Published online before print October 24, 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
2 Correspondence: University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. E-mail: mukherji{at}nso2.uchc.edu
Cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) play an important role in defense against viral infections. Following clonal expansion and effector functions, a vast majority of the antigen-specific CTL undergoes programmed cell death to maintain homeostasis. We have shown earlier that melanoma epitope-specific CTL are quite sensitive to activation-induced cell death (AICD) even on the secondary encounter of the antigen. Excessive sensitivity of viral antigen-specific CTL to AICD, however, would be counterproductive. It might be argued that although CTL for a "self" epitope might be more prone to AICD for maintaining self-tolerance, viral antigen-specific CTL are likely to be less sensitive to AICD. We show here that influenza matrix protein-derived MP5866 epitope-specific CTL, activated in vitro and bearing a memory phenotype, are just as sensitive to AICD. The AICD in these CTL is not blocked by the pan-caspase inhibitor benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp (OMe)-fluoromethylketone or by soluble Ig-Fc chimeras of the death receptors [Fas, TNF receptor (TNF-R), TRAIL-RI, TRAIL-RII]. However, the MP5866-specific CTL can be rescued from AICD by the c-jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor SP600125. These results have implications for immunotherapeutic intervention in rescuing viral epitope-specific CTL from AICD.
Key Words: JNK AICD CTL
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Norell, T. Martins da Palma, A. Lesher, N. Kaur, M. Mehrotra, O. S. Naga, N. Spivey, S. Olafimihan, N. G. Chakraborty, C. Voelkel-Johnson, et al. Inhibition of Superoxide Generation upon T-Cell Receptor Engagement Rescues Mart-127-35-Reactive T Cells from Activation-Induced Cell Death Cancer Res., August 1, 2009; 69(15): 6282 - 6289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||