HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morimoto, Y. Articles by Fujiwara, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morimoto, Y. Articles by Fujiwara, H.

(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2005;78:753-761.)
© 2005 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Induction of surface CCR4 and its functionality in mouse Th2 cells is regulated differently during Th2 development

Yasunari Morimoto^*,, Yang Bian^*, Ping Gao^*, Yumi Yashiro-Ohtani^*, Xu-Yu Zhou^*, Shiro Ono^*,1, Hirokazu Nakahara, Mikihiko Kogo, Toshiyuki Hamaoka^* and Hiromi Fujiwara^*

^* Department of Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, and
Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Japan

¹Correspondence: Department of Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. E-mail: sono{at}ongene.med.osaka-u.ac.jp

T helper cell type 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells express distinct sets of chemokine receptors. In contrast to Th1 chemokine receptors, it is largely unknown how Th2 chemokine receptors such as CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) are induced during Th2 differentiation. Here, we investigated the induction of CCR4 surface expression and ligand responsiveness evaluated by functional assays such as chemokine binding and chemotaxis. This was done in comparison with those of a Th1 chemokine receptor, CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3). Resting T cells expressed neither CXCR3 nor CCR4. CXCR3 expression and ligand responsiveness were observed when resting T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 in the presence of [interleukin (IL)-12+anti-IL-4] and then recultured without T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation. Unlike CXCR3, CCR4 was induced immediately after anti-CD3/anti-CD28 stimulation in the presence of (IL-4+anti-interferon-+anti-IL-12). However, these CCR4-positive cells failed to exhibit chemokine binding and chemotaxis. Although the levels of surface CCR4 expression were not increased after the subsequent reculture in the absence of TCR stimulation, CCR4 responsiveness was induced in this stage of Th2 cells. The induction of CCR4 expression and the acquisition of CCR4 responsiveness did not occur in IL-4-deficient (IL-4^–/–) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)6^–/– T cells. CCR4 expression and functionality were regained in IL-4^–/– but not in STAT6^–/– T cells by the addition of recombinant IL-4. Although surface expression and functionality of CCR4 are induced depending on the IL-4/STAT6 signaling pathway, the present results indicate that the functionality of CCR4 does not correlate with CCR4 expression but emerges at later stages of Th2 differentiation.

Key Words: chemokine/chemokine receptor • Th1 • CXCR3 • IL-4 • STAT6