally, the
importance of eosinophils in lung fibrosis was examined in IL-5 gene
knockout mice (IL-5tm1Kopf). BLM treatment induced
significant lung fibrosis in IL-5 knockout mice in the absence of
eosinophilia. These findings indicate that eosinophils are not an
absolute requirement for BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis in the
mouse.
Key Words: lung eosinophilia cytokines knockout mice
|
|
|---|
A series of recent studies have associated eosinophilia with pulmonary
fibrosis. Accumulation of eosinophils in alveolar space and parenchyma
has been observed in fibrogenic lesions, such as idiopathic pulmonary
fibrosis in humans [4
] and BLM-induced lung fibrosis in
rats [5
] and mice [6
]. Moreover, we have
recently shown that BLM induces T cell-independent lung fibrosis, which
is accompanied by prominent lung eosinophilia [7
], in
C57Bl/6 severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. The observed
absence of a critical role for T and B lymphocytes and the presence of
a prominent eosinophilia in these studies suggested a potentially
important role for eosinophils in this murine disease model. Studies by
several labs [8
9
10
11
] demonstrated that treatment of mice
with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
resulted in a significant
reduction in lung fibrosis as measured by hydroxyproline content. In
addition, treatment with anti-TNF-
has been shown to block lung
eosinophilia in BLM-treated mice as determined by histology
[11
]. Using in situ and northern
hybridization, and immunochemical and histochemical techniques,
monocyte chemotactic factor-1 (MCP-1), a potent chemoattractant for
monocytes, and interleukin (IL)-5, a major cytokine involved in
development of eosinophilia [12
], were shown to be
upregulated in eosinophils of BLM-induced fibrotic mouse lungs
[6
, 13
]. These observations suggested that
eosinophils might exert fibrogenic effects via recruitment of monocytes
and additional eosinophils. Finally, eosinophils could potentially
serve as an important cellular source of fibrogenic cytokines, such as
transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 and TGF-
, and have been shown
to produce TGF-ß1 in BLM-induced fibrotic lungs in rats
[14
]. Furthermore, the majority of the eosinophils
present in healing wounds have been shown to express TGF-
mRNA and
protein [15
]. Thus, there is substantial evidence in
rodent models to suggest that eosinophils may contribute to lung
fibrosis. In spite of the fact that many studies have shown a
correlation of eosoinophilia with fibrosis, direct evidence is needed
before eosinophils can be documented as an essential component in the
development of fibrosis.
The studies presented in this paper were designed to examine the hypothesis that eosinophils are an essential component for BLM-induced lung fibrosis. Anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody (TRFK-5) or IL-5 gene knockout mice were used to prevent eosinophilia in mice injected intratracheally with BLM. Lung fibrosis and eosinophilia were evaluated by hydroxyproline content and eosinophil peroxidase activity, respectively. The results indicated that pulmonary fibrosis and pronounced eosinophilia developed in BLM-treated C57Bl/6 SCID mice and CBA/J mice. In contrast, minimal eosinophilia was detected by eosinophil peroxidase activity in BLM-treated wildtype C57Bl/6 mice; however, pulmonary fibrosis was equivalent to that observed in C57Bl/6 SCID and CBA/J strains of mice. Treatment of C57Bl/6 SCID and CBA/J mice with anti-IL-5 antibody blocked completely pulmonary eosinophilia but failed to block pulmonary fibrosis. IL-5 gene knockout C57Bl/6 IL-5tm1Kopf mice failed to develop eosinophilia but still developed profound lung fibrosis following BLM treatment. These data demonstrated that eosinophils are not essential for the development of lung fibrosis in BLM-treated mice and that their presence in fibrotic lesions may indicate a role in post-induction events in lung fibrosis.
|
|
|---|
Intratracheal inoculation of BLM and treatment with anti-IL-5
antibody
Each mouse was anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (26.5
mg/Kg of body weight, Butler Company, Columbus, OH). The trachea
was exposed by a 1.5 cm incision in the neck and injected with 0.075
units (U; C57Bl/6 and C57Bl/6 SCID mice) or 0.025 U (CBA/J mice) BLM
(Blenoxane, BLM sulfate, Bristol Myers Pharmaceuticals, Evansville, IN)
dissolved in 20 µl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The incision was
closed with a 9 mm Mikron Autoclip (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD).
Postsurgically, the mice were warmed under a table lamp until recovered
from anesthesia. Mortality as a result of toxic effects of BLM was
<15% in all strains of mice used in these studies. All procedures
were conducted in a sterile environment and approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of
Kentucky (Lexington).
TRFK-5 (rat anti-mouse IL-5) ascites was prepared in pristane-primed Balb/C mice with the TRFK-5 hybridoma, kindly provided by Dr. Robert Coffman (DNAX, Palo Alto, CA). Mice were injected intraperitoneally with TRFK-5 ascites (1 mg protein/mouse in 200 µl) 2 h before BLM treatment and thereafter, every other day. Normal rat immunoglobulin G (IgG) was used as a control for the anti-IL-5 antibody.
Eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) activity measurement
A biochemical method described by Schneider and Issekutz
[16
] was modified to quantify lung EPO activity.
Briefly, right, upper-lung lobes (wet weight, about 40 mg) were
collected and stored at -70°C until processing. Lung tissue was
homogenized with a motor-driven, 1 ml glass homogenizer in 1 ml of pH
8.0 HEPES buffer followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for
30 min at 4°C. The pellet was rehomogenized in 350 µl 0.5% CTAC
(cetyltrimethylammonium chloride) and centrifuged as above. The
supernatant (tissue extract) was diluted 1:1 with pH 8.0 HEPES buffer,
and 75 µl of the diluted sample was pipette into a 96-well plate in
duplicate. HEPES buffer served as a negative control. The substrate
solution, which consisted of 50 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 6 mM KBr, 3mM OPD
(O-phenylenediamine), and 8.8 mM H2O2, was
freshly prepared, and 75 µl was added to each well. The reaction was
allowed to occur at room temperature and was stopped after 1.5 min with
75 µl 4 N sulfuric acid containing 2 mM resorcinol. OD490
was determined for EPO activity.
Hydoxyproline content determination
A modified method from Witschi et al.
[17
] was used to determine hydroxyproline content. At
day 14 after BLM administration, mice were killed, and lungs were
perfused with PBS via the right ventricle. The left lung lobes were
dissected out and hydrolyzed with 6 N HCl at 110°C for 72 h. The
hydroxyproline content was determined by oxidizing the samples with 0.2
M chloramine-T extracting with toluene and reacting with Ehrlichs
reagent. The colored product was measured at 560 nm and compared to a
standard curve.
Histology examination
Hematoxylin-eosin staining and Massons Trichrome staining for
collagen were performed by the University of Kentucky Histology Service
in the Department of Pathology.
Measurement of lung tissue cytokine mRNA levels
Lower lobes of right lungs were collected and immediately frozen
in liquid nitrogen until extraction of RNA. Total RNA was isolated by
TRIzol, according to the methods described by the manufacturer (Life
Technologies, Grand Island, NY). The purified RNA was used for analysis
of mRNA expression using the Riboquant Multi-Probe RNase Protection
Assay System (Pharmingen, San Diegeo, CA), according to manufacturers
instructions. Briefly, 32P-labeled antisense RNA probes
were synthesized with the mouse cytokine/chemokine multiprobe template
set 3b by polymerase T7RNA. The labeled probe (3x105
cpm/µl) was hybridized in solution overnight in excess of the target
RNA (10 µg total RNA/treatment) in a total reaction volume of 8 µl.
The free probe and other single-strand RNA were digested with RNases A
and T1, per instructions provided by the manufacturer. The remaining
RNase-protected probe was precipitated and dissolved in loading buffer
and denatured by heating. After resolution of protected probes in 5%
acrylamide gel at 45 watts for 2 h, the gel was dried in a slab
gel dryer (Sarvant Instruments, Farmingdale, NY). After autoradiography
by phosphoimage screen exposure for 36 h, cytokine mRNA was
quantified by densitometry and normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
Data expressions and statistics analysis
All data in this paper were presented as mean ±
SEM. The difference between two groups was tested with
Students t-test for unpaired data. The difference among
multiple groups was tested with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. BLM-induced lung fibrosis in C57Bl/6 SCID and wildtype C57Bl/6 mice.
C57Bl/6 SCID and wildtype mice were injected i.t. with 0.075 U BLM and
were killed 14 days later. Hydroxyproline content of their left lung
lobes was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data are
representative of three similar experiments, each containing 812
animals per group. *P < 0.005 indicates a significant
difference from the PBS-treated control group.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. Lung eosinophilia in C57Bl/6 SCID and C57Bl/6 wildtype mice after BLM
treatement. Mouse lung EPO activity was measured at 3, 7, and 14 days
after i.t. BLM (0.075 U) inoculation. Data represent three similar
experiments with 410 mice per group in each experiment.
*P < 0.005 and #P < 0.05 indicate
significant differences from the PBS-treated control group.
|
![]() View larger version (189K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained histological sections of lungs from
BLM-treated mice. (A) C57Bl/6 wildtype, treated with BLM and normal rat
IgG; (B) C57Bl/6 wildtype, treated with BLM and anti-IL-5; (C) C57Bl/6
SCID, treated with BLM and normal rat IgG; and (D) C57Bl/6 SCID treated
with BLM and anti-IL-5.
|
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
Figure 4. Anti-IL-5 antibody completely blocks lung eosinophilia induced by BLM.
C57Bl/6 wildtype, C57Bl/6 SCID, and CBA/J mice were injected i.t. with
BLM (0.075 U for C57Bl/6 and 0.0275 U for CBA/J) and i.p. with TRFK-5,
anti-IL-5 antibody, or normal rat IgG 2 h before BLM and
thereafter, every other day. Lung EPO activity was measured in C57Bl/6
SCID and C57Bl/6 wildtype mice 7 days, and in CBA/J mice, 14 days,
post-BLM inoculation. Data are representative of three similar
experiments with 410 mice per group in each experiment.
*P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference from the
related PBS control group.
|
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
Figure 5. Anti-IL-5 antibody failed to reduce BLM-induced lung fibrosis in
C57Bl/6 SCID, C57Bl/6 wildtype mice, or CBA/J mice. Mice were treated
with BLM and anti-IL-5 as described in Figure 4
. Hydroxyproline content
was measured 14 days post-i.t. BLM inoculation. No significant
difference was observed among different treatment groups of
BLM-injected mice in all three strains of mice tested. These data are
representative of three similar experiments with 410 per group in
each experiment. *P < 0.005 indicates a significant
difference from the related PBS-treated group.
|
![]() View larger version (222K): [in a new window] |
Figure 6. Massons Trichrome-stained histological sections of lungs from C57Bl/6
SCID mice 14 days after BLM treatment. (A) Control, PBS-treated; (B)
BLM-treated; (C) BLM- and anti-IL-5-treated; (D) BLM- and normal rat
IgG-treated.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 1. IL-5 Knockout (KO) Mice Developed Lung Fibrosis in Response to BLM
|
and IL-6 (cytokines known to be elevated in
response to BLM) were examined by RNase protection assay and normalized
to GAPDH mRNA at days 3, 7, and 14 after BLM treatment. The results in
Figure 7
demonstrate that TNF-
and IL-6 mRNA levels were increased
significantly on days 3 and 7 after BLM treatment. Moreover, both
cytokines were increased to a similar extent after BLM treatment in
C57Bl/6 SCID mice regardless of whether IL-5 was neutralized to prevent
eosinophilia, indicating that BLM-induced changes in TNF-
and IL-6
expression were independent of the presence of eosinophils. By day 14,
the levels of TNF-
and IL-6 mRNA had returned normal and were not
significantly different from PBS-treated control mice
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
Figure 7. BLM elevated lung TNF- and IL-6 mRNA levels in C57Bl/6 SCID mice.
C57Bl/6 SCID mice were treated with BLM and anti-IL-5 as described in
Figure 3
. Lung TNF- and IL-6 mRNA levels were assayed by RPA and
normalized to GAPDH. Data represent three similar experiments with 46
mice per group in each experiment. *P < 0.05 indicates
a significant difference from the related PBS-treated group. There is
no significant difference among groups treated with BLM.
|
|
|
|---|
treatment
[11
], suggesting these two events may be linked
functionally. Moreover, eosinophils at the fibrotic site have been
shown to express fibrogenic cytokines TGF-
and TGF-ß
[14
, 15
]. In agreement with previous studies, our current investigations demonstrate that lung eosinophilia developed in CBA/J mice after BLM treatment. In addition, after BLM instillation, pronounced lung eosinophilia was present in C57Bl/6 SCID mouse lungs but was only minimally present in wildtype C57Bl/6 mice. The fact that all three strains developed equivalent levels of lung fibrosis but displayed discrepant levels of eosinophilia suggested that eosinophils may not be a critical cell type for the development of lung fibrosis.
To evaluate the role of eosinophils in fibrosis and to prevent eosinophilia after BLM treatment, mice were administered anti-IL-5 2 h before BLM inoculation and every other day thereafter. Treatment with anti-IL-5 prevented completely BLM-induced lung eosinophilia in C57Bl/6 SCID mice and in CBA/J mice, as evidenced by reduced EPO activity; however, anti-IL-5 failed to block BLM-induced lung fibrosis (Figs. 4 and 5) . Treatment with anti-IL-5 failed also to prevent BLM-induced lung fibrosis in C57Bl/6 wildtype mice, which displayed only minor pulmonary eosinophilia after BLM (unpublished results). These data strongly suggested that eosinophils are not essential for lung fibrosis induced by BLM in any of the mouse strains tested.
In contrast to our finding, Gharaee-Kermani et al. [20 ] demonstrated that anti-IL-5 treatment blocked pulmonary fibrosis induced by BLM in CBA/J mice. The current studies used the same mouse strain (CBA/J), the same route of administration for BLM (intratracheal), the same dose of BLM (0.025 U), and the same anti-IL-5 antibody (TRFK-5). The only difference in the present study was that mice were injected with anti-IL-5 antibody more frequently (every other day) and with a larger dose (1 mg protein). The reason for the discrepancy in outcome between the present study and that of Gharaee-Kermani et al. [20 ] is currently unknown.
IL-5 is a well-recognized eosinophilopoietic growth factor capable of stimulating eosinophil differentiation and maturation in vitro and in vivo [21 22 23 ]. TRFK-5, mouse IL-5-specific neutralizing antibody has been shown to prevent effectively or resolve existing tissue eosinophilia in many diseases in which eosinophilia is involved [24 , 25 ]. The present study showed that treatment with TRFK-5 caused EPO activity to fall slightly below basal level at days 7 and 14 after BLM treatment, suggesting suppression of eosinophil differentiation in bone marrow by TRFK-5. In addition to affecting eosinophil differentiation, IL-5 has been shown to cooperate with other chemoattractants, such as eotaxin and RANTES in mediating eosinophil migration to the lung in response to allergen challenge [26 27 28 29 ]. Mice treated with TRFK-5 (0.06 mg/kg 2 h before antigen challenge) resulted in 50% inhibition of bronchoalveolar pulmonary (BALF) eosinophila at 24 h after airway antigen challenge in a lung inflammatory model [25 ]. Intravenous Sephadex particle injection into guinea pigs mimics intravenous injection of parasite larvae, inducing a pulmonary eosinophilia by 24 h after injection. Treatment with TRFK-5 15 min before the injection of Sephadex completely suppressed eosinophilia in BALF and significantly reduced lung tissue EPO activity [24 ]. A single dose of TRFK-5 (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) reversibly inhibited antigen-dependent lung eosinophilia for at least 12 weeks [25 ].
Pulmonary eosinophilia, including that induced by BLM, has been suggested to be T cell-dependent [20 , 30 ]. Th2 cells likely play a prominent role in eosinophilia via secretion of IL-5 and IL-4. However, the results of the present study showed that induction of eosinophilia can occur in the absence of T cells, because C57Bl/6 SCID mice developed a prominent eosinophilia after BLM treatment. Moreover, lung eosinophilia in C57Bl/6 SCID mice was still shown to be IL-5-dependent, suggesting that another source of IL-5 was induced by BLM in the absence of T cells, possibly mast cells and/or natural killer (NK) cells [23 ].
TNF-
has been considered a key factor in the development of lung
fibrosis in response to BLM [8
9
10
, 31
].
The current study revealed that TNF-
mRNA levels were significantly
elevated at days 3 and 7 and declined by day 14 in all BLM-treated
groups regardless of whether lung eosinophilia was present. No
significant difference in TNF-
mRNA levels was observed between
different treatment groups of BLM-injected mice at any time point
examined. The observed changes in TNF-
mRNA levels were consistent
with previous findings by Piguet et al. [8
],
where it was shown that a single dose of BLM caused lung TNF-
mRNA
to increase between days 5 and 15. The current study further
demonstrated that BLM-induced changes in TNF-
could occur also in
the absence of T cells and under conditions where eosinophilia failed
to occur. It is interesting to note that neutralization of TNF-
was
shown by Zhang et al. [11
] to prevent
eosinophilia after BLM treatment; however, our studies have shown that
prevention of eosinophilia with anti-IL-5 failed to block TNF-
expression by BLM. Together, these findings suggest that TNF-
may
contribute to the development of eosinophilia after BLM but that
eosinophils are not required for the expression of TNF-
after BLM
treatment.
To confirm our findings that eosinophils were not necessary for the
development of pulmonary fibrosis, IL-5 gene knockout mice were
evaluated for their response to BLM treatment. Significant lung
fibrosis was detected 14 days post-BLM in these eosinophil-deficient
mice, again indicating that pulmonary fibrosis can occur in the absence
of eosinophils. Thus, in three different mouse strains and via two
methods to prevent eosinophilia, we have not been able to demonstrate a
critical role for eosinophils in the development of BLM-induced
pulmonary fibrosis. Whether eosinophils are critical for other fibrotic
diseases in humans or in animal models is not clear from these studies.
Certainly, the biology of eosinophils suggests that they could
participate in the fibrotic process. Eosinophils have been shown to
transcribe and/or translate a wide range of cytokines including IL-1
, TGF-
, TGF-ß, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
(GM-CSF), TNF-
, MCP-1, IL-3, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-8. Several of these
cytokines have been shown in animal models to participate in the
development of fibrosis. However, eosinophils have been shown to
synthesize collagenases specific for types I, II, and III collagen also
but neither elastase nor nonspecific neutral protease
[32
33
34
]. Thus, it is possible that eosinophils may not
be involved in initiation of the fibrotic process but rather may serve
a role in the remodeling of the fibrotic lesion. Further studies to
address whether eosinophils serve this accessory role in remodeling
fibrotic lesions in the murine model of fibrosis need to be performed.
Received March 6, 2000; revised May 9, 2000; accepted May 11, 2000.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Mozaffarian, A. W. Brewer, E. S. Trueblood, I. G. Luzina, N. W. Todd, S. P. Atamas, and H. A. Arnett Mechanisms of Oncostatin M-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation and Fibrosis J. Immunol., November 15, 2008; 181(10): 7243 - 7253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Wallach-Dayan, R. Golan-Gerstl, and R. Breuer Evasion of myofibroblasts from immune surveillance: A mechanism for tissue fibrosis PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20460 - 20465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. van den Brule, J. Heymans, X. Havaux, J.-C. Renauld, D. Lison, F. Huaux, and O. Denis Profibrotic Effect of IL-9 Overexpression in a Model of Airway Remodeling Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2007; 37(2): 202 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arras, J. Louahed, J.-F. Heilier, M. Delos, F. Brombacher, J.-C. Renauld, D. Lison, and F. Huaux IL-9 Protects against Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury: Involvement of Prostaglandins Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2005; 166(1): 107 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Huaux, T. Liu, B. McGarry, M. Ullenbruch, Z. Xing, and S. H. Phan Eosinophils and T Lymphocytes Possess Distinct Roles in Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury and Fibrosis J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 5470 - 5481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chakrabarti, K. S. Kobayashi, R. A. Flavell, C. B. Marks, K. Miyake, D. R. Liston, K. T. Fowler, F. S. Gorelick, and N. W. Andrews Impaired membrane resealing and autoimmune myositis in synaptotagmin VII-deficient mice J. Cell Biol., August 18, 2003; 162(4): 543 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ghosh, T. Mendoza, L. A. Ortiz, G. W. Hoyle, C. D. Fermin, A. R. Brody, M. Friedman, and G. F. Morris Bleomycin Sensitivity of Mice Expressing Dominant-Negative p53 in the Lung Epithelium Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2002; 166(6): 890 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||