Journal of Leukocyte Biology eBioscience full spectrum cell analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lathey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Collman, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lathey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Collman, R. G.
(Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2000;68:324-330.)
© 2000 by Society for Leukocyte Biology

Co-receptor usage was more predictive than NSI/SI phenotype for HIV replication in macrophages: is NSI/SI phenotyping sufficient?

Janet L. Lathey*, Donald Brambilla{dagger}, Maureen M. Goodenow{ddagger}, Mostafa Nokta§, Suraiya Rasheed||, Edward B. Siwak, James W. Bremer**, Diana D. Huang**, Yanjie Yi{dagger}{dagger}, Patricia S. Reichelderfer{ddagger}{ddagger} and Ronald G. Collman{dagger},1

* Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California;
{dagger} New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts;
{ddagger} Department of Pathology, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida;
§ Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas, Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas;
|| Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas;
** Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois;
{dagger}{dagger} Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
{ddagger}{ddagger} National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Correspondence: Janet L. Lathey, Ph.D., Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. #0672, La Jolla, CA 92093-0672. E-mail: jlathey{at}uesd.edu

A monocyte-derived macrophage (MDM) culture assay was used to define the replication kinetics of HIV isolates. Ten-day-old MDMs were infected with HIV. Supernatants were collected and assayed for HIV p24 on days 3, 7, 10, and 14 post-infection (PI). In this assay, SF162 (macrophage tropic, NSI) produced increasing amounts of HIV p24 antigen with increasing time in culture. BRU (nonmacrophage tropic, SI) infection resulted in low levels of HIV p24 antigen with no increase in production during the culture period. A panel of 12 clinical isolates was evaluated. All isolates produced detectable levels of HIV p24 antigen in MDMs. However, the NSI viruses had significantly higher log10 HIV p24 antigen values at all times PI (P < 0.01). Co-receptor usage was determined for all 12 isolates (8 NSI and 4 SI). All SI isolates used CXCR4 for entry; two used CXCR4 only, one used CXCR4, CCR5, and CCR3, and one was a mixture of two isolates using CXCR4 and CCR5. None of the NSI viruses used CXCR4 for entry. All used CCR5 as their predominant co-receptor. Of the eight NSI isolates, three used CCR5 only, two used CCR5 and CCR2b, one used CCR5 and CCR3, and one used CCR5, CCR3, and CCR2b. Log10 HIV p24 antigen production on day 14 PI for viruses that used CCR5+CCR3 (3.79 + 1.40) was greater than for viruses that used CCR5+CCR2b (3.22 + 1.55) or CCR5 (3.32 + 1.49), and all were greater than those that used CXCR4 only (1.69 + 0.28), regardless of SI phenotype (P < 0.05). Thus, in these primary isolates, macrophage tropism and replication kinetics were closely linked to CCR5 utilization, whereas SI capacity was closely linked to CXCR4 utilization. Furthermore, viruses, which could use CCR5 and CCR3 for entry, had a replication advantage in macrophages, regardless of SI phenotype.

Key Words: macrophage tropism • viral phenotype • HIV co-receptors • HIV replication kinetics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
G. Ghaffari, D. L. Tuttle, D. Briggs, B. R. Burkhardt, D. Bhatt, W. A. Andiman, J. W. Sleasman, and M. M. Goodenow
Complex Determinants in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope gp120 Mediate CXCR4-Dependent Infection of Macrophages
J. Virol., November 1, 2005; 79(21): 13250 - 13261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. R. Coberley, J. J. Kohler, J. N. Brown, J. T. Oshier, H. V. Baker, M. P. Popp, J. W. Sleasman, and M. M. Goodenow
Impact on Genetic Networks in Human Macrophages by a CCR5 Strain of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
J. Virol., November 1, 2004; 78(21): 11477 - 11486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. M. Goodenow, S. L. Rose, D. L. Tuttle, and J. W. Sleasman
HIV-1 fitness and macrophages
J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2003; 74(5): 657 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
L. J. Montaner, C.-F. Perno, and S. Crowe
Macrophage infection by HIV-1: focus on viral reservoirs and pathogenesis
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2000; 68(3): 301 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for Leukocyte Biology.