(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2000;68:267-276.)
© 2000
by Society for Leukocyte Biology
Lipopolysaccharide-triggered desensitization of TNF-
mRNA expression involves lack of phosphorylation of I
B
in a murine macrophage-like cell line, P388D1
Mitsuhiro Fujihara*,
Shinobu Wakamoto*,
Takatoshi Ito*,
Masashi Muroi
,
Tsuneo Suzuki
,
Hisami Ikeda* and
Kenji Ikebuchi*
* Japanese Red Cross, Hokkaido Red Cross Blood Center, Sapporo;
Division of Microbiology, National Institutes of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan; and
Department of Microbiology, Molecular Genetics and Immunology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
Correspondence: Dr. Mitsuhiro Fujihara, Japanese Red Cross, Hokkaido Red Cross Blood Center, Yamanote 2-2, Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0002 Japan. E-mail: fujihara{at}hokkaido.bc.jrc.or.jp
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Activation of nuclear factor
B (NF-
B) is thought to be
required for cytokine production by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-responsive
cells. Here, we investigated the contribution of NF-
B in preventing
LPS-induced transcription of the tumor necrosis factor
(TNF-
)
gene in a murine macrophage cell line, P388D1, when tolerance was
induced in the cells with a short exposure to a higher dose of LPS.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with the
B elements of the
murine TNF-
promoter and enhancer revealed that nuclear mobilization
of heterodimers of p65/p50, c-rel/p50 and p65/c-rel, and homodimers of
p65 was markedly reduced in LPS-tolerant cells, whereas that of p50
homodimers was only slightly increased. Western blot analysis showed
that the phosphorylation of Ser32 on I
B
and its
transient degradation did not occur in LPS-tolerant cells. These
results thus suggest that desensitization of TNF-
gene expression in
this LPS-tolerant state is closely associated with down-regulation of
transactivating NF-
B and may involve a defect in the LPS-induced
I
B
kinase pathway.
Key Words: NF-
B signal transduction Toll-like receptor 4
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Desensitization or tolerance is a well-known process that is
characterized by the loss of responses due to repeated stimulation.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell wall constituent of gram-negative
bacteria, is a potent activator of macrophage functions
[1
, 2
]. LPS plays major roles in septic
shock, and also has the ability to induce desensitization to its own
effects in a variety of primary monocyte/macrophage cells and cell
lines [3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
]. The macrophages in an LPS-tolerant state
typically respond to a secondary LPS stimulation to a much lesser
extent (such as LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokine production) than
the initial stimulation. LPS tolerance is now regarded as an adaptation
or reprogramming of cellular responses such as cytokine
autocrine/paracrine regulatory control [15
], and appears
to require the synthesis of one or more proteins that interfere with
LPS-signaling processes [8
, 9
,
11
12
13
14
].
LPS-induced signal transmission is thought to entail binding to
specific cellular receptors, which trigger intracellular signaling
cascades leading to activation of the transcription factor nuclear
factor
B (NF-
B) and mitogen-activating protein kinases among
others [16
]. NF-
B is essential for tumor necrosis
factor
(TNF-
) gene expression in LPS-stimulated murine primary
macrophages [17
18
19
]. NF-
B consists of multiple
proteins belonging to the Rel family that include p105/p50 (NF-
B1),
p65 (RelA), p100/p52 (Lyt10, NF-
B2), c-rel, and RelB
[20
]. The p50/p65 heterodimer has been most thoroughly
studied and is known to have transactivating function, whereas p50
homodimer appears to function most commonly as a transcriptional
suppressor [21
22
23
]. In most cell types, NF-
B dimers
are kept in the cytoplasm through interaction with the I
B inhibitory
proteins [24
, 25
]. Among I
Bs, the most
important appear to be I
B
, I
Bß, and the newly discovered
I
B
. I
B proteins show distinct specificity for various NF-
B
protein dimer combinations. For instance, I
B
binds to both p50
homodimers and p50/p65 heterodimers but inhibits only p50/p65
heterodimers [26
, 27
]. In response to cell
stimulation with proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF), LPS, and
phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), at least two of the I
Bs (I
B
and I
Bß) undergo rapid phosphorylation at two sites within their
amino-terminal regulatory domain. The phosphorylation of the I
Bs
results in their polyubiquitination, which in turn leads to their 26S
proteasome-mediated degradation, allowing NF-
B to translocate into
the nucleus and activate target genes [28
,
29
]. This phosphorylation occurs on Ser-32 and Ser-36 of
I
B
and Ser-19 and Ser-23 of I
Bß [30
,
31
]. Thus, the signal-induced phosphorylation of I
B is
the key event that triggers the cascade of events leading to activation
of NF-
B. Hence, I
B kinase (IKK)-
/IKK1 and IKK-ß/IKK2 have
been molecularly cloned [32
].
CD14, the 53- to 55-kDa glycoprotein expressed on phagocytic
leukocytes, has been identified as the principle LPS-binding molecule
[33
]. The serum LPS-binding protein (LBP) significantly
increases LPS binding of CD14, and facilitates transfer of LPS monomers
into high-density lipoproteins [34
, 35
].
Thus, CD14 and LBP are regarded as one of the components of an LPS
receptor complex [16
, 33
]. However, because
CD14 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein without
transmembrane domain, its interaction with other signal-transducing
molecules has been assumed. Recently, several members of a mammalian
Toll-like receptor (TLR) family have been identified
[36
]. Members of the TLR family share homology in their
intracellular portions with the signaling domains of the IL-1 receptor
family, and Drosophila Toll and several mammalian TLRs have
been shown to activate NF-
B [37
, 38
].
Overexpression of TLR2 or TLR4 cDNA was originally shown to confer
responsiveness to LPS stimulation in human embryonic kidney HEK293
cells through NF-
B signaling cascade, suggesting the implication of
TLR2 in LPS signal transduction [39
, 40
].
Identification studies of the causative gene of the LPS
hyporesponsiveness of C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice demonstrated that
defective LPS signaling corresponds to mutations of the TLR4 gene
[41
, 42
]. Vogel et al. demonstrated that
mutation of the TLR4 gene in C3H/HeJ exerts a dominant-negative effect
on LPS sensitivity in vivo [43
]. In addition,
TLR-4 knockout mice are shown to be hyporesponsive to LPS
[44
]. Furthermore, Chow reported that human TLR4
activates NF-
B-mediated expression by stimulation with LPS/CD14 in
HEK293 cells [45
]. It has also been reported that TLR4
can confer CD14- dependent LPS responsiveness on HEK293 cells,
depending on the concomitant expression of an additional protein, MD-2
[46
]. More recently published data suggested that TLR4
is a strong candidate as an LPS signal transducer in normal phagocytes
and that differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of negative
and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components
[47
48
49
50
51
]. With regard to LPS tolerance, TLR4 mRNA was
shown to be strongly and transiently suppressed by LPS treatment in
murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 cells [41
]. This
result suggested that down-regulation of TLR4 mRNA contributes to
endotoxin tolerance.
The involvement of NF-
B has been studied to understand the
mechanisms of desensitization of TNF-
gene expression in response to
LPS [3
, 4
, 9
,
11
12
13
14
]. Several studies showed that an up-regulation of
NF-
B p50 homodimers and the binding of p50 homodimers to the
B#3
element of mouse TNF-
promoter is attributed to down-regulation of
TNF-
gene expression in an LPS-tolerant state, because p50 can bind
to DNA but lacks a transactivation domain [8
,
12
13
14
]. This notion is supported by the result that the
expression of TNF-
mRNA was not diminished by prolonged exposure to
LPS in macrophages from p50-/- mice [52
].
Furthermore, it has been shown that TNF-
transcription in mouse
macrophages is attenuated by an autocrine factor that preferentially
induces p50 homodimers, thereby causing their binding to the distal
B sites of mouse TNF-
promoter, including
B#3
[53
].
Although LPS tolerance, in general, requires a prolonged primary LPS
challenge, a short exposure to LPS can induce a tolerant state in
vitro [10
, 11
, 54
,
55
]. We also recently demonstrated that the protooncogene
junB, a member of the Jun family, is down-regulated in the
LPS-tolerant state that is induced by a short exposure of primary LPS,
in the mouse macrophage cell line, P388D1, with the decreased
expression of TNF-
gene [56
]. In this study,
therefore, we addressed the question of whether an up-regulation of p50
is instrumental in the down-regulation of TNF-
expression, in an LPS
tolerant state caused by a short exposure to primary LPS. In addition,
the phosphorylation as well as degradation of I
Bs was examined in
the LPS-tolerant state with regard to the diminished expression of
TNF-
mRNA. We also investigated whether the suppression of TLR4 mRNA
expression occurs in response to LPS in our system. The results show
that: (1) the nuclear translocation of heterodimers of transactivating
NF-
B (p50/p65, p50/c-rel, and p65/c-rel heterodimers and p65
homodimers) was markedly reduced in the LPS-tolerant state, whereas the
nuclear translocation of p50 homodimers was slightly increased; (2) the
phosphorylation of I
B
, and subsequent loss of its degradation was
not observed in the LPS-tolerant state; and (3) the down-regulation of
TLR4 mRNA expression was not observed in either the control or the
LPS-tolerant state in our system.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Cell culture and induction of endotoxin tolerance
The mouse macrophage-like cell line, P388D1 cells, which were
isolated from a methylcholanthren-induced lymphoid neoplasm of a DBA/2
mouse and has been shown to possess characteristics typical of
macrophages, were grown in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, supplemented with 100 U/mL
penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Endotoxin tolerance was
induced by incubating cells with 1 µg/mL LPS (Escherichia
coli 0111:B4; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h. The
cells (1 x 107/experiment) were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed for 2 h in LPS-free
complete medium. Then the cells were restimulated with LPS as described
in the figure legends. For all assays, control cells were treated
similarly, but were not given the primary dose. In some experiments,
cells (3 x 106/10cm-dish) were cultured for 2 days in
the presence or absence of 100 ng/mL LPS. The cells were then washed
and stimulated at 1 µg/mL LPS for the indicated periods
[12
, 13
].
Northern blot analysis
Northern analysis of TNF-
and ß-actin mRNAs was carried out
as described previously [58
]. P388D1 cells (1 x
107/experiment) treated as indicated in the text were
washed with cold PBS, quickly frozen, and stored at -80°C until use.
Total cellular RNA was extracted from the cells through the use of the
guanidinium thiocyanate procedure. The isolated RNA (10 µg) was
electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde and
then transferred to Nytran nylon membranes (Schleicher and Schuell,
Dassel, Germany) by capillary action using 10x SSC. The membranes were
prehybridized for at least 2 h at 42°C in a solution containing
50% (v/v) formamide, 5x SSPE, 5x Denhardts solution, 0.5% sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.01 M EDTA, and 100 µg/mL salmon sperm DNA.
Membranes were then incubated for 20 h at 42°C in the same
solution with 32P-labeled cDNA probes specific for TNF-
previously labeled by the random hexamer priming method using
[
-32P]dCTP. Membranes were then washed twice at 25°C
in 0.1% SDS and 2x SSPE for 30 min, twice at 42°C in 0.1% SDS and
0.1x SSPE, and autoradiographed on a Kodak XAR-5 film at -80°C with
intensifying screens. Membranes were then stripped and reprobed with
32P-labeled ß-actin cDNA. The mouse TLR4 cDNA fragments
were obtained by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR) from total RNA extracted from mouse macrophage cell line,
RAW264.7 cells. The primers used were identical to those reported
[41
]. The resultant 2.6-kb TLR4 fragment was cloned into
pCRII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The identity of this fragment as a
TLR4 cDNA fragment was confirmed by recognition sites of several
restriction enzymes as well as partial DNA sequencing. The linearized
plasmids containing the properly oriented insert were transcribed using
an in vitro transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) with
[
-32P]UTP, and used for hybridization. The membranes
were prehybridized for at least 6 h at 55°C in a solution
containing 50% (v/v) formamide, 5x SSPE, 5x Denhardts solution,
0.5% SDS, and 100 µg/mL salmon sperm DNA. Membranes were then
incubated for 20 h at 55°C in the same solution with
32P-labeled TLR4 riboprobe. Membranes were then washed
three times at 65°C in 0.5% SDS and 1x SSPE for 15 min, and
autoradiographed on a Kodak MS film at -80°C with intensifying
screens. After analysis with TLR4 probe, the membrane was rehybridized
with 32P-labeled ß-actin riboprobe. In some experiments,
blots were hybridized using ULTRAhyb solution (Ambion) with
32P-labeled DNA probe obtained by RT-PCR. The primers used
were 5-TGACACCCTCCATAGACTTC-3 and
5-GTTCTCCTCAGGTCCAAGTTGCCGTTTC-3 [42
]. As a negative
control, the RNA from a mouse T cell hybridoma, HTB 176.10 was used.
Preparation of nuclear and cytosolic extracts
Nuclear extracts and cytosolic fractions were prepared by the
method of Sadowski and Gilman [57
], as follows. After
the stimulation period, the cells (1 x
107/experiment) were rinsed twice with ice-cold PBS, once
with PBS containing 1 mM Na3VO4 and 5 mM NaF,
and once with hypotonic buffer. Ice-cold hypotonic buffer with 0.4%
Nonidet P-40 (NP-40; 0.5 mL) was added directly to the cells to lyse
them. Lysates were scraped into microfuge tubes and mixed, and the
nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 s.
Supernatants were supplemented with NaCl to 120 mM, clarified (15,000
rpm for 20 min), and glycerol was added to 10% as the cytosol
fraction. The nuclei were then washed twice with 500 µL of hypotonic
buffer containing 0.4% NP-40 and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min.
The nuclear pellets were resuspended in 75 µL of high-salt buffer on
ice for 30 min with occasional gentle mixing. The nuclear suspension
was centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 rpm, and then 5 min at 15,000 rpm
to remove the insoluble fraction. Hypotonic buffer consisted of: 20 mM
HEPES (pH7.9), 20 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM
Na4P2O7, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1
µg/mL of pepstatin, and 10 µg/mL each of leupeptin and aprotinin.
This buffer containing 420 mM NaCl and 20% glycerol (high-salt buffer)
was used for nuclear extraction. Cytosolic and nuclear extracts were
then frozen and stored at -80°C. The protein concentration of each
extract was determined by the Bradford assay (Bio Rad Laboratories,
Hercules, CA).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
This was carried out as described previously
[58
]. The following NF-
B-specific oligonucleotides
containing one NF-
B site were used:
B#3 motif (the -510) of the
murine TNF-
promoter [17
]
(5-TTCAGGGGGCTTTCCCTACA-3) and
B#4 motif (+2830) of the
downstream of the murine TNF-
gene [18
]
(5-CATGGGGGCATGGGAATTTCCCACTCTGCATG-3). The oligonucleotide and its
complementary strand were annealed, and labeled by a T4 kinase-mediated
phosphorylation reaction in the presence of [
-32P]ATP.
Nuclear protein extracts (56 µg) with 2.5 µg of poly
(dI-dC) · poly (dI-dC) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden)
and end-labeled DNA (
40,000 cpm) were mixed in 25 µL of EMSA
buffer (10 mM Tris · HCl, pH 7.5, containing 40 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1
mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 4% glycerol, 0.1% NP-40, 1 mM DTT, and 1
µg/µL BSA) and incubated for 30 min at 25°C after mixing. After
this initial binding reaction, 20 µL of the mixture was
electrophoresed at 15 V/cm for 1.5 h at room temperature through a
native 4.5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.25x TBE. Gels were processed for
autoradiography. To quantitate the amount of NF-
B proteins
specifically bound to the probe, the radioactive bands identified by
autoradiography were cut out and counted in a ß counter. For the
supershift assay, nuclear proteins (2 µg/25 µL) extracted from
P388D1 cells treated with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 30 min were first
incubated for 60 min at 25°C with 1 µL of polyclonal antibodies
directed against p50 (#sc-1192x), p65 (#sc-372x), c-rel (#sc-70x), or
STAT-3 (#sc-482x) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
Antiserum to carboxy terminus of mouse cRel (#1266) that was kindly
provided by Dr. N. Rice (NCI-FCRDC, Frederick, MD) was also used. These
mixtures were then subjected to EMSA as described above.
Western blot analysis
Nuclear extracts (10 µg) and cytosolic extracts (30 µg) were
subjected to an electrophoresis in 10% SDS-PAGE. The proteins
separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane
(Schleicher and Schuell) using electrophoretic transfer cell.
Subsequently, the nitrocellulose membrane was blocked with TBST (20 mM
Tris, 137 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.6) containing 5% w/v nonfat
dry milk for 3 h at room temperature. The membrane was then
incubated with TBST containing the relevant Abs in the presence of 5%
BSA at 4°C overnight with gentle agitation. The primary Abs used were
the rabbit polyclonal antibodies of anti-I
B
(New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA), anti-I
Bß (N-20), anti-p50 (H-119), anti-p65 (C-20),
and anti-c-rel (N-466) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology at a 1/1000
dilution. After being rinsed with three changes of TBST, the blot was
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody at
1/4000 dilution in TBS with 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h at room
temperature. The blots probed with relevant antibodies were then washed
three times with TBST, and developed with the use of the Phototope
chemiluminescence detection system (New England Biolabs). To detect the
posphorylation of Ser32 of I
B
, Abs that specifically
recognize Ser32 on I
B
were purchased from New England
Biolabs and used in immunoblot analyses. Detection of Ab binding was
conducted as described in the manufacturers instructions.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
TNF-
mRNA expression by the treatment with LPS in P388D1 cells
The kinetics and dose-response characteristics for TNF-
mRNA
expression in mouse macrophage cell line, P388D1 cells in response to
LPS treatment were first examined by Northern analysis. P388D1 cells
(1 x 107) were incubated with LPS (1 µg/mL) for
varying periods of time (06 h). Total RNAs were then extracted from
the cells and were subjected to Northern analysis. The expression of
TNF-
mRNA was substantially increased at 30 min of exposure to LPS,
further increased at 1 h, and then greatly reduced after a 3-h
exposure to LPS (Fig. 1A
).
Prior exposure to LPS reduced TNF-
expression in response to
secondary LPS treatment
Next, the question of how repeated exposure of P388D1 cells to LPS
affects TNF-
expression was investigated. To this end, P388D1 cells
were exposed for 1 h at 37°C to varying doses of LPS (10 pg/mL
to 1 µg/mL). Cells were then washed, incubated for an additional
2 h in LPS-free medium, and restimulated with 1 µg/mL of LPS for
1 h. Northern analysis of total RNAs extracted from the cells
(Fig. 1B)
showed that the secondary responses of cells became more
refractory, when cells were first exposed to >10 ng/mL LPS. The
initial exposure of cells to <1 ng/mL LPS did not substantially alter
the TNF-
mRNA expression on secondary exposure of the cells.
NF-
B translocation by the treatment with LPS in P388D1 cells
NF-
B proteins have been shown to regulate the expression of
TNF-
mRNA in murine macrophages [17
18
19
]. Indeed,
pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, a relatively specific inhibitor of the
activation of NF-
B in macrophages [59
], remarkably
inhibited the LPS-triggered TNF-
expression in P388D1 cells (data
not shown). To investigate the mode of activation of NF-
B in
response to LPS treatment, P388D1 cells were incubated with LPS (1
µg/mL) for up to 3 h. Nuclear extracts were prepared and
incubated with end-labeled oligonucleotide probe containing
B#3
motif (the -510) of the murine TNF-
promoter [12
].
The reaction mixtures were then subjected to EMSA. Figure 2A
showed that the
B#3 site bound two major complexes
constitutively, the fast-moving C1 complex and slower-moving C2
complex. The C1 complex gradually increased in nuclear extract and was
about 1.6-fold the constitutive level (based on the radioactive counts
of the C1 complex band cut out) at 3 h. The level of C2 complex
substantially increased as early as 10 min after exposure to LPS,
reached a maximum at 30 min (about 4.8-fold the constitutive level),
and then declined. To identify the components of the C1 and C2
complexes, supershift analyses were performed. Both C1 and C2 complexes
were supershifted markedly when the nuclear extract was preincubated
with anti-p50 antibody before binding to the probe. A significant
reduction of C2 complex with supershift was observed with anti-p65 or
anti-c-rel antibody, but the level of C1 complex was not decreased by
these antibodies. The antiserum to carboxy-terminal of mouse c-rel
(#1266) showed the same result (data not shown). Unrelevant antibody
against STAT-3 affected neither C1 nor C2 complexes. Thus, C1 complex
appeared to consist predominantly of homodimer of p50, whereas C2
complex appeared to contain heterodimers of p50/p65 and p50/c-rel (Fig. 2C) .
Because
B#3 motif was shown to be minimally important for
LPS-induced transcription of the extended TNF-
promoter
[19
], we tested an mTNF-
B#4 element that was known to
have enhancer activity and to bind two conventional complexes I and II
as well as a slower-migrating complex III in LPS-activated mouse bone
marrow-derived macrophages or mouse macrophage cell line, ANA-1 cells
[18
]. Combination of high-resolution EMSA with
monospecific antibodies and ultraviolet-cross-linking indicated that
the p50 homodimer as a protein constituent of complex I, p50/c-rel and
p50/p65 heterodimers as the fraction of complex II, and the p65/c-rel
heterodimer and p65 homodimer as a constituents of complex III
[18
]. In the nuclear extract from LPS-activated P388D1
cells the mTNF-
B#4 probe bound three complexes designated as C1, C2,
and C3, similar to the results obtained in the LPS-activated murine
macrophages or ANA-1 cells (Fig. 2B)
. The C1 complex (p50 homodimer)
gradually increased in nuclear extract and was about 1.6-fold the
constitutive level at 3 h. The level of C2 complex (p50/p65 and
p50/c-rel) substantially increased as early as 10 min after exposure to
LPS, reached a maximum at 3060 min (about eightfold the constitutive
level), and then declined. The level of C3 complex (presumably p65
homodimer and p65/c-rel) also increased, reached a maximum at 3060
min (about 4.3-fold the constitutive level), and then declined. Thus,
EMSA using two
B elements revealed that transient and significant
increases in levels of heterodimers including p50/p65, p50/c-rel, and
p65/c-rel, and homodimers of p65 occurred with LPS stimulation, whereas
levels of p50 homodimers were gradually and slightly elevated during
the observed periods.
I
B
degradation by treatment with LPS in P388D1 cells
Activation of NF-
B by TNF-
or IL-1 is achieved through
phosphorylation-dependent degradation of the I
Bs, which results in
the release and subsequent nuclear translocation of NF-
B
[28
, 29
]. We performed immunoblotting
experiments with I
B
and I
Bß antibodies to examine whether
LPS causes degradation of these I
B proteins in this cell line.
Almost complete degradation of I
B
had occurred by 30 min after
LPS treatment, with reexpression observed by 60 min. The
phosphorylation of Ser32 of I
B
occurred as early as
10 min after LPS treatment, and persisted thereafter (Fig. 3A
). By contrast, no degradation of I
Bß was observed over
3 h after LPS treatment (Fig. 3B) . Thus, the degradation of
I
B
, due to the phosphorylation, is mainly responsible for the
translocation of NF-
B in this cell line in response to LPS.
Prior exposure to LPS reduced NF-
B activation in response to
secondary LPS treatment
We then examined whether the reduced level of steady-state TNF-
mRNA observed in endotoxin-tolerant cells could be due to the decrease
in NF-
B activation, as follows. P388D1 cells were incubated for
1 h with or without 1 µg/mL LPS. Cells were then washed,
incubated for 2 h in LPS-free medium, and incubated with LPS for
0, 15, 30, and 90 min. Nuclear extracts were subjected to EMSA using
the oligonucleotide probe containing
B#3 (Fig. 4A
). Treatment with LPS in the control cells increased the C2
complex binding with a peak at 30 min (Fig. 4
, lanes 14), whereas the
increase of C2 complex activation in LPS-pretreated cells by secondary
stimulation with LPS was very small (Fig. 4
, lanes 58). The fold
increase of C2 complex binding of control cells was significantly
higher than that of LPS-treatment cells at 30 min after LPS treatment
(3.58 ± 0.45 vs. 1.91 ± 0.52, P < 0.05 by
unpaired Students t test). The C1 complex slightly
increased in both control and LPS-tolerant cells, but there was no
significant difference between control and LPS-tolerant cells
(1.13 ± 0.13 vs. 1.81 ± 0.44).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Effect of pretreatment with LPS on translocation of NF- B activation
in response to subsequent exposure to LPS. P388D1 cells (1 x
107/experiment) were incubated in the absence (lanes 14)
or presence (lanes 58) of 1 µg/mL LPS for 1 h, washed twice in
PBS, and incubated again for 2 h in LPS-free medium. Cells were
then stimulated for 0 (lanes 1, 5), 15 (lanes 2, 6), 30 (lanes 3, 7),
or 90 min (lanes 4, 8) with 1 µg/mL LPS. Nuclear extracts were
subjected to EMSA using radiolabeled oligonucleotides corresponding to
the B#3 of the TNF- promoter (A) or the downstream B element
( B#4) of the TNF- gene (B). The autoradiograph (left panel) shown
is a representative result of three different experiments (right
panel). Degree of increase in each complex over the constitutive level,
respectively, was determined as shown in Figure 2
, and was expressed as
the mean ± SE of three experiments.
|
|
We also performed EMSA with the probe corresponding to
B#4
site (Fig. 4B)
. Treatment with LPS in the control cells resulted in
increase in the C2 and C3 complex binding with a peak at 30 min (lanes
14), whereas the increases of C2 and C3 complex activation by
restimulation with LPS in LPS-pretreated cells were very small (lanes
58). The degree of increases of C2 and C3 complex binding in control
cells were significantly higher than those in LPS-treatment cells at 30
min after LPS treatment ( 5.23 ± 0.28 vs. 1.51 ± 0.20 in
C2, 4.20 ± 0.25 vs. 1.16 ± 0.23 in C3, P <
0.05 by unpaired Students t test). Again, there was no
significant difference between control and LPS-tolerant cells in the C1
complex binding. These results suggest that decreased activation of C2
complex (p50/p65 and p50/c-rel) as well as C3 complex (presumably
p65/c-rel and p65 homodimer) in LPS-tolerant cells contributed to
decreased levels of LPS-triggered TNF-
mRNA expression.
Translocation of p65 and c-rel was greatly reduced in the
LPS-tolerant state
To analyze the down-regulation of NF-
B activation in the
LPS-tolerant state, we performed immunoblotting analysis of NF-
B
proteins, p65, p50, and c-rel, in the nuclear fraction of the control
and LPS-tolerant cells (Fig. 5
). In the control cells, the level of p65 increased at 15 and 30
min and then decreased at 90 min, whereas the level of p65 did not
increase in the LPS-tolerant cells. The level of p50 also increased at
30 min and declined at 90 min in the control cells, whereas the level
of p50 in LPS-tolerant cells remained higher than the constitutive
level of the control cells. The level of c-rel clearly increased at 30
min after LPS treatment in the control cells, but not in the
LPS-tolerant cells. These results support the EMSA patterns that the
binding of heterodimers of p50/p65, p50/c-rel, and p65/c-rel and
homodimers of p65 to the
B#4 in LPS-tolerant cells were
significantly less than that in the control cells. In addition, the
slightly higher binding of p50 homodimers to the
B#3, in the
LPS-tolerant cells may be related to the persistent presence of p50 in
the nucleus in the tolerant cells.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Effect of pretreatment with LPS on translocation of p65, p50, and c-rel
in response to subsequent exposure to LPS. Cells were treated as
described in the legend of Figure 4
. Nuclear extracts were subjected to
10% SDS-PAGE, and blotted on nitrocellulose membrane. The blots were
probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-p65, anti-p50, or anti-c-rel
antibody. The position of each band is indicated by an arrow. A
representative blot of three independent experiments is shown.
|
|
Lack of phosphorylation and degradation of I
B
in the
LPS-tolerant state
To examine whether the degradation as well as phosphorylation of
I
B
occurred in the LPS-tolerant state, we performed
immunoblotting analysis of the I
B
in the cytosolic fraction of
control and LPS-tolerant cells (Fig. 6
). In the control cells, the level of I
B
decreased at 15 and
30 min and then increased at 90 min, suggesting that LPS stimulation
induced the transient degradation and resynthesis of I
B
. In
contrast, the level of I
B
did not change significantly in the
LPS-tolerant cells. Furthermore, the increased phosphorylation of
Ser32 of I
B
was observed in the control cells, but
not in the tolerant cells. The level of I
Bß did not change in
either control or LPS-tolerant cells. These results suggest that the
absence of phosphorylation of I
B
contributes to the
down-regulated TNF-
mRNA expression in LPS-tolerant cells.
Effect of LPS treatment on TLR4 mRNA expression in control and
LPS-tolerant cells
It was recently shown that TLR4 primarily acts in the recognition
of LPS and transduces the LPS signal in mice. In addition, LPS
treatment was shown to cause strong and transient suppression of TLR4
mRNA in murine RAW264.7 cells, suggesting that the down-regulation of
TLR4 mRNA contributes to endotoxin tolerance [41
].
Therefore, we investigated the expression pattern of TLR4 mRNA in both
the control and the LPS-tolerant state in response to LPS. P388D1 cells
were incubated for 1 h with or without 1 µg/mL LPS. Cells were
then washed, incubated for 2 h in LPS-free medium, and incubated
for 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 h with 1 µg/mL LPS. Figure 7
shows that the TLR4 mRNA expression was suppressed in neither the
control nor LPS-tolerant state. This result suggests that the
down-regulation of TNF-
mRNA expression detected in our system was
not due to the change of TLR4 mRNA level.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Effect of pretreatment with LPS on the TLR4 mRNA expression in response
to subsequent exposure to LPS. P388D1 cells (1 x 107
cells) were incubated in the absence (lanes 15) or presence (lanes
610) of 1 µg/mL LPS for 1 h, washed twice in PBS, and
incubated again for 2 h in LPS-free medium. Cells were then
stimulated for 0 (lanes 1, 6), 0.5 (lanes 2, 7), 1 (lanes 3, 8), 2
(lanes 4, 9), or 3 h (lanes 5, 10) with 1 µg/mL LPS. Total RNAs
extracted from the cells were subjected to Northern analysis. TLR4 mRNA
was detected on Northern blots with riboprobe as described in Materials
and Methods. After analysis with TLR4 probe, the membrane was
rehybridized with ß-actin riboprobe. Additional experiments gave
similar results. Right panel: untreated P388D1 (lane 1), a mouse T cell
hybridoma HTB 176.10 as a negative control (lane 2).
|
|
Preincubation with a lower LPS dose for a longer period resulted in
a substantial increase in p50 homodimer in response to secondary LPS
treatment
Previously, Ziegler-Heitbroch et al. demonstrated that LPS
tolerance involves a preferential increase in p50 homodimers using the
same cell line and
B#3 oligonucleotides as those we used in this
study. The differences in outcome may be due to differences in the
experimental conditions to induce LPS tolerance. The earlier study used
a much longer preincubation and a lower dose of LPS to induce LPS
tolerance. To test whether these differences may account for the
disagreement, P388D1 cells were preincubated for 2 days with 100 ng/mL
LPS, washed, and then restimulated with 1 µg/mL LPS for up to 1 h. The result of EMSA using the
B#3 oligonucleotides revealed that
p50 homodimers (C1 complex) were significantly increased in
LPS-tolerant cells and were further up-regulated by LPS restimulation
(compare Fig. 4A
), confirming the earlier study by Ziegler-Heitbroch et
al. [12
] (Fig. 8A
).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8. (A) Effect of longer pretreatment with a lower LPS dose on
translocation of NF- B activation in response to subsequent exposure
to LPS. P388D1 cells (3 x 106/experiment) were
incubated in the absence (lanes 14) or presence (lanes 58) of 100
ng/mL LPS for 2 days, and washed once with LPS-free medium. Cells were
then stimulated for 0 (lanes 1, 5), 15 (lanes 2, 6), 30 (lanes 3, 7),
or 60 min (lanes 4, 8) with 1 µg/mL LPS. Nuclear extracts were
subjected to EMSA using radiolabeled oligonucleotides corresponding to
the B#3 of the TNF- promoter (left panel). The autoradiograph
shows a representative of two separate experiments that gave similar
results (right panel). The degree of increase in each complex over the
constitutive level, respectively, was determined as shown in Figure 2
,
and was expressed as the mean of two experiments. (B) The effect of
longer pretreatment with a lower LPS dose on phosphorylation of
Ser32 on I B and its degradation in response to
subsequent exposure to LPS. Cells were treated as described above.
Cytosolic extracts were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, and blotted on
nitrocellulose membrane. The phosphorylation of Ser32 on
I B was determined by phospho I B -specific Ab, and the total
level of I B was probed with polyclonal rabbit I B antibody.
Another experiment showed similar results.
|
|
We also performed immunoblotting analysis to examine whether
degradation as well as phosphorylation of I
B
occurred in
LPS-tolerant cells (Fig. 8B)
. Immunoblotting analysis of the total
I
B
level and the phosphorylation of I
B
showed that LPS
restimulation failed to induce the transient degradation and
resynthesis of I
B
in LPS-tolerant cells. In addition,
LPS-triggered phosphorylation of I
B
was not observed in
LPS-tolerant cells. These results suggest that the proximal level of
LPS-signal transduction pathway was impaired in LPS-tolerant cells,
regardless of experimental conditions to induce LPS tolerance.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The notion that NF-
B pathways play an important role in
LPS-induced desensitization of TNF-
gene expression is supported by
several investigators. Although multiple mechanisms have been proposed,
the up-regulation of p50 homodimers is currently recognized as
instrumental to LPS-tolerance in TNF-
gene expression.
Ziegler-Heitbrock et al. [8
, 12
] provided
evidence that human Mono Mac 6 cells translocate predominantly p50/p65
or p50/c-rel heterodimers after primary LPS challenge, whereas
LPS-tolerant cells had a persistent nuclear localization of p50
homodimers that was up-regulated in response to secondary LPS
stimulation. They also examined whether similar processes occur in
murine monocyte/macrophage cells, and detected a pronounced
up-regulation of p50 homodimers in LPS-tolerant P388D1 cells. Because
the p50 homodimers are not effective in transcriptional activation, and
the strong up-regulation of p50 homodimers is thought to be attributed
to down-regulation of TNF-
gene expression in the LPS-tolerant
state, they assumed that the increase of p50 homodimer DNA binding
activity is due to the synthesis of p50 protein from its precursor,
p105, and demonstrated that p105 mRNA levels were up-regulated upon
stimulation of Mono Mac 6 cells with LPS, whereas p65 mRNA levels were
unaffected [8
]. This is in agreement with reports that
NF-
B itself participates in the regulation of p105 expression
through NF-
B motifs in the p105 promoter [60
,
61
], whereas the p65 promoter does not contain such a
motif [62
]. Furthermore, it has been speculated that
up-regulation of p50 in the cytoplasm favors formation of p50
homodimers in cytoplasm, and resultant p50 homodimers may directly
translocate to the nucleus [54
], as at least I
B
does not inhibit p50 homodimers [26
, 27
].
Bohuslav et al. provided evidence of an essential role for p50 in LPS
tolerance [52
]. They demonstrated that murine peritoneal
exudate macrophages obtained from p50 knock-out mice did not become LPS
tolerant, as measured by TNF-
gene expression, after an 18-h
pretreatment with LPS, whereas macrophages from wild-type mice did.
Also, they reported the persistent nuclear localization of p50
homodimers, which bound probe DNA containing the
B#3 site from the
mouse TNF-
promoter in cells after induction of LPS tolerance.
In this study, we addressed the question of whether up-regulation of
p50 homodimers is also essential, when the LPS-tolerant state was
induced by a shorter exposure (1 h) to a higher dose of primary LPS (1
µg/mL) in P388D1 cells: these were 2- to 3-day and 100 ng/mL in the
study by Ziegler-Heitbrock et al. We used the same oligonucleotide
(
B#3 motif of the mouse TNF-
promoter) together with the
B#4
of the downstream of TNF-
gene as a comparison. The results of the
gel shift assay revealed a remarkable decrease in mobilization of
heterodimers consisting of homodimers of p65 and heterodimers of
p50/p65, p50/c-rel, and p65/c-rel in the LPS-tolerant state. Although
constitutive p50 homodimers and the gradual increase in response to LPS
were detected, only a slight up-regulation of p50 homodimers in the
LPS-tolerant state was observed. Western analysis of nuclear proteins
in the LPS-tolerant state showed a markedly decreased nuclear
translocation of p65 and c-rel. In contrast, the levels of nuclear p50
remained high in the tolerant state. This up-regulation of nuclear p50
levels presumably contributed to the slight increase of p50 homodimers
in the LPS-tolerant state, although the up-regulation of p50 homodimers
was much less extensive than those reported by Ziegler-Heitbrock et al.
Our results thus suggest that desensitization of TNF-
mRNA
expression in our system is mainly associated with down-regulation of
homodimers of p65 and heterodimers of p50/p65, p50/c-rel, and
p65/c-rel, whereas the slight increase of p50 homodimers may involve
the decreased cytokine expression to some extent. The slight increase
of p50 homodimers in our system seems to be due to the short period of
primary LPS exposure (1 h), because the up-regulation of p50 homodimers
after primary LPS exposure requires transcriptional activation of the
p50-precursor p105, and subsequent protein synthesis. Analysis of
B#3 site-bound nuclear complexes of mouse macrophages by ultraviolet
cross-linking revealed a substantial increase in the binding of p50 in
cells that were activated with LPS for increasing periods of time and a
concomitant decrease in p65 [54
]. The predominance of
p50 over p65, which allows for p50/p65 to be gradually displaced with
p50 homodimers was detected after 4 h of exposure to LPS
[52
]. In fact, as shown in Figure 8A
, the significant
increase in p50 homodimers occurred in LPS-tolerant cells and further
up-regulation was observed in response to LPS, when the cells were
preincubated with 100 ng/mL LPS for 2 days (compare Figure 4A
).
I
B
and I
Bß are mediators of either transient or persistent
NF-
B activation in response to stimulators like TNF-
and LPS,
respectively [63
]. We estimated the amount of I
B
and I
Bß proteins at different time points after LPS treatment with
Western blots. The results, outlined in Figure 3
, clearly indicate that
LPS treatment produced a transient decrease of I
B
, in parallel to
the transient phase in the increase of homodimers of p65 and
heterodimers consisting of p50/p65, p50/c-rel, and p65/c-rel. In
contrast, the I
Bß protein level in the cytoplasm was not altered
after LPS treatment in this cell line. Thus, I
B
appears to be
mainly responsible for the regulation of NF-
B activation in P388D1
cells. Furthermore, LPS treatment did not induce the phosphorylation of
Ser32 of I
B
in the LPS-tolerant state, nor the
degradation of I
B
. These results suggest that the down-regulation
of homodimers of p65 and heterodimers of p50/p65, p50/c-rel, and
p65/c-rel involves a defect in the LPS-induced I
B
kinase pathway.
In view of I
B effect on LPS tolerance, the absence of LPS-inducible
I
B kinase activity was previously shown in human ovarian carcinoma
cells pretreated with LPS for 1 h, when the cells were challenged
with secondary LPS after incubation for 4 h in the absence of LPS
[55
]. Our findings are in agreement with the results
reported in the non-myeloid cells, suggesting that LPS-inducible I
B
kinase plays an important role in LPS tolerance in both non-myeloid and
myeloid cells, particularly when the tolerant state was induced by a
short exposure to primary LPS. In contrast, our results differ from
another published report in which the degradation of I
B
occurred
by restimulation with LPS in human THP-1 cells treated with LPS for
16 h, suggesting that the pathway leading to I
B
phosphorylation and degradation is intact in LPS-tolerant THP-1 cells
[9
]. This disagreement was not simply due to the
difference in exposure periods and/or dose of primary LPS, because the
inability of the I
B
phosphorylation as well as degradation by LPS
restimulation was still observed in LPS-tolerant P388D1 cells when LPS
tolerance was induced by longer incubation with a lower dose of primary
LPS as outlined in Figure 8B
. It is interesting that, although I
B
degradation occurred in LPS-tolerant THP-1 cells, the I
B
level
was more rapidly returned to the steady-state level in
endotoxin-tolerant cells compared with control cells. From this
finding, the authors speculated that the enhanced rate of synthesis of
I
B
in the LPS-tolerant state is partially responsible for LPS
tolerance, judged by the down-regulated IL-1ß expression, thereby
causing only transient activation of NF-
B. The susceptibility of
I
B
pathway to LPS stimulation in an LPS-tolerant state may depend
on the particular cell type.
Recent studies demonstrated that TLR4 may be the primary mediator of
LPS signaling [41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
]. The engagement of TLR4 with LPS
induces NF-
B. It is interesting that LPS treatment caused a strong
and transient suppression of TLR4 mRNA expression in mouse macrophage
cell line RAW264.7 cells, suggesting that down-regulation of TLR4 mRNA
contributes to endotoxin tolerance [41
]. However, this
is unlikely in our system, because our Northern analysis demonstrated
that TLR4 mRNA was not suppressed in response to LPS in either the
control or the LPS-tolerant state up to 3-h exposure of LPS (Fig. 7)
.
The down-regulation of TLR4 mRNA observed in RAW 264.7 cells may not be
a generalized phenomenon, because TLR4 mRNA was significantly induced
after treatment with LPS in human monocytes [64
].
Further work is required to identify the crucial step of LPS signaling
pathway, resulting in the lack of phosphorylation of I
B
in the
LPS-tolerant state.
In conclusion, when an LPS-tolerant state is induced by short exposure
to primary LPS, LPS-induced desensitization of TNF-
gene expression
is closely associated with down-regulation of transactivating NF-
B
(homodimers of p65 and heterodimers consisting of p50/p65, p50/c-rel,
and p65/c-rel) activation, and may be involved in a defective
LPS-inducible I
B
kinase pathway.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
|---|
We express our gratitude to the late Dr. Sadayoshi Sekiguchi, the
ex-director of Hokkaido Red Cross Blood Center, for his support of this
study.
Received July 6, 1999;
revised March 20, 2000;
accepted April 12, 2000.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Morrison, D. C., Ryan, J. L. (1979) Bacterial endotoxins and host immune responses Adv. Immunol. 28,293-450[Medline]
-
Raetz, C. R. (1990) Biochemistry of endotoxins Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59,129-170[Medline]
-
Zuckerman, S. H., Evans, G. F., Snyder, Y. M., Roeder, W. D. (1989) Endotoxin-macrophage interaction; post-translational regulation of tumor necrosis factor expression J. Immunol. 143,1223-1227[Abstract]
-
Virca, G. D., Kim, S. Y., Glaser, K. B., Ulevitch, R. J. (1989) Lipopolysaccharide induces hyporesponsiveness to its own action in RAW 264.7 cells J. Biol. Chem. 264,21951-21956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haas, J. G., Baeuerle, P. A., Riethmüller, G., Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. L. (1990) Molecular mechanisms in down-regulation of tumor necrosis factor expression Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87,9563-9567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zuckerman, S. H., Evans, G. F., Butler, L. D. (1991) Endotoxin tolerance: independent regulation of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor expression Infect. Immun. 59,2774-2780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Granowitz, E. V., Porat, R., Mier, J. W., Orencole, S. F., Kaplanski, G., Lynch, E. A., Ye, K., Vannier, E., Wolff, S. M., Dinarello, C. A. (1993) Intravenous endotoxin suppresses the cytokine response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy humans J. Immunol. 151,1637-1645[Abstract]
-
Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. L., Wedel, A., Schraut, W., Ströbel, M., Wendelgass, P., Sternsdorf, T., Bäuerle, P. A., Haas, J. G., Riethmüller, G. (1994) Tolerance to lipopolysaccharide involves mobilization of nuclear factor
B with predominance of p50 homodimers J. Biol. Chem. 269,17001-17004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
LaRue, K. E. A., McCall, C. E. (1994) A labile transcriptional repressor modulates endotoxin tolerance J. Exp. Med. 180,2269-2275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takasuka, N., Matsuura, K., Yamamoto, S., Akagawa, K. (1995) Suppression of TNF-
mRNA expression in LPS-primed macrophages occurs at the level of nuclear factor-
B activation, but not at the level of protein kinase C or CD14 expression J. Immunol. 154,4803-4812[Abstract]
-
Kravchenko, V. V., Steinemann, S., Kline, L., Feng, L., Ulevitch, R. J. (1996) Endotoxin tolerance is induced in Chinese hamster ovary cell lines expressing human CD14 Shock 5,194-201[Medline]
-
Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. L., Petersmann, I., Frankenberger, M. (1997) p50 (NF-
B1) is upregulated in LPS tolerant P388D1 murine macrophages Immunobiology 198,73-80[Medline]
-
Frankenberger, M., Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. L. (1997) LPS tolerance in monocytes/macrophages: Three 3 cytosines are required in the DNA binding motif for detection of upregulated NF-
B p50 homodimers Immunobiology 198,81-90[Medline]
-
Kastenbauer, S., Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. (1999) NF-
B1 (p50) is upregulated in lipopolysaccharide tolerance and can block tumor necrosis factor gene expression Infect. Immun. 67,1553-1559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shnyra, A., Brewington, R., Alipio, A., Amura, C., Morrison, D. C. (1998) Reprogramming of lipopolysaccharide-primed macrophages is controlled by a counterbalanced production of IL-10 and IL-12 J. Immunol. 160,3729-3736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ulevitch, R. J., Tobias, P. S. (1995) Receptor-dependent mechanisms of cell stimulation by bacterial endotoxin Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13,437-457[Medline]
-
Drouet, C., Shakhov, A. N., Jongeneel, C. V. (1991) Enhancers and transcription factors controlling the inducibility of the tumor necrosis factor-
promoter in primary macrophages J. Immunol. 147,1694-1700[Abstract]
-
Kuprash, D. V., Udalova, I. A., Turetskaya, R. L., Rice, N. R., Nedospasov, S. A. (1995) Conserved
B element located downstream of the tumor necrosis factor
gene: distinct NF-
B binding pattern and enhancer activity in LPS activated murine macrophages Oncogene 11,97-106[Medline]
-
Kuprash, D. V., Udalova, I. A., Turetskaya, R. L., Kwiatkowski, D., Rice, N. R., Nedospasov, S. A. (1999) Similarities and differences between human and murine TNF promoters in their response to lipopolysaccharide J. Immunol. 162,4045-4052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ghosh, S., May, M. J., Kopp, E. B. (1998) NF-
B and Rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16,225-260[Medline]
-
Kieran, M., Blank, V., Logeat, F., Vandekerckhove, J., Lottspeich, F., Le Bail, O., Urban, M. B., Kourilsky, P., Baeuerle, P. A., Israël, A. (1990) The DNA binding subunit of NF-
B is identical to factor KBF1 and homologous to the rel oncogene product Cell 62,1007-1018[Medline]
-
Urban, M. B., Schreck, R., Baeuerle, P. A. (1991) NF-
B contacts DNA by a heterodimer of the p50 and p65 subunit EMBO J 10,1817-1825[Medline]
-
Kang, S. M., Tran, A. C., Grilli, M., Lenardo, M. J. (1992) NF-
B subunit regulation in nontransformed CD4+ T lymphocytes Science 256,1452-1456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Beg, A. A., Baldwin, A. S., Jr (1993) The I
B proteins: multifunctional regulators of Rel/NF-
B transcription factors Genes Dev 7,2064-2070[Free Full Text]
-
Brown, K., Gerstberger, S., Carlson, L., Franzoso, G., Siebenlist, U. (1995) Control of I
B-
proteolysis by site-specific, signal-induced phosphorylation Science 267,1485-1488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haskill, S., Beg, A. A., Tompkins, S. M., Morris, J. S., Yurochko, A. D., Sampson-Johannes, A., Mondal, K., Ralph, P., Baldwin, A. S., Jr (1991) Characterization of an immediate-early gene induced in adherent monocytes that encodes I
B-like activity Cell 65,1281-1289[Medline]
-
Beg, A. A., Ruben, S. M., Scheinman, R. I., Haskill, S., Rosen, C. A., Baldwin, A. S., Jr (1992) I
B interacts with the nuclear localization sequences of the subunits of NF-
B: a mechanism of cytoplasmic retention Genes Dev. 6,1899-1913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, Z., Hagler, J., Palombella, V. J., Melandri, F., Scherer, D., Ballard, D., Maniatis, T. (1995) Signal-induced site-specific phosphorylation targets I
B
to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway Genes Dev 9,1586-1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DiDonato, J., Mercurio, F., Rosette, C., Wu-Li, J., Suyang, H., Ghosh, S., Karin, M. (1996) Mapping of the inducible I
B phosphorylation sites that signal its ubiquitination and degradation Mol. Cell. Biol. 16,1295-1304[Abstract]
-
Traenckner, E. B., Pahl, H. L., Henkel, T., Schmidt, K. N., Wilk, S., Baeuerle, P. A. (1995) Phosphorylation of human I
B-
on serines 32 and 36 controls I
B-
proteolysis and NF-
B activation in response to diverse stimuli EMBO J 14,2876-2883[Medline]
-
Verma, I. M., Stevenson, J. K., Schwarz, E. M., Van Antwerp, D., Miyamoto, S. (1995) Rel/NF-
B/I
B family: intimate tales of association and dissociation Genes Dev 9,2723-2735[Free Full Text]
-
Stancovski, I., Baltimore, D. (1997) NF-
B activation: the I
B kinase revealed? Cell 91,299-302[Medline]
-
Wright, S. D., Ramos, R. A., Tobias, P. S., Ulevitch, R. J., Mathison, J. C. (1990) CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein Science 249,1431-1433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wurfel, M. M., Wright, S. D. (1995) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein catalyzes binding of LPS to lipoproteins Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 392,287-295[Medline]
-
Ulevitch, R. J., Tobias, P. S. (1994) Recognition of endotoxin by cells leading to transmembrane signaling Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6,125-130[Medline]
-
Rock, F. L., Hardiman, G., Timans, J. C., Kastelein, R. A., Bazan, J. F. (1998) A family of human receptors structurally related to Droshophila Toll Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95,588-593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chaudhary, P. M., Ferguson, C., Nguyen, V., Nguyen, O., Massa, H. F., Eby, M., Jasmin, A., Trask, B. J., Hood, L., Nelson, P. S. (1998) Cloning and characterization of two Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor-like genes TIL3 and TIL4: evidence for a multi-gene receptor family in humans Blood 91,4020-4027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P., Janeway, C. A., Jr (1997) A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity Nature 388,394-397[Medline]
-
Yang, R. B., Mark, M. R., Gray, A., Huang, A., Xie, M. H., Zhang, M., Goddard, A., Wood, W. I., Gurney, A. L., Godowski, P. J. (1998) Toll-like receptor-2 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced cellular signalling Nature 395,284-288[Medline]
-
Kirschning, C. J., Wesche, H., Ayres, T. M., Rothe, M. (1998) Human Toll-like receptor 2 confers responsiveness to bacterial lipopolysaccharide J. Exp. Med. 188,2091-2097[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Poltorak, A., He, X., Smirnova, I., Liu, M. Y., Huffel, C. V., Du, X., Birdwell, D., Alejos, E., Silva, M., Galanos, C., Freudenberg, M., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Layton, B., Beutler, B. (1998) Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene Science 282,2085-2088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Qureshi, S. T., Larivière, L., Leveque, G., Clermont, S., Moore, K. J., Gros, P., Malo, D. (1999) Endotoxin-tolerant mice have mutations in Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) J. Exp. Med. 189,615-625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vogel, S. N., Johnson, D., Perena, P. Y., Med