/RANTES protein demonstrates the use of different regions of the RANTES protein to bind and activate its receptors








* IRIBHN Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium;
Serono Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Geneva, Switzerland;
Medizinische Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univerity of Munich, Munich, Germany; and
The Wohl Virion Centre, Department of Molecular Pathology, The Windeyer Institute for Medical Sciences, University College Medical School, London, UK
Correspondence: Amanda E. I. Proudfoot, Serono Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 14, Chemin des Aulx, 1228 Plan les Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland. E-mail: amanda.proudfoot{at}serono.com
Human RANTES (CCL5) and MIP-1
(CCL3) bind and activate several CC
chemokine receptors. RANTES is a high-affinity ligand for CCR1 and
CCR5, and it binds CCR3 with moderate affinity and CCR4 with low
affinity. MIP-1
has similar binding characteristics to RANTES except
that it does not bind to CCR3. Here we have generated a chimera of
human MIP-1
and RANTES, called MIP/RANTES, consisting of the eight
amino terminal residues of MIP-1
preceding the CC motif, and the
remainder of the sequence is RANTES. The chimera is able to induce
chemotaxis of human monocytes. MIP/RANTES has >100-fold reduction in
binding to CCR1 and does not bind to CCR3 but retains full, functional
binding to CCR5. It has equivalent affinity for CCR5 to MIP-1
and
RANTES, binding with an IC50 of 1.12 nM, and is able to
mobilize calcium and induce endocytosis of CCR5 in PBMC in a manner
equi-potent to RANTES. It also retains the ability to inhibit R5 using
HIV-1 strains. Therefore, we conclude that the amino terminus of RANTES
is not involved in CCR5 binding, but it is essential for CCR1 and
CCR3.
Key Words: chemokine ligand monocyte
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. C. Jensen, S. Thiele, T. Ulven, T. W. Schwartz, and M. M. Rosenkilde Positive Versus Negative Modulation of Different Endogenous Chemokines for CC-chemokine Receptor 1 by Small Molecule Agonists through Allosteric Versus Orthosteric Binding J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2008; 283(34): 23121 - 23128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Richter, R. Bistrian, S. Escher, W.-G. Forssmann, J. Vakili, R. Henschler, N. Spodsberg, A. Frimpong-Boateng, and U. Forssmann Quantum Proteolytic Activation of Chemokine CCL15 by Neutrophil Granulocytes Modulates Mononuclear Cell Adhesiveness J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1599 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Casarosa, M. Waldhoer, P. J. LiWang, H. F. Vischer, T. Kledal, H. Timmerman, T. W. Schwartz, M. J. Smit, and R. Leurs CC and CX3C Chemokines Differentially Interact with the N Terminus of the Human Cytomegalovirus-encoded US28 Receptor J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3275 - 3285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Blanpain, B. J. Doranz, A. Bondue, C. Govaerts, A. De Leener, G. Vassart, R. W. Doms, A. Proudfoot, and M. Parmentier The Core Domain of Chemokines Binds CCR5 Extracellular Domains while Their Amino Terminus Interacts with the Transmembrane Helix Bundle J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 5179 - 5187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||