PeproTech Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falk, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falk, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, S. N.

Journal of Leukocyte Biology, Vol 43, Issue 2 148-157, Copyright © 1988 by Society for Leukocyte Biology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of bone marrow progenitors responsive to granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and macrophage colony stimulating factor-1

LA Falk and SN Vogel
Department of Microbiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814.

The responsiveness of bone marrow progenitors (BMP) from C3H mice to highly purified or recombinant preparations of Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 (CSF-1) and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) was compared by counting the number of colonies (greater than or equal to 50 cells) after 10 days in culture with CSF. Cells responsive to CSF-1 or GM-CSF exhibited maximum colony formation over a wide dose range, although GM-CSF supported colony formation at lower concentrations. The response of BMP to optimal concentrations of CSF-1 was greater than or equal to 5 times greater than the response of BMP to GM-CSF. Analysis of the kinetics of colony formation revealed that, at day 5, the number of BMP responsive to GM-CSF or CSF-1 was approximately equal; the number of CSF-1 colonies increased significantly through day 10, while those cultured in GM-CSF did not. The response of BMP to CSF-1 and GM-CSF was also studied in liquid culture; the differences in yield of mature macrophages was consistent with the differences observed in agar culture. Although both cell populations were shown to be 100% mononuclear by day 7, Coulter Channelyzer analysis of these mature macrophages showed marked differences in cell size distribution. By day 7, cells grown in CSF-1 resulted in a homogeneous population of large cells, whereas GM-CSF cultures showed a heterogeneous distribution. Finally, CSF-1-derived cells possessed increased nonspecific and specific phagocytic capabilities when compared to GM-CSF-derived macrophages. These findings indicate that the actions of GM-CSF and CSF-1 upon the bone marrow compartment results in the generation of mature macrophages which differ morphologically and functionally and may account for the heterogeneity in macrophage populations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
A. J. Fleetwood, H. Dinh, A. D. Cook, P. J Hertzog, and J. A. Hamilton
GM-CSF- and M-CSF-dependent macrophage phenotypes display differential dependence on Type I interferon signaling
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2009; 86(2): 411 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
R. K. Aneja, A. Tsung, H. Sjodin, J. V. Gefter, R. L. Delude, T. R. Billiar, and M. P. Fink
Preconditioning with high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) induces lipopolysaccharide (LPS) tolerance
J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2008; 84(5): 1326 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-D. Ha, D. Ng, S. L. Pelech, and S. O. Kim
Critical Role of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt/Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Signaling Pathway in Recovery from Anthrax Lethal Toxin-induced Cell Cycle Arrest and MEK Cleavage in Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36230 - 36239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
F. Schonlau, C. Schlesiger, J. Ehrehen, S. Grabbe, C. Sorg, and C. Sunderkotter
Monocyte and macrophage functions in M-CSF-deficient op/op mice during experimental leishmaniasis
J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2003; 73(5): 564 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
E. Carballo, D. M. Pitterle, D. J. Stumpo, R. T. Sperling, and P. J. Blackshear
Phagocytic and macropinocytic activity in MARCKS-deficient macrophages and fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 1999; 277(1): C163 - C173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Ikeda, K. Sasaki, K. Ikeda, G. Yamaoka, K. Kawanishi, Y. Kawachi, T. Uchida, J. Takahara, and S. Irino
A New Cytokine-Dependent Monoblastic Cell Line With t(9;11)(p22;q23) Differentiates to Macrophages With Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) and to Osteoclast-Like Cells With M-CSF and Interleukin-4
Blood, June 15, 1998; 91(12): 4543 - 4553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Cecchini, M. Dominguez, S Mocci, A Wetterwald, R Felix, H Fleisch, O Chisholm, W Hofstetter, J. Pollard, and E. Stanley
Role of colony stimulating factor-1 in the establishment and regulation of tissue macrophages during postnatal development of the mouse
Development, January 6, 1994; 120(6): 1357 - 1372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. K. Ogle, X. Guo, J. W. Alexander, R. Fukushima, and J. D. Ogle
The Activation of Bone Marrow Macrophages 24 Hours After Thermal Injury
Arch Surg, January 1, 1993; 128(1): 96 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]